Monday, 21 August 2017

MIGRATION! Not just a British issue.


https://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files/responsive/cover/main/desktop/2015/11/22/635837665903296535703297173_082515_refugees.jpg



In Britain, a policy of 'immigration' was started after the Second World War. Every government since has continued it, blind to its social consequences. It may be argued, that just as with recent EU inward movement from the east, this has benefited those with capital but disadvantaged the traditional 'working class'. This may explain in part an emergence of racism in the latter but liberalism in the former. Your experience Ben, I would suggest, is fairly typical of the psychological response by many to being 'swamped' by a new culture, distinctly different to the preceding one. It was evidenced in the 'fifties' by the Notting Hill riots but of course an objection to 'invaders' can be traced back to earliest times. The English character and constitution (note small 'c' but it applies equally to the big one) has taken hundreds, if not thousands of years to form. It no doubt has good and bad points but it is recognisable and distinctive. 'Multi-culturalism' may be the prevailing politically correct view, but just like Euro centric ones, they may not reflect the predominant mood or spirit of the country, if such can be distilled. As a result it has produced yet another gulf between the governors and the governed. Immigration was seen to be an issue because it was too big and too fast and was proved to be out of control. Any country can expect to have and keep a prevailing identity and there is an inchoate angst in Britain that it is losing its traditional values from a range of factors, of which immigration is but one. On the up-side, we may well be more tolerant and caring in many areas of life and social policy than we once were. The history of a nation never stands still. Nor can the clock be turned back to some non-existent perfect Elysian state and time, so we must cope with what we have. But we must also be honest with ourselves and the problems that have been created by a naive approach to uncontrolled immigration policy, on the basis of 'multi-cultualism' rather than 'integration'. Somehow in a multi-cultural world, with huge economic divergence, where modern media cuts through division like a butter knife, we still have not learnt how to cope with the destabilising consequences of a mass movement of population about the world, trying to escape poverty and violence.

Sunday, 20 August 2017

Cambrils Shootings - More Questions

Below the car in question, from which it is alleged five young terrorists emerged. It appears to have come to rest against some form of official barrier. At some subsequent point they were all shot dead - four by the same officer. We need to ask how reliable and accurate is this version of events?


https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/cpsprodpb/C74F/production/_97432015_mediaitem97432014.jpg

Another image of the scene:


http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article11008260.ece/ALTERNATES/s1200/Police-investigate-at-the-scene-of-an-attack-in-Cambrils-south-of-Barcelona.jpg  "Lone hero police officer shot dead FOUR terrorists armed with machetes and guns in second Spain attack - Mirror Online"

Today 20th August, 2017, the Daily Mail published the following report by journalist Tom Worden, the thrust of which identifying a "hero" policeman, who it claimed shot dead four terrorists, "thus saving many people's lives". The full article may be located here: 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4806658/Pictured-soldier-gunned-jihadis-Cambrils.html?ito=social-twitter_mailonline

Now every detail of the story may in fact be an wholly accurate and reliable record of the official story but we would be wise to keep in mind that this is not necessarily the same as an accurate and reliable record of what actually happened. 

These so-called ISIS terror attack are so formulaic and filled with so many inconsistencies and doubtful details, that people need to remain objective and not be swept along with the media-encouraged panic and hysteria.

The Daily Mail article typically asks no questions or doubts about the Cambrils operation that resulted in five young men being shot dead at about one a.m. on a public road. Why is there is no real analysis of what really happened, the actual threat posed by the men or why it was necessary to shoot them all dead, rather than challenge and arrest them? 

Nor is there anything about how the car came to be identified and targeted. Was it being tracked and followed or are we to believe that an off duty policeman, trained in weapons, just appeared on the scene at the right time? Nor is there any real explanation of how the car ended up on its roof. Individuals in a car on its roof after such an accident are surely vulnerable and most amenable to proper arrest? 

Were they not injured or rendered unconscious? Upside down and presumably entangled in safety belts, they had somehow to extricate themselves through those smashed windows before posing a danger or confronting the policeman with the gun.

Reports about what happened and the risk the five occupants posed are suspiciously indecisive and conflicting. Did they have suicide vests on or only fake ones as has been reported? If the latter what sort of self-respecting Jihadist terrorist would that be? This Mail report claims they emerged from the car "armed with an axe and knives". No guns or explosives then? So what would justify the lethal response with firearms?

