Monday, 28 November 2016

Excellent Hampstead Case Summary in Light of "Pizzagate" Revelations

What will it take to get the Hampstead case re-opened and properly investigated? Until it happens it brings utter shame on the Met Police - recently severely criticised by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary, for this very matter - (See below*),  the Family Courts Division of the High Court and the British State itself!

* From:

"Met police heavily criticised over child protection failings. Emergency measures for force after watchdog says 75% of sampled child risk cases reveal serious police errors"


Pizzagate is directly connected to the Hampstead case via the children's father

2 days ago by  in pizzagate
UPDATE. The father of the two children mentioned in this article has now been confirmed to have worked for LuvForHaiti, which is owned by Josiah Bruny, a man that has been linked to Pizzagate. Read more here:
Short summary of the Hampstead case (facts only with a minimum of names, you don't have to read it all just now, I just wanted to make sure that it was all saved in one place for future reference):
While on vacation in Morocco in August/September 2014, two siblings aged 8 and 9 from Hampstead, London revealed to their mother and her new partner that they along with 18 other children had been sexually and physically abused by their father and their teachers at school and in church. They described their father as the local leader of an international cult dealing in child trafficking, ritual murder and the production of child abuse material.
According to the children a coven of satanic families exists in Hampstead, often several families on the same street. They have infiltrated schools, churches, child protection services and the police. At least 5 primary schools have been compromised. At the two children’s own school 20 «special children» were taken out of class on Wednesdays to be kicked in the genitals and anally raped by teachers and others coming to school. The women raped the children with strap on dildos. The children who screamed the most were injected with sedatives and all children were bribed with sweets afterwards. Babies were sedated and flown in from foreign countries and ritually sacrificed in a secret room in the school and the meat and blood was consumed. The meat was often mixed into the school dinners. Ritual sacrifices also took place on Saturdays at church and the cult members and children danced around in costumes made out of human skulls and slippers made out of human skin. The two children had been forced to hold the knife while ritually murdering a baby. They were also taken to parties were they were introduced to drugs by their father. Hard to believe, but this what the children were disclosing to their mother, her new partner and the police.
Most notably regarding #Pizzagate there was a link to a McDonalds restaurant, a Starbucks coffee shop and a Pizza Express. The children disclosed that employees at these three places were involved in child abuse and ritual sacrifice taking place inside these businesses.
When they got home from their vacation the mother and her partner reported this to the police, who then referred it to Scotland Yard. When the siblings were taken in to be interviewed the first time, they were happy to disclose their experiences and seemed to expect that these would be investigated.
The second time they were interviewed they were however taken into state custody on the grounds that the mother’s new partner had tortured them to make the allegations. The mother's new partner however was never interviewed by the police!
After having spent nearly a full week in the company of strangers the children in their third police interview retract some but not all of their allegations. The father was interviewed about some of the allegations two days prior to this.
The interviews were transcribed by the investigative community and can still be read in their entirety here:
An expert on child abuse examined the children and found conclusive evidence that they had been sexually abused. Then all of a sudden the case was closed citing no crime had occurred.
The mother and her new partner fought on in the family courts to have the children returned to them. They sacked their first legal team.
A person on the mother's second legal team leaked the story on to the internet before fleeing the country after learning that an arrest warrant had been made out for her.
The mother narrowingly escaped out of a window and later out of the UK when a large group of police came asking for her.
The person who leaked the videos online then spearheaded a campaign that gathered 16000 signatures in support of the case before the campaign was deleted by the petition website because of a violation of a court order.
Peaceful demonstrations were held outside the church that were disrupted by two agent provocateurs that started shouting and harassing the church members before being arrested some weeks later.
One of the supporters created a blog that released 27 investigative videos with further speculations about the case based on the social media accounts of the alleged cult members before it was removed by the blog service Wordpress for violation of terms and guidelines.
The videos are still online though:
Another video investigator:
The father of the children referred to them as «his» children in a Youtube comment under a false name.
This sock puppet account is one of many that are believed to have been set up solely to discredit the case and are believed to be one and the same person: the father. One supporter of the children made a blog about this:
The many trolls and sock puppets then set up a spoof blog of the investigative blog previously mentioned and for months and months, supporters and investigators were heavily trolled by the «people» surrounding the spoof blog.
A person using her full name stepped forward as an independent witness in a Youtube comment:
A judge ordered that the mother and her partner had tortured the children to make the allegations and that everyone who thinks otherwise is "evil and/or foolish".
The case was reported about in the mainstream media under these pretenses. The BBC airs a half hour long interview with the father who can be seen "crying" on camera. and full interview here
The children still remain in state custody having been moved between at least three foster families. Their mother and her partner in exile is currently campaigning for the release of the children. Here is their website:
The mother released a statement early on:
that was transcribed here:
Technical details about the leaked material:
In early February 2015 a series of video interview clips with two siblings, a boy aged 8 and a girl aged 9, emerged online where they detailed their experiences of being sexually and physically abused by their father, their teachers and other members of what appeared to be an international ritual abuse cult.
