Covid Madness infects Wetherspoon 'Manager'.

In an arrangement with the local council, Tremenheere's toilets are advertised as being available to the public, whether customer or not. I have been a regular, well behaved patron of the pub on and off since it opened nearly two decades ago. I have never caused a disturbance or been asked to leave until now. 

About 18 months ago during the Covid 'emergency' I used a door marked 'Exit' nearest to the staircase to the first floor facilities. A young officious male employee, who turned out to be the manager that day, appeared and arbitrarily banned me from entering for six months for breaking the rule. This seemed out of all proportion to the infringement but I complied and kept away from the place thereafter. After the six months was up I occasionally entered to use the toilets as per the agreement referred to. 

Today (8.12.21) I briefly entered, having been invited to greet a friend but had no intention of stopping. The same manager named 'Matthew' (he refused to give his surname) appeared again almost immediately and ordered me out. He said I was still banned from the premises, which included using the toilets, for infringement of their Covid rules and for being "rude to the staff". 

When I protested I had not been rude and been banned for 'six months' only, and that over a year ago, he said the ban had been extended. He could not give a reason other than his decision to do so. The initial six month ban was totally disproportionate and unjustified, let alone eighteen months. Nor can his word be trusted as at first he denied he said six months. I think it's called 'moving the goal posts' - even if they weren't required in the first place!

The power of being a Wetherspoon's 'Manager' has obviously gone to his head or he has been infected with Covid madness. The only other alternative is that he is motivated by personal animus or prejudice. He has victimised and attempted to humiliate me, in front of other customers for no good reason. 

I told him I intended to complain to the firm about his attitude and behaviour but doubt there is any point. (A previous complaint of criminal damage did not even get the benefit of a reply! I suppose it gets so many complaints it takes none of them seriously.) These circumstances bring Wetherspoons locally into ridicule and disrepute. 

Arn't there any house rules on what Managers can and cannot do? Is there no right of appeal against ridiculous decisions or objective standards for sanctions such as banning a customer? As the firm seeks to recover after the disruption of 'Lockdown', I wonder if this Manager is the the sort of individual Wetherspoons want in charge of their business and customers? He has certainly lost me as one that's for sure!

See also:  https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=hysteria

The tax payer has run up a bill of literally hundreds of billions at the behest of the government on the pretext of a deadly disease, based on exaggerated projections, fraudulent figures and the misrepresented interpretation of them. Dying people were classified as dying from covid when it was actually other chronic and acute conditions. Positive PCR tests have been confused with illness and given a completely unreliable picture that has none the less fuelled the hysteria. The twin peaks that did occur in the death rate, significantly followed the first lock-down and the first roll-out of the 'vaccine' programme. Deaths in these two peaks were largely confined to the very old or the very ill, both in an institutional setting. The lessons from this are clear. Since then the back-log in diagnosis and treatment has caused some increase in deaths, as has the side-effects of the vaccine itself, particularly in relation to coronary and circulation problems. These were foreseen and predicted by experts in the field. The vaccines themselves have proved to have little or no protective effect either to the subject or others. Indeed there is evidence that more people end up in hospital post-jab than those who have refused it. Natural resistance has been found to be widespread but has been ludicrously denigrated. Again figures have been manipulated by only recognising the 'vaccinated' after fourteen days, whilst a positive PCR test within 28 days of death was sufficient to classify the death accordingly. As to the financial fraud, it is admitted by government that AT LEAST five billion pounds went to firms and individuals who made fraudulent claims. But this figure is completely dwarfed by the 37+ billion completely wasted on 'track and trace' and all the other pointless alterations and disruptions. In practice the whole farrago of lies facilitated a huge transfer of money from government coffers to private companies and individuals, principally but not exclusively the pharmaceutical firms which miraculously produced the experimental vaccines, that have not only proved ineffective but actually harmful to health, without liability. Share prices have sky-rocketed and individuals have become millionaires on the back of it. Meanwhile the tax payer and average worker have been lumbered with the bill for decades to come. In other words a huge transfer of capital from effectively the poor to the rich. And all this without reference to the huge amount of social and emotional pain resulting from isolation, even in death. If this does not constitute an unprecedented fraud and scam on the British people, I don't know what is.