There seems to be no video or photographic images to support this version of events. It is not clear who shot the one video clip that has been widely circulated including on the Mail article, but what it does show briefly is even more disturbing.

It shows two men in the foreground shooting what appears to be an unarmed man in a pink tee-shirt on the opposite side of a crash barrier. He appears to collapse, presumably after being hit and then gets up again, waving his arms. In no way can this be interpreted as presenting a danger. Indeed it could equally be interpreted as a plea of innocence and submission.

It appears in this clip https://www.facebook.com/WorldNewsTonight/videos/vb.214832449817/10156193326478812/?type=2&theater (note title!) that after falling down, apparently shot, the target appears to get up and actually proceed to cross the road. What happens after this is not shown.

The action of shooting an unarmed man with no real certainty of guilt for anything, is so contrary to normal police procedures as to raise serious questions as to the real motive of the action. 

And in these images there is no evidence of the upturned car from which it is claimed he has emerged apparently quite unscathed and free of any signs of blood or injury. Indeed as can be seen he appears quite pristine!

As always we need to ask who shot the video and why is it this is the only clip available? Why did the person with the filming device - whatever it was - not continue the filming to show us what happened subsequently? What we are dealing with is edited footage which always raises questions. Of course there is no real proof that live rounds were fired or the victim died from the encounter.

Of course all these basic question are not even hinted at in the article, all swept away in hailing the extreme bravery of the unidentified police officer, who it is claimed, despite being ex-army and in a special police unit called the Mossos d'Esquadra (1) - a small quasi-military Catalan police unit - we are told was employed on a day-to-day basis educating children on terror risks? Excuse me! But how credible is it that a trained fire arms officer would be so deployed in the current climate? If true, it hardly indicates sound use of resources.

Besides the shocking video clip, several photographs are used to illustrate the article one of which purports to show the back of the head of the officer concerned. I will reproduce it below with the Mail description: 

The officer (pictured circled above), now with the Catalan police force the Mossos d'Esquadra, was on patrol working overtime when five terrorists launched an attack in the seaside town of Cambrils, Spain

The officer (pictured circled above), now with the Catalan police force the Mossos d'Esquadra, was on patrol working overtime when five terrorists launched an attack in the seaside town of Cambrils, Spain.


It is claimed that he shot dead four of the five. The fifth man the article states tried to escape but after "stabbing a woman in the neck, fled before he was shot by another officer."

The major problem with this is that neither claims are supported by the brief video clip that show two very casually dressed men, clearly NOT in police uniform, shooting the man in the pink tee-shirt, apparently fatally, neither of whom approximate in head features to the man circled above. 

The man on the right who appears to be the shooter is in shorts and what appears to be a protective vest but even from that distance it can be seen that his shaved head does not match the circled officer above. 

The video suggests the man in the Bermuda shorts standing beside him arrives wearing a black shoulder bag. He appears to show no fear in contrast to the stereo-typical panic in these situations and is accepted by the shooter. Does it indicate this was just a member of the public who arrives on scene or was he police related?  Check for yourselves. (See below a still from the video referred to. The video itself can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8YR85lEsGk )

Using his army training and experience, the officer pulled his weapon and shot dead four of terrorists
"Using his army training and experience, the officer pulled his weapon and shot dead four of terrorists"


Clearly the Mail, presumably with official approval, identifies this as the same officer but this raises another problem as to the account. If as is claimed he shot dead FOUR, how can this one isolated man be explained? This would better fit the one who attempted to get away but this would rule out THIS  officer as apparently that was another one.

So there is clearly something seriously wrong with the "heroic cop" cop account, leaving aside the very serious question why the five, and particularly the man in the pink tee-shirt were not properly challenged and arrested.

The officer in question may have been heroic in the face of a presumed danger, but on the face of it it appears unlikely that the two pictured are the same individual. But if they are, it raises other questions of how and where he shot another three men dead, especially considering his and their location and the number of bullets fired on the video. (I counted ten shots - a full magazine on just this one suspect).

It would be nice if the Daily Mail could have resolved some of these questions to reassure us that this was not a modified story to present the police in best light and distract from a more accurate account. Or was this yet just another case of extra-judicial killing by armed individual(s) for some other unspecified motive?

