We desperately need a new attitude to health and disease!
"Mens sana in corpore sano"
It always amazes me that people are prepared to be injected with substances without the foggiest idea what it is or how it is supposed to work. The human body and its multiple organs and processes have developed over millions of years to ensure survival and protection from all biological and physical threats. Only when the natural order of things is abused, does it respond with what we term disease. People are controlled by their brains, consciously and automatously, influenced by information from what they regard as credible sources. This is particularly true of medical interventions based only on trust and faith. Is it any wonder that the NHS and its practitioners have taken on the role of Church and Clergy? Stressors to health abound. Some are self-imposed, some come with the territory so to speak, and are outside individual control as for example the air we breathe, where only societal policies can have any benefit. The Covid paranoia and policy has undoubtedly had many serious adverse consequences, but by the same token some have been beneficial such as the reduction in atmospheric pollution from vehicles and aircraft. Road side sulphur dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, significant lung irritants, have been reduced by up to around 40%. The skies are much bluer, less polluted by condensate trails. These are the significant issues whilst the narrative concentrates on Carbon dioxide to divert attention from the real dangers. Now increasingly human health is threatened by an explosion in electromagnetic energy whilst atomic radiation still lurks in the background and hasn't gone away. In the past century life expectancy has increased but it is a misnomer to think of this as primarily a medical success. Rather it results from a reduction in poverty and improvement in nutrition and environmental circumstances. Where these remain absent, life expectancy is still curtailed. Old threats have been replaced by new ones including modern drug dependent medicine itself. 'Iatrogenic disease' accounts for a large proportion of hospital beds, yet still people demand the 'magic bullet. and are steeped in what can only be described as superstition, believing in every announcement, edict and nostrum, that turn out to be not only ineffective but positively harmful. The adverse effects of multiple vaccinations cannot be spoken of or researched. It is a modern day shibboleth that cannot be challenged and woe betide anyone that does as the Andrew Wakefield scandal demonstrated. A similar blanket censorship has applied to Coronavirus. We need to get back to basics, to educate ourselves as to the true causes of ill heath, both mental and physical, to prioritise caring over interventions, to realise that the NHS predicated on money and big pharma is not the key to health personal or societal; that rather it is a reflection of current problems and not a cure of them.
Following from:
European Plans for ‘Vaccine Passports’ Were in Place 20 Months Prior to the Pandemic. Coincidence?
Global Research, April 03, 2021
The 2019 Global Vaccination Summit
Unreported by most mainstream media outlets, a ‘Global Vaccination Summit’ was hosted in Brussels, Belgium, on 12 September 2019. Organized by the European Commission in cooperation with the World Health Organization, the meeting took place just 3 months before the coronavirus outbreak began. Significantly, this was also only 36 days before the now infamous coronavirus outbreak simulation exercise, supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, which took place on 18 October 2019.
An invitation-only event, the vaccination summit participants included political leaders, high-level representatives from the United Nations and other international organizations, health ministries, leading academics, scientists and health professionals, the private sector, and non-governmental organizations.
The summit was structured around three round tables entitled ‘In Vaccines We Trust’, ‘The Magic Of Science’, and ‘Vaccines Protecting Everyone, Everywhere’. Notable panel members for these round tables included Nanette Cocero, Global President of Pfizer Vaccines; Dr. Seth Berkley, CEO of GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance – an organization that has received vast amounts of funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; and Joe Cerrell, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s Managing Director for Global Policy and Advocacy.
Pandemic planning was clearly in evidence at this summit meeting. Key documents distributed to the participants included reports on ‘Pandemic influenza preparedness planning’, ‘A pandemic influenza exercise for the European Union’, ‘Avian Influenza and Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Planning’, ‘Pandemic influenza preparedness and response planning’, ‘Towards sufficiency of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in the EU’, and ‘A “Public Private Partnership” on European Pandemic influenza vaccines’. Across all these documents, the goal of strengthening collaboration with the pharmaceutical industry is repeatedly stressed, as also is the message that a global pandemic was now inevitable.
But none from flu this year apparently! 150,000 is unreliable as everyone, apart from you it seems, knows. First it is not the figure for the year but a running total but more importantly conflates the symptoms of flu with other primary fatal conditions it would appear just to make the SARS Cov-2 look more dangerous. There is a major disjoint between the notifiable disease statistics and the overall suggested covid deaths, reinforcing the view of statistical manipulation for political purposes. It is generally acknowledged that the PCR test, the figures for which have been used to spread alarm and require isolation, are utterly unreliable to indicate either infection or infectivity. Thirty seven billion pounds have been wasted on a useless 'track and trace' system. The wearing of masks, social distancing and banning of group meetings are based on nothing more than guesswork and have caused untold misery and illness. Information on the adverse effects of the jabs has been suppressed as has any alternative view on the efficacy of the policy. The public has been terrorised for no reason and the sooner people realise it, the better.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVicki Neill
DeleteTim Veater Wow so well put, totally agree.