33 clips found their way online, 19 short home videos recorded while the children were on vacation in Morocco and right after they had returned to London, and 14 longer police interview videos recorded by the police after the crimes had been reported to Barnet Police Station.
The video interviews with the children while on vacation and after coming home as well as the three police interviews were transcribed by the investigative community and can still be read in their entirety here;
The interview videos are illegal in the UK and has to be sought elsewhere.
How the material was leaked online:
Short story: A blogger picked it up after having been accidentally CC'ed in an email to the Home Secretary.
Long story: On 2 February, 2015 an email by Sabine McNeill was published on the "The Tap Blog" at the website that the editor Henry Curteis had received by mistake because he had inadvertently been CC’d in the list of recipients when Sabine was sending the email to Home Secretary Theresa May. He left out Sabine McNeill’s name in the email he published but included links to 19 video interview clips that he had uploaded to Youtube after downloading them from the Google Drive that Sabine McNeill had set up to share the videos with her fellow MacKenzie friends, and which she had also shared the link to in her email to Home Secretary Theresa May.
At about the same time a document was uploaded by an unknown party to the anonymous textsharing service Pastebin that contained the testimony of the children's mother. The text appeared to be the mothers notes summarizing her children’s allegations along with names and addresses to the alleged cult members. Original link: deleted by unknown party but reuploaded to:
The uploaded document borrowed parts of a text by the Anonymous operation "Operation Death Eaters" published no earlier than 27. Oct. 2014 and this copied part was pasted in before and after the text with the allegations to make it look like an "official" Anonymous document.
The fact that the document was released as though it was coming from an official Anonymous operation called Operation Death Eaters made this particular operation release a statement that they were not the originators of the document along with a general warning against naming alleged abusers online.
Although the Anonymous Operation Death Eaters earlier had released a statement saying they wanted the recent strings of uncovered historical child sexual abuse cases investigated as being a single cult dealing in human trafficking instead of singular isolated cases, Operation Death Eaters has never since commented on the two children’s disclosures about just such an international cult.
This leaked document was then published in full on the Veterans Today website on 22. february. On the same day the editor Gordon Duff claimed in the Facebook comments to the article that «There are file tags from MI5 embedded in the original doc«.
Detailed timeline:
05/2014 – Ms Draper’s credit card is compromised. One of the children admitted (August 2014) getting the card details and passing them to the father, who forced to do it by threatening them. The card was used to purchase air tickets and software on several occasions.
07/2014 – The children admitted stealing about £2,000 from the mother’s and Mr Christie’s purse, his iphone and antique silver bracelet (£2,000) following Mr Dearman’s threats and demands.
9/08–04/09/2014 – The children disclosed the sexual assaults and violence, committed by their father since their young age, his paedophile associates and a number of other abusers.
04/09/2014 – Private contact with Mr Christie’s brother in law Jean-Clement Yauhirou, police constable of Haringey police station, who took initial evidence, filmed the witnesses’ disclosure on his computer and made a note of the children’s drawings and diary pages.
05/09/2014 – Mr Yauhirou passed the information to the Child Abuse Investigation Team of Barnet Police station.
05/09/2014 – DS Johnathan DICKS, DS Cleo Papachristou visited home address of the victims.
05/09/2014 at 8pm – DC Steve Martin and DS Papachristou took initial recorded disclosure from the victims. DC Martin arranged with the family that a drive around would be completed on Monday, 8th September, to identify the properties where the assaults were committed.
08/09/2014 at 11am – Both victims were taken on a drive to identify possible addresses. One of the addresses was identified.
08/09/2014 - Initial strategy meeting held.
09/09/2014 – Strategy LADO meeting at Crowndale Centre, NW3 with Camden Social Services Department, chaired by Tina Bailey. It was agreed to take the children into protective custody.
10/09/2014 – Strategy LADO meeting with Camden Social Services. Second ABE interview was decided.
10/09/2014 – Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/09/2014 - Joint home visit with the police: ABE trained Social Worker Bethan Thomas.
11/09/2014 at 14:30 – Video interviews at Police station where the children give detailed accounts of sexual abuse, implicating some 60 adults who sexually abuse some 20 children and many more babies.
11/09/2014 at 14:30 – Significant Witness Interview with the mother. At 19.50 Police Protection Powers were used by Barnet Police to keep the children after their interview.
12/09/2014 – Hearing of Private Law Proceedings between father and mother in Family Court of High Holborn, with HHJ Gargan – used to ‘consolidate’ with Public Law Proceedings and granting the ICO. Transfer of Court Proceedings from LB Camden to LB Barnet, joining father Ricky Dearman as 2nd Respondent
12/09/2014 – LB Camden applied for and obtained an Emergency Protection Order.
12/09/2014 –Medical examinations of both children confirm the allegations of sexual abuse and violence. Dr Hodes says that the scars in the rectum area were caused by the insertion of plastic objects. She confirms that many injuries had occurred at least half a year to a year before the examination.
13/09/2014 at 11:23 – According to the CRIS report, another interview was completed which was consistent with the children’s previous accounts. However, no video evidence has been disclosed.
15/09/2014 – Interview of the children’s father Mr Dearman.
15/09/2014 - Strategy LADO meeting of Camden Social Services.
16/09/2014 - Application for Care and Interim Care Order, LB Camden
17/09/2014 – Further ABE interviews of the children where they withdraw their allegations, claiming that the details of their “made up” story had been taken from a film called “Mask of Zorro” (PG rating). They now make allegations against Mr Christie.
17/08/2014 - Case Management Hearing No 1 – Mother represented by solicitor, herself ill.
22/09/2014 – The case was closed by Barnet Police by DI Cannon with “no crime confirmed” status.
22/09/2014 – Review Strategy meeting: Barnet to present case and apply for Interim Care Order (ICO).
26/09/2014 - DI Fernandez of Barnet Police tells the mother that case is closed.
22/12/2014 - Judicial Review filed against Commissioner of Metropolitan Police to re-open the case.

