Covid Deaths: Evidence of Statistical Manipulation to create panic.

Political theatrics?

The Conservative MP Desmond Swayne got himself into deep water by challenging the Government's position on Covid in speeches in the House of Commons, and latterly by suggesting the statistics relating to the disease had been 'manipulated'. Calls were made by Government ministers for him to withdraw his assessment, and he came under a lot of pressure to do so. 

However, despite not wishing to dispute that a set of symptoms do exist linked to a causative virus known as SARS Cov-2, and that it can be potentially life threatening particularly to the old or those with other serious illnesses, the following unimpeachable sources certainly indicate something very strange is going on. 

They reveal that not only have deaths attributable to the bug been exaggerated in certain instances but also that a less than expected number of deaths from respiratory conditions across the board suggest the deaths from Covid in large part, merely represent a 're-designation' of expected fatal conditions. In so far as this is true, a description of 'manipulation' of the statistics, is supported. 

As I have said from the beginning of this affair, from the Imperial College/Ferguson modelling onwards, it would seem fair to say that the Government has seemed intent on projecting the worst possible scenario rather than the best and of ignoring completely evidence that either its lock-down policies have had a direct causal effect on fatalities or that much of the much publicised 'hundred thousand deaths' can be attributed to other underlying causes within the context of perfectly normal seasonal variations. 

Once these factors are taken fully into account, the deaths attributable solely to the SARS Cov-2 virus are dramatically reduced. No Government effort it seems is being directed towards the aim of establishing a more accurate picture, presumably because it would undermine the present policy and narrative. People should demand to be better advised.

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ALeKk02nMAmgDvIjjkFDj-EFLYYMTaEzGw:1612048811859&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=boris+images&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiw_qnm5cTuAhVKThUIHfSdDTEQ7Al6BAgEEAM&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=h2iqcDG5aoF3IM

The following, from two unassailable sources, prove the mortality figures publicised by government and media, are exaggerated and misrepresented, presumably to promote unnecessary fear and support the range of policies introduced, that have had undoubted highly damaging health and economic consequences, whilst at the same time infringing basic human freedoms of movement, association, free speech and commerce.

Much of this has turned on deaths that have been stated to be caused by the SARS Cov-2 virus and now by it is claimed more virulent strains. For this assertion we have to rely on the statistics that government agencies collate and publish. It is now clear that misrepresentation results from three basic causes:

1.  Exaggerating the basic number of deaths from a basic miscalculation or error;

2.  Including 'Covid' as the cause of death when it was actually either not mentioned or only as a subsidiary factor;

3.  By reclassifying respiratory and other diseases that would normally occur to exclusively that of the SARS Cov-2 virus.

Of course other than deaths, the totally unreliable and deceptive PCR test results, the very dubious 'R' figure and other proved unreliable modelling prognostications, have been used to stoke unnecessary fear and support a draconian regime of 'lock-down'.

The two reliable sources to which I refer are:

1. Public Health England:

 https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html

Excess mortality in England, week ending 15 January 2021

Experimental Statistics

and

2.  https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/death-certificate-data-covid-19-as-the-underlying-cause-of-death?fbclid=IwAR1UBugHPs9DeZiRLune48lWAtGVLq9DTz-18C1y3FvkFPjcF8a_3yuLEkQ

Evidence Service to support the COVID-19 response

Death certificate data: COVID-19 as the underlying cause of death

September 16, 2020

Tim Veater

Sheila Rowe

 I'm assuming you meant 'quote' there rather than 'quite'. If so feel free but would appreciate reference to source if you don't mind. The article was not completed I'm afraid as I haven't dealt with the 'sticks' or listed the psychological and behavioural changes that have been induced, many of which may have permanent consequences. (If only I could apply myself more!) But the intention is there to add.