I was just thinking an identical thought. This government is absolutely OBSESSED with, for the majority of the population, a relatively low risk bug, whilst piling up and exacerbating other illnesses which have gone undiagnosed and untreated. This is inexplicable and unforgivable myopia. Now they are talking about two covid tests per week for everyone and obligatory covid 'passports' in order to live a normal life. What is wrong with them all? Are they all utterly mad or is there some other sinister agenda driving this thing? More and more sensible people think so. veaterecosan
ReplyDeleteIt is not that I disbelieve there is a bug that can cause a serious disease but that I am very sceptical about how the risk has been presented, namely that everyone is at equal risk, requiring everyone to adopt the behavioural changes required by law. Nor do I accept that masks, disinfectants, closures, and social distancing have been in any way effective in controlling the incidence of disease. The media has uniformly ignored the epidemiological evidence of all the contributory factors that should have been the focus of control but hasn't been. Age, sex, race, disease and institutional settings have overwhelmingly affected the chances of contracting symptoms and subsequent prognosis but have not been addressed. Similarly the significant adverse effects of vaccination have been virtually ignored. All these factors should have required a much more nuanced public information campaign and public policy. For example normality of social intercourse and business should have been aimed at as a priority, whilst focusing on the cohorts at higher risk, rather than promoting a general paranoia and lock down, the economic and psychological consequences of which may be permanent. The most egregious example of bad policy was in relation to schools and school children. The evidence suggests that lock down policies do nothing to curb the incidence of disease, whilst at the same time causing many other profound adverse effects. Nor should generalised vaccination with substances, proved to involve serious biological reactions in about 3% of cases, be promoted to the low risk groups (healthy under 65's) Vaccination passports with their significant social and economic ramifications, should be out of the question. There needs to be a truly independent investigation into the Covid statistics, as to their accuracy (PCR tests are clearly unreliable) as is the actual cause of death in cases. This should be done in parallel with deaths that have followed closely on vaccination, ascribed to Covid, rather than the complications of the jab itself. Incredibly Hancock the Health Secretary admitted this had not even been thought about or catered for. Unfortunately, so much money (billions of pounds) have been expended by government on largely pointless policy, besides the vested interest of big pharma, a truly independent inquiry into these issues is highly unlikely, and as with 9/11, a largely false narrative and the wrong policy will continue to be promulgated to the general public. veaterecosan
ReplyDeleteVicki Neill
DeleteTim Veater Wow so well put, totally agree.
Will someone please investigate where all the billions have gone in this farrago of lies and deception and who has pocketed the cash? The latest revelation appears to be that the travel-restrictions-busting son of Princess Anne, Peter Phillips was on a trip to Scotland for a firm called 'XL Medical'. It is a 'Private Limited Company' dating from 2009 and based it seems in Burnham on Crouch, although Phillips himself is not listed as one of the four officers. Nor is the Managing Director Ashok Kumar Bhargava
ReplyDeleteManaging Director, XL Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. if this is the same company. It would be interesting to know if this firm has received any government contracts and what precisely Peter Phillips role in it is. https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.u...
http://www.xlrem.com/
http://www.xlrem.com/company/#message
It is a well known fact that fertility in western men has dropped by about 50% in forty years, so the phenomenon, whether planned or not, is already happening. Further the four genetic 'inserts' in the coronavirus include one with HIV homology which may well have longer term adverse effects. The observed blood clotting in both 'cases' and post vaccination, point to the same biological process taking place, that should caution those not in high risk groups to avoid the jab, which suspiciously most governments are pushing like crazy. Why when there is no prophylactic justification?
ReplyDeleteThe blood clot issue was early on, identified as one of the unusual side effects of the disease. The fact that it has now emerged as a side effect of the AZ jab, that has been engineered to mimic the disease itself, is a cause of genuine concern. The fact that it is in a relatively few number of cases, should not disguise the fact that this is but one of the many thousands of cases, both in America and Britain, where other serious adverse effects have been reported in relation to both the AZ and Pfizer products. This information, as a matter of government policy, has been supressed so as not to interfere with the vaccination programme. The 'vaccines' are novel and insufficiently tested, both for short and long-term consequences and by common consent are dubiously effective in either preventing infection or infectivity. There are worrying indications from the post roll-out spike in deaths, that in the elderly and infirm, the jabs may have hastened death rather than delayed it. They are now being promoted to age groups not at serious risk from the disease itself, including inexplicably and inexcusably, children. Those expressing grave reservations have been silenced by Government, media and professional bodies, so as not to 'rock the boat'. Only UK Column in Britain and a few other outlets, have highlighted the unreliability of the official narrative, designed to influence attitudes and behaviours far more than to protect the public from any notional or significant biological threat.
ReplyDelete"Dark Winters" and "Hot Summers". See how words are used to compliment covert plans for social unrest and control. Society is subject to infectious disease manipulation to facilitate a social and economic "reset". The more people realise it the better. Remember, "the time spent in reconnaissance is seldom wasted."
ReplyDeleteDark Winter
Heiko Schöning – Vice president of World Freedom Alliance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obNiPVWzkTI