Veater Ecosan: "The World About Us"

Truly Dark Matter

"God is light and in him is no darkness at all."

Hello, Tim. About 9/11, do you know about Dr Judy Wood (https://www.drjudywood.com) and her research / fight to demonstrate that the towers did not fall via controled demolition (the version proposed for those who didn't buy the Al Quaida US government version). She has produced a book in 2012, "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11", which I am going to buy. She was apparently denigrated and shut up about her 9/11 findings, but some people have recently resurected her works, presumably following the "fires" in Hawai, where directed energy technology has been invoked.

Dr Judy Wood - "Know What it is that You Know that You Know"

I think it goes without saying, that given the billions poured into 'defence' research and procurement in the nearly 80 years since the first nuclear test and use, it would be naive to believe that other types of deadly weaponry have not been developed by the main powers, and that these by their very nature have remained substantially hidden from public knowledge. On one of my Gaza posts I referred to the anomalous 'lightening' images, that are clearly NOT lightening. They could possibly be explained by a rocket taking off, but not a conventional munition from the sky, although that seems to be what is described. In this connection the burnt out cars on the 7th, placed at the door of the alleged Hamas invaders cannot be explained by small arms fire. More likely helicopter fired rockets which could only come from Izraeli helicopters or planes, or some other type of weapon. The strange characteristics of 'fire' events in America and elsewhere, where even alloy wheels have melted, yet the surrounding grassland is unscorched suggest a fundamentally different type of weapon to conventional high explosives let alone placed at the door of natural bush fire. This has parallels with Judy Woods' speculations regarding the Twin Towers (Yes I have listened to many of her talks way back and I don't know if she is still doing them or has changed her ideas) It is certainly hard to conventionally explain the 'dustification', the loss of mass in the remains or the intense heat, both in the towers pre-collapse and in the demolished remnants. The official explanations are clearly bunkum which also proves - if proof were necessary - deception and conspiracy, but it doesn't explain the true cause. I still think high tech conventional demolition techniques were employed (the side explosions in stages can be seen on video as the towers come down and then of course there is the clincher of Tower 7 - but that is not to say some other method was also employed. For example there is hard evidence of a huge explosion coming from the basement quite separate from the aeroplane impacts. The world was fed a pack of lies, everybody knows it but governments, including our own still promulgate and defend them. That tells us all we need to know about the moral state of the West. Unfortunately it tells us nothing about theactual cause or the physical means employed. That is left to people like Judy Woods to speculate about.

Quanta Magazine

dpSeonsort1e1lO0c0gfP4uMi m3tr 0t4 aa4 :cfat3iot64399725219b

Astronomers can’t explain why gravitational-lens images produced by galaxy cluster Abell 2837 are so warped. It could mean that dark matter interacts with itself — or that we need better models of gravitational lensing, reports Sharmila Kuthunur for Scientific American.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/.../many-mirrored.../

If dark matter interacts with itself, it could be far more complex than we realize. In 2015, Liz Kruesi interviewed the physicist James Bullock about the possibility of a rich “dark sector” of many interacting dark matter particles.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-case-for-complex-dark.../

My simple observation prompted this and now I am no wiser!

Tim Veater

Unfathomably we appear to be half way between the biggest and smallest particles!

Sean Sheeter

Tim Veater 9: The SuperSymmetric Creation of Baryons and Dark Matter

1: Dividing the Mo gaugino mass of 359.999519 GeV by 64 gives the 'base mass' of the Bottom Lambda baryon Lob = 5.624992485 GeV. I say 'base mass’ here because its book value is a little over 5 MeV less, though adding the strange mass and subtracting the down quark's mass to the base mass set the negatively charged Xi baryon Xb- mass (same procedure with the base mass works for the Sigma’s as well). After learning there were higher mass Lambdas as well as Xi b-baryons in 2016, I discovered that taking 3/2 of the +charged up together with an electron's -charge gives a total neutrally charged mass of 5.2657225897 MeV, while 1/3 of that = 1.75524086323 MeV. In any case, the actual b-Lambda mass Lb0’ is then 5619.72676241 MeV, while you will find multiplying that combined halving of the up’s mass and charge and 1/3 of the electron’s mass and charge by various factors will give you the all the missing masses in heavier b-baryon decays to less massive states listed by the Particle Data Group.

2: Dividing the M1/2 gaugino mass of 340.772997766 GeV by pi equals 108.4714141334 GeV. So, subtracting out the masses of one bottom and two strange minus charged quarks give a mass 5.73648 MeV more than the positively charged Wino mass of 103.884160332 GeV. In other words, the M1/2 gaugino decays into an Omega (bss)- bottom baryon and a W+ antiWino.

3: Dividing the +Wino mass by the fine structure number a = 137.03599965... minus a factor of 2/p and multiplying by 3 gives a charmed Lambda baryon (cud)+ mass of 2,284.8526238 MeV. Particle Table I gives a far more complicated derivation taken by multiplying the p+e mass by 2^π/2 (making it a 1/2–spin fermion) and subtracting out the -charged electron mass to give the lambda’s +charge, which, after subtracting out the huge (uncharged) 503 MeV factor, gives a final Lc+ mass of 2284.85268768 MeV. Close but no dice compared to a Mathematical and Empirical Proof of SuperSymmetry as the antiWino decays into a +charged Charmed Lambda baryon and an antiNeutralino having a mass of 42.327656301 GeV representing the largest stable mass of Dark 'WIMP' antiMatter which only interacts via gravitational forces.

