CHARLIE KIRK KILLING.
The FBI is either incompetent or corrupt. You choose.
28.9.2025:
Analysis Solves Kirk Case—Evidence Points Away From Robinson’s Position https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLiv8MAzw9s A very thorough analysis.24.9.2025:
From the very beginning, everything shouted an organised conspiracy killing by experts, including the obligatory deflection and cover-up. The visual clues, the circumstances surrounding it and the way the crime scene was treated after the event, all pointed to a professional hit and away from the official narrative. This is very dark and disturbing territory but the most recent revelations eminating from amateur footage and public participation, now prove the official story is a contrived pack of lies, as I had suggested in my first article here: https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-killing-of-charlie-kirk-considered.html What is more, everything points to a 'Deep State' operation with Israeli involvement. Needless to say this could not happen without American SS involvement. We are undoubtedly back in JFK and 9/11 territory!
Frontal shot ruled out!
I am no ballistic or forensic expert, but even I could see the injury inflicted on Charlie Kirk's neck could not have come from a sporting rifle and bullet of the sort alleged, leaving aside all the obvious problems associated with it. (The youth and inexperience of Robinson; the fact that only one shot was fired; the cartidge left in the rifle with three incriminating others; why a prone shooter was not quickly identified; video that runs counter to the story and the implausiblity of it on multiple levels; why and who operated the camera to pan and follow the suspect but not show him prone or shooting; the fact that the rifle had to be dismantled and reassembled with likely consequences for the shot; how did he reassemble if he left the screwdriver onthe roof?; the dubious photo of the weapon in an unmentioned cardboard box with no sign of the towel it was supposedly wrapped in; the clearly fake 'conversation' that emerged and the suspicious way he gave himself up only 33 hours later; etc. etc.)
Body reaction gives clues
The reaction of Kirk's body to the violent impact and the injury itself has been recorded on video and publish on YouTube and other platforms, though it usually cuts short of the most gory section. It is therefore truncated on grounds of decency but what is left is still revelatory. It proves the shot came from Kirk's right (the viewers left) and probably exited (unless retained) to his left. Notably he also collapsed in that direction partly from the kinetic energy transferred. Despite being convinced he was quite dead and unrecoverable, his body was manually carried to a waiting 4 x 4 and thence to hospital. The autopsy report by the medical examiner has not been released but given past history, there is a very big question surrounding its reliability. We shall see. Robinson has been charged and we know how reluctant State authorities are to change their view once stated. The Tsarnaev brothers are the frightening reminder of that!
Screen shots from videos
Below I reproduce numerous screen shots of peoples' videos illustrating the visual and audio evidence. I have numbered them for ease of reference with their internet link. Both witnesses shown on hearing the report state they looked to their LEFT. It is an open question whether or not Robinson's rifle was actually fired or not or whether on a signal it was used to mask the sound of the fatal shot. Of course, if two bullets were fired, two bullets should have been located. Without doubt, if the robinson rifle had been fired and hit Kirk as its target, not only would the injury from the exit wound have traumatic, leaving a huge material stain on the material behind and there is none to be seen, but the bullet too would have travelled in that same direction, leaving a visible hole. There is no such indication of eith ruling out the frontal shot. If there was no frontal shot, Robinson cannot be the murderer. Please note there is additional supporting evidence for the shot from Kirk's right, not only a momentary mussel flash but also amazingly an image of the likely shooter. It should also be noted that at least two or three addition bodies, presumably sharp-shooters, have been located on the surrounding building roofs.
Likely suspects?
I think it was Scott Ritter who said in practice the MOSSAD and the CIA are one! It is reported there were twelve registered Israeli cell phones at the Kirk event and this in a Morman University? If it was a Mossad led operation, it could not have been carried out without CIA/Military Intelligence complicity, though those in the know is likely to have been a relatively small group. The motivation would clearly be Kirk's criticism of Israeli policy in the Middle East and his large influential MAGA following that could be a rwal pollitical challenge to American unqualified support. Netanyahu's outrage over the suggestion that Israel may be involved increased its likelihood rather than diminished it by his claiming Israeli could not do such a thing, when it is internationally acknowledged it is, and has been for eightly years an assassinating state without equal - though never without excuse.
