The CT Is The Key To The Pandemic
Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive” for SARS-CoV-2 infection and being ordered to take off work and self-isolate for two weeks.
To optimize accuracy and avoid imposing unnecessary hardship on healthy people, PCR tests must be run at far fewer cycles than the 40 to 45 CTs currently recommended.
Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
An April 2020 study6 in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero, as illustrated in the following graph from that study.7
By running PCR tests at 40 to 45 amplification cycles, you end up with the false appearance of an outbreak, and this grossly flawed testing scheme is what government leaders are basing their mask mandates and lockdown orders on.
percentage of positive viral culture
Percentage of positive viral culture of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive nasopharyngeal samples from Covid-19 patients, according to Ct value (plain line). The dashed curve indicates the polynomial regression curve.
0.001112 is the death rate
The CDC and ONS say it is 6% of the 66,453 have died only of Covid, no other morbidity so it is 0.000664%
This from 2018 BBC News:
'The rate of hospital admissions in England rose by over 50% in the first week of January to 7.38 per 100,000.'
'Around 5,000 people were admitted to hospital with flu in the first week of January - Prof Paul Cosford, medical director from Public Health England, said: "The levels of flu being seen are high and of course that is contributing to the pressures in the NHS, ***but they are not *unprecedented* levels***."' = ??
Compared to end of December to January 2020-2021:
'On Monday 28 December, 3,075 patients were admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (2 January saw 3,145 admissions)' = If 2018 Covid figures were not at "unprecedented levels" then 2020 is equally nowhere near.
And, it's not like they can claim flu cases are exasperating admissions: Allegedly, there have been only minimal cases of flu in UK this year [2020]:
'The number of acute respiratory infection incidents *in England* was 922 in week 51, compared to 860 in the previous week.'
WE ARE BEING FED (GARBAGE).
Figures for 2016 - 2018
In 2019, there were 530,841 deaths registered in England and Wales.
Using the Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional, as at week 46 (13th November 2020) 529,928 registered deaths in England and Wales.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/totaldeathsin2019and2020sofarintheuk#:~:text=Using%20the%20Deaths%20registered%20weekly,2019%20in%20late%20January%202021.
Pertinent questions still not answered by Government. (And they should be!)
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/june.backhouse/videos/4215616048455360
The government and media just will not give a sensible balanced picture. As stated it consciously promoted fear to secure compliance to largely quite pointless 'precautions' and behaviours that clearly haven't worked or we wouldn't be in a third phase of lock-down, apparently without end. It is too much in the sway of big pharma and doom-laden soothsayers in the pay of them and the great Gates Foundation. It is the general public that will eventually foot the bill, whether in lives or money.
ReplyDeleteThe definition of lunacy is to keep doing something that doesn't work. The lock down measures clearly don't work as we are told they are needed a third time. The rules are plainly ridiculous AND ineffective and should be abandoned. For the overwhelming majority (99'7%) the disease has limited effect. Sooner or later we have to live with it as with all previous examples. Concentrate on protecting the vulnerable, ensure people with symptoms isolate, perfect medical interventions, ensure hospitals are equipped to deal with temporary influx of patients, encourage susceptible groups to take preventive measures, let the country get back to reasonable normality. https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=corona+virus
ReplyDeleteQuite the opposite in fact! In March the alleged death toll from Covid went up precipitously only AFTER lockdown was introduced. It went down when it was removed. Strange but true. This phenomenon has been repeated again now with another in between. There are many causes of death besides the respiratory symptoms related to Covid which are neither novel or much different from normal. It is hard for the public, deluged with government propaganda, to distinguish between deaths caused by a virus and those caused by other factors, including the effects of a lockdown itself. The same problem will arise with the blanket use of an un-proved vaccine, many of the consequences of which may be long term and not immediately or obviously related to it. We have also seen how a 'mutant ninja' virus has been introduced to prolong the iron-handed, inflexible measures, whilst the original one seems to have been manufactured and distributed intentionally, the rationale for which is something far more malign and portentous.
