Saturday 30 January 2021

 Covid Deaths: Evidence of Statistical Manipulation to create panic.

Political theatrics?

The Conservative MP Desmond Swayne got himself into deep water by challenging the Government's position on Covid in speeches in the House of Commons, and latterly by suggesting the statistics relating to the disease had been 'manipulated'. Calls were made by Government ministers for him to withdraw his assessment, and he came under a lot of pressure to do so. 

However, despite not wishing to dispute that a set of symptoms do exist linked to a causative virus known as SARS Cov-2, and that it can be potentially life threatening particularly to the old or those with other serious illnesses, the following unimpeachable sources certainly indicate something very strange is going on. 

They reveal that not only have deaths attributable to the bug been exaggerated in certain instances but also that a less than expected number of deaths from respiratory conditions across the board suggest the deaths from Covid in large part, merely represent a 're-designation' of expected fatal conditions. In so far as this is true, a description of 'manipulation' of the statistics, is supported. 

As I have said from the beginning of this affair, from the Imperial College/Ferguson modelling onwards, it would seem fair to say that the Government has seemed intent on projecting the worst possible scenario rather than the best and of ignoring completely evidence that either its lock-down policies have had a direct causal effect on fatalities or that much of the much publicised 'hundred thousand deaths' can be attributed to other underlying causes within the context of perfectly normal seasonal variations. 

Once these factors are taken fully into account, the deaths attributable solely to the SARS Cov-2 virus are dramatically reduced. No Government effort it seems is being directed towards the aim of establishing a more accurate picture, presumably because it would undermine the present policy and narrative. People should demand to be better advised.


https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ALeKk02nMAmgDvIjjkFDj-EFLYYMTaEzGw:1612048811859&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=boris+images&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw_qnm5cTuAhVKThUIHfSdDTEQ7Al6BAgEEAM&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=h2iqcDG5aoF3IM


The following, from two unassailable sources, prove the mortality figures publicised by government and media, are exaggerated and misrepresented, presumably to promote unnecessary fear and support the range of policies introduced, that have had undoubted highly damaging health and economic consequences, whilst at the same time infringing basic human freedoms of movement, association, free speech and commerce.

Much of this has turned on deaths that have been stated to be caused by the SARS Cov-2 virus and now by it is claimed more virulent strains. For this assertion we have to rely on the statistics that government agencies collate and publish. It is now clear that misrepresentation results from three basic causes:

1.  Exaggerating the basic number of deaths from a basic miscalculation or error;

2.  Including 'Covid' as the cause of death when it was actually either not mentioned or only as a subsidiary factor;

3.  By reclassifying respiratory and other diseases that would normally occur to exclusively that of the SARS Cov-2 virus.


Of course other than deaths, the totally unreliable and deceptive PCR test results, the very dubious 'R' figure and other proved unreliable modelling prognostications, have been used to stoke unnecessary fear and support a draconian regime of 'lock-down'.

The two reliable sources to which I refer are:

1. Public Health England:

 https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html

Excess mortality in England, week ending 15 January 2021

Experimental Statistics

and



Evidence Service to support the COVID-19 response



Death certificate data: COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death

September 16, 2020





Tim Veater

Sheila Rowe
 I'm assuming you meant 'quote' there rather than 'quite'. If so feel free but would appreciate reference to source if you don't mind. The article was not completed I'm afraid as I haven't dealt with the 'sticks' or listed the psychological and behavioural changes that have been induced, many of which may have permanent consequences. (If only I could apply myself more!) But the intention is there to add.

Incidentally I have been reading the Government's own statistics on the subject of death certification and the designated increase over expected that can be placed at the door of Covid. As always these are complicated and require considerable application. First it has been revealed by the Centre for Evidenced based Medicine that the figure for Covid deaths was factually over-stated by up to a third, that is Covid was attributed but was not the stated cause. The document can be viewed here:


However what I think is perhaps more significant are the government tables of excess deaths here, i.e. actual over average expected based on previous years, here:


If you go to "Death by underlying causes' well down the page, you will see each cause of death represented for the period Sept. 2020 to Jan 2021 as a ratio between the number of deaths, whether higher or lower than might be expected. (You can check out each one by pressing the respective tab) What is important is that causes of deaths from Cancer, Acute Respiratory Infections, Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases, Other Respiratory Diseases, Dementia and Parkinson's Disease are all without exception lower than expected. In other words there is here clear evidence that the hysteria over the number of deaths attributable to Covid may be nothing more than a reassignment of the written cause from one category to another!









