Sunday, 4 June 2017

"London Bridge is Falling Down". A Play in (at least) Three Terrorist Acts."

The Sun says: "

London Bridge attack – Theresa May declares Britain has been ‘too tolerant to Islamic extremism’ hours after van and knife rampage

One officer was seriously wounded while heroic cops gunned down extremists within eight minutes of first emergency call"

"Unreal City, 
Under the brown fog of a winter dawn, 
A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many, 
I had not thought death had undone so many. 
Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled, 
And each man fixed his eyes before his feet. 
Flowed up the hill and down King William Street, 
To where Saint Mary Woolnoth kept the hours 
With a dead sound on the final stroke of nine. 
There I saw one I knew, and stopped him, crying: “Stetson! 
“You who were with me in the ships at Mylae! 
“That corpse you planted last year in your garden, 
“Has it begun to sprout? Will it bloom this year? 
“Or has the sudden frost disturbed its bed? 
“Oh keep the Dog far hence, that’s friend to men, 
“Or with his nails he’ll dig it up again! 

“You! hypocrite lecteur!—mon semblable,—mon frère!”"
The Waste Land

Related Poem Content Details

There is certainly a picture emerging - whether its intentional manipulation or not. The Tories - and more particularly the dark forces behind them - are definitely running scared that their calculations are not holding up with the prospect of a Hung Parliament. It is conceivable Labour and SNP may make an alliance and form a government. If 'terrorism' or the threat of it, can be used to stop it, it will be, make no mistake. All plausibly deniable of course.


Armed police with children in Sheffield,f_auto,ar_3:2,c_fill/!/image/image.jpg

"All three attackers shot within eight minutes." Whether real or not, this folks is the new policing message. "Death by Police Shooting" is being sold as a "Good Thing". It parallels the national campaign of "normalising" armed police with guns by photographing them smiling with children. The agenda is clear and VERY dangerous.


BIRMINGHAM POLICE RAID 10.4.17.  A 12 year old girl holds her hands up in front of an armed officer.

LONDON: Guns at the ready.

BBC interview of Emily Thornbury here:

At -1:01 "Thrale Street" named after notable MP but subliminally very close to "Thrall". Def. of thrall: "thrall
the state of being in someone's power, or of having great power over someone.
"she was in thrall to her abusive husband"
synonyms: power, clutches, hands, control, grip, grasp, yoke; More
a slave, servant, or captive." Purely coincidental of course.*&output-format=auto&output-quality=auto

"As Dr Day said back in his ‘Everything Is In Place And Nobody Can Stop Us Now’ lecture, in 1969:

“Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. At that time it was thought terrorism would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place, or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.” [9-11 convinced Americans to relinquish control.]"

BBC have just released images of someone believed to be an attacker on the ground with canisters around waist

As usual the question is "Who benefits?" Well it's certainly not Muslims, British or otherwise.


It's obviously not the the three people we are told were "shot dead by police within eight minutes" - summary execution if I've ever heard of it. And what happened to the attacker who was photogaphed last night "under arrest" and very much alive. (Shades of the Tsarnev brothers in the Boston criminal fraud I think to myself?) 

The van crashed into the pavement before the trio jumped out and began stabbing people at random

It's not in the interests of the victims or the innocent bystanders who were either commanded by police to "run, run, run", or "get down on the floor" or were herded with their hands up.

So who might benefit or alternatively be thought to benefit, by the people who organised the event, for organisers there must have been?

Ho being led from the scene clutching his bleeding neck

Well it is not hard to see it might be calculated to chime with the Conservatives political message, "strong and stable". Isn't that what everyone yearns for in time of trouble? Then again, foreign attack always stiffens the patriotic sinews that would likely benefit the party that claims to be big on defence - whether it is or not. Nor can it escape notice that with every attack - and of course this is the third in the relatively short period in the run up to the General Election and we were in fact warned after the first that others were "imminent"! - which seems just a tad coincidental, particularly it is impossible to formulate in what way a Conservative victory could in any way benefit ISIS. 