Tim Veater

Incidentally I have been reading the Government's own statistics on the subject of death certification and the designated increase over expected that can be placed at the door of Covid. As always these are complicated and require considerable application. First it has been revealed by the Centre for Evidenced based Medicine that the figure for Covid deaths was factually over-stated by up to a third, that is Covid was attributed but was not the stated cause. The document can be viewed here:

https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/death-certificate-data-covid-19-as-the-underlying-cause-of-death?fbclid=IwAR1UBugHPs9DeZiRLune

Tim Veater

However what I think is perhaps more significant are the government tables of excess deaths here, i.e. actual over average expected based on previous years, here:

https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/static-reports/mortality-surveillance/excess-mortality-in-england-latest.html

Tim Veater

If you go to "Death by underlying causes' well down the page, you will see each cause of death represented for the period Sept. 2020 to Jan 2021 as a ratio between the number of deaths, whether higher or lower than might be expected. (You can check out each one by pressing the respective tab) What is important is that causes of deaths from Cancer, Acute Respiratory Infections, Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases, Other Respiratory Diseases, Dementia and Parkinson's Disease are all without exception lower than expected. In other words there is here clear evidence that the hysteria over the number of deaths attributable to Covid may be nothing more than a reassignment of the written cause from one category to another!

Penny Coutts

Gordon Bowden, 788 - 790 Finchley Road, Pandoras Box

tS1pofnsosrdehd  · 

Not sure if anyone follows the bernician or if it's 'allowed' on here - but here is an update that has been taken down everywhere: Michael O'Bernicia's latest update was taken down within minutes. Luckily I've copied the text:

COVID-1984 PCP UPDATE | We are now in the final stages of preparing to lay the papers in the Private Criminal Prosecution against the architects of a genocidal pandemic fraud, that has all but destroyed this country and the world we once knew and loved.

However, the prima facie evidence we have amassed is so compelling and substantive, it is simply inconceivable that any British jury would not convict the defendants of the multiple murderous frauds alleged.

Without a hint of hyperbole or wishful thinking, the evidence we will soon be filing into the criminal court is so emphatic that it has the potential to expose the complex deceptions perpetrated worldwide, within a single viral social media post.

Our adversaries are now so concerned that the masses are waking up to the lethal nature of 'vaccine adverse events' that they are even pretending a sadly deceased centenarian didn't have the COVID jab, shortly before he died of the symptoms it is known to cause.

Despite the fact that Sky News covered his first dose of the COVID vaxx being administered, a few days before he passed on, the rest of the mainstream media are pretending that didn't happen.

Meanwhile, otherwise healthy people are dropping down dead at the rate my friend, the prolific Scouse polymath, Mark Oakford and I predicted a few weeks ago; others are suffering paralysis and a whole host of newly acquired lifelong or fatal conditions.

Most crucially, the only common denominator between them all is that they had mRNA spiked flu and/or COVID jabs, shortly before their physical demise.

There is also circumstantial evidence which suggests the current batch of shots could be killing as many as two thirds of the over-65's, as the endless stream of post-vaxx deaths in care homes horrifyingly affirms.

I therefore beseech everybody who reads this post to demand, from the bottom of your heart, shouting it from the rooftops, that autopsies must be performed on everybody who allegedly dies of COVID-19 from henceforth.

In the event there is one courageous and honourable high court judge left in this country, who happens across this post, in the names of justice, freedom and right, you must declare an order of the court's own motion to that effect, at your earliest opportunity.

Should such a high court declaration be made, independent autopsies would determine the actual causes of death, rather than merely assuming COVID-19 was the cause, without examining the dead bodies.

The only legislative measure preventing this is the comprehensively unlawful and definitively void Coronavirus Act 2020, which effectively suspended autopsies indefinitely, even when people die in suspicious circumstances.

Nevertheless, a fearless judge would be able to rely upon Lord Sumption's scholarly testimony of the constitutionally unlawful nature of the tyrannous 2020 Act, in setting aside its suspension of autopsies,

On the ground that the families of the departed are legally entitled to know whether 'vaccines' caused or contributed to the deaths of their loved ones, rather than COVID-19, as the prima facie evidence shows.

The judge would also be able to rely upon the evidence we will be filing in the PCP, which will take place, all being well, within the next few days.

As would any brave and brilliant QC, with the connections required to guide an application for such a declaration through the high court, without delay or obstruction.

However, given that, for a judge or a QC to put their arse on the line, they also need to accept that will mean risking their careers, as well as their safety, which few if any are likely to do, the evidence will also be made available to experienced lay litigants, who fully comprehend the nature of the crimes committed and the common law remedy available.

Having said that, we really don't have any time to waste debating the issues or the remedy at hand because people are dying at the end of a needle every day.

If enough of us don't take non-violent direct action, there will be no way out of lockdown for anybody, without agreeing to play Russian Roulette with the flu and COVID jabs, which many of us would never consent to, under any circumstances whatsoever.

