Don't say you didn't know.

Don't say you weren't warned.

MUST WATCH!

Mike Yeadon's warning to the world:

https://www.facebook.com/claude.baesens/videos/425115848825337

Mike has been subjected to a coordinated barrage of criticism since making his expert opinion known. Of course governments, including our own have ignored his warnings and intensified the 'vaccine' rollout, despite factual evidence that the harms he predicted are being realised.

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/health-coronavirus-vaccines-skeptic/

Michael Yeadon was a scientific researcher and vice president at drugs giant Pfizer Inc. He co-founded a successful biotech. Then his career took an unexpected turn.

By STEVE STECKLOW and ANDREW MACASKILL in LONDON

 

Filed March 18, 2021, 11 a.m. GMT

Late last year, a semi-retired British scientist co-authored a petition to Europe’s medicines regulator. The petitioners made a bold demand: Halt COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.

Even bolder was their argument for doing so: They speculated, without providing evidence, that the vaccines could cause infertility in women.

The document appeared on a German website on Dec.1. Scientists denounced the theory. Regulators weren’t swayed, either: Weeks later, the European Medicines Agency approved the European Union’s first COVID-19 shot, co-developed by Pfizer Inc. But damage was already done.

Social media quickly spread exaggerated claims that COVID-19 jabs cause female infertility. Within weeks, doctors and nurses in Britain began reporting that concerned women were asking them whether it was true, according to the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. In January, a survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), a non-profit organization, found that 13% of unvaccinated people in the United States had heard that “COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to cause infertility.”

What gave the debunked claim credibility was that one of the petition’s co-authors, Michael Yeadon, wasn’t just any scientist. The 60-year-old is a former vice president of Pfizer, where he spent 16 years as an allergy and respiratory researcher. He later co-founded a biotech firm that the Swiss drugmaker Novartis purchased for at least $325 million.

My comment on the following disturbing findings of huge variations in toxicity of various Pfizer vaccine batches.

No one really knows what substance is going into their arm. It is an act of faith in a criminal organisation. (Pfizer biggest fine ever) Who is to know if different batches have different concentrations or formulas? Some may be intentional placebos to check on whether adverse events are statistically significant or not. As far as I am aware there is little or no independent monitoring so how would we know but it could explain why some batches appear more dangerous than others and why two jabs appear to be regarded as ineffective.

Following from: https://www.sott.net/article/462238-Report-links-ballooning-fatalities-to-specific-batches-of-the-Covid-19-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR1oJuvPQGKCyEw3gO0e91Dm1oQ38EIC7azizn8d9ktcPD_a3Pl_q75L428 https://www.sott.net/article/462238-Report-links-ballooning-fatalities-to-specific-batches-of-the-Covid-19-vaccine?fbclid=IwAR1oJuvPQGKCyEw3gO0e91Dm1oQ38EIC7azizn8d9ktcPD_a3Pl_q75L428

Report links ballooning fatalities to "specific batches" of the Covid-19 vaccine

Mike Whitney
The Unz Review
Sun, 19 Dec 2021 00:00 UTC

 

"Dr. Fauci is likely responsible for a preponderance of the total 802,000 US Covid deaths.... It was Dr. Fauci who organized the suppression of easily marshaled and inexpensive early treatments... Fauci who promoted the protocol of sending sick patients home from the ER without any treatment ... Fauci who is responsible for the emergency use authorization on the mRNA "vaccines" that may have killed hundreds of thousands more Americans... And .. Fauci who wants to vaxx up all the children in America, despite evidence that the mRNA shots permanently disable children's innate natural immune systems and can cause lasting heart, blood vessel, brain, and reproductive damage..." James Howard Kunstler, "Where Do You Stand?"

Question- Can the deaths that are reported on VAERS be linked to specific batches of the Covid-19 vaccine?

Answer- Yes, they can.

Question- Are you sure of that? What you're suggesting is that particular lots of the vaccine are toxic.

Answer- That appears to be the case.

Question- I want to make sure I understand what you're saying: Are you accusing the drug companies of murder?

Answer- That possibility can't be ruled out, although it cannot yet be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt." Not surprisingly, however, neither industry leaders, regulators or the FBI have shown the slightest interest in examining the evidence that has been meticulously compiled by reputable researchers. The fact is, there is already sufficient statistical evidence that something very sinister is going on that requires an immediate and thorough investigation. It's a matter of gravest concern, after all, people are dying.

Question- I'm still can't believe what you're saying. Do you really think that corporations kill for money?

