Covid Deaths: Evidence of Statistical Manipulation to create panic.
The Conservative MP Desmond Swayne got himself into deep water by challenging the Government's position on Covid in speeches in the House of Commons, and latterly by suggesting the statistics relating to the disease had been 'manipulated'. Calls were made by Government ministers for him to withdraw his assessment, and he came under a lot of pressure to do so.
However, despite not wishing to dispute that a set of symptoms do exist linked to a causative virus known as SARS Cov-2, and that it can be potentially life threatening particularly to the old or those with other serious illnesses, the following unimpeachable sources certainly indicate something very strange is going on.
They reveal that not only have deaths attributable to the bug been exaggerated in certain instances but also that a less than expected number of deaths from respiratory conditions across the board suggest the deaths from Covid in large part, merely represent a 're-designation' of expected fatal conditions. In so far as this is true, a description of 'manipulation' of the statistics, is supported.
As I have said from the beginning of this affair, from the Imperial College/Ferguson modelling onwards, it would seem fair to say that the Government has seemed intent on projecting the worst possible scenario rather than the best and of ignoring completely evidence that either its lock-down policies have had a direct causal effect on fatalities or that much of the much publicised 'hundred thousand deaths' can be attributed to other underlying causes within the context of perfectly normal seasonal variations.
Once these factors are taken fully into account, the deaths attributable solely to the SARS Cov-2 virus are dramatically reduced. No Government effort it seems is being directed towards the aim of establishing a more accurate picture, presumably because it would undermine the present policy and narrative. People should demand to be better advised.
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ALeKk02nMAmgDvIjjkFDj-EFLYYMTaEzGw:1612048811859&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=boris+images&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw_qnm5cTuAhVKThUIHfSdDTEQ7Al6BAgEEAM&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=h2iqcDG5aoF3IM
The following, from two unassailable sources, prove the mortality figures publicised by government and media, are exaggerated and misrepresented, presumably to promote unnecessary fear and support the range of policies introduced, that have had undoubted highly damaging health and economic consequences, whilst at the same time infringing basic human freedoms of movement, association, free speech and commerce.
Much of this has turned on deaths that have been stated to be caused by the SARS Cov-2 virus and now by it is claimed more virulent strains. For this assertion we have to rely on the statistics that government agencies collate and publish. It is now clear that misrepresentation results from three basic causes:
1. Exaggerating the basic number of deaths from a basic miscalculation or error;
2. Including 'Covid' as the cause of death when it was actually either not mentioned or only as a subsidiary factor;
3. By reclassifying respiratory and other diseases that would normally occur to exclusively that of the SARS Cov-2 virus.
Of course other than deaths, the totally unreliable and deceptive PCR test results, the very dubious 'R' figure and other proved unreliable modelling prognostications, have been used to stoke unnecessary fear and support a draconian regime of 'lock-down'.
The two reliable sources to which I refer are:
1. Public Health England:
Excess mortality in England, week ending 15 January 2021
Experimental Statistics
Evidence Service to support the COVID-19 response
Death certificate data: COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death
September 16, 2020
None of 52 contacts of first Corona case in York from person arriving back from China became infected!
ReplyDeletePublic Health England traced 52 people who may have come into contact with the patients, including 45 healthcare workers. The group had also taken journeys by taxi and the taxi drivers were asked to self-isolate.
But none tested positive for coronavirus and no further cases were linked to the first two patients, according to a paper in journal Epidemiology and Infection. The report says little was known about how the virus might contaminate surfaces, highlighting the need for more research.
https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/19050839.yorks-first-coronavirus-cases-helped-doctors-learn-covid/
Janet Ingman I am sorry to learn you suffer from epilepsy and react adversely to antibiotics which might suggest there is a connection between the two. Both vaccination and anti-biotics have undoubtedly saved millions of lives from disease and premature death but they seem likely to have contributed to a swathe of other conditions that the medical profession, pharmaceutical industry and government prefer to dismiss by refusing to acknowledge a causative link but which now I think is undeniable. I believe anti-biotics, vaccines and other drugs have been over-prescribed resulting in a whole raft of medical problems that threaten the very existence of the NHS and cause untold human suffering. Of course the various Covid vaccines are not vaccines in the accepted sense - namely attenuated versions of the bacterial disease itself - but are novel laboratory genetically modified entities of RNA closely aligned to SARS Cov-2, injected into the body via muscle tissue, in the hope that it will generate a T-cell response, should the body become infected with the primary pathogen. This is cutting edge stuff and largely experimental modification of the human genome and far too early in the day to determine what the adverse reactions may be. American studies published already suggest that about 3% have already evidenced serious adverse effects yet still some recommend that children who have been statistically unaffected by Covid, are subjected to this known and other unknown risks. In my view this is not only unwarranted but is positively reckless.
ReplyDeleteEmotional first hand account of caring for the dying in a NHS hospital. Sadly may not be representative of the situation in all hospitals and nursing homes, about which horrific stories emerge, made much worse by the inhumane policy of denying access to the terminally by family members and loved ones.
ReplyDeleteHappy Sunday! If you get a chance, listen to this. Very moving. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000rtx3
Adverse side-effects of Pfizer jab discussed by Dr. .....
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzSzU-eUVcM