Therefore, here is my extraordinary proposal for nationwide non-violent totalitarian non-compliance, under the protection of Magna Carta 2020 and the Treaty of Universal Community Trust:

That every 'authorised person' refuses to administer any 'vaccines' or PCR tests for 90 days, starting the day following the laying of the papers in the PCP.

For the purposes of which, the People's Union of Britain will serve notice on the UK Government Cabinet Office, demanding that the suspension of autopsies be lifted and that all lockdown regulations are suspended with immediate effect, pending the outcome of the PUB's PCP.

The PUB has set aside £10 million worth of cryptocurrency, to offer financial assistance to any NHS employees who lose their jobs and fall on hard times, as a result of refusing to administer flu and COVID vaccines. More funds can be raised, as and when required, which would naturally cover potential legal costs.

Moreover, if what we are alleging in the PCP is true [and it most certainly is], as a result of a nationwide Vaxx and PCR Strike, we would witness a rapid decline in both 'COVID' deaths and cases, much like we saw between June and September 2020.

Thereby proving that the UK Government's 'vaccination' programme is entirely founded upon unequivocally dishonest statements. Fraud-in-the-factum, by another name.

In truth, the motive for the defendants' conspiracy to commit these most nefarious frauds was and remains deceptively simple: to maximise 'vaccination' uptake, both in Britain and the rest of the world.

Nevertheless, make no mistake about it; SAGE is not a scientific advisory committee - it is merely the UK branch of an international, unaccountable, totalitarian, pharmaceutical dictatorship, bought and paid for by the Gates of Hell and Big Pharma's stakeholders.

However, in the most simplistic terms, were it not for their reliance upon Ferguson's Imperial College Model, which fraudulently predicted that 50,000,000 people would die of the dreaded lurgy without locking down the whole world, COVID-1984 would never have transpired.

Whilst most people are currently arguing about whether the government has been lying to us about everything from day one, so called 'COVID deniers' now have sufficient prima facie evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt, that the entire scamdemic is founded upon Ferguson's prediction that 50 million people would die, from a 'virus' which has never been proven to exist, if his lockdown policies were not imposed worldwide.

How utterly chilling it is to contemplate that, in accordance with the WHO's leaked predicted mortality rate of 377 deaths per 100,000 healthy adults injected, around 520,000 Britons would perish if 68 million were 'vaccinated' with both the flu and COVID shots - only 10,000 more than Ferguson's prediction of 510,000 UK deaths in the initial stage of the 'pandemic'.

Despite being up against the clock to get the papers completed as as soon as I am able, I can't end this update without offering my humble and eternal gratitude to everybody who has contributed to this genuine effort to End Genocide Now, on these shores and everywhere.

https://www.thebernician.net/

 THE FRENCH PEOPLE PROTEST the 'Global Security Bill'.

This is Global Security Problem of Repression by Government in the context of Covid Lock-down.

The French National Assembly is currently examining, with the usual fast track procedure that prevents and marginalises parliamentary debate, a bill called "global security". This law, filed on October 20 by a group of MPs from the presidential party, couched in the best neoliberal rhetoric, aims to provide a new framework for security actions that its drafters promise will be "inventive and innovative".

With these two adjectives, "inventive and innovative", the legislators are probably referring to the three highly controversial articles of the proposal that concern the recording and dissemination of images in the context of police actions. Perfectly in line with the trend of the times – and by consequence, we are sorry to have it observed, with very little inventiveness and innovation – these articles impose a general surveillance for the many and a privileged disclosure for the few, as they provide for ground mass surveillance, air mass surveillance and a ban on documenting police action.

Article 21 of the law authorizes the police and gendarmes to film their interventions by "mobile cameras", to access the images they have recorded and to transmit them in real time to the command post; article 22 proposes to authorize the deployment of drones to monitor public space; article 24 proposes to prohibit the public from disseminating "the image of the face or any other element of identification of an official of the national police or of a soldier of the national gendarmerie when acting within the framework of 'a police operation' and when this dissemination is made 'with the aim of harming his physical or mental integrity' ”.

These provisions add fuel to the flames of an increasingly tense relationship between the police and the population. The police, who we must be clear about, have in recent years been impoverished and forced to mechanically optimize their performance through drastic neoliberal reforms, and who are also exhausted by the fight against terrorism, have been used in recent years as an instrument for the repression of social discontent. Faced with the escalation in social protest, in particular from the Gilets Jaunes, the government has explicitly chosen to demand from the Police a “confrontational approach” in the handling of demonstrations.