Answer- Have you ever heard of Vioxx, Paxil or Oxycodone or have you been living under a rock for the last 40 years? Are you at all familiar with the abysmal record of these serial felons that masquerade as respectable pharmaceutical companies but have inflicted horrible suffering and injury on the population? Yes, I realize that liberals love these drug companies and believe they operate with the purest of intentions, but I'm telling you that they'd cut your heart out in a split-second if they thought it would fatten their bottom line. I suggest you expand your reading and figure it out for yourself.

Question- Let's cut to the chase: What proof do you have that the drug companies are deliberately distributing these "toxic" batches of vaccines?

Answer- Wait a minute: What I'm saying is there's enough evidence to warrant an investigation. I'm also saying that if industry shills, like Fauci, were really on the up-an-up, they'd temporarily halt the vaccination campaign until this business is sorted out. Now check out this blurb from The Expose':

"An investigation of data found in the USA's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

But what's perhaps more concerning is that the "deadly" lots were distributed widely across the United States whilst other "benign" lots were sent to just a few locations." ("EXCLUSIVE - 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data", The Expose)

"The above chart on the left shows the number of deaths reported as adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine by lot number sent to 13+ states across the USA. This chart has identified the actual lot numbers of Pfizer vaccine that have caused the most deaths in the USA. The deadliest of which is lot number 'EN6201' causing almost 120 deaths." (The Expose')

Answer- Think about that for a minute. The "deadly" vaccines were widely distributed across the US but they're all identifiable by a simple lot number. That's astonishing, don't you think? So, we know that specific lot numbers are killing and injuring people but Fauci and Co. still haven't alerted the public, notified the FBI, called for an investigation or stopped the vaccination campaign. Why? And why is the media ignoring this story? If they were genuinely interested in saving lives, this would be headline news, wouldn't it?

Question- But that's all just speculation. You still have not produced a lick of evidence to back your claims.

Answer- You're right. So far, it's all just theory, so let's get back to the article:

"Scientists compared variability between Flu vaccine lots with variability between Covid vaccine lots, and were shocked to find EXCESSIVE and HIGHLY UNUSUAL degree of variation between different lots of the Covid vaccines. When 22,000 flu vaccine lots were examined, almost all of them produced 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions per lot...

When the same number of Covid vaccines were compared, there was found to be huge variation - with many lots producing 5 or fewer severe adverse reactions , but many others producing 1000-5000 severe adverse reactions." (The Expose')

How does that happen? How does one batch generate almost zero adverse reactions and another batch generates 1,000-times that amount? Is it just a quality control issue or is there more here that meets the eye?

And this is not a trivial matter since it appears that these particular batches may be responsible for the bulk of the 20,000 fatalities listed on the VAERS reporting system. Also, as the author points out:

"Under FDA regulations, such high variation between different lots and between different manufacturers means the drugs are ADULTERATED, and carries significant legal penalties. Such variation may also negate EUA authorization - which is only granted based on consistency of the product." (The Expose')

Question- I agree that it's all very concerning, but you still haven't produced any hard evidence yet. Show me the proof of wrongdoing or admit that you're jumping the gun.

Answer- Look; we're building a case here without access to the labs where these vaccines were manufactured and without access to any forensic evidence whatsoever. The best we can do is provide circumstantial and statistical evidence that a thorough investigation is warranted. Got it? We don't have a smoking gun. What we have is compelling evidence that something very sinister is going on. People are dying and their deaths are directly connected to specific vaccine lots that can be positively identified and traced back to their source. Isn't that enough to justify an independent probe?

I think it is but, naturally, the people who have something to hide are not going to support an investigation.

Now, get a load of this video that gives an excellent rundown of what we're dealing with. The whole thing is worth watching, but for our purposes, we'll focus on minute 14: 35. Here's what they say:

"With 2,244 batches shown on the graph, 40% had only 1 adverse reaction, whereas the top 20% were causing over 1,000 adverse reactions per batch... Which shows that the top 20% is 1,000 times worse than the bottom 40%." That's exactly correct. Only a small percentage of lots are causing almost 100% of adverse events and deaths in our data sets.. There can be 1,000% difference in the experience of someone who gets a shot from one lot, than from someone who gets a shot from another." It's a very disturbing situation, no product should be varying like this when it is being given to masses of otherwise healthy people, (including) pregnant women and children. We are exposing them to a gigantic amount of risk. ...

...People who think (these vaccines ) are safe and effective like all the traditional vaccines you are familiar with, you should think again, because this variability exposes a large number of people to excessive risk.