ReplyDeleteThe cull of the old and infirm, the decimation of British business and introduction of Police State continues apace under the direction of a 'Conservative' Government with 'Labour' backing. It is quite clear there is a non-Covid agenda at work here, and that Government is antipathetical to the interests and welfare of the people. The lock-down - actually akin to military curfew - keeps being extended, an indicator of which is the announcement that it is unlikely pubs will be allowed to open again until May at the earliest. How long before over sixty million people say 'enough is enough'? http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2021/01/you-have-been-warned-now-why-on-earth.html
ReplyDeleteMary Cook
ReplyDeleteTim Veater The source is so off the mark, it is difficult to know where to start. Excess deaths for 2020 up to mid December: 71,000. Covid is not a type of flu it is a coronavirus a family which includes the common cold. It is not irrational to take precautions against a disease which, in a third of the cases is asyptomatic. Need I go on.
· Reply · 12m
Tim Veater
Mary Cook No need. Is an a-symptomatic disease, a disease for practicable purposes? Handcock in his doom-laden manner keeps telling us how infectious and deadly the killer disease is. The facts of the matter are there is unknown level of immunity already existing in the population (related Coronaviruses have been circulating for decades); the PCR test on which much of the propaganda and policy is based, is likely only 3% accurate; a positive result means neither that the person is infected or infective; overall death rate (despite increase from non-covid causes as a direct result of policy) and hospital admissions are not much above the seasonal average and both have been highly exaggerated; the under 65 healthy are at virtually NO risk of dying from related symptoms. Need I go on also?
Does anyone believe ANYTHING coming out of government any more? Clearly on the basis of your poll they do. Such is the power of propaganda. Where is the objective evidence that the people ending up in hospital has ANY correlation with the alleged breaking of rules. Apart from the fact that if figures put out by government are reliable all the petty rules have been quite ineffective in stopping the spread of the bug ('the proof of the pudding is in the eating) government policy appears to be spitting into the wind. It claims to be 'scientific'. In fact it is just arbitrary and futile.
ReplyDeleteFleet of ambulances respond to Covid outbreak at Cornwall care home
ReplyDeleteOnlookers said it was 'like something out of a movie' with paramedics wearing hazmat suits, which the ambulance service has clarified as personal protection equipment (PPE) From: https://www.cornwalllive.com/news/cornwall-news/covid-outbreak-helston-care-home-4876749
NOTE: H.M. Government Statement: "Status of COVID-19
As of 19 March 2020, COVID-19 is no longer considered to be a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK.
The 4 nations public health HCID group made an interim recommendation in January 2020 to classify COVID-19 as an HCID. This was based on consideration of the UK HCID criteria about the virus and the disease with information available during the early stages of the outbreak. Now that more is known about COVID-19, the public health bodies in the UK have reviewed the most up to date information about COVID-19 against the UK HCID criteria. They have determined that several features have now changed; in particular, more information is available about mortality rates (low overall), and there is now greater clinical awareness and a specific and sensitive laboratory test, the availability of which continues to increase.
The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) is also of the opinion that COVID-19 should no longer be classified as an HCID."
This was obviously a DISPROPORTIONATE reaction from the Ambulance service from which we expect a RATIONAL APPROACH. It is H&S risk assessment gone wild. Corona virus, a form of flu, is neither highly infectious or deadly in the normal course of events, especially to young healthy persons who presumably staff the ambulance service. If face masks are effective as the government tells us, they should have been sufficient for the ambulance personnel. If hazchem suits were required, they would be required for all persons working in the care sector. This over-reaction was enough to frighten the inmates to death or was it a publicity stunt to frighten the general population. Either way it should be denounced as yet another example of state organs losing their reason and over reacting along with the police breaking into people's houses and arresting people on park benches, supported it seems by government ministers to encourage an unnecessary hysteria.