As the association La Quadrature du Net explains, the confrontational approach “aims above all to dissuade the population from taking part in demonstrations, whether by psychological exhaustion of the participants (practice of the trapping, blocking or filtering of the entries and exits of the march route, teargassing, body searches, abusive behavior) or by physical violence (LBD, grenades, charges)”. This policy has given way in the last two years to a fully fledged state violence, which caused an estimated 6,000 persons injured, 318 severe head injuries sustained by protesters; the hands of five protesters torn off by explosive grenades; thirty five people blinded by being shot with “flashbang grenades”, as well as three deaths.

In addition to clashes with demonstrators, in recent years the police have multiplied discriminatory, often violent, racial profiling, focused on the population of Arab or black origin; they were recently sent to break in, search and arrest four ten (ten!) year old children on charges of being apologists for terrorism, who were then released a few hours later; and, what is more, they have killed 42 people since 2019, including the delivery boy, Cédric Chouvat, killed in Paris by ventral tackling and strangulation following his "outrageous" attempt to ... film his arrest.

The situation is so serious and beyond control that the Council of Europe through its Commissioner for Human Rights, the European Parliament and the UN have all expressed concern and strongly condemned the disproportionate use of police violence in France. https://www.opendemocracy.net/.../frances-global.../

 UNRELIABLE PCR TEST ON WHICH ALL COVID LOCK-DOWN POLICY IS BASED

In other words the scientific basis of this elaborate government masquerade is akin to building with no foundations.

Mariano Bizzarri

Sapienza University of Rome

epidemiological data related to the prevalence of Covid-19 infection among peoples are likely to be significantly biased by relevant incidence of both negative and false positive results. To sum up:

1) false negative results may be ascribed to erroneous/flawed analytical performances as well by the inappropriate choice of timing (i.e., pick-up of the biological sample could have been obtained at wrong timing: too early or too late in respect to the onset of the infection).

2) false positive results may instead arise chiefly as consequence of extended Ct, far beyond the recommended threshold of 30-33. Other causes of false positive results include wrong timing, cross-reactivity among SARS-CoV-2 and other Coronaviruses.

3) Last (but not the least!), false positive results should be ascribed to administrative errors and malpractices, as demonstrated recently in Italy. A survey reported by Il Corriere della Sera, shows that positive patients, albeit symptomless, have been persistently added in the pool of positive patients, nonetheless they recovered from the initial test several weeks before.

References

Rita Jaafar,Sarah Aherfi,Nathalie Wurtz, Clio Grimaldier,Van Thuan Hoang, Philippe Colson, Didier Raoult, and Bernard La Scola. Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates. Clin Inf Dis, 2020

Y. Pan, L. Long, D. Zhang, T. Yuan, S. Cui, P. Yang, S. Ren, Potential false-negative nucleic acid testing results for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from thermal inactivation of samples with low viral loads, Clin. Chem. 66, 794–801 (2020)

Tom MR, Mina MJ. To Interpret the SARS-CoV-2 Test, Consider the Cycle Threshold Value. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 19;71(16):2252-2254. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa619. PMID: 32435816; PMCID: PMC7314112.

Covid, Lombardia errore nel calcolo dell’Rt: migliaia di guariti sono stati conteggiati come ancora positivi (“Covid, Lombardy, error in the calculation of the RT: thousands of recovered have been counted as still positive”). https://www.corriere.it/cronache/21_gennaio_23/lombardia-errore-dati-migliaia-guariti-sono-stati-conteggiati-come-ancora-positivi-a94fa550-5d3f-11eb-ae12-b118d8ea2872.shtml

Mina MJ, Parker R, Larremore DB. Rethinking Covid-19 Test Sensitivity - A Strategy for Containment. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):e120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025631. Epub 2020 Sep 30. PMID: 32997903.

Zhongren Ma, Pengfei Li, Yuepeng Ji, Aqsa Ikram, Qiuwei Pan. Cross-reactivity towards SARS-CoV-2: the potential role of low-pathogenic human coronaviruses. The Lancet microb., August 2020, e151

 

ALL CHANGE. NO CHANGE!

