Policeman shot dead in Croydon custody suite.
Flowers have been left in memory of the police officerCredit: Reuters
Following from: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12764124/croydon-shooting-police-officer-shot/
One man known as MusicBox MB, 33, from Croydon told the Sun Online: “I’ve been in there a few times. Before they take you into the station they search you outside and the van you come in.
“There is no way you can get into that station with a gun, you can't get in there with a tiny bag of weed. 100 per cent they won't have searched him properly, that's why this happened.”
And one local man, 31, who had also been detained in the custody centre, said: "It doesn't make any sense to me. I don't know how this guy has the freedom to start shooting up the place.
"They arrested me at home and still searched me and cuffed me. This guy is walking in there with arms, uncuffed, unsearched."
Asked about how someone could enter the building while armed, former Det Ch Insp Chris Phillips said: "I think police officers are probably less likely to search people now with all the furore that goes on.
"When people get arrested there is a general view that they should be searched before being transported to the police station but that doesn't always happen - and it depends on what the man was arrested for.
Both former police officers and offenders expressed surprise at the possible lack of checks, with it understood the suspect was being booked in for possession of ammunition.
The 23-year-old suspect was detained by special constables after he was seen 'acting suspiciously' and was taken by van to the custody suite in Windmill Lane just after 2am.
Commissioner Cressida Dick issued a statement this morning on the deathCredit: PA:Press Association
My initial reaction is sadness at the loss of life and the grief this causes to the immediate family But in these very strange times we need to be very cautious in the way we approach the story.
The twenty-three three year old unnamed man who apparently carried out the murder inside the custody suite is currently in hospital in a critical condition, having it is said, turned the gun on himself. So far no information has been forthcoming on the weapon or the circumstances of the event, other than in broad outline. Virtually all reporting has concentrated on demonstrations of respect by colleagues and public alike. The Mayor, the Commissioner and an unidentified female have been filmed attending a hastily convened religious prayer gathering led by an ordained CoE priest in red vestments, all of course keeping their social distance, though not wearing the obligatory masks.
Is it just me that finds this sort of novel theatrics for presumably some public relations purpose - the thing was videoed and released to the media - slightly if not distasteful, inappropriate? It appears to be the 'new normal' in certain tragic events, but significantly not others. It is not disrespectful to the victim, to enquire about the mechanics of the arrangement. Who suggested it? Who organised it? Only then can can we come to a conclusion as to its genuineness or if it was a calculated public relations exercise for political or psycho/social goals.
Although we 'the public' have no idea what happened and are wholly dependent on the police and news media to tell us, those professionals investigating the murder, should already have a very clear picture. After all, it happened in a very controlled environment with at least two other officers present and subject to state of the art CCTV which will provide complete and timed coverage. Please do not tell us the CCTV was not working on the day or my suspicions will rightly go into overdrive!
In the circumstances, both audibly and visually, there should be absolutely no doubt as to the precise sequence of events, that in time should inform the public. Issues of policing and custody are of genuine public interest, both for the protection of the public and the officers dealing with them. However, despite our current ignorance, certain questions, so far unexplained, jump out to the casual, or not so casual, observer.
The most obvious is how in the hell did a man with a gun on him, get into the building, let alone the custody suite? Unlike a knife or sharp implement, a gun is hardly easy to conceal. Any person of a suspicious character would surely be frisked. Even in this day and age, no person is arrested lightly. What was this man arrested for? Then was the arrested person not handcuffed? No trained policeman would remove handcuffs before asking, "Have you anything on you that we should know about" and ensuring he hadn't.
What is even more extraordinary in this case, is the fact that we are told he was arrested in the early hours of the morning (approximately 2 am) for "possession of ammunition"! What? In other words, this man was already flagged up as a potential gun owner and user. This would have been a red flag to any arresting officer, demanding extra caution. Protocol would surely demand the involvement of armed officers in such a situation, and as a very minimum a thorough body search. This would surely have occurred to the dullest civilian let alone trained officers.