"Not only has this case not "gone away" but in its wake it has left a trail of further injustice and persecution designed to bury it. No action by the state, however perfidious, has been regarded as being unacceptable in the mission to deny the possibility that children of eight and nine could speak the truth and so condemn the actions of adults and the machinations of established institutions and neighbourhoods. Given the wider context, both here and in America particularly, though the examples are legion and international, only perversity and cover-up reaching up to the highest points of judiciary and government can explain the intentional blindness and cupidity. Those refusing to take the allegations seriously will always be irredeemably and indelibly stained with the charge that they failed to protect and defend vulnerable children when they were most in need - indeed to place them in greater danger, in order to protect instead shibboleths of person and position and to pursue by whatever draconian means was available, those that sought to represent their interests. They will for ever, in my mind at least, stand condemned of failing in the most basic duty of the law, to protect the weak and pursue the guilty. In so doing they have brought into disrepute the whole system, an edifice that both structurally and metaphorically, is crumbling in the face of the revelations before our very eyes. Eternal shame on those that did the wrong thing for the wrong reason, and all those that have subsequently refused to challenge what has been said and done."

Sunday, 27 November 2016

The Murder of Jo Cox by Thomas Mair

The facts the jury probably didn't hear.

The message in the launderette's window says: "Please note, I did not tackle the gunman. And no one shouted Britain First at any time."

Video of Mair's arrest here:

Very Important! Check it out at 2mins 20 secs and then compare it with this image:

"Police said a man was arrested in Market Street near the scene of the attack in Birstall" BBC (Of course it wasn't though witness said he saw him arrested there! In fact it was in culdesac a mile away!)