British Transport Police!!! Everyone getting in on the act apparently.

Then again we see how these events benefit a stated more repressive domestic agenda, particularly in relation to the control of the media and internet; the arming and militarising of the police, the acceptance of police guns, the army on the streets, and the replacement of due process with summary execution. 

Strange figure in black.
Police arrive on the scene at London bridge

The parallels with France, America and Israel are impossible to avoid. Now, with the failure of the democratic system to respond in the way intended - horror of horrors Corbyn and Labour might actually win - a petition is launched to postpone the election "indefinitely". So as I have suggested many times before, if this latest ploy works on the back of these 'terror attacks', we have a fascist COUP in all but name. So to return to the original question, who do YOU think benefits?

Remember this politician's involvement in the Melbourne fake attack? "Cashing in"?
 The London deaths were a political opportunity for One Nation's leader. Photo: AAP
"Barely hours after people were killed and maimed in the attacks, Senator Hanson used UK police advice to people caught up in terrorist incidents to push her message of banning Muslims from immigrating to Australia."

Pauline Hanson


Counter-terrorism officers are patrolling near the scene. Police say all three attackers were shot dead.
Counter-terrorism officers near the scene of the attack

Two people react to London Bridge attacks.



Genuine or Fake? Will anyone ask if this was necessary or appropriate. Or how the policemen came to be INSIDE given that the complete incident was over in less than eight seconds?

Published on 31 May 2017
Jordan Maxwell continues as a preeminent researcher and independent scholar in the field of occult / religious philosophy. His interest in these subjects began as far back as 1959. He served for three-and-a-half years as the Religion Editor of Truth Seeker Magazine, America’s oldest Free Thought Journal (since 1873). His work exploring the hidden foundations of Western religions and secret societies creates enthusiastic responses from audiences around the world.

His work on the subject of secret societies, both ancient and modern, and their symbols, has fascinated audiences around the world for decades. Considering the rapidly moving events of today, and the very real part hidden religious agendas play in our modern war-torn world, he feels these controversial subjects are not only interesting to explore, but too important to ignore! His extraordinary presentations include documents and photographs seldom seen elsewhere.

Jordan has been away from major media for over six years...and tonight he's ready to speak out, once again, to everyone.

Air date: May 30, 2017

Northern Ireland in the 1970's. Looks familiar?

"I sat upon the shore 
Fishing, with the arid plain behind me 
Shall I at least set my lands in order? 
London Bridge is falling down falling down falling down 
Poi s’ascose nel foco che gli affina 
Quando fiam uti chelidon—O swallow swallow 
Le Prince d’Aquitaine à la tour abolie 
These fragments I have shored against my ruins 
Why then Ile fit you. Hieronymo’s mad againe. 
Datta. Dayadhvam. Damyata.
                  Shantih     shantih     shantih "