It follows that this summary of numerical proofs from the extended Particle Table II illustrates that the origin of Material Baryogenesis is analogous to Paul Dirac's analysis of free neutron decay into a proton, an electron and an electron antineutrino. Now Paul Dirac was a dear friend of my late partner A.J. Meyer. So surely Dirac’s ‘Cosmological Large Number Hypothesis’ gave A.J. the genius inspiration for what became the correspondence between the 2-based exponential of the Monolith Number and logarithmic system of the Fine Structure Number outlined in chapter 6.

4: When finishing the transcription of the neutrino and axion sector of Particle Table II I pieced together what should likely be my last major discovery. Here is the original equation for the sterile neutrino Msυ = .01155696195 eV <-- 99.739048924 = Np+e × pi/2! Now just as chapter two outlined The Sixth Class of String Theory, the sterile neutrino represents The Fourth Class of Flavor and Third Class of Dark Mass!!! While the sterile neutrino is generally acknowledged to be dark matter that only interacts with gravity, as far as I know nobody has proposed it’s a fourth flavor. In fact, though I believe it’s commonly known that as dark matter, sterile neutrinos are Not a Weakly Interacting Particle, Wikipedia says it Has to have Three Flavors!? And then there’s this announcement in Nature: Nuclear reaction rules out sterile-neutrino hypothesis - Jan 11, 2023 ... An anomalous measurement from a nuclear reactor triggered a three-year campaign to find an elusive particle called the sterile neutrino. If it’s not weak interacting, How could it Interact with a nuclear reactor?!

In any case, the question then arises as to What particle or particles Produced the sterile neutrino? As Particle Table II demonstrates, first is Gluino Decay into Three Charge Conserved First Generation Squarks. In The Sixth Class of String Theory Inflation Terminated at the Big Bang’s White Hole Radius of 7Nu/12 = 7.18 meters, which is filled with 2^5Nu/4 = 2.44299601544 × 10^76 = Nhh Heavy Higgs bosons. But the entire universal mass during the 3rd AdS stage of inflation consisted of spin 3/2 gravitinos, which are then now massless. In turn, the Heavy Higgs Imparts Its Mass to the Three Colorful StRings of the Gluino, Each Ring of which then Decays into a Sterile Neutrino Fermion to Maintain SuperSymmetric Coherence with the creation of the One +2/3 Charged sUp (plus Two sBottoms) or Two –1/3 Charged sDowns (with One sCharm) First Generation Squark Bosons!!! The first generation sUp or two sDowns (of ½ sUp mass each) go on to decay to a likely total of 3 sCharms, 4 sBottoms and 2 sStrange squarks, each stage of which produces gobs of bosonic Axions to maintain Charge Conservation. Yet axion dark matter does not require creation by a conserved charge as for example tons of axions are produced when the Heavy Higgs Bosons impart mass to the Gluino Fermions, along with the first smattering of a gluon plasma composed of ‘base glueballs’ g^b’ (see last chapter) to maintain a limited period of Mass Conservation.

5: Note that when one looks at a doubly-looped string-at-a-point in Diagram I of The Sixth Class of String Theory one could continuously pass from the counterclockwise spin of the left loop through the mid point to the clockwise spin on the right loop. More importantly note that the boldfaced Double-Looped String of figure 1 UNWINDS into the boldfaced Single-Looped String of central figure 2. It follows that each Set of Nine SQUARKS undergoes COLLECTIVE SUPERSYMMETRIC DECAY into SETS of the THREE NEAREST QUARKS forming THREE HEAVY BARYONS!!! The heaviest of which would be (bbb)-, (bbc)0, (bbs)-, (bcc)+, (bcs)0, *(bss)-, *(ccc)++, (ccs)+, *(css)0 and *(sss)-, all fully charge conserved, where the baryons marked with a * are in Particle Table II and the rest including *(ccc)++ nobody will ever see because the SuSy era is over. In addition, in order to compensate for this huge LOSS Of MASS and to MAINTAIN SUPER-SYMMETRIC COHERENCE, the SQUARKS are CONVERTED INTO ITS FINAL PORTION Of AXION DARK MATTER! I originally said my final big discovery was likely solving the sterile neutrino mystery while I was transcribing the final section on neutrinos in Particle Table II. But obviously the above is a much bigger Final Discovery: The UNIFICATION OF SUPERSYMMETRIC PARTICLE PHYSICS WITH THE SIXTH CLASS OF STRING THEORY!!!!!!

6: For this sixth section we’ll return to our discussion of the three 0, - and + charged Baryons from their three respective Gauginos. The M1/2 gaugino decays into a –charged Omega b-baryon and a +charged AntiWino gaugino, which goes on to decay into AntiNeutralino Dark Matter and a +charged charmed Lambda baryon. Which therefore just leaves Mo gaugino decay to an uncharged Lambda b-baryon and a Sterile AntiNeutrino!

Jacob Dix

Occam's razor. It's most likely our models are broken.