America run from Jerusalem.

How did it ever come to this? And they complained about RUSSIAN interference in their elections?

Ernst Zundel

ct2Spoaonsor0Shed  · 

Biden administration is looking good!

 Is Britain's nation Covid neurotic or psychotic?

https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ALeKk03rv0Z7fPLoR1x_-ToEW6IVL5yOYA:1611181962585&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=psychotic+images&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwilmrHEyKvuAhWJTsAKHYWUDXEQ7Al6BAgCEAM&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=BMUaTnChlLT7nM

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyQhqoFYPTqDea9TyrqMhrQ

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_RXZ1ZQDv

The only difference between a Neurotic and a Psychotic they say, is that a "Neurotic builds castles in the sky but a Psychotic lives in them."  It is hard to tell whether the British Nation, leaving aside all the others, has gone neurotic or psychotic over Covid 19 ad nauseam.

The neurosis is everywhere to see. The detour of pedestrians. The wearing of masks in the open air. The wearing of two masks. The masks on children. The excessive use of anti-biotic hand sprays (notice anti-BIOTIC useless against viruses) The fear of going out, of shaking hands. etc. etc.

How about the Psychotic? Well the introduction of "Do not resuscitate" may well fall into that category, as might the refusal to allow family members to visit dying relatives or critically ill children. Or perhaps that should just be categorised as utterly insensitive bureaucratic mania?

How can we regard the devastating consequences of Government policy on the economy, on business, on people's lives, or the very real consequences on physical and mental health other than Psychotic? The number of people waiting more than twelve months for medical and surgical interventions has apparently grown from a little over a thousand to more than a hundred and thirty thousand. Those diagnosed with life threatening cancers are having to wait longer than they should when speed of treatment is fundamental to outcome.

This is not only psychotic, it is positively criminally insane as the inordinate numbers of care home deaths proved.  This was not the result of a virus, but of administrative policy that withdrew care and treatment from the vulnerable.

And what of crime and punishment? Was the response by police and courts neurotic or psychotic? Whilst losing 150,000 records of criminals, and unable to quell the mounting numbers of crimes and frauds, including an epidemic of street crimes and murders, it was nevertheless able to mount operations with huge numbers of police to prevent peaceful demonstrations, often demonstrating a level of aggression and violence against even the elderly. If this was not psychotic, what is? 

Arresting people in Supermarkets for not wearing a mask, although the law allows it; bursting into people's homes to check on whether there was a party going on; arresting people for going for a walk or sitting on a park bench too long, how can you classify these actions other than psychotic besides being an infringement of basic human freedoms. Significantly both Home Secretary and Minister of Heath support these outrageous and insane actions by the police. Do you need to be insane to support insanity? Is Government itself suffering from individual and corporate Neurosis or Psychosis. Should it by rights be Certified?

COVID THE PSYCOPATH!

A WHO team is currently in China with the objective of discovering the source of the SARS Cov-2 outbreak in Wuhan. Should be classify this as Neurotic or Psychotic, given that the genesis of the RNA entity is already clear? Is it just another example of 'Distraction' from the documented reality: that this was a laboratory developed and copyrighted formula in the United States Fort Detrick in Maryland, USA, before legislation required it to transfer to Wuhan, still funded by the American CDC. 

There is little doubt that it was developed as a biological weapon and deployed just in time for the run-up to the American Presidential election, where it was a critical factor in the defeat of President Trump. Fauci, who holds the copyright to the virus, was an obvious actor in this Deep State operation, that has had the desired effect in a much wider political and economic 'reframing'.

Sceptics of this story line should note that Fort Kendrick figured large in the anthrax contaminated parcel scare following 9/11, itself a criminal fraud of the highest and most psychotic order. Britain's equivalent is of course Porton Down in Wiltshire. It is interesting to speculate how much is known in that establishment or what part it has played in the identification of the SARS Cov-2 agent and the policy that has flowed from it. No doubt it is up to speed. It is noteworthy that the quarantined-at-Windsor Queen of England's first official visits was to Porton Down to check out progress, nor that Porton Down figured large in the alleged Novichok poisoning incident in Salisbury.  https://www.royal.uk/queen-and-duke-cambridge-visit-porton-down

Interestingly, MI6's agent, Christopher Steele links both the Russia gate allegations against Trump and the Salisbury Novichok incident. Some might think this pushes a coincidence explanation to breaking point. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Steele

We are all aware that using fear to ensure compliance is a psychotic trait, as is the inability to feel the suffering of others. Yes 'fear' was the stated objective of government to ensure compliance with its crazy 'lock-down' rules, accompanied with a lack of empathy for the personal suffering and anxiety they would cause. Old people isolated, the sick dying alone, children terrified, families separated.