  1. It is not just numbers, it is the fundamental ethos of what a British Police Force ought to be. I believe fabricated terrorism has been used to justify a plan conceived somewhere in the bowels of the Home Office, at the instigation of an American/Israeli conspiracy, that started in recent times with the dastardly 9/11 plot (of course it started long before) to change the very nature of policing, to enable them to implement even more drastic public policy changes and to control the likely reaction. This has been done under the pretext of "operational control" without the barest Parliamentary oversight or discussion, not that that would have made any difference in the face of such an extreme threat. The policemen have been subject to brain washing and seem to have adopted their new role and function with alacrity. That is a sad fact of the human psyche. They have been removed from normal policing by consent functions and been imbibed with the view that they are now robo-cops whose only duty is mask their faces - thus de-humanising them - and weaponised, for what purpose? Presumably to shoot on sight anyone they thing deserving of it? They certainly do not prevent the terrorism as we all have witnessed. By definition they arrive after the event. Whether they prevent greater calamity over and above traditional methods that were employed against the IRA for example, is an open question. It is certainly true that if they are continually being trained or in a state of readiness, they cannot be doing their traditional and much more important, for the cohesion and security of society, their traditional roles. Not only have recent events proved the vacuity of the new arrangements, no area whatever the likely risk, has been spared this new "robo cop" phenomenon. So we have had tooled up coppers walking menacing on Scarborough beach and Truro Railway Station! Clearly this far more than a sensible reaction to real threat from 'ISIS' or anyone else. It is a national psychological operation at the behest of the Home Office to instill fear and normalise what is quite abnormal. Despite all the photo shoots with smiling children and animals - also a government ploy - the guns and threat to the civilian population is very real. This has been proved by the application of these people in house possession and other situations where there is no threat, and ordinary policemen employing civilised tactics would have been just as effective. Occasional deaths from ISIS in the scheme of things - even if genuine - are as nothing to the dangers implicit in a police state, that our political leaders seem determined to thrust upon us - even though of course they would vehemently deny it, whilst the population is distracted by 'bread and circus'. Thank you soaps, X Factor and Ariana Grande, you are indeed doing a grand job.

  2. Certainly needs explanation:

  3. I quite understand how you feel Geri. This is all mass mind/behaviour control. Leaving aside for a moment the issue of how reliable/genuine are the injury/fatality statistics, and the event itself, why the minute silence for them, when all the untold thousands of deaths that happen every day, go virtually unrecorded and unlamented by the state and general population? I feel genuine sympathy for those caught up in such events and nothing but contempt for those that organise and carry them out, but I despise also, those that immediately seek to gain political and emotional capital out of them. This I find highly suspicious. Perhaps someone will lay down the objective ground rules for when national minute silences are required and when not. We used to have them only on the 11th November. Now they appear to be happening every week! In what way are they supposed to help? True empathy is never manufactured in the Cabinet Office. Nor should it be.

  4. Theresa May, Salmon Abedi and British support of Jihadist terrorism.

  5. "The Jihadsts Next Door". CHANNEL 4. OOPS! From 14 mins here:

    UK Column.

  6. And if all this stuff does your head in, I recommend you listen to this! Borodin Quartet plays Beethoven String Quartet Op.127 & 130


    The only true terrorist sympathisers in this country, apart from the Wahabi inspiired jihadhists themselves, are Theresa May, the Tory Party and the right wing gutter press that is controlled by the same corporations that own the Tories.

    When you look at these terrorist events in any detail plenty of questions arise. None of these ever get raised by the mainstream media (MSM). All we get from them are soundbites about the horror, the heroism, our wonderful security services etc.

    The story is fixed from the moment the attack occurs. There are no questions, no analysis, no debate. We are told what happened and that's it. If you ever dare to ask any questions at all you are simply dismissed as a "loony conspiracy theorist." Yet no answers are ever provided to any of the questions raised.

    Take the Manchester bomber, Salaman Abedi, for example.

    His mum told the security services he was a threat, the FBI told the security services he was a threat. HIS father was an LIFG terrorist who was a known associate of a notorious LIFG bomb maker (also given safe harbour in the UK) with links to Ayman Al Zawahiri (the Co founder if Al Qaeda.) His father was used by the British intelligence agencies in a failed plot to assassinate Gaddafi in 1996.

    Abedi clearly grew up in a community of Libyan terrorist who were supported and protected by our intelligence services and our government. He was known to fly frequently between the UK and Syria and Libya. Yet he was also a known combatent. Then, on the last occasion, just after flying back to the UK, from Libya again, he kills 22 innocent people and ruins God knows how many more lives using a "suicide bomb" with a "remote" trigger mechanism.

    However counterterrorism police stated that they were "not allowed" to detain him and his LIFG terrorist freinds under the direct order of the Home Office. So that is Theresa May and now Amber Rudd, helping the man who blew up 81 innocent men, women and children in Britain.