Man being arrested

Here's another:

Still from mobile phone footage issued by West Yorkshire Police showing police officers crouching over a man alleged to be Thomas Mair

Note in the video there is no sign of the holdall (presumably with gun inside - see photo below) or it being moved. None of the officers appear to be in a position to move it. Where did it go or alternatively how did it get there?

The helicopter police video here ( clarrifies it a certain extent. I am right in my guess about the first police car to arrive. The holdall is shown from the air but video stops before it must have been moved before the start of the house video. Of course as part of the crime scene it should not have been moved or interfered with until photographed and subjected to proper forensic examination.

On the same police video he is seen at Hill head Drive without his overcoat. Where was that abandoned and was it located? Note now also the BLACK cap rather than the white one he had been wearing. Was in the habit of having two caps and where is the white one?

Arriving at Library day before

Tommy Mair trial for the murder of MP Jo Cox

Prosecutors claim CCTV showed Mair in the area at the time of the attack

Does this look like the same guy to you? And whats that long thing he's carrying. A bag or something else. Note dark hair and build that doesn't seem to match to me.

Still from CCTV footage issued by West Yorkshire Police showing Thomas Mair

Note time and date of above image.

The two UNARMED officers had arrived first followed by a whole platoon of armed ones. Sadly they have no excuse to expend their bullets on a sitting duck that appears not even able to quack! Was this meant to happen? Indeed would the man on the ground have survived had they not? 

Note also the arrival of two possibly three unmarked cars in addition to five police cars shown. The manner in which they arrive and treated by police suggests they are involved. So who are these people in these 2/3 unmarked cars. Is it possible they are Special Branch or other Government employees on site to make sure things go according to plan? Note also the arrested man appears to have walked into a culdisac more convenient for the police than him.

Note in this vid there is no sign of either a black hold-all  or the brightly decorated plastic bag although there is in others. The police car in the fore ground obviously belongs to armed officers as they return to it. The unarmed officer's car is in the middle with door open. How though were they able to get there first? 

They are said to have "rugby tackled" Mair which would suggest he was running away. If so this would be out of character with other images and descriptions of him so perhaps they just brought him to the ground heavily. In the circumstances it would perhaps have been reasonable. 

But again the video shows no evidence of Mair resisting arrest or of putting up any kind of resistance. Did they in fact sabotage what they knew would be a possible assassination if they didn't? Who after all would have questioned the shooting dead of an armed man who had supposedly just carried out an horrendous attack on an innocent and attractive MP? 

Shooting dead suspected terrorist has become the norm for armed officers so he may in fact owe his life to the unarmed ones. Hollande in France has made it explicit; Cameron hinted at the same. What better opportunity than this where a legislator, and a young and attractive one at that, had been assassinated? Surely it could be relied on for the 'Diana effect' despite not being so well known?

Rather strangely Diana or Artimis tend to merge with Athena or Minerva in classical mythology, and as we shall see, this is not wholly irrelevant as Mair seems to have had a new looking wallet placed right next to his gun, with the head of Medusa boldly displayed (all covered with snakes) who actuall becomes the shield of Athena! Well I never did. Who would guess this manic depressive extreme nationalist would put so much thought into Greek and Roman mythology? (See below)

The shooting of alleged 'terrorists' serves multiple purposes. It removes the need for a trial and any possibility the accused may dispute the accurate or fabricated story of his culpability. It can be portrayed as a necessary evil by very brave and heroic police officers. And it has the further advantage that it impresses on the public mind that not only is the government protecting them, but the extremist threat is ever present and real, and that the arming of the police is an unfortunate necessity, in an increasingly dangerous world. 

Of course the government would never admit to this hidden agenda or of actually planning and executing these events themselves. They would say it was complete baloney. And who in politics would dare to suggest this was so or even raise a voice in defence of 'Mair' himself? 

Published on 16 Jun 2016
The suspected murderer of British politician MP Jo Cox being arrested and treated at the scene for a head injury. Mother of 2 Jo Cox was shot and stabbed multiple times in a brutal attack while meeting members of her constituency on the 16th of June 2016. Thoughts and prayers are with her family in this tragic time that has shocked the nation.