Ritual and religious 'coincidences'
In my earlier article I pointed out many strange coincidences. Here is another. Kirk was killed twelve days before the Autumn Equinox. His flamboyant memorial service, a mixture of revivalist mission and political rally to thousands, and his massive funeral cortege, were either side of the Autumn Equinox. Coincidence? Unlikely. It might be thought his body was embalmed and buried with undue haste given the fact that he was the victim of a murder, whose injuries - like Kennedy's - could provide invaluable information. Similarly the crime scene itself was both treated cavalierly and contaminated following the attack and then hastily cleaned up remeniscent of other suspicious events such as the accident that carried off Princess Diana. The aftermath remembrance is as important as the event itself. It reinforces the official narrative - in this case the evil left/liberal forces aligned against Israel and making America great again - whilst channelling the grief and dismay in the chosen direction. We see the same orchestration time after time, whilst the truth about the event is strictly controlled and obfuscated.
Jewish New Year!
In addition to the Equinox, important in the ritual calender, it is also the twenty-second of the month - that significant 22 again. In addition it happens to be the last day of the Jewish Year and a day of preparation for Rosh Hashanah ("Head of the Year") which commences this evening. What better way to start the new year than "being rid of that turbulant priest". The leaders of the Israeli State are undeniably pathological killers, for which one more, however prominent would not present a problem if it was thought to further their geo-political aims.
SCREEN SHOTS
I may add some additional comments to them later. In the mean time the original videos can be accessed as indicated.
1. Charlie Kirk got shot at 12.23 PM. The Jerusalem Post - the first newspaper to report it - did so at 11.58 AM. That's 25 minutes BEFORE it happened, 8000 miles away.! Now explain THAT one.
NSA Detected 12 Israeli Registered Cellphones at the site of the Kirk Shooting. This was shared with the WH and the administration w/ this info are "really freaked out".
Is Manipulated Evidence Derailing the Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation? with Zeb Boykin
16.3
16.5
16.6
16.7
16.8
16.11
16.13
4.8
4.14
4.15
15.6
15.9 What is he placing in his left back pocket? It wasn't there when he jumped the table. Has he picked up a gun or something else?
15.13
15.14
15.21
"Standing immediately in front" " ten or fifteen feet away", this (still emotional) un-named witness describes what he saw. Note where he places his RIGHT hand (representing Charlie Kirk's LEFT side) whilst he states (verbatim) "I heard a loud crack and as soon as I thought that I saw Charlie's neck explode." The four screen shots are in sequence. They definitely indicate he saw the Right hand side of Charlie's neck explode, not the left. That is unless he is MIRRORING the injury. Why does the interviewer not clarify this fundamental issue?
As we should all be aware, it is not the entry point of a bullet but its EXIT point that causes the damage. Thus nothing could be of greater significance than on what side of his neck he witnessed what he describes as "an explosion". If the bullet came from the front as is claimed, the physiological damage would have been at the back of the neck on Charlie's left hand side. If it came from left or right, the OPPOSITE side of the neck would evidence an 'explosion'.
Unless embedded in soft tissue or bone, virtually impossible in this case, the bullet would continue its trajectory and cause damage to anything, human or otherwise, in its way. Why has there been no clear statement regarding the recovery of the bullet and where it was located, which would provide the clearest evidence of its direction of travel and thus where it came from? If coming from the front, it presumablly passed through the linen or canvass backing to the tent leaving a HOLE. I can find no reference to this anywhere. Why?
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
61.C This has been put down to his neckless. If so why was it not recovered? I believe it is more likely to be semi-fluid brain matter forced by cavitation pressure within the skull out through the bullet entry hole, the point of which can be seen above the right ear! If the exit point is the mark on the lower left side of his neck (see below) the trajectory of the bullet must have been from a very high angle (45 degrees?) - possibly a drone using on-site laser targeting?
61E The drone flies over (Note time)
61F A drone or a bird?
6.2
5.3
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.12
Clearly this witness thinks the gunshot noise comes from his LEFT. He is not alone.
