Catherine, Princess of Wales (42) announces she has been diagnosed with cancer.
Meanwhile a 'crocus attack' in Moscow.
So the American Embassy in Moscow specifically warned its citizens to stay away from musical events, whilst Russia's own security apparatus knew nothing about it? The usual red flags.
"On the same day, the US embassy in Moscow issued a public warning to American citizens warning them to stay away from concerts because of a heightened terror threat.The four suspects do not appear to have had previous convictions or security alerts attached to their names, which may partly explain why Russian authorities failed to detect the plot." https://www.aol.co.uk/news/russia-weighs-return-death-penalty-120051384.html
Four men were identified as Dalerdzhon Mirzoyev, 32, Saidakrami Rachabalizoda, 30, Shamsidin Fariduni, 25, and Mukhammadsobir Faizov, 19. all from Tajikistan. They were filmed being tortured, presumably in brutal retribution and to extract confessions. Who would not admit to a crime in such circumstances? But yet again I pose the question, were they really the perpatrators or just the usual convenient stooges, in an event carried out by some intelligence organisation or another (Russian/ American/ Ukrainian/Israeli) and for what purpose? You choose.
This is sad news and must be distressing for her husband, children and immediate family. It comes hot on the heals of a number of emotional and health-related shocks affecting the Royal Family within only a few years and the beginning of this. The death of the former Queen and her Consort; Sarah Ferguson, the ex-wife but current partner of disgraced Andrew, Duke of York diagnosed with breast cance and then within months of malignant melanoma; the newly appointed King Charles III diagnosed with an unspecified malignant cancer; the shocking self inflicted it would appear, death of the husband of the Duke and Duchess of Kent's daughter, who was formerly in a relationship with Catherine's sister and Maid of Honour, Pippa Middleton; and now this announcement in relation to Kate herself. It also follows a certain amount of controversy and speculation over a 'doctored' photograph was released of Kate with her three children, in the absence of her husband and her engagement and wedding ring, the former having belonged to Diana, Princess of Wales, who died in a Paris car crash in 1997.
It's a good question....There are few PR mistakes in Royal circles:
24.3.2024: The public, via the media, and 'experts' is being CONDITIONED! The message that I have heard repeatedly is that "one in two can expect to get cancer". In other words you will be lucky if you don't! No one actually poses the question why this should be so? We now have three members of the royal circle diagnosed with a malignant version of the disease. It certainly poses some questions if the information is reliable. Sarah Ferguson back with disgraced Andrew, was the first to report breast cancer and subsequently melanoma, but was seen looking fit and cheerful at the recent memorial service for the late King of Greece, at which Andrew also took a leading role but which William failed to attend. There are some strange aspects to Catherine's stated health status. She had what was clearly her serious operation on the 17th January. Yet it has been reported chemo-therapy treatment did not begin until the end of February. Presumably the six week delay was to allow a period of recovery from the operation. Conversely, if this information is accurrate, it means that at the time her statement was recorded, she had been having the treament for at least three weeks, yet she appears very healthy with none of the usual distressing side effects including hair loss which usually occurs after two or three weeks. She said, "However tests after the operation found cancer had been present. My medical team therefore advised that I should undergo a course of preventative chemotherapy and I am now in the early stages of that treatment. The chemotherapy treatment began in late February." (1 day ago) It certainly gives rise to questions in the mind doesn't it? https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/24108991/kate-middleton-catherine-wales-cancer-trends-diagnosis-youth
Purely coincidental of course.
Those of us who have studied high-profile events with suspicious manipulative elements, have noted how frequently Fridays and the number '22' has appeared, either as a date or some other feature. The current announcement that the Catherine, the Princess of Wales has had cancer, by which we must assume is malignant cancer, diagnosed following her earlier abdominal surgery on the 17th January, has happen on Friday 22nd March (22.3.2024) After nine weeks Catherine on Wednesday 20th, recorded her public message that has gone viral on both news channels and Internet, pushing all the other stories off the front page. Last Wednesday 20th March, 2024, was also the Vernal or Spring Equinox.
1.4.2024: The King, wearing a blue tie with boats on it, told another well-wisher that he was “very touched” that she had come to Windsor Castle to see him.
Another told him: “Happy Easter your Majesty, never give in, keep going strong,” to which the King responded: “I just obey my instructions.”