Who took this video? Does anyone know? It appears to have been loaded the same day on "WatchVid". Does anyone know anything about "WatchVid"? What would have been the out come if the unarmed policemen hadn't found him first? Did this the frustrate the true plan?

On this Jack Dromey says, "We just pray she pulls through." Not dead at scene then?

From: vice news video here:
Witness says he walked down and "saw a man with a baseball cap - a white baseball cap. He pulled an old fashioned gun out of his bag. Heard shot. People scattered very scared. We ran back to the restaurant. Then we heard second shot.Then we waited."
Another female witness said Mair "had been hanging about. That he stabbed her and another man. Then he came back and shot her three times in the head."

A gun that was presented in evidence (below) during the trial of Thomas Mair CREDIT: WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE

A gun that was presented in evidence during the trial of Thomas Mair
Questions: At what point was this photo taken? Clearly before it was placed in an exhibits bag. Note blood stain on wipe. Gloved fingers suggest policeman's hand on scene.  Note also heavy duty PVC hold-all and what appears to be a decorated blue plastic bag. Note it contains a wallet with Greek goddess Medusa emblem in gold prominently displayed.

Compare with the image below:

So what do we know about her apart from being a Greek God? Wikipedia has this: 
"The 2nd-century BCE novelist Dionysios Skytobrachion puts her somewhere in Libya, where Herodotus had said the Berbers originated her myth, as part of their religion.
Medusa was beheaded by the hero Perseus, who thereafter used her head, which retained its ability to turn onlookers to stone, as a weapon[4] until he gave it to the goddess Athena to place on her shield
In classical antiquity the image of the head of Medusa appeared in the evil-averting device known as the Gorgoneion."

Now I didn't know Mair was into classical mythology but he may have been I suppose. As far as I am aware nothing has been made of this particular detail but it strikes me as typically elitist not Mairish. One of those little clues that just happens to be left lying around. Of course we may draw parallels between Cox and Medusa and between Perseus and her killer - whether Mair or someone else. "The power to turn her enemies to stone for those that looked on her and effectively the protector of the godess Athena." Surely not a side swipe at brexiteers and in praise of the European ideal surely? After all the event and its meticulous timing was surely intended to be the final nail in the Brexit coffin. ("Oops sorry boss it doesn't appear to have gone according to plan!")

Perhaps this use of imagery is even more poignant:

"The profoundest instinct in man is to war against the truth; that is, against the Real. He shuns facts from his infancy. His life is a perpetual evasion. Miracle, chimera and to-morrow keep him alive. He lives on fiction and myth. It is the Lie that makes him free. Animals alone are given the privilege of lifting the veil of Isis; men dare not. The animal, awake, has no fictional escape from the Real because he has no imagination. Man, awake, is compelled to seek a perpetual escape into Hope, Belief, Fable, Art, God, Socialism, Immortality, Alcohol, Love. From Medusa-Truth he makes an appeal to Maya-Lie."
— Jack London, The Mutiny of the Elsinore"

Need I say more?

A knife that was presented in evidence during the trial of Thomas Mair
Police say they found a dagger-like knife in Mair's holdall 
Here's the other one. Clean as a new pin you notice.
Tommy Mair trial for the murder of MP Jo Cox

Further Police CCTV video is here:

Thomas Mair (below) in police custody after his arrest CREDIT: WEST YORKSHIRE POLICE/PA
Thomas Mair in police custody after his arrest
Check out shape of nose on shadow which I have trouble reconciling with his own. Also pronounced forehead that appears to be lacking in his actual profile. Strange. The location of the shot also raises questions - obviously not that secure or confined for an alleged violent terrorist. Note posters on wall, absence of any other policemen in shot and slippers and different (police issue?) clothes to that he was arrested in. He certainly doesn't appear to being treated as a highly dangerous radical "terrorist" to me. Does he you?

Map from Market Street, Birstall, Batley WF17 9EN, UK to Risedale Avenue, Birstall, Batley WF17 0NA, UK
5 min (0.9 mivia A643

Map of the area

Please note witness reported killer "walking calmly towards the Market". This note is in the precise opposite direction to the route he is said to have taken! And why would the police report he was arrested in Market Street when in fact the arrest took place over a mile away an hour later?

