"The Panama Cabal" 'BLAIRMORE'? Was this a private joke or just more of the same? After all Cameron has proved to be just 'more Blair' hasn't he, and protected his forebear into the bargain? Does it come as any surprise that the firm concerned - 'Mossak Fonseca' - was founded by Jurgen Mossak in 1977, the son of Erhard, a member of Hitler's Waffen SS, that ran his death camps! He apparently fled to Panama and worked for the CIA in 1947. (See: Operation Paperclip) ('Mossak' is also strangely only one  consonant removed from 'Mossad' as it happens) Is it any wonder I have labelled this whole business - part of a much more vast scandal of 'shell companies' designed to launder drug and crime money, beside avoiding tax - the 'Panama Cabal'?  I don't know! Fathers and Sons! "Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation." Exodus 34:7 See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-36002759 Panama papers: Mossack Fonseca offices in El Salvador raided From 'Daily Pickings' here: Critical Thinking info@freecriticalthinking.org  Behind the smokescreen of Panama

Daily Pickings is a blog on issues and events related to the work of the Critical Thinking project and invariably references videos, articles, books and academic papers. Accumulation of these materials adds to the "Critical Thinking reference library". We welcome comments and interaction on Daily Pickings via Comments for which you need to be logged in as a User. Critical Thinking is a collaborative, educational project relying on contributions from diverse sources. Hi Tim, In the febrile atmosphere of the Panama Papers PSYOP, we need to be vigilant; what is happening under our noses while we look the other way? In the UK, the sell-off of the Land Registry is slipping through amid the diversion; ironically, this article is in the Guardian, one of the main outlets for the Panama PSYOP. Land Registry faces privatisation by Heather Stewart, Hilary Osborne and Rowena Mason Government agency that documents ownership of land and property across England and Wales to be sold off after 150 years as state institution A far bigger problem are so called free trade agreements which are little to do with trade but are weapons of wealth extraction and oppression. Food safety standards are under constant attack around the globe and, like the TransPacific Partnership (TPP), the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) will undermine food safety across Europe. Following Breadcrumbs: TPP Text Provides Clues to U.S. Positions in TTIP by Karen Hansen-Kuhn This paper focuses on TPP provisions not included in previous trade agreements that could affect food and farm systems in Europe if they were adopted in TTIP: -     rules on food safety that redefine the science behind the standards -     new challenges for enforcement of food safety rules -     provisions that create pressure to accept GMO imports -     restrictions on food labeling -     challenges to local food names -     a built-in agenda for future changes These trade agreements not only attack food, health and environmental standards but have a chilling affect on democracy (such as it exists). New Analysis Shows 'Frivolous' Corporate Sovereignty Suits Increasingly Used To Deter Regulation Rather Than Win Compensation by Glyn Moody     Why would investors continue to file these highly costly cases, if the expected success rate is so low? In fact, things turn out to be even more mysterious:     Current estimates actually overstate investors' success rates, especially when it comes to specific types of legal claims. What is more, this rate of success has been dropping precipitously over time -- the exact opposite trend to the one we observe in inter-state disputes in the trade regime over the same period. Sounds of disquiet are even heard from arch proponents of free trade. Yes, I believe in free trade. But here’s why we must protect our NHS from TTIP by Peter Lilley In the meantime, the inexorable march to one world government continues not least with David Cameron spending £9 million of UK government money, on a leaflet to be distributed to every household, to promote remaining in the EU while attempting to frighten the bejesus out of any waiverers teetering towards the BREXIT camp. BBC Bias, Brexit, the EU, Bilderberg and Global Government by Steven MacMillan One the most pivotal speeches that Cameron has made on the EU in recent months, was not given at the House of Commons, but at the shadow British government: the Royal Institute of International Affairs (or Chatham House). The executive body of the EU – the European Commission – is a corporate partner of Chatham House. The majority of the major political figures in the West support Britain staying in the EU, including Barack Obama, Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson. This is because the EU is far more than just a union in Europe; it’s a stepping stone towards global government. The elevated cattle are shepherding humanity into slavery, it is time for the rest of us to make their task impossible - withdraw consent. -------------------------------- To find out more about the Critical Thinking project go to freecriticalthinking.org If you want to Comment on today's Daily Pickings go to: http://freecriticalthinking.org/daily-pickings Raise awareness of issues ignored by the mainstream media and share information by forwarding this email to a friend, colleague or family member who can subscribe to the Critical Thinking mailing list to receive Daily Pickings: http://www.freecriticalthinking.org/subscribe Added on the 11.4.2016 from same source: Panama ripples around Rothschild Daily Pickings is a blog on issues and events related to the work of the Critical Thinking project and invariably references videos, articles, books and academic papers. Accumulation of these materials adds to the "Critical Thinking reference library". We welcome comments and interaction on Daily Pickings via Comments for which you need to be logged in as a User. Critical Thinking is a collaborative, educational project relying on contributions from diverse sources. Hi Tim, Ultimately, everything that happens links back to the political economy controlled by the Rothschild led Structural Elite. The Rothschild Conspiracy Explained in 4 Minutes (video) In the case of the Panama Papers, we may never know the source of the leak but apparently some Mossack Fonseca papers were sold to Süddeutsche Zeitung some two years ago and distributed to US, UK and Iceland authorities. James Corbett reveals more of the background detail: Sunday Wire: The Secret Origins of the Panama Papers James joins Patrick Henningsen of Sunday Wire to discuss the Panama Papers, from the WNYC hit piece on Corbett’s “counterintuitive conspiracies” to the mainstream propaganda suggesting Russia’s involvement in the leak. But as the controlled journalists of the MSM start pointing the finger at Putin, we examine the story that no one else is discussing: the pre-Panama Papers leak of info from Mossack Fonseco that was sold to the German government two years ago. As Daily Pickings has suggested previously, the Panama Papers provide further justification for a global taxation agreement on the road to one world government. An agreement was signed by 51 countries in 2014 but not, surprise, surprise, by Panama. The One Sentence Summary of the Panama Papers by James Corbett Another interesting connection reveals itself in an almost completely unknown treaty that was signed in 2014. Reported on in only the most obscure corners of the internet, the “multilateral competent authority agreement” was signed by 51 countries at the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes in Berlin in October 2014. The MCAA sets out standards for sharing tax information between signatory countries and the types of data to be shared, including account balances, interest, dividends and sales proceeds from financial assets, not just from corporations, trusts and foundations, but from any individuals holding assets in any signatory nation. Various strands of this story reveal the Rothschild connection; Corbett highlights a Financial Times report on Rothschild defending Poroshenko, the US imposed president of Ukraine. As a matter of principle, we never comment on individuals or client relationships, but on this occasion we have been authorized by our client to confirm that Rothschild Trust has been appointed by Mr Poroshenko as trustee of a blind trust to hold his shares in Roshen [Mr Poroshenko's chocolate and confectionary business]. This follows over 12 months of extensive preparation, and the relevant trust deed was signed on 14th January 2016. The trust has been modelled on international standards for politicians requiring trusts to hold their assets while they are in office. We know of the symbiotic relationship between banking and intelligence services and the Panama Papers have PSYOPS written all over them. We can either follow this story wheremedia direct our attention or we can think smart and undermine the system of our own enslavement. Critical Thinking presentation at the BIRKBECK OPEN DISCUSSION SOCIETY, on 12th February 2016 (51 minute video)