I always keep my eye out for indicators of contrivance or artifice in the public relations and news out following high-profile events, particularly those that come within the generic "terror" label.
There is a difference between the genuine and spontaneous outpouring of grief and sympathy on the one hand, and orchestrated and pre-planned campaigns in the mould of those used by advertising agencies on the other. Human emotions can be easily manipulated as we know from our own experience in the concert hall, cinema or pop concert such as that performed by the singer Ariana Grande on the night of the attack. In addition these same emotions can be manipulated by those who plan and carry out the attacks themselves. This does not need me to convince you. It is plain for all to see.
We arguably witnessed the modern phenomenon first following the very suspicious Charlie Hebdo attack, when what appeared to be the prepared meme of "Juis oui Charlie Hebdo" although its gestation can be traced further, particularly with the death of iconic figures. The Hebdo example appeared with remarkable speed on thousands of posters. It leads to the inevitable conclusion that this gesture was already to be rolled out within hours of the event.
By definition the production of a slogan requires unitary and central organisation. As far as I am aware no one has enquired into or revealed the actual mechanics of this. For example who came up with the slogan? Who transferred it to print? Who did the distribution?
These are all crucial details in choreography of terror but it would be hard to believe that it would be Jihadist Militants that would organise such a thing, nor could it be spontaneous and atomistic.
And of course if it was ready to roll, it means that whoever was behind it knew in advance what was to happen.
The same techniques have been employed since, as we have all witnessed, suggesting the "controlling mind" in such things, has the power and influence to operate across national boundaries. Clearly although the violence is ascribed to ISIS, it would be ridiculous to do the same for the management of the subsequent publicity. This has to be a reflection of WESTERN authorities.
So now moving to the Manchester incident, I have already dealt with some of the many 'coincidences', familiar and suspicious features that we have come to expect with these European terror attacks. Both government and media pour contempt on these reservations but never examine or address them. There are so many anomalies that keep being repeated, that only a fool or rogue would not concur there is something very strange - even suspicious - in the official account.
Here I want to concentrate on just one of those suspicious photographic examples. They have a clear message that both Jews and Muslims share a rejection of violence. This must be wholly good mustn't it?
The subliminal message may be less obvious but I would ask you to consider it. It parallels the meme of "togetherness", "love", "forgiveness" and rather weirdly "smiles".
If I give you all the examples I shall get side-tracked so I shall have to resist the temptation.
Of course these emotions are in stark contrast to what might be humanly expected or perhaps more importantly the military action that it propels.
As pointed out in earlier article, in the few days following the attack there were top level meetings of NATO, G7 and Bilderburg, with an American Presidential Middle East/European tour by Donald Trump thrown in.
The following Friday ex-President Obama landed in Edinburgh to give a speech to the Hunter Foundation "dedicated to poverty eradication and educational enablement". One of its 'partners' happens to be the Clinton Foundation and "Cash for Kids". Immediately after the Manchester bombing he tweeted to his 88 million followers, expressing his sympathy and praising the 'faith and character' of those affected by the blast.
Two days later Manchester United midfielder Ander Herrera dedicated their first-time Europa League triumph over Ajax Amsterdam to the victims of the deadly bomb attack.
The Aviva Premiership Rugby Final was on the following Saturday 27 May 2017 at Twickenham. In the County Championship on the same day in the same place, Lancashire beat Cornwall. (Manchester of course is in Lancashire)
The Manchester Run - a huge local charity event - was organised for the following Sunday (26th).
Call me old fashioned but these are some very BIG timing coincidences!
So in Thursday's edition of the London Times there was this photograph of two young and beautiful women sub-titled as: "... St Ann's Square Manchester where Renee Black, who is Jewish, and Sadiq Patel, a Muslim prayed for victims..."
I have searched in vain on the Internet for the actual image and text in the Times (obviously I have the original paper hard copy) but I am satisfied the image below is of the same two individuals from a different source. Note the white rose and tearless emotion!
The photograph has all the marks of a pre-planned publicity stunt, lacking any genuine emotion, however this is not the important point.
What is strange is that the by-line does not refer to the photograph of the two women or say who they are, only to Renee Black and Sadiq Patel in a very stylised demonstration of Jewish/Muslim 'togetherness'. However perhaps even stranger, the two unidentified women with the incongruous by-line, bear a striking likeness to two of the fatally injured - Eilidh MacLeod and Michelle Kiss. Of course this must be just a rather spooky coincidence.
The follow image and text refers to Eilidh MacLeod, one of the victims who died. It comes from the Telegraph here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/05/23/victims-manchester-terror-attack/ As far as I am aware a reliable identity for the two above has never been provided.
What should we make of all this?
On the face of it the message promoted by these images and slogans are good ones. Who could object to a coming together of what are ostensibly opposing religious forces after a terrible event, or indeed a recommendation for forgiveness, love and understanding? Trouble it is a rather superficial and inaccurate misrepresentation, that in the process denies any possibility of an analysis of the event itself or the underlying psychological purpose of the meme. Just a few examples of the slogan below.
(Incidentally this image link was not deemed safe by my computer!)
Nor are we allowed to examine the religious beliefs promulgated by the religions, or their ultimate consequences. The application of reason to faith is thereby stifled by such terms as "anti-semitism", "hate speech" and "political correctness". Britain has a long history of both tolerance and intolerance, but it is the application of reason to belief and action that is critical if we are to survive this current evil. An ostrich mentality will not help us. Nor can or should we ignore those elements embedded in religion that encourage hatred or violent or oppressive behaviour to others.
I would suggest the event and its subsequent handling have clear objectives, that have repeated time and time again throughout Europe. I believe that the terror and subsequent control of the messaging have common creative sources and controls. Does it not seem a a tad strange that the theme of "togetherness" so prominent in Manchester was the self same logo adopted for the NATO conference just a few days later and indeed for the whole of the EU that Britain is intent on leaving?
The apparent contrast between the violence and the reaction, is there to distance the two and implant the concept that 'we' and 'our' values are superior. We can abhor the sin whilst loving and forgiving the sinner.
Further that both Jewish and Muslim faiths are suffused with these attitudes and emotions. (Christianity meanwhile is relatively side-lined) whilst any serious examination of illiberal beliefs and actions in the two (or three) cultural and political spheres and territories can be skimmed over with aplomb - even a bomb! The inherent hypocrisy and egotism embedded in the reaction to these events is impossible to ignore.
However our opposition (note not hatred) is directed to the organisation labelled ISIS or Daesh. This is the camouflaged and real objective, because the terror meted on the streets justifies both domestic and foreign policy objectives aimed not only against ISIS but paradoxically those that are also opposed to it - namely Syria and Russia.
Note the speed with which this line was pursued at NATO and the G7, and undoubtedly Bilderburg also, where the real business strategy is agreed. And what is the real consequence of all this, which we are told was being pushed by the USA despite its President's diffidence? Well of course further military intervention in Syria and supporting an Israeli objective of destabilisation and domination whilst building up tensions with Russian and Iran that risk all-out war.
Thus the populations of the west are herded in a miasmatic mix of pop sexuality, emotional grief, love and smiles, whilst the real power-brokers and decision-makers advance towards their political, territorial and natural resources goal unopposed by their respective electorates.
Note below the prominance of the heat blankets and the slogan on the bus.
One of the claimed missing, presumed injured or dead, had actually been murdered four years previously!
"Mum horrified after picture of daughter murdered by ex used in collages of 'missing in Manchester'
Also see: "The Manchester Hoax Compilation"