UPDATE: Today (21.8.2017) it has been announced that the van driver was Younes Abouyaaqoub aged 22. (2) What of course none of the media point out is that if reliable, the two previously named individuals - Driss Oukabir, 28 and his brother  Moussa Oukabir, 18   - were falsely accused of the act. 

How could such grievous mistakes have been made? What guarantee is there that the third person to be accused of driving the van is any more reliable?


It is claimed that Abouyaaqoub fled the scene of the attack on foot and hijacked a car to escape. Police fired on the car after it rammed through a checkpoint Thursday night but Abouyaaqoub was able to flee a second time. The car's owner, named as Pau Perez, was found stabbed to death in the vehicle. He becomes the 15th victim of the attack.
Even this account raises serious questions. Did he abandon the car and flee on foot after it rammed the checkpoint or did he drive on abandoning the car later? If the checkpoint was manned by armed police, how was he able to escape so easily? At what point did he stab dead the owner of the car and why if his objective was to escape capture? And why if this all happened on Thursday night, effectively identifying the true perpatrator, did the police still perpetuate the story that it was one or other of the Oukabir brothers?
Here are the images of four of the alleged "terrorist cell", Abouyaaqoub bottom right, put out by the Spanish Interior Ministry and published by CNN:
Handout images released by the Catalan regional police on August 18 shows four suspects of the Barcelona and Cambrils attacks (from top L): Moussa Oukabir, Said Aallaa, Mohamed Hychami and Younes Abouyaaqoub.
Now compare and contrast with the following images that are said  to be of him also published by CNN:


https://twitter.com/interiorgob/status/899587639652872193/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2017%2F08%2F21%2Feurope%2Fbarcelona-attack%2Findex.html

It is hard to see how these facial images can be reconciled as being the same person. The shape of face and nose appear quite different! The above images were said to be taken in Ripoll the day before the attack, whilst the one below the next day in Barcelona after he has carried out the outrage. Note he is wearing identical clothing sometimes with dark glasses or not.

Younes Abouyaaqoub, the man suspected of driving the white Fiat van into crowds along Las Ramblas
A CCTV still said to show Younes Abouyaaqoub in La Boqueria market after the attack. http://news.sky.com/story/europe-wide-alert-for-barcelona-van-driver-10999108


Here is another image that claims to be Abouyaaqoub escaping through the market after the attack. Am I the only one to raise doubts that these different images accord with one another?

CCTV images have emerged appearing to show Younes Abouyaaqoub making his escape on foot through Barcelona’s La Boqueria market
CCTV images have emerged appearing to show Younes Abouyaaqoub making his escape on foot through Barcelona’s La Boqueria market CREDIT: EL PAIS

It is beyond dispute that the first two individuals accused of driving the van were completely wrong. Is there any reassurance that this latest named individual is any more reliable, or indeed that the images correlate with the individual named or in any way tie him to the van in question? In other words where are the CCTV images that show him getting out of the van immediately after it came to a stand-still?

Younes Abouyaaqoub is said to be on the run and sought by European police forces. Given the fate of his friends shot dead it is not surprising that he should fear the same fate and want to run and hide. The fact that he does cannot be automatically taken as proof of guilt and should not be although all media outlets propagate that assumption. This is classic patsy-territory and we should be very wary of it. 

The cell has been nick-named the "Dirty Dozen" another red flag of western instigation. "The Three Muskateers" was applied to this group of alleged terrorists. (3) Jihadi John and the suggestion this was linked to the Beatles (4) Note these are not indicative of Eastern or Muslim thinking but of Western.

In passing, note the now familiar subliminals at work in this image here: 

Civilians mourn at an impromptu memorial at Las Ramblas, Barcelona
Civilians mourn at an impromptu memorial at Las Ramblas, Barcelona CREDIT:  REUTERS

Here is the suggested terrorist cell members as deduced by https://firenewsfeed.com/incident/377760




FURTHER UPDATE!

Roadblock near the scene of the operation carried out by police on 21 August following the previous week's Barcelona van attack,
AFP. Spanish police have shot dead the main suspect in last Thursday's Barcelona attack, Younes Abouyaaqoub.

So my ominous prediction is realised! Younes Abouyaaqoub aged 22, has also now been shot dead by Spanish forces. He is apparently the sixth person shot dead by police in connection with the incident and the eighth suspect to die. This comes not long after he was finally identified as the driver of the white van that crashed into people on a Barcelona street. 