Video on the Guardian site here: evidences a very BIG problem. Immediately before the attack Mair is shown walking with white baseball cap, light trousers and an overcoat. However later video after the murder said to be of him, shows him walking past with a black baseball cap, black trousers and NO overcoat. This clothing is repeated in images of where he is arrested. This is a clear conflict of evidence that has not been explained. Further there is no evidence of blood splashing on his clothes although rather strangely there is in the bag.

Just some of the contradictions or unsupported claims
  • Air lifted to hospital or ambulance to hospital (both reported)?
  • Why no video of either?
  • Why taken to London when crime in Yorkshire jurisdiction? (Shades of JFK)
  • Committal proceedings under Chief Magistrate, Senior District Judge Emma Arbuthnot in the  Marylebone court kept for the most dangerous cases. Her Alma mater · Trinity College, Cambridge 
  • Died at scene or in hospital?
  • Helicopter with camera over scene! Who did ambulance belong to?
  • Was she coming out of her car or coming out of the library?
  • Conflicting evidence as to whether she was shot or stabbed first and by how many times.
  • She was reportedly confirmed dead at the scene at 1.48 pm. Yet no pictorial evidence.
  • From the same report this witness claims to have seen both her being taken away in an ambulance as HE was arrested. (See * below)
  • And anyway why would she still be at the scene almost an hour after the event?
  • He had to reload each time. Two and three shots are reported. Going away and coming back.
  • It was claimed when arrested that he had a cache of ammunition (.22 bullets) in his coat pocket but as we have seen he appears to have no coat on when arrested
  • How could a leading politician (the MP for Birmingham Erdington) speak of her recovery well after the event?
  • Earlier shown with WHITE baseball cap and so described at scene, wearing black baseball cap when walking past CCTV in Hill Crescent (strange place for CCTV?) No cap when arrested and injures head on road. Somewhere on trip from murder scene to arrest point loses 'bomber-type' outer coat and no mention of it being retrieved as far as I have seen. (Important for blood staining)
  • Blood next to muzzle of gun but not on clothes? 
  • Adapted gun now said to come from a right wing associate.
  • Reported character of Mair does not fit what was being claimed.
  • Multiple photos of clearly different people all claimed to Mair.
  • The frankly unbelievably story circulated by the press that 25,000 people had tweeted in SUPPORT of her murder, again linking this to Brexit voters.
  • Note the alleged Mair photo below linking him to the Kray twins.
  • Strange similarities and parallels with other notable killings such as Olof Palme and Anna Lindh in Sweden also linked to EU votes or similar.
  • Speed with which the very next day, all the political leader found themselves in Kirkstall for a memorial service.
  • The blatant way in which the murder was portrayed as being right wing extremism and Brexit favouring. This can only be interpreted as endeavouring to influence the vote that followed shortly after.
  • The speech by her husband that did the same.
  • The unprecedented recall of parliament the next day followed by what would have been Cox's birthday!
  • Even the date 16th of the 6th  2016 - and can you believe it if you add up the time numerals 
  • Why was the jury at Thomas Mair's trial not allowed to see photos of her body and injuries? (Jurors are not usually so protected)
  • Why did the judge (Mr Justice Wilkie)  refuse Mair's request to address the jury at the end of the trial after virtually no evidence or extenuation, had been given in his defence ?

*("Graeme Howard, 38, who lives in nearby Bond Street, told the Guardian he heard the man shout “Britain first” before the shooting and during the arrest.
“I heard the shot and I ran outside and saw some ladies from the cafe running out with towels,” he said. “There was loads of screaming and shouting and the police officers showed up.
He was shouting ‘Britain first’ when he was doing it and being arrested. He was pinned down by two police officers and she was taken away in an ambulance.)
On both counts this was just wrong - or was it?

Are all these images of the same man?

Neighbours have confirmed the man in the blue cap standing behind the Britain First banner berating the Muslim men is Mair.
mair BF 1
Image result for images thomas mair

This was supposed to be Thomas Mair rather obviously psychologically linking Brexit with two notorious convicted killers.

Court drawing of Thomas Mair , charged with the murder of MP Jo Cox 
Image result for images thomas mair