The government claimed it was all 'science led', yet the body reputedly setting the agenda and stoking the fear, got it hopelessly wrong. So called SAGE or the "Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies" has lots of people attending its meetings but rather strangely "Permission to publish names was requested from all participants. Those who did not give permission have not been named."  Why would someone not wish to be named on such a body?

At the meeting of the 22nd January, 2020 the following attended: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/888767/S0369_Precautionary_SAGE_meeting_on_Wuhan_Coronavirus__WN-CoV__.pdf 

Attendees Scientific experts: Patrick Vallance (GCSA), Chris Whitty (CMO), Charlotte Watts (CSA DfID), Jonathan Van Tam (Deputy CMO), Neil Ferguson (Imperial), Carole Mundell (CSA FCO), Peter Horby (Oxford), Christine Middlemiss (CVO DEFRA), James Rubin (King's College), Cathy Roth (DFID), Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome), Phil Blythe (CSA DfT), Pasi Penttinen (ECDC), David Lalloo (LSHTM), Maria Zambon (PHE), Ben Killingley (UCL), John Edmunds (LSTHM), Jim McMenamin (Health Protection Scotland). Observers and Government officials: Rupert Shute (dCSA HO), Kavitha Kishen (DfT), Stuart Wainwright (GoS), Tasha Grant (CCS), Samantha Harris (GoS).

It should be noted that the Imperial College projection of deaths proved wildly overstated and Neil Furguson its representative, was sacked in consequence. He appears to have been subsequently reinstated into the government fold of advisors.

It can readily be acknowledged that behaviour is a product of mental activity. It is the summation of knowledge, attitudes and skills acquired by virtue of genetic make-up, environmental influences and personal choice from cognitive reasoning. It follows therefore the way to change any of these attributes, the mind is the focus and target, whether individually or en masse.

Both human behaviour and mental activity have been studied thoroughly in the last one hundred years. Both psychology and psychiatry have received enormous attention, not least by secret agencies of the state. The early work on 'brain washing', using Lysergic acid diethylamide, better known as LSD or 'Acid' by the CIA and no doubt others, has become notorious. But experiments with animals came earlier. Pavlov's dog and Skinner's rats have become notorious. By virtue of psychoanalysis, the study of damaged brains, increasingly sophisticated experiments and cerebral diagnostic machines, the effects of different chemical compounds, besides neurosurgery itself, gradually revealed more and more secrets of this incredible organ and with it the power to influence and control it.

Make no mistake, what we are witnessing in this 'international covid crisis', is not only the engineering of a biologic threat, but also a mass psychological operation to make its intended purpose complete. All the knowledge gained from the relatively new sciences of psychology and psychiatry, of all the social surveys, statistics and understanding of social networks and factor influencing persuasion, have been put to use to obvious effect.

The concept of 'carrot and stick' in human motivation and attitude is well known. In common with all animals, humans yearn for praise, reward - both practical and psychological - and acceptance. It is said to love and be loved is the chief human goal whether genuine or contrived. Conversely animals avoid pain, disappointment and failure and humans are no exception to the general rule. Peer group pressure is enormously power to ensure compliance even if it conflicts with firmly held moral principles. There is of course a huge amount of research material to support these assertions. 

However the important point is that the well understood arsenal of techniques have been applied during the Covid episode to ensure compliance with predetermined behavioural objects, totally disconnected from those stated. As such, either wittingly or unwittingly, Governments have been complicit in a fraudulent propaganda exercise to change patterns of behaviour and thought, that have practically no relationship to the sated objective of preventing disease or even 'protecting the NHS'. These are merely the powerful tools of mass mind and behavioural  manipulation. As has been long stated, there is a thin line between 'Health Education' and 'Societal Propaganda'.