Following the five-minute walkabout, he was driven back to the castle in his state Bentley with the Queen.
Rather coincidentally, Vogue ran an article by Vivianne CROWLEY (no less) entitled, "How To Celebrate The Spring Equinox, According To A Wiccan High Priestess". She is described as a "psychology lecturer and Wiccan priestess who shares practical advice on how to tune into the natural world – and general magic – around you." It is illustrated with the above photograph dated 14.3.2024. Whether intentional or not, the timing of Catherine's announcement certainly has occultist parallels.
But there are other coincidental aspects to the timing of the announce, bearing in mind its very predictable effect domestically and world-wide. Elsewhere we have the more traditional 'Friday the twenty-second event' occurring. In Moscow at almost the very same time a devastating terrorist attack in the tradition mode. Here is the New York Times report verbatim. (It saves me typing it all again!) Note the appearance of '40' again. It is conveniently blamed on an Afghanistan ISIS group that the Times is immediately informed USA intelligence was aware of and of the plan to carry out the attack! Astounding! Didn't it inform the Russian authorities then? It sounds suspiciously like the USA is implicated to be able so quickly to attach responsibility. Rather like 9/11 don't you think?
Also of course Israel has been having a rather rough press over its 'humanitarian efforts' in Gaza. What better way to reignite anti-Muslim sentiment in Russia and deflect from both Gaza and Ukraine, or some other mad plan hatched up in the military/industrial office of the Pentegon? The Russian outrage follows a very Bataclan/Manchester etc etc script but Catherine's news certainly hits it off the top spot. Were the two coordinated? We shall never know but it is worth bearing in mind as world events roll on in their chaotic but paradoxically planned way.
Several camouflage-clad gunmen opened fire at a popular concert venue on the outskirts of Moscow on Friday night, killing at least 40 people and wounding more than 100, Russia’s top security agency said, which would make it the deadliest attack in the capital region in years.
A branch of the Islamic State claimed responsibility, and U.S. officials confirmed the claim shortly afterward. The United States collected intelligence in March that Islamic State-Khorasan, known as ISIS-K, the branch of the group based in Afghanistan, had been planning an attack on Moscow, according to officials.
As gunshots boomed through the building containing the concert hall, one of the largest and most popular music venues in the Moscow area, fire erupted in the upper floors of the structure, and the blaze intensified after an explosion, the news agency RIA Novosti reported.
Multiple videos posted on social media and verified by The New York Times show several people entering the venue, Crocus City Hall — a sprawling shopping and entertainment complex in suburban Krasnogorsk, northwest of Moscow — and firing rifles. Other videos show people running past bloodied victims lying on the floor or screaming at the sound of gunshots, while photos show bodies lined up outside the building.
The shooting occurred minutes before a sold-out performance by the veteran rock band Piknik was scheduled to start. The concert hall has 6,200 seats, according to its website.
A woman who gave her name only as Marina said in a text message that she was standing in line for the concert outside, in the cold, about 8 p.m. when people without overcoats started running out of the building, saying they had heard shots.
“As soon as I heard automatic rifle shots I started running, too,” she said.
The state news agency TASS reported that emergency services had dispatched helicopters to try to rescue people from the building’s roof, where flames and smoke could be seen billowing into the night sky. The roof near the concert stage was collapsing around 10 p.m. local time, RIA Novosti reported.
Russia’s Investigative Committee, the country’s equivalent to the F.B.I., said it had opened a criminal case into a terrorist act and dispatched its investigators to the site. RIA Novosti said that a special police unit was working inside the building.
So convenient?
Mykhailo Podolyak, a top adviser to Ukraine’s presidential office, said in a video statement that “Ukraine has absolutely nothing to do” with the attack. John F. Kirby, a spokesman for President Biden’s National Security Council, told reporters that the White House had “no indication at this time that Ukraine or Ukrainians were involved.”
The attack appeared to be one of the deadliest in Russia in decades. The deadliest was the Beslan school siege of 2004, when more than 330 people were killed as Chechen militants, who took more than 1,000 people hostage, battled Russian forces in a school in southern Russia. Two years earlier, militants seized a crowded Moscow theater in 2002; more than 100 hostages died in that standoff, after Russian special forces pumped an aerosol version of fentanyl into the theater in an attempt to incapacitate the gunmen.
Alina Lobzina contributed reporting.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.