A number of conflicting images have been published purporting to prove the claim. 

Of course they do no such thing, merely showing a young man both before and after the event walking through a public space wearing the same clothes. To date nothing shows this young man getting out of the van when it stopped. 

Nor is the fact that he is but the THIRD person so accused, and that the previous two, also accused with the same degree of confidence to be the driver, proved to be quite untrue, notwithstanding that one of them, only eighteen years of age, was shot dead on a very questionable pretext of danger a couple of days after the attack. 

Now we are told this latest suspect was shot dead also.

Police say (the BBC reports (5))  he was "shot in the Subirats area, close to Sant Sadurní d'Anoia, after someone spotted him at a petrol station". This time the excuse for killing him was that he was allegedly wearing some sort of "fake explosive belt". 

Yet again we are told "when confronted he shouted 'Allahu Ackbar' ('God is Greatest') This appears to be an essential ingredient in the terror act mix though often disputed by witnesses. 

What serious Jihadist terrorist would employ a mock suicide belt in remote place whilst on the run, I ask myself? 

It appears from the published air-photo, to have taken place in woodland to the south of a sewage treatment plant. The circumstances of his location are not provided so we are left to guess how he was found and why he was there. 

Nor are there any details of the shooting, although there is no suggestion that Abouyaaqoub was armed or offered any real threat to the officers concerned - if indeed it was officers that shot him. 

What I would like to know is why Europe appears to have adopted this brutal form of law enforcement where suspects are shot on sight? 

Apparently traditional methods of arrest are as obsolete as the policy of 'shoot-to-kill' is uniformly popular. It would appear that this new approach needs only a suggestion of "terrorism" to normalise it, whether the individual resists arrest, offers a threat or even proved to be guilty of the accusation. 

No one in public life or the media appears to raise the slightest reservation regarding this wave of officially sanctioned killings, that replace any necessity for due process or enquiry as to whether the person is guilty or not.

Needless to say a dead accused is never afforded the opportunity to defend himself or for that matter spill the beans on an illegal official conspiracy to blame the wrong people.

These incidents do nothing for Muslim fundamentalism or benefit whatever group currently constitutes 'ISIS', but it is certainly very successful at achieving other objectives, more the province of a US/Israeli 'deep-state' agenda: to create social division and animosity along sectarian lines; create irrational panic and fear; stoke hatred of Muslims in particular; and facilitate repressive measures, of which the normalisation of 'shoot-to-kill' is just one extreme example.



REFERENCES.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mossos_d%27Esquadra

2. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/21/europe/barcelona-attack/index.html


3. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/03/three-musketeers-terrorist-gang-jailed-life-lee-rigby-style/


4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihadi_John


5.  http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-41004603



Friday, 18 August 2017

Barcelona Terror Attack Questions



https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/tp-composite-barcelona-terror-map.jpg?strip=all&w=750&quality=100



There will be many more questions than the few I pose here. As usual I am limited for time and space, not to mention factual details from other than the unquestioning media sources. 

Perhaps I should summarise them before I set off on this brief discussion of a few of them. Sadly I cannot provide satisfactory answers. So:


  • why was it that the male and female couple - Mr Mouncey from Hull and Miss Walton from Lincoln - were both used separately, by newspaper and BBC sources as principal witnesses?
  • why are the witnesses used by the media so often attractive young women?
  • what caused the loud "bangs", apparently with elapse of time in between? Is it reasonable to suggest that this was created from impacting people only?
  • the driver of the van escaped on foot apparently under the gaze of police on scene. A police commander states the only reason he wasn't shot was because of a danger of hitting members of the public. Further another van was found abandoned 80 miles north which it is claimed was the getaway vehicle. Is this all credible?
  • yet again we have a "thoughtful terrorist" helping investigators by leaving his identity documents inside the hired van. This identified Driss Oukabir, 28, as the culprit. Unfortunately, seeing the circulated pictures he handed himself in and claimed it must have been his younger brother who stole his documents to hire the van. Is this is a familiar indicator of a set-up that has not quite gone according to plan?
  • The younger brother now being sought is 18-year-old Moussa Oukabir shown here:
  • Note familiar poses and images from previous city attackers designed to create a certain impression?



http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article11006421.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/Suspect-in-Barcelona-truck-incident.jpg


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/police-identify-suspect-behind-barcelona-11006389

  • Here he is the same day as being clearly identified as the terrorist by the New York Daily News video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjQQHApvZIY Shades of JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald not to mention the Tsarnaev brothers?
  • The younger brother now being sought is 18-year-old Moussa Oukabir shown here:


Moussa Oukabir, 18, is being hunted as the suspected van driver


  • Although there are reports of gunmen and a hostage situation subsequent to the main attack, I can find no information on this or what happened. In any event how does this tie in with the young 18 year old alleged driver of the attack vehicle?