Not sure if anyone follows the bernician or if it's 'allowed' on here - but here is an update that has been taken down everywhere: Michael O'Bernicia's latest update was taken down within minutes. Luckily I've copied the text:
COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | We are now in the final stages of preparing to lay the papers in the Private Criminal Prosecution against the architects of a genocidal pandemic fraud, that has all but destroyed this country and the world we once knew and loved.
However, the prima facie evidence we have amassed is so compelling and substantive, it is simply inconceivable that any British jury would not convict the defendants of the multiple murderous frauds alleged.
Without a hint of hyperbole or wishful thinking, the evidence we will soon be filing into the criminal court is so emphatic that it has the potential to expose the complex deceptions perpetrated worldwide, within a single viral social media post.
Our adversaries are now so concerned that the masses are waking up to the lethal nature of 'vaccine adverse events' that they are even pretending a sadly deceased centenarian didn't have the COVID jab, shortly before he died of the symptoms it is known to cause.
Despite the fact that Sky News covered his first dose of the COVID vaxx being administered, a few days before he passed on, the rest of the mainstream media are pretending that didn't happen.
Meanwhile, otherwise healthy people are dropping down dead at the rate my friend, the prolific Scouse polymath, Mark Oakford and I predicted a few weeks ago; others are suffering paralysis and a whole host of newly acquired lifelong or fatal conditions.
Most crucially, the only common denominator between them all is that they had mRNA spiked flu and/or COVID jabs, shortly before their physical demise.
There is also circumstantial evidence which suggests the current batch of shots could be killing as many as two thirds of the over-65's, as the endless stream of post-vaxx deaths in care homes horrifyingly affirms.
I therefore beseech everybody who reads this post to demand, from the bottom of your heart, shouting it from the rooftops, that autopsies must be performed on everybody who allegedly dies of COVID-19 from henceforth.
In the event there is one courageous and honourable high court judge left in this country, who happens across this post, in the names of justice, freedom and right, you must declare an order of the court's own motion to that effect, at your earliest opportunity.
Should such a high court declaration be made, independent autopsies would determine the actual causes of death, rather than merely assuming COVID-19 was the cause, without examining the dead bodies.
The only legislative measure preventing this is the comprehensively unlawful and definitively void Coronavirus Act 2020, which effectively suspended autopsies indefinitely, even when people die in suspicious circumstances.
Nevertheless, a fearless judge would be able to rely upon Lord Sumption's scholarly testimony of the constitutionally unlawful nature of the tyrannous 2020 Act, in setting aside its suspension of autopsies,
On the ground that the families of the departed are legally entitled to know whether 'vaccines' caused or contributed to the deaths of their loved ones, rather than COVID-19, as the prima facie evidence shows.
The judge would also be able to rely upon the evidence we will be filing in the PCP, which will take place, all being well, within the next few days.
As would any brave and brilliant QC, with the connections required to guide an application for such a declaration through the high court, without delay or obstruction.
However, given that, for a judge or a QC to put their arse on the line, they also need to accept that will mean risking their careers, as well as their safety, which few if any are likely to do, the evidence will also be made available to experienced lay litigants, who fully comprehend the nature of the crimes committed and the common law remedy available.
Having said that, we really don't have any time to waste debating the issues or the remedy at hand because people are dying at the end of a needle every day.
If enough of us don't take non-violent direct action, there will be no way out of lockdown for anybody, without agreeing to play Russian Roulette with the flu and COVID jabs, which many of us would never consent to, under any circumstances whatsoever.
Therefore, here is my extraordinary proposal for nationwide non-violent totalitarian non-compliance, under the protection of Magna Carta 2020 and the Treaty of Universal Community Trust:
That every 'authorised person' refuses to administer any 'vaccines' or PCR tests for 90 days, starting the day following the laying of the papers in the PCP.
For the purposes of which, the People's Union of Britain will serve notice on the UK Government Cabinet Office, demanding that the suspension of autopsies be lifted and that all lockdown regulations are suspended with immediate effect, pending the outcome of the PUB's PCP.
The PUB has set aside £10 million worth of cryptocurrency, to offer financial assistance to any NHS employees who lose their jobs and fall on hard times, as a result of refusing to administer flu and COVID vaccines. More funds can be raised, as and when required, which would naturally cover potential legal costs.
Moreover, if what we are alleging in the PCP is true [and it most certainly is], as a result of a nationwide Vaxx and PCR Strike, we would witness a rapid decline in both 'COVID' deaths and cases, much like we saw between June and September 2020.
Thereby proving that the UK Government's 'vaccination' programme is entirely founded upon unequivocally dishonest statements. Fraud-in-the-factum, by another name.
In truth, the motive for the defendants' conspiracy to commit these most nefarious frauds was and remains deceptively simple: to maximise 'vaccination' uptake, both in Britain and the rest of the world.
Nevertheless, make no mistake about it; SAGE is not a scientific advisory committee - it is merely the UK branch of an international, unaccountable, totalitarian, pharmaceutical dictatorship, bought and paid for by the Gates of Hell and Big Pharma's stakeholders.
However, in the most simplistic terms, were it not for their reliance upon Ferguson's Imperial College Model, which fraudulently predicted that 50,000,000 people would die of the dreaded lurgy without locking down the whole world, COVID-1984 would never have transpired.
Whilst most people are currently arguing about whether the government has been lying to us about everything from day one, so called 'COVID deniers' now have sufficient prima facie evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the entire scamdemic is founded upon Ferguson's prediction that 50 million people would die, from a 'virus' which has never been proven to exist, if his lockdown policies were not imposed worldwide.
How utterly chilling it is to contemplate that, in accordance with the WHO's leaked predicted mortality rate of 377 deaths per 100,000 healthy adults injected, around 520,000 Britons would perish if 68 million were 'vaccinated' with both the flu and COVID shots - only 10,000 more than Ferguson's prediction of 510,000 UK deaths in the initial stage of the 'pandemic'.
Despite being up against the clock to get the papers completed as as soon as I am able, I can't end this update without offering my humble and eternal gratitude to everybody who has contributed to this genuine effort to End Genocide Now, on these shores and everywhere.