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid
ReplyDeleteWhat is the evidence that SARS cov-2 is highly infectious? If it is the PCR test the evidence is poor. PCR tests are reckoned to be reliable in only 3% of cases. The statistics relating to death from Covid have been exaggerated and misrepresented. It is estimated that throughout the so called 'epidemic' only about 400 healthy persons have died without underlying other serious underlying conditions. If Covid was so infectious, no one nursing Covid sufferers would have been spared. It is not 'utter nonsense' to remind people that the Government's own expert committee (HCID) after reviewing the evidence early on, did not consider Covid to justify the description of a "High Consequence Infectious Disease". Those that are, are listed here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/911402/20200821_Global_high_consequence_infectious_disease_events_July_2020.pdf It should be noted that FIVE respiratory related conditions are still included. Despite this fact the government still presents Covid as if it still was a HCIF and pursues quite futile policies, that have proved to be so.
ReplyDeleteIt is not unusual for people to die in hospital. To properly interpret these figures, we first need to know if the number dying in these hospitals is any higher or lower than that in a normal season. That would serve to either justify fears or allay them. Second we need to know what "with Corona virus" actually means. Does it mean the primary cause of death was Corona virus, a contributory cause or merely that the person died primarily from other causes, but had given a positive PCR test, which is generally acknowledged to be accurate in only 3% of cases? Third, we need to know the breakdown of sex, age and underlying health status to make an intelligent assessment of the actual risk to the general, healthy population. Needless to say none of this information is provided with the result that it is worse than useless in that it just stokes what is probably unnecessary fear and alarm. Until you report the situation properly, people are best advised to treat it with the scepticism it deserves.
ReplyDeleteDangerous reactions to covid vaccination : https://brandnewtube.com/watch/urgent-news-about-the-covid-19-vaccine_botqwzI8R7UUVY2.html
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/info-by-product/clinical-considerations.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fvaccines%2Fcovid-19%2Finfo-by-product%2Fpfizer%2Fclinical-considerations.html
Authorized age groups
Under the EUAs, the following age groups are authorized to receive vaccination:
Pfizer-BioNTech: ages ≥16 years
Moderna: ages ≥18 years
Children and adolescents outside of these authorized age groups should not receive COVID-19 vaccination at this time.
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
You obviously don't know about Koch's postulates, or if you do, have overlooked the fact that the British Dept. of Health has confirmed that the SARS Cov-2 virus has never been isolated here from an individual, even when suffering from Covid related symptoms pre or post mortem. Nor as far as I am aware, has a clear case of transfer from one person to another been proven. The 'excess deaths' in late March occurred AFTER the lock down was introduced despite the alleged virus having been in the country for the previous three months at least. The majority of it resulted not from Covid but from the mistreatment of the elderly in care homes and other institutional setting. The facts speak for themselves. Despite all the quite ridiculous restrictions, infections and deaths attributed to the virus continue, ergo they don't work. In fact it is beyond dispute they have caused many more premature deaths, and will continue to do so from other causes. That is why you are quite right, there are "lies, damn lies and statistics" and they need to be treated with the greatest caution and objectivity.
ReplyDelete23 individuals in Norway and 10 in Germany die within four days of vaccination. Yet again Tim is vindicated! American Frontline Doctors give the following advice: If you are in a group - basically under 65 and healthy - or subject to severe ill health conditions, the risks of taking the untested vaccine probably far outweigh the risks of not taking it. As it stands, those under 20 should definitely NOT take it.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bicw9IKC5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR07YtliXPeVLfXR5lxhvd7vJ76PI-YirNgIbtxhvMWdu5KNPXnFWGeBAeQ&v=xFntHpk1uok&feature=youtu.be
The very safe vaccine. "Pfizer, too, says it is “actively seeking follow-up.” A statement emailed to Science noted it already recommends that “appropriate medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available” in case a vaccinee develops anaphylaxis."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/12/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions?fbclid=IwAR2NxaVItpI4Nrk5OY1AXs_lDo6PH5lV0BbyPBXKrpCV1QWWiIJDwuQmnSU