Here are two almost identical accounts in two British local newspapers representing areas from which the two witnesses come - Hull and Lincoln. 

Rather coincidentally, in view of what must have been thousands witnessing the event, his girlfriend was also employed by the BBC to be the witness of choice for their top story report and interview on the one o'clock news on Friday 18th August, 2017. 

Why was it that different media outlets used just these two people independentently? Some might think that arriving just an hour before the incident (for Mr Mouncey's birthday) and leaving immediately after is just a tad strange.

 He refers two TWO large "bangs". A question that obviously arises what would have caused these? The van apparently ploughed into people, and although deadly in its effect, it it is unlikely to make a "bang" unless hitting something very solid, and then only once. So what were these two loud bangs to which he refers?

This image of the stationary van, though seriously damaged at the front, proves it did not hit any solid object on its route. The reported "bangs" therefore remain something of a mystery.


http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/78/590x/secondary/Spain-Terror-1036500.jpg


It should be noted that in one of the few variations in the two reports, the Hull Mail quotes Mr Mouncey as saying he heard a loud "crash" NOT  a "bang" - a small but significant variable in an otherwise almost identical  report.

In this BBC interview here the witness says on being asked about "the bangs" he had referred to, that he thought it was the sound of the van running into the people. "Yes I thought that was what it was" he says. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-40968496/barcelona-attack-eyewitness-van-was-10-feet-from-me  I would question whether loud bangs heard from some distance away, would have been caused by this source.


From Lincolnshire Live here: http://www.lincolnshirelive.co.uk/news/lincoln-news/people-were-running-screaming-lincoln-345333


Nick Mouncey, 28, was visiting the Spanish city as a surprise birthday trip from his girlfriend.


He said the commotion started when he heard a loud bang.
He said: "We were sat in a cafe bar about fifty yards from where it all happened. We were just sat having a glass of wine and relaxing and we heard this huge bang.
"There was then a wall of people running and screaming towards us from where the van crashed.
Nick Mouncey and his girlfriend, Stephanie Walton, who were caught in the Barcelona Terror attack
“We all ran off into a local cafe and they kept people inside. We were there for a couple of minutes and eventually went back into the street and I heard another big bang.
“It was a bit more scary and this time they closed all the shutters when we went back in the cafe. They then opened the back door of the cafe to get people out and we left there.”
Mr Mouncey added that he and his girlfriend, Stephanie Walton, have not left their hotel since the attack, on what was supposed to be a holiday to remember.
He added: "It was actually my birthday yesterday when it happened and my girlfriend had booked the trip as a surprise for me. It’s a surprise I’ll never forget.
“We had walked across the market bit where it happened an hour before and were planning on going to the Hard Rock, where the van went, just when it happened. If it was five minutes later we could have been there.
“We haven’t really left the hotel now we are back. We are flying back tomorrow and it’s obviously been very edgy since.”
There was a second terror attack yesterday in the country at the coastal resort of Cambrils.
Five terrorists were also shot dead by police after ramming people in the city.