4 comments:

  1. None of 52 contacts of first Corona case in York from person arriving back from China became infected!

    Public Health England traced 52 people who may have come into contact with the patients, including 45 healthcare workers. The group had also taken journeys by taxi and the taxi drivers were asked to self-isolate.

    But none tested positive for coronavirus and no further cases were linked to the first two patients, according to a paper in journal Epidemiology and Infection. The report says little was known about how the virus might contaminate surfaces, highlighting the need for more research.
    https://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/19050839.yorks-first-coronavirus-cases-helped-doctors-learn-covid/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Janet Ingman I am sorry to learn you suffer from epilepsy and react adversely to antibiotics which might suggest there is a connection between the two. Both vaccination and anti-biotics have undoubtedly saved millions of lives from disease and premature death but they seem likely to have contributed to a swathe of other conditions that the medical profession, pharmaceutical industry and government prefer to dismiss by refusing to acknowledge a causative link but which now I think is undeniable. I believe anti-biotics, vaccines and other drugs have been over-prescribed resulting in a whole raft of medical problems that threaten the very existence of the NHS and cause untold human suffering. Of course the various Covid vaccines are not vaccines in the accepted sense - namely attenuated versions of the bacterial disease itself - but are novel laboratory genetically modified entities of RNA closely aligned to SARS Cov-2, injected into the body via muscle tissue, in the hope that it will generate a T-cell response, should the body become infected with the primary pathogen. This is cutting edge stuff and largely experimental modification of the human genome and far too early in the day to determine what the adverse reactions may be. American studies published already suggest that about 3% have already evidenced serious adverse effects yet still some recommend that children who have been statistically unaffected by Covid, are subjected to this known and other unknown risks. In my view this is not only unwarranted but is positively reckless.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Emotional first hand account of caring for the dying in a NHS hospital. Sadly may not be representative of the situation in all hospitals and nursing homes, about which horrific stories emerge, made much worse by the inhumane policy of denying access to the terminally by family members and loved ones.
    Happy Sunday! If you get a chance, listen to this. Very moving. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m000rtx3

    ReplyDelete
  4. Adverse side-effects of Pfizer jab discussed by Dr. .....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzSzU-eUVcM

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.