...Sometime manufacturers are exempt from good manufacturing practices if the FDA deems it is a public health emergency, but in that case, the public should be aware of what they are taking. They should not be equating these injections to traditional vaccines." ("Covid 19 Vaccines by Lot Number", Bitchute)

Answer- Allow me to state the obvious: "1,000% difference" is more than a rounding error. It suggests that certain lots are contaminated even though they are still being used. That is flat-out scary.

Also, while this analysis does not prove a criminal conspiracy, it certainly strengthens the case for those who- like myself- believe that that's exactly what's going on, a conspiracy. Naturally, any depopulation scheme would have to appear randomized and sporadic. Such a scheme would not play out in a year or even two years, but over the course of a decade or more. Vaccines would play a critical role in that scheme as they provide direct access to the physical biology of all 7 billion people on earth. A small portion of those people would die shortly after inoculation, which is what we are seeing here. The vast majority of fatalities, however, would only show up in the excess mortality data which has been steadily rising in all the countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year. The trajectory of these excess deaths suggest that the depopulation agenda will only be achieved over a protracted period of time, perhaps, a decade or more. What that shows, is that -while our rulers may be evil- they're not stupid, in fact, they are disturbingly calculating. Here's how analyst Steve Kirsch summed it up on his Substack account:

"It is exceptionally clear that criminal activity within the vaccine community has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches, which is why overall we get such poor results.... This is exceptionally clear when you see that about 99% of the vaccine batches produce typically 0-3 adverse events in the VAERS database, whilst the other 1% produce typically hundreds to many-thousands of AE (Adverse Events), including almost all of the deaths and serious disabilities, which aren't present in the other 99%."

Repeat: "Criminal activity... has caused an adulteration of 1% of the vaccine batches."

As former Pfizer VP Mike Yeadon points out in another post, there are only two options we need to consider regarding this matter. Either:

1. No one noticed. (Not the manufacturers, nor FDA, nor CDC, HHS, insurers etc.)

2. (Or) They know. (what's going on, that is.)

Which is it?

Yeadon concludes that it would be impossible for the people in charge NOT to know. So, yes, they DO know; they know there are "adulterated" batches that are killing and injuring people, just as they know they're not going to do anything that would rock the boat and change the ultimate outcome. So, the fatalities will continue to mount; that's what we're left with. Here's more from Yeadon:

"Given VAERS is publicly accessible & is specified as a tool for detecting the unexpected, there must be someone in a three-letter agency tasked with monitoring VAERS.... The he adds this, "I don't care what your general view is of vaccines broadly or covid19 vaccines specifically, you cannot accept this huge degree of output vaccination from lot to lot. It's injected Russian roulette."

Not surprisingly, that's the term that keeps popping up everywhere: "Russian roulette"; spin the chamber and hope you don't blow your brains out. Is it too much to expect that vaccination should be more than a (potentially) life-ending roll-of-the-dice? Is that too much to ask?

Question- This might surprise you, but I actually agree with you for once. I think it would be perfectly reasonable for people to check the lot number before they get vaccinated. But I don't agree with your other wild assumptions which I think are totally off-base.

Answer- Fair enough. But I should mention that I was just as skeptical as you when I first read the article. I just couldn't imagine that there could be a such a huge discrepancy between vaccines that are supposed to be identical. Now we see that they're not identical, not even close. The differences are humongous and deadly. Which brings us to our next question: Is it intentional? If these lots are responsible for most of the vaccine-generated deaths on VAERS, and if there is up-to "1,000 to 1" difference in adverse events between these and the other batches; then we need to know whether or not this was done deliberately or not. So, is it all a big mistake or are we looking at premeditated murder?

Question- There you go again, stretching the facts to fit your theory. I still think there could be more benign explanation.

Answer- Let me get this straight: This analysis identifies certain batches of vaccines as a thousand-times more lethal than other batches, but you think there is a "benign explanation" for that? Please, tell me what that explanation might be?

Question- I don't know off-hand. I'd have to think about it for a while. But I don't think jumping to conclusions gets us any closer to the truth.

Answer- I wouldn't call statistical analysis "jumping to conclusions", but that's your call. Anyway, let's skip the debate and get back to the article:

"But the investigation of VAERS data also revealed that reported deaths due to the Pfizer vaccine were again only associated with certain batches of the jab. The chart above shows that 96% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,828 reported deaths were associated with just 4% of the lots of Pfizer vaccine.

Five lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each, a further 5 lot numbers were associated with 81-100 deaths each, and just 2 separate lot numbers were associated with over 100 deaths each....

The same can be seen for the Moderna Covid-19 vaccine. Ninety-five-percent of the lots of Moderna vaccine had zero death reports made against them. Meaning the 2,603 deaths were associated with just 5% of the lots of Moderna vaccine.