But trained officers raises another question. We are told he was detained by two 'Special Constables'. Two Special Constables, at 2 am to deal with someone suspected of 'possessing ammunition'? If true this sounds so reckless as to be almost unbelievable. Who were these 'Special Constables'? Is it normal for two special constables to be out and about at 2 am in the absence of a properly trained conventional Constable? It is well known that 'Special Constables', i.e. people from normal life who sign up for unpaid police support work, are held in contempt by regular officers. How come these volunteers were assigned such a potentially dangerous undertaking?
However what if the term 'Special Constable' was in fact used to cover a different breed of 'Special' entirely?
We have seen in previous events how non-traditional policemen have appeared to confront terrorists or terrorist events. It is becoming a bit of a habit.
At the Westminster attack when PC Palmer was stabbed to death, two armed individuals appeared at just the right moment to shoot the attacker, Khalid Masood. The identity of them has of course never been revealed, though the explanation of who and why they were there has never seemed credible. At London Bridge it just happened to be a retired British Transport policeman who was available to take a leading role. (In fact BRP keep popping up inexplicably at terror events) In the Streatham Road, Richmond stabbing event, it was an MI5 Officer on the scene following the terrorist who shot him dead, the police arriving only subsequently.
So it is reasonable to ask, who and what were these 'Special Constables' and the exact circumstances of the said 'detention'? Did they come across the 23 year old by accident or were they tasked to find him? Were they on foot or in a police vehicle? How did they transfer the man to the holding centre and what precautions were taken to ensure he wasn't in possession of an offensive weapon - even a firearm?
One final question arises in my mind: why did the man shoot only the Custody Sergeant? How many shots were fired before he turned the gun, allegedly, on himself? Why were the 'Special Constables' not injured if they were in the same confined space? These are all valid questions that of course the media do not pursue, and the authorities do not answer, preferring instead to deflect the attention to the sentimental and emotional. We should not be surprised. It has become the norm. Investigative, sceptical journalism has been replaced with celebrity soap.
It of course comes at a time when Julian Assange is fighting an extradition charge and the police have come under considerable criticism for its enforcement of the unprecedented Covid lock-down.
LATEST! (23:30 25.9.2020)
Saturday's Times reports the gun was 'hidden in suspect's jacket'.
Whereas the Mail states he 'produced a revolver he had stuffed down his trousers'.
There is obviously a direct conflict there.
Then we are told the man was on the terrorist list which makes the lax precautions even more incredible. At the time of the shooting it is reported he was still handcuffed, with his hands behind his back. How in this condition he retrieved the pistol either from his coat pocket or underpants, and managed to aim a shot, and to shoot himself, is not explained.
Then another strange feature is the statement that the Custody Sergeant now named as Matiu Ratana (54) was about to carry out a search in a Covid screening cell. All previous experience suggests this would not be a task for the Custody Sergeant but for other officers. The Custody Sergeant usually remains behind the reception desk to ensure protocols are followed, before a person is taken to the cells. All possessions and risk items are removed at that stage. To be hit several times in the heart, at point blank range, as is reported, raises questions as to why Sergeant Ratana wasn't behind his protective counter.
The Commissioner, Cressida Dick, has now stated that the suspect was arrested by regular police officers on patrol. This conflicts with earlier report that they were 'Special Constables'. Her update here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i45UVGk-kRQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i45UVGk-kRQ
Met Police Commissioner speaks on 'shocking' death of Croydon police officer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aidPUN2nIWA
Croydon police shooting: "Police have been taken for granted for too long, we are paying the price"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rHu-sBu8Cw
Croydon police shooting: "One of Sadiq Khan's biggest failures has been to tackle crime"
Then as extraordinary co-incidence would have it in Paris....
Paris attack: Stabbing near Charlie Hebdo office 'an act of terror'
See: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-54302337
French Prime Minister Jean Castex visited the scene flanked by Interior Minister Gérald Darmanin and Paris Mayor Anne HidalgoReuters
The attack came as a high-profile trial was under way of 14 people accused of helping two jihadists carry out the 2015 attack on Charlie Hebdo, in which 12 people were killed.