10.7
10.9
19.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y10B2GUMiD0 @ 54 mins Long held shot (2.40 mins) before the cameraman could have known this was the escape root of alleged shooter. Suspicious! Note a pyramid and obelisk in shot. Cameraman says "What ever this building is right here these are all over it , actively clearing this building, looking through every storage shed. Something's going down here. Looking like this might have been a sniper outpost up here on this building possibly cuz that would be the only spot to reach down to the courtyard and the cops are up here searching every nick and cranny of this building." Signs in distance of police in alleged shooting position. (See below)
Where are my 21 images gone?
Bryan Kohberger. Idaho killer.
1.10.2025:
26.2
26.4
26.5
26.6
27.2 The only (available) i-Phone image of 'gun man' on the roof.
27.3 Image taken six hours after shooting at near-by 'Dairy Queen'. Note clothes and absence of abrassions on arms plus relaxed demeanour.
28.2 Similarly in this image where he is allegedly accessing the roof with a rifle secreted under his clothes, the cap appears to lack the two white markings. Different cap or different person? Apologies the screenshot has a partly obscuring logo.
27.4 'Shooter' caught running across roof immediately after shot fired.
'The LEGEND OF ZELDA series centers on the various incarnations of Link, a courageous young man of the elf-like Hylian race, and Princess Zelda, a princess within the bloodline of the goddess Hylia, as they fight to save the land of Hyrule from Ganon, an evil warlord turned demon king who wishes to use the Triforce, a sacred relic that can grant any wish its user desires when complete, to remake the world in his own dark image.'
'Happy 39th Birthday to The Legend of Zelda which released on February 21st, 1986!'
29.1
29.2
29.3
29.4
29.5
29.6
30.2 What appears to be bullet or laser targeting immediately before bullet hits (next)
30.3 Note crowd has not had time to react although Kirk has been hit.
31.2 This is the guy who afterwards removed the camera behind Charlie. For some inexplicable reason, after Charlie was shot, he repositioned himself here, on the other side of the underpass, ostensibly to film Charlies body being carried to the awaiting, earlier located 4 x 4 in which he was transferred to a nearby hospital, although clearly dead. Why no attempts were made to render First Aid at the scene has not been explained. In the video from which this still is taken, Jason Goodman suggests this could have been a location for firing an high-powered air pistol, the trajectory and velocity of which appear to accord. Andrew Kolvert
32.1
32.2 It is difficult to tell whether the 'smudge' is blood or more likely a raised arm in the crowd given next sequential shot.
32.3 Note red mark on T-shirt to the right. Does this mark the path of the bullet?
32.4: Running on the roof from a different angle to the one published by FBI two days after. Again strangely casting no shadow.
32.5
32.6 Partly obscured by Tyler Robinson's head but it is very difficult to reconcile this with the next shot as it qould have been obscured by the trees. It appears to be a quite different section of the roof. We have here TWO DIFFERENT EXIT POINTS - clearly impossible unless taken on different days!
32.7 The above video obviously of a section of the roof beyond the trees!
32.8 Weapons very evident. What was the status of the men who rushed to carry him off. Personal body guards, police, FBI or military?
32/9 Man in white touches hat.
32.10 Immediately following man in black behind outstretches arm
33.2 A very big coincidence...
32.13 The operation control vehicle leaving the scene immediatly after shooting.
32.14 Note blacked-out windows. Image on door appears to match Robinson's alleged T-shirt!
32.15 George Zinn, as Jewish man, who reacted in a pre-programmed way, claiming responsiblity and allowing assassin to escape, who also happed to be on site at 9/11 and Boston Bombing???? All too contrived.
32.16 Did the shot come from somewhere up there? If so where?
34.2: Car taking off at 12.46
34.4: Car leaves parking lot.
34.5: Car pulling in @ 12.44
34.6: Car leaving (top left)
35.2
35.4 Arm signal same instant shot fired (note reaction of man in white)
35.6 Milliseconds later bullet hits.
35.7
35.8
36.1 From:
36.2 Neckless still in place. Evidence of fluid burst above his right ear.. Exiting bullet causing shirt to rise up as it leves on downward path from his right to left. In the face of this clear evidence, how can the prosecuting authorities stick to their claim the bullet came from the front 150 yards away?