    Yet what do the scum sucking, terrorist supporting filth in the press print on the eve if the election? "Jeremy Corbyn is a terrorist sympathiser."

    Jeremy Corbyn has fought and argued against the use of violence all his political life. To pretend otherwise is and absurd lie. You are utterly deluded if you swallow it.

    Before you do, read this with your critically brain switched on:

    The whole story is based upon unnamed witnesses who "say" when Corbyn spoke at rally which questioned Israeli foreign policy (an entirely legitimate, non violent act) some jihadhi terrorist sympathisers were in the audience of thousands that attended. There is no evidence offered at all to substantiate this claim. "People said" is not evidence, it is hearsay. Meaningless in other words. They offer nothing, zip, nada to back up their claims that these idiots even attended.

    But even if they did, was Corbyn on crowd control duty that day then? Was he controlling the policing of the event? Was he taking tickets at the gate (which didn't exist anyway because it was a free open air rally?)

  8. CONTD:
    It is beyond moronic to suggest that Corbyn could have any control or influence at all over who chose to attend an open air rally. To suggest this therefore means he shares the same views as every individual in the crowd is rediculous.

    When fascists attend the tiny gatherings the Tories speak at is that Boris Johnson or Theresa May's fault?

    However to print this lie on the eve if a general election, that has been dominated by the coincidental horror of terrorism; when that terrorism appears to have quite possibly been facilitated by senior figures in the Conservative government, tells you everything you need to know about the corporate Tory / MSM nexus who will say and do anything to ensure that you vote to protect their continued war profits.

    So before you trot off to the polling booth armed with nothing but a confused, befuddled, brainwashed perspective that has been rammed down your throat by the very people who, all the actual, real, documented evidence suggests, are genuinely terrorist sympathisers, why don't you just take a moment to find out what Corbyn actually says.

    Or can't you be bothered?

    Tim Veater Of course in relation to warnings, knowledge and failures, in relation to the latest London Bridge event, they have been repeated. It has become almost SOP culprits are known to police, have long criminal records, are on watch lists, are specifically warned about by family or other agencies, have recognised links to MI5/6, yet remarkably are not considered worthy of monitoring despite the amazing technical/legal/resource facilities available to the security services/police. Of course all are shot dead. Yet apparently no one in this community is ever criticised and excuses are accepted without demure! No one ever seems to follow up the details of post mortems/inquests/funerals of the alleged/real fatalities to check whether the details support the claims. For example in the latest London Bridge event about 50 bullets were fired, yet no one really knows where they ended up or killed on the way. Is it just me, or can everyone see a fundamental contrast between the 'real' terrorism we see in Kabul, Iraq and Syria (to name but three) and the sort of hyped up commercial events we have witnessed in Europe since say Hebdo?

  9. London Bridge Attack. How about this? It was a puzzle to me why the pub chosen for the panic film where everyone was told to get down on the floor was called Katzemjammers. The name translates to meaning "cat's wail" (caterwaul) and hence "discordant sound", sometimes used to indicate a general state of depression or bewilderment. Alternatively Google Translate offers "Hangover". Could it also be a sick play on 'Rita Katz', the mouth piece of the whole crISIS phenomenon?

  10. Background of the some of the three UK terrorist attckers. Were they in fact assets of the British or some other State security service?


  11. A further interesting aspect to this Millbank Tower business in which this 'Crisis Solutions' operation took place and from which the very suspect "Hyandai crossing bridge and woman falling in the Thames" video was taken is that (and I don't believe this has been referred to by anyone to date) it is owned by two Jewish billionaires, David Reuben, Simon Reuben, who made their money from Russian metals and later transferred to London property when Putin came to power. So in respect of crucial initial filming of these 'terrorist' events immediately made available on the internet, in stark contrast to the absence of all other CCTV footage, we have yet again a distinct Jewish connection and footprint. Another interesting and unremarked fact is of course that Millbank Tower is bang next to the headquarters of Britain's internal security service - MI5.


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.