Thirteen lot numbers were associated with 41-60 deaths each, 2 lot numbers were associated with 61-80 deaths each and 1 lot number was associated with 81-100 deaths....This data therefore shows that each lot from the 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people." (The Expose')

Answer- So, the same weird pattern applies to both major vaccine producers, but you still think there's a "benign explanation", right?

Question- Right.

Answer- And, even though "deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified", you don't think they were deliberately distributed across the country?

Question- No, I don't.

Answer- So, it's all just a "big accident" by well-meaning people doing their best in very trying circumstances, right?

Question- Yes.

Answer- And the fact that no one is investigating this situation- that continues to cause death and injury- is just a bureaucratic snafu of some kind, right?

Question- Right.

Answer- I think you're in denial. That's all. I think you're so attached to your own view that you refuse to see what is going on right beneath your nose. My guess is that if Anthony Fauci ordered the summary execution of all 60 million Americans who refuse to get vaccinated, you'd come up with some excuse for him. You'd say "That's okay, he's just doing his job, he's just fighting Covid."

That's true, isn't it?

Question- You always exaggerate.

Answer- One last thing: Do you know what the "perfect crime" is? The "perfect crime" is one in which there is no evidentiary link between the perpetrator and the victim. No proof, no apparent motive and no smoking gun. The plan to exterminate millions of people with toxic vaccines was supposed to be the perfect crime. But, guess what? Someone slipped up and we now have the lot numbers. That's right, the lot numbers. Someone carelessly left their fingerprints on the murder weapon and, now, all we have to do is track him down and bring him to justice.

It's not much, but it's a step in the right direction.

Postscript

I don't really like the tone of this article, and I think much of the criticism in the comments section is reasonable and fair. I usually base my pieces on the analysis of medical experts, scientists and other professionals. This article depends too much on the findings of a website that may have some credibility issues. (although, I hope not.)

Personally, I found the video extremely compelling and persuasive, and I also think that the topic deserves greater scrutiny and investigation. But I also think, overall, the article is a bit thin on facts and data and long on conjecture.

In short, I think the topic deserves better analysis than I provided, and I apologize to those who think the article is not up to snuff. I'll do better next time.

WHO Director: "Some Countries Using Boosters To Kill Children, & That's Not Right"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=r1_Wdp_rsyI&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR0kGu5N1CiVeqeS4JoIN_mEA_TryOjoHBdPcALLGwDUjHAHVinlaIOXHug

Keven Brochu

Tim Veater lol you've either been living under a rock or you're trolling.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2035389

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2101544

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2105290

Oh, and here's a randomized double-blind study with ivermectin.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777389

Yeah... Benefits are negligible at best. Nowhere near the "miracle drug" people like you are trying to making it be. Even Molnupiravir, which has been a disappointment, is more effective.

Reply to Keven Brochu: The study referred to (https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2034577?fbclid=IwAR17T6Zjb_bq7ruF0J5bz1qRGgAkoKsHZalDMnWvOx6KmWySWge5qPNjgoU ) bases its conclusion on the difference of 8 and 162 cases of severe covid seven days after the second dose out of 43,000 in the study a difference of a mere 154. The reasons for this could be numerous. At any event it depends on less than a mere 0.35% of the total, hardly a reliably basis on which to base a roll out to everyone. In addition although it states that there will be a two year follow-up, this is then contradicted by the statement that the placebo group would not remain so and so could not be followed up over time. It states: "Therefore, both the occurrence of adverse events more than 2 to 3.5 months after the second dose and more comprehensive information on the duration of protection remain to be determined." More accurately, cannot and will not be determined. Again to base results of a speculative and experimental treatment on such a short period of months might be regarded as reckless. Although there were no deaths from covid in the groups there were deaths from circulatory issues. There were also significantly more severe systemic adverse effects in the vaccine over the placebo groups. This is passed off as non significant. The study was funded by the company that has subsequently more than doubled its profits to 42 billion which for most people would raise serious issues of conflict of interest and the susceptibility to bias in the interpretation. Of course this has recently been borne out by revelations about methodology and interpretation. (See: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33652582/ and https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635 ) But perhaps even more importantly, the complacent conclusion of the research must be contrasted with two significant far more reliable real life facts: first the results of the 'Vaers' and 'Yellow Card' adverse effects systems in respectively the USA and UK (20,000 and 1600 directly related deaths respectively plus literally millions of other adverse effects); the second being the evidence of infection rates after one and two injections, and the stated need for a booster, which is living proof that the much vaunted vaccine is neither safe nor effective.