37.1 From:
37.2
37.3: @ 19 26
"Stays there until 19.39." "Second appearance is 20.24. He will stay there until 20.48" But is he seeing something that isn't there?
39.1 From:
39.2 From: House cam capture of allegedly Robinson dragging his right leg because of concealed rifle!
39.3 Ditto.
40.1 From:
40.2
40.3
40.4
40.6
40.7
40.8
Clearly false information in this video posted 4 hours ago. (Now 00.40 7.10.2025) Why? "From the top of the Losee Centre, just a few hundred feet from the stage, they found what they were looking for, a 39 and roo 6 Mauser bolt action rifle, engraved with political slogans, along with palm prints and sneaker impressions. The evidence pointed directly to one man, 22 year old Tyler Robinson."
41.3 and reads it for about 6 seconds
41.4 Six seconds after replacing i-phone his arms rises to his glasses. From other video we know this is when he switches their camera on.
41.5 Blue shirt man walks past. Man in black raises arm (signal)
41.6
42.3 Turns out that the last man to ask Kirk a question about gun violence was a 29 year old jewish maths student named Hunter Kozak the son of a top executive of the Jimmy Kimmel Show, briefly taken off air for a related Donald Trump joke.
42.4
42.5
42.6 Unemotional when questioned about it:
42.7 Kozak's mother and father.
42.8 Steve Kozak, Hunter's dad. Yet another 'coincidence'. Was the last question on gun control curated by media-connected insiders?
42.9 'Like father, like son'. (Strangely something of a 'Tony Soprano' look-a-like!)
43.2 Tyler Robinson spotted in background at 12.15 pm?
43.3 Starts walking off to left.
43.4 Man in white T shirt immediately after takes something from location!
43.5
43.6
43.7 Walks off.
43.8 Goes towards building whilst security guy or policeman on right checks phone? All this just x mins before fatal shot when Robinson is meant to be on the roof preparing to shoot!
43.9 Hard to spot but dot (drone) flies over?
43.10
43.11 Up and to left of cursor
43.12
43.13 Enlarged. Dead centre. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kW074gGEn90 Rocket drones tested in Utah: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55NMmC9OIZ4
44.2
44.3
44.4
44.7 Man in black turns on spectacle camera.
44.8 Man in black checks watch
44.9. Hand signaller looks behind him (in direction of the shooter?)
44.10 Touches left shoulder
44.11 Note rectangular device on shoulder under shirt
44.12 Checks watch again
44.13
45.1 From: https://x.com/i/status/1976469728345440719 Looks like a gun to me!
45.4
45.7 Muscular, athletic right-handed man 25 to 30, dark hair, glasses, running in a due southerly direction (shadows at 12.30)
45.8 Camera location (but I can't spot him here - has he gone?)
46.2 Cerebral fluid being ejected from the area of Kirk's right temple.
46.5 He keels over, back and to his LEFT, wholly consistent with a projectile from his right - NOT front or LHS.
47.3
47.4
47.5
47.8
47.10 Sound of shot reation: Precisely three (3) seconds from arm signal.
48.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZB2WyUWslQ The 'arm sign and shot from a distance:
49.2 Two seconds later bullet impacts. Note force shifts Kirk to his LEFT.
49.3
50.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKbzilIMlvM Is the cerebral fluid eminating from the bullet entering top right (right temple) or bottom left (lower right neck)? Note swelling right temple.
50.2 Then immediately the ejection of brain matter and verebral fluid from that site.
50.3 Which is ejected to Kirk's rear right
50.5 Whilst Kirks head is forced to his left and back. If the red spot and injury issuing blood was on the left side of his neck, it suggests a steep downward gradient of the bullet, either from the top of adjacent building or from an aerial platform, probabably utilizing some form of laser targeting for accuracy.