In an interview with broadcaster France 2, Mr Darmanin described the stabbing as "a new bloody attack against our country, against journalists".
"It's the street where Charlie Hebdo used to be. This is the way the Islamist terrorists operate," the interior minister said.
He said he had ordered security to be stepped up around synagogues this weekend for Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.
UPDATE: BBC NEWS. (with video) Still leaves many unanswered questions! Can the police account be trusted is one of them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cn06S-FFA24
The view of Paul Dakers:
ReplyDelete"Paul Dakers
badge icon
Admin
· 6h ·
To be quite honest, and this is a personal point of view, I find the presence of Cressida Dick on TV fawning over this Sergeant Ratana quite sickening! She was what? An Inspector at the time of the operation when Jean Charles de Menzies was shot 7 times and physically assaulted by 3 firearms officers, and consequently killed.
For those of you who don't remember, de Menzies was the wrong target as the aforementioned Officers had lost sight of who they were following and focused their murderous intentions on him - he offered no resistance and the case was settled by means of a financial payout to the family - no Officer went to jail.
What did happen was Judge Henrickson put in place a special caveat which allowed the Jury to find Cressida Dick not liable for the death, which they duly did. I don't know of any other case where this happened before or since, and in any other similar case the option of being found not guilty doesn't exist.
The evidence was there plain and simple and she was guilty as sin of gross misconduct, but then hey, who's to say who the Judge drinks with eh? Dick, was then hidden in the Home Office for 10 years before popping up as Chief Constable a couple of years back - that would be a strange enough career path for anyone, but in this case it smacks of freemasonry protection!
So forgive me if I don't start gushing about how harsh it was that this Sergeant was shot dead, apparently by someone in handcuffs with his hands behind his back - figure that one out - because I don't believe Police command gives the tiniest little shit about the people!!"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-54799673
ReplyDeleteMatiu Ratana funeral: Mourners remember officer killed in line of duty
Published 4 November 2020
CIRCUMSTANCES AND HOW THIS COULD HAPPEN, STILL NOT EXPLAINED!
ReplyDeleteBBC: Matiu Ratana death: Norwich man released in police officer murder case
Published2 November 2020
"The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) confirmed Mr De Zoysa was handcuffed with his hands behind his back and had been taken to the custody centre in a police vehicle, before being escorted into the building.
Detectives said Mr De Zoysa remains "unfit for interviewing" after apparently also shooting himself.
The 23-year-old had been arrested for possession of ammunition and possession of Class B drugs with intent to supply following a stop and search in the London Road area of Pollards Hill in the early hours of 25 September.
After being taken to a holding room in the custody centre, he is said to have opened fire "several times" - fatally injuring Sgt Ratana who died in hospital at 04:10 BST.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-54783564
Have you seen the latest on this story? OPC finds nothing peculiar about man searched by police yet not finding a fire arm. Then whilst handcuffed behind his back, managing to shoot custody sergeant dead and himself in the neck???? No one has yet explained how this was physically and procedurally possible. Yet more reason to distrust the police and those supposedly policing them? https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=croydon https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-57089128 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/29/man-charged-with-murder-over-matt-ratana-croydon-police-officer-shooting https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-who-failed-to-find-gun-in-matt-ratana-case-cleared-ztg7kqtw7
ReplyDelete"Sergeant Matt Ratana was shot dead in Croydon, south London, in September
ReplyDeleteMETROPOLITAN POLICE/PA
The police watchdog is taking no further action against the officers who failed to find the gun used in the fatal shooting of Sergeant Matt Ratana.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has been investigating the circumstances in which Ratana, 54, was shot in the chest at Croydon custody centre, south London, in September.
Louis de Zoysa, 23, who has been charged with murder, had been searched by officers on the street before he was taken in handcuffs to the centre. They allegedly found drugs and ammunition, prompting his original arrest, but they did not find a revolver.
The IOPC has examined CCTV and police bodyworn camera footage and part of its remit was to examine how thoroughly De Zoysa was searched before he
The Times (Firewall) https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-who-failed-to-find-gun-in-matt-ratana-case-cleared-ztg7kqtw7