This from the Hull Daily Mail here: http://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/hull-east-yorkshire-news/hull-mans-barcelona-attack-horror-344851
A man from Hull has described seeing people “screaming and fleeing” after a terrorist drove a van into crowds of people in Barcelona.
At least 13 people were killed and dozens wounded when the van was driven into crowds on Las Ramblas on Thursday afternoon, in what Spain’s Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has described as a “jihadist attack”
Nick Mouncey, from Willerby, was in Barcelona as a surprise birthday trip from his girlfriend when he heard a loud crash.
“We were sat in a café bar about fifty yards from where it all happened,” he said. “We were just sat having a glass of wine and relaxing and we heard this huge bang.
“There was then a wall of people running and screaming towards us from where the van crashed.
“We all ran off into a local café and they kept people inside. We were there for a couple of minutes and eventually went back into the street and I heard another big bang.
“It was a bit more scary and this time they closed all the shutters when we went back in the café. They then opened the back door of the café to get people out and we left there.”
Mr Mouncey, 28, who now lives in Lincoln, said he and his girlfriend, Stephanie Walton, have not left their hotel since the attack, on what was supposed to be a holiday to remember.
“We just flew out yesterday morning and had only been there for about an hour," he said.
"It was actually my birthday yesterday when it happened and my girlfriend had booked the trip as a surprise for me. It’s a surprise I’ll never forget.
“We had walked across the market bit where it happened an hour before and were planning on going to the Hard Rock, where the van went, just when it happened. If it was five minutes later we could have been there.
“We haven’t really left the hotel now we are back. We are flying back tomorrow and it’s obviously been very edgy since.”
Three people have been arrested so far in connection to the attacks. Five people wearing fake suicide belts were shot dead in a related attack later on in the evening.

Meanwhile a Northern Ireland report has this attractive witness who happens to be the Dublin Live Editor reporting on the event. Note the repeat of the shutters and reference to the two armed men at the restaurant about which further details are hard to come by. Were they captured? Was there a shoot-out? Were there any casualties?
From: http://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/belfast-news/co-armagh-womans-video-shows-13492941
Brave Armagh native and Dublin Live Editor Alana Fearon
This video shows a Co Armagh woman describing the horror as dozens of people have been injured after a truck ploughed into a crowd of people in Barcelona.
Brave Alana Fearon was on holidays in Barcelona when the horrific incident happened, the Irish Mirror reports .
The Dublin Live Editor and Armagh native was rushed into a restaurant where the shutters were pulled and the premise went into lockdown.
Two armed men have reportedly stormed a restaurant in Barcelona just minutes after a van ploughed into pedestrians in the Spanish city.
DublnLive.ie editor and Irish Mirror journalist Alana said: said: "Police came from all angles and took everybody into shops.
"We just saw lots and lots of tourists running down La Rambla, which is obviously the busiest area in Barcelona.
"We thought that initially that it was pickpockets, because we had been warned and we thought police were coming after them.
"We saw up to 13 police vans, riot police, flying past us in vans. Doors open, rifles. We were sitting at one of the bars in the middle of the strip.
"Everyone was asking 'what happened?' There was no ambulances initially. We didn't understand what happened. A police car came up.
"A police man with a megaphone was hanging out the front of the door and telling everyone to get inside.
"We were put inside the bar where we're staying and the shutters were put down and everyone was very upset.
"We were initially very, very scared as we were supposed to be in Placa de Catalunya.
"That's where the airport bus goes from, so it would have been a very busy square. But we decided to sit on and get a taxi so we didn't go up to it.

The Melbourne woman at three recent terrorist attacks

"AN Australian woman caught up in the Barcelona attack has revealed how it was the third time she has cheated death in a terror incident this year. Julia Monaco, 26, from Melbourne, was in a shopping centre with pals when the van ploughed through a crowd on Las Ramblas yesterday."

Julia Monaco, 26, was caught up in three terror attacks in as many months
Julia Monaco, 26, was caught up in three terror attacks in as many months
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4272384/aussie-woman-26-who-escaped-barcelona-terror-was-caught-up-in-london-bridge-notre-dame-attacks/  LINKEDIN




From: https://twitter.com/juliaandmonaco?lang=en

Obviously a socially aware person concerned about American politics:

"
  1.   Retweeted
    By the way, fuck these nazi motherfuckers.
  2. Well this gave me a good lil lol after being truly sickened by the tiki torch holding losers. And we're sure it's 2017?"



From: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/barcelona-terror-attack-manchester-arena-bombing-survivor-chris-pawley-cheats-death-in-las-ramblas_uk_5996e576e4b0a2608a6bc495

Barcelona Terror Attack: Manchester Arena Bombing Survivor Chris Pawley Cheats Death In Las Ramblas


FACEBOOK
"Writing on Facebook, he said: “Just to let everyone know me and Corey are OK, getting a lot of messages. It’s crazy here, the shops have put all their shutters down and the army is out but hope everyone is OK who’s been injured!”
"Of the attack in Manchester in May in which 22 people lost their lives, Pawley recalled he had just exited the arena when the bomb went off. He added: “We were so, so lucky. So lucky we managed to escape unhurt.”