The 'Carrot and Stick' approach is not difficult to recognise but it is amazing how little awareness people have of being subject to it. The NHS has an almost mythical place in the hearts of the British public. Some say it has taken the place of religion and the Church of England. Politicians know this, so it is no surprise that 'protecting the NHS' was adopted as a major slogan, however ludicrous it is on examination. Protecting a person's health is one thing; protecting an organisation is quite another. At no point has the NHS been in danger of collapse. In any event, given the huge sums thrown at utterly failed 'track and trace', testing, masks, advertising and yes even vaccination, the resources were obviously available to meet any demand placed upon it. The whole point of a national health service is that it is capable to meet the demands placed on it. If there was a shortage of hospitals, beds, staff or equipment, it is because government planned it, not that there was a flu virus going around.

So the powerful 'love' of the NHS was deployed to get the behavioural objectives identified. But it was also linked to another powerful behavioural influencer, namely the Thursday night banging event - for want of a better description - when everybody up and down the land was encouraged to bang the drum for nation health staff. Peer group pressure in operation, making people feel good, a classic 'carrot' device to get people to accept a draconian 'stay ay home' curfew. Having achieved its purpose, it notably hasn't been repeated which rather ays it all.

Other hugely expensive 'carrots' have been employed. Paying 80% of wages; VAT and other tax breaks; subsidised meals; payments to business for loss of trade, etc etc.  This is obviously unsustainable in the short term and will have to be paid for in the long, but again it undoubtedly helped to ensure compliance.  No doubt 'SAGE' will have advised the government, that once 'norms of behaviour' AKA 'habits' have been established, you can withdraw the measures that created them. People wear masks outside, although this is not required, and will probably continue to do so even when the threat is officially removed (should that day ever arrive) as with other behavioural changes like standing apart and not shaking hands, for example.

I am told there are more people with a psychology background on SAGE than medical or statistical. I haven't checked out whether this is true but I could certainly believe it. Sage hase been the principle element in leading government and nation down a fundamentally erroneous and deadly path.

So having briefly considered the 'carrots', how about the 'sticks'?

https://www.nexusnewsfeed.com/article/geopolitics/55-americans-have-died-following-covid-vaccination-norway-deaths-rise-to-29/?fbclid=IwAR13sLOA-M5a0eP4xjKcvKNneHMoKCvxVVUKcsUTDU05UT7QyfqnrErf3Bc

And there's more....

FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated in ONE DAY are "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work" after vaccination.

This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.

https://www.cdc.gov/.../slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf

Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he 'wants answers'

https://trib.al/eEWi66p

Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine

https://www.reuters.com/.../health-coronavirus-mexico...

Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.

https://www.rt.com/.../511332-israel-vaccination.../

Wife of 'perfectly healthy' Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Miami-doctor-58-dies...

75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293865

Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/.../us-health-coronavirus-swiss...

88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated.

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/293952

Thousands negatively affected after getting Covid-19 vaccine.

https://m.theepochtimes.com/thousands-negatively-affected...

Hospital worker with no prior allergies in intensive care with severe reaction after Pfizer Covid vaccine.

https://metro.co.uk/.../hospital-worker-in-intensive.../

4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’.

https://www.rt.com/.../509081-pfizer-vaccine-fda-bells.../

Investigation launched as 2 people die in Norway nursing home days after receiving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.

https://www.rt.com/.../511623-norway-covid19-vaccine-deaths/

Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines

https://m.theepochtimes.com/hundreds-sent-to-emergency...

U.S. officials report more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.

https://www.google.com/.../mobi.../article/amp/idUSKBN29B2GS

NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions.

https://www.google.com/.../pfizer-covid-vaccine-nhs...

COVID-19: Single vaccine dose leads to 'greater risk' from new coronavirus variants, South African experts warn

http://news.sky.com/.../covid-19-single-vaccine-dose...

CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer's COVID vaccine

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../At-21-Americans-life...

Woman experiences side effects of COVID-19 vaccine

http://www.everythinglubbock.com/.../woman.../amp/

COVID Vaccine Side Effects More Common After 2nd Dose.

http://www.boston.cbslocal.com/.../covid-vaccine.../amp/

Bulgaria Reports 4 Cases Of Side Effects From Pfizer Covid Vaccine.

http://www.ndtv.com/.../bulgaria-reports-4-cases-of-side...

Two NHS workers suffer allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine.

https://www.google.com/.../coronavirus-news-vaccine.../amp/

~forwarded from Dr Tenpenny

* https://www.royal.uk/queen-and-duke-cambridge-visit-porton-down