50.6
50.7 Is this even 5'9" Robinson?
51.1 From: On or off?
51.2 Arm 'signal'
51.3
51.4 Reflexes with shot
51.5 Turns glasses back on or off over Kirks body after he has pushed him off chair. Given amazing synchronisity with arm signal and shot, it certainly suggests he either conducted the shot or was aware it would happen in that instant. If he was turning the camera ON it was to capture that interval, 3 seconds max, of time, or more likely given other cons down, was to ensure the moment was NOT captured, as it did not support the proposed false explanation of events.
51.6
51.7
52.2
52.3
52.4
52.5
52.7
52.8 Twigg or some unidentified young male? The video appears appears to track, so who took it? UVU security?
53.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKE7IYgtFxo
53.4 flips lanyard. Who or what is he looking at? That's a pre-arranged signal or I'm an Easter bunny.
53.5 two minutes to shot, camera back up
53.8
53.9 Mic and necklace
53.10 Man in top left corner not visible before kick-off
53.12
54.3 Man in black glasses appears to raise his right arm
54.4
54.5 Note man top left with moustache
54.6
55.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXaPy30-Y_o What's this???
55.2
55.3
55.4
55.5 Moments before shot, car boot opens!
55.6
55.7
55.8 Milliseconds to shot
56.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znVj061XJKg
58.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQnv68THM2U
59/1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATrA5eXCIPU
60.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vFvZlDzUcs
61.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hWOiHtp8rY
62.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U--7Zta4ylY Demonstable lies regarding Micky McCoy (Kirk's Chief of Staff) reaction to the shooting on the "Charlie Kirk Show" 26.10.2025 (for so it is)
Andrew Kolvet in the chair. Blake Neff on the right. Sam Parker video of McCoy walking off after shooting. Neff says it was "extremely disgusting attack" (meaning the McCoy not Kirk) and then goes on to make claims that are demonstrably untrue.
63.4
63.5
63.6 tyler Robinson spotted 12.15 pm on balcony eight minutes before shot sounded. Walks off:
63.8 All wear brown shoes with white soles? Issued bodyguard kit?
64.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29uZn9CG1HQ Distinctive arm gesture???
64.2 Is that the outline of a figure on the right of the Osee Centre?
64.3 Note three indestinct figures on balcony, one sitting extreme left.
64.4 Balcony fills
64.5 12.07 Charlie arrives. He has precisely 16 minutes to live!
64.7 Again centre filming Kirk
48/9 Balcony full
46.10 Figure and shadow (?) on empty section of balcony
64.11 figure walks to left
64.13 Now seen just above time dot before he disappears from view.
64.14 Micky extreme right
64.15: the balcony at 12.12
65.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zVAoARLhe8
66.1 From: In less than a second after shot he turns and walks off and shows no interest in what has happened to his 'best friend' and mentor. Nor does he show, as claimed by his Pastor father, that he devotes his time to organising the response 'covered in blood'. Instead he just keeps walking into the distance to an unknown destination, apparently calling both his father and Kirk's wife on the way. Who else he might have contacted or spoken to is unknown.
66.2 Bullet hole in tent?
66.3
66.4
67.1 From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hso3pC604_w&t=302s The most likely shooter's location. (Something I have always thought if it wasn't from a drone)
67.2 See arrow
67.3
67.4
67.5 Running man appears about 12 seconds after shot (Arrow curser) (From Adam Bartholomew's, rather suspect, video)
67.6
67/7
67.8
67.9
67.10
67.11 He jumps through police tape without reducing speed
67.12 and off he runs, no weapon visible
67.13
67.14
67.16
67.17 Note entry cavitation
67.18 Bullet finally leaves body
67.19
68.1 From: Already in position filming with i-phone?
68.2
69.3
69.4
WATCH THIS CLOSELY - SOMETHING IS OFF
As Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a man stood near his tent wearing a thick, bright green hoodie in 90° summer heat - sunglasses on, face hidden.
That alone is strange but it gets worse.
Frame-by-frame: there aren’t one, but two men in the exact same hoodie.
One lingers near the tent.
The other bolts from the scene the moment it happens.
Two identical hoodies.
One shooting.
Someone planned this. The question is who?
Delete this or update your post and clear these guys ASAP. It’s extremely reckless to publicly cast your suspicions like this. You have invited danger and unwanted negative attention into their lives. It’s terribly irresponsible. STOP.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.