FOLEY AND “CRISIS ACTORS” AND A HOLLYWOOD SET-UP?
Another very distinctive and automatic feature is visible in this interview http://www.businessinsider.com/how-did-isis-kidnap-james-foley-2014-8
namely the way in which Foley projects his tongue slightly and licks his lips periodically as he speaks. It happens about every 15 seconds although the gap varies considerably throughout the interview.
This is likely to be a deeply engrained and unconscious mannerism that once established would remain an unaltered facet of his speech pattern and I would suggest, become even more pronounced in situations of extreme stress.
Now compare with the alleged last speech here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxA_-yQTiLI&bpctr=1409584908 . You will notice that not once the “actor” even attempts this idiosyncratic autonomic response.
Whilst we are at it, the voice inflection of the putative “executioner” includes unmistakable Israeli/Jewish elements. The individual may indeed be British but if so he is almost certainly of Jewish/Israeli extraction or from a Jewish/Israeli social group, sufficient to pick up the oral clues.
I am not the first to make the Jewish/Israeli accent connection, although I have not seen the lip movement absence previously referred to elsewhere, although it may have been. It is however an important indicator to add to all the others.
These other indicators, for example what appears to be a complete absence of blood when the throat is “cut”, point to this tremendously evocative and influential event being a hoax and a lie. It has been subsequently declared as such by forensic experts. The fact that at least two quite different sets of “parents” have been paraded on American TV, points to a much deeper fraud that we can only assume was projected onto the world to propel the current “script” and agenda promoted by predominantly Britain and America, to justify a military re-engagement in Iraq and Syria.
This was under the cover of an essential and urgent “humanitarian” exercise that turned out to be largely illusionary. (Notice how the Israeli’s used the identical term for a brief cessation of bombing in Gazza. It was put out that it was a “humanitarian ceasefire” quite contrary to the facts)
However it should not blind us to the fact under the pretext of a fabricated video and humanitarian disaster America has carried out more than one hundred bombing raids in the area. These of course are not violent or barbaric as are the dangerous Muslim extremists, who in an ultimate twist of cynicism, we are advised by Saudi Arabia, their Sunni backers and financiers, now pose a significant and immediate threat to us in Britain. You could hardly make it up!
Unfortunately these fabrications, once launched upon the world have great impact and staying power. They are very difficult to dislodge from the public consciousness, even when demonstrated to be untrue. We have both MH 370 and 17 as very recent and notorious examples that follow in a long line, including Boston, 7/7, 9/11 and notably the USS Liberty. In all of these and many others, common features of cover-up and refusal to admit the truth, emerge, whilst the initial Government-created lie, remains the dominant explanation and almost impossible to shift once launched. Presumably this is why, despite the pitfalls, it keeps happening.
The fact that our government, with all its advanced facilities, does not highlight the fraud, but rather supports it, undermines their whole position on “anti-terrorism” and foreign policy. It also must destroy the public’s trust in the statements coming from leading politicians. The seriousness of this for our own constitution and democracy cannot be over-stated.
The USS Liberty incident, discussed elsewhere, was a case in point, in which as a result of a treacherous and ultimately treasonous secret agreement between Israel and America, not only were Americans sacrificed, unprotected, and silenced, but we came within a hair’s breadth of nuking Cairo! A nuclear armed plane was on its way before it was recalled by Robert Strange McNamara, US Secretary for Defense.
Currently the proved lie that Putin or his agents shot down MH17, similarly is used to justify the Ukrainian assault in the east that has resulted in almost half a million displaced persons, much destruction and death to civilians there. Yet the western alliance countries refuse to retract their accusation or tell us what really happened and who was to blame that resulted in the murder of so many innocent travellers – if indeed there were. Is it any wonder, western governments and the narrative they project, is so distrusted by the people they ostensibly represent?
One final terminological observation that may be as significant or insignificant as you wish. “Foley” is defined as, “sound effects created for a film <a Foley artist>. Origin of FOLEY. Jack D. Foley † 1967 American sound technician. First Known Use: 1984. ” (Merriam) And “Foley is the reproduction of everyday sound effects that are added to film, video, and other media in post-production to enhance audio quality. These reproduced sounds can be anything from the swishing of clothing and footsteps to squeaky doors and breaking glass. The best foley art is so well integrated into a film that it goes unnoticed by the audience. It helps to create a sense of reality within a scene. Without these crucial background noises, movies feel unnaturally quiet and uncomfortable. The term “Foley” is also used to describe a place, such as Foley-stage or Foley-studio, where the Foley process takes place. ” (WIKI) end.
Questions surrounding the credibility of the Foley execution video including a comparison of vocal and facial features – Tim Veater
(The execution video itself has been disabled on You Tube for breaching its guidelines)
One of the most impressive questions relates to the two distinctive pot marks to the left side of Foley’s face (RHS when viewed from the front) which are apparently absent in the execution video. These would not have disappeared with time. Other visible differences are high-lighted. The viewer will have to make up their own minds if the two video representations are in fact the same individual or two different people.