Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum.
Why are so many 'World Leaders' part of it?
'Is someone out there is using Orwell’s work not as a warning, but as an owner’s manual?' Neil Oliver on global policies and future prospects for the average Joe.
From Sheila Rowe (with thanks)
12:13 AM
Sheila
Sheila Rowe
You may or may not have read below - I've copied and pasted it to save you looking it up. I'm definitely going to write to my MP, using the template below.
Article from The Great Switch Off.
Hi Everyone - I hope it's acceptable to ask for support on here. I am deeply concerned about the Government's involvement in the World Economic Forum (WEF). May I suggest we all start questioning our MP's. before we become part of The Great Reset the WEF is planning and, to some extent, is already implementing.
Below is a template letter (shared with permission by Anna De Buisseret, Lawyer) for you to send to your own MP.
Let me know by direct message if you would prefer an emailed copy of this or need help finding your local MP etc.
It would be really useful if you could comment "done" in the comments section so that we can estimate numbers.
Template in comments. Below
Dear (Insert the name of your local MP),
It has come to my attention that seven current and former members of the Cabinet, namely Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak, Sajid Javid, Jeremy Hunt, Priti Patel and Elizabeth Truss, are members of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”). I would suggest this represents a conflict of interest. At the very least it raises serious questions as to whether the decision making of such Cabinet ministers is based upon what is best for the nation or as often appears, as “shadow” spokespersons for the WEF. A recent example would be the statement made by Elizabeth Truss regarding Russia and the Ukraine which can be viewed here https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61251698
.
In addition, several political figures have gone through the WEF Young Global Leaders (“YGL”) program, namely Tony Blair (1993), Gordon Brown (1993), Ed Balls (2005), Yvette Cooper (2005) David Cameron (2006), Shami Chakrabarti (2006), Kate Garvey (2007), Douglas Alexander (2007), Brendan Cox (2012), Chuka Umunna (2012), and Lord Nat Wei Min (2013). Research suggests that the YGLs program is a five year indoctrination into the WEF principles with the goal being the creation of world leaders who do not answer to the people, but rather to the WEF. Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the WEF, said in 2017, “What we are very proud of is that we penetrate the global cabinets of countries with our young global leaders.”
Whilst not an expert on the WEF, a cursory glance at the website gives cause for concern. For example, in 2016 Ceri Parker, Commissioning Editor, Agenda, WEF, published an article “8 Predictions for the World in 2030” - https://www.weforum.org/.../8-predictions-for-the-world.../
. I would like to draw your attention to point 1 of the article which states, “All products have become services” and goes on to state that we, the people, won't own anything rather we’ll “borrow” what we need on demand. Please can you explain if the people do not own anything, then who does? The State? Corporations? If the people are not permitted to own anything, is that not a return to feudalism?
Please can you further explain how the WEF intends to get "buy in" from the British people to relinquish everything they own, everything they have inherited or worked so hard to attain and instead “borrow” everything and “be happy”? Who benefits from the implementation of “Agenda 2030”?
Could you please respond to the following questions:
1. do all members of the Cabinet support the WEF global agenda?
2. to what extent does WEF policy influence the decision making of the Cabinet?
3. what influence over national affairs do Young Global Leaders have? I ask since it is evident many are in highly paid positions throughout the private sector.
4. how many members of Parliament agree with and support the WEF agenda?
5. do you believe that any politician or political figure with links to the WEF should be obligated to disclose that relationship to the public? If not, as such connections raise clear concern regarding conflict of interest, can you please provide your reasoning as to why the public do not have a right to be informed?
6. what is your understanding of the WEF, its aims and influence, either directly or indirectly, on national policy?
These are critical questions that must be answered because I did not elect Klaus Schwab to a government position nor did I vote for Agenda 2030, nor did anyone in our country yet the events of the last two years would seem to suggest that much of the WEF agenda is being implemented, with direct and detrimental impact on the daily lives of the British public.
It is imperative that all British citizens be made aware of the existence of the WEF and understand its role in the governing of our nation. I therefore look forward to your urgent response and clarification.
I leave you with a paragraph from the foreword by The Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, to the Ministerial Code (Cabinet Office August 2019):
“There must be no bullying and no harassment; no leaking; no breach of collective responsibility. No misuse of taxpayer mo
Sheila
Sheila Rowe
Doh, it wouldn't print the last paragraph - see below.
I leave you with a paragraph from the foreword by The Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, to the Ministerial Code (Cabinet Office August 2019):
“There must be no bullying and no harassment; no leaking; no breach of collective responsibility. No misuse of taxpayer money and no actual or perceived conflicts of interest. The precious principles of public life enshrined in this document - integrity, objectivity, accountability, transparency, honesty and leadership in the public interest - must be honoured at all times; as must the political impartiality of our much admired civil service."
Kind regards,
Insert your name and full address
Hind Ebrahem
ReplyDeleteDo you want to know the reason for the Israeli occupation’s killing of the journalist “Sherine Abu Aqleh” and many journalists, and the demolition of the Al-Jazeera building? Read this and you will find the answer in the ninth point.
The State of Israel
1. There was no state of Israel prior to 1948. There was only Palestine.
2. The state of Israel was only “born” in 1948 through TERRORISM where it had attacked, murdered and driven away Arab Palestine from their beloved homes and lands. Please google up Haganah, Irgun and Stern Gang. You will discover facts regarding Zionist paramilitary organisation, violence, terrorism, and massacre (Deir Yassin) amongst others.
3. Amazingly, these “criminal activities” were “JUSTIFIED”, based on the claim that the Jews were the aboriginal people of the “Promised Land” by God (Judaism) 4,000 years ago.
4. Fast forward to the early 1900s, Palestine was inhibited by majority Arab Muslims, followed by Christians and minority Jews for hundreds if not thousands of years as well. It was definitely not an empty land.
5. That’s why there are terms such as “Palestinian Refugees” where approx. 400 – 600 Arab Palestinian villages were destroyed, 20,000 were killed including innocent woman, elderly man and children, and 750,00 more had been DRIVEN OUT to the Gaza Strip, West Bank and neighbouring Arab countries during the formation of the state of Israel. The day is remembered as “Nakba” (Catastrophe). These Arab Palestinians are prevented by Israel from returning to their beloved homes and claiming back their properties.
6. It didn’t end there. The state of Israel then “expanded” further by grabbing more Palestinian lands. Hence, we encounter more terms such as “Occupied Land”, “Occupying Forces”, “Illegal Settlement” that had violated many UN Charters and international laws.
7. Did the “Promised Land” by God, justify the brutal violence, killings, murders and massacre of innocent people of the land…??? I believe there is no God of any religion would justify that.
8. Naturally, the Arab Palestine fought back to claim back and free their rightful lands. Ironically, the “Oppressed Palestinians” are labelled as “Terrorists” whilst the “Israeli Oppressor” has the right to “defend itself”.
9. The world is watching and people are not easily fooled anymore. This is what Israel is so afraid of, the TRUTHS.
#freepalestine
There's certainly a parallel between Hitler claiming the Sudetenland, German and Putin claiming the Donbas Russian. Both claims had and have credible cultural and historic credence. Both Germany and Russia invaded a foreign country - Poland - but we did not declare war on Russia because of it. On the premise that 'our enemy's enemy is our friend', Russia became our ally against Germany and it is doubtful we could have won the war without its huge sacrifice. Russia the ally, then became Russia the enemy, which lasted until the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989, but even with the break-up of the Soviet Union and its loss of political control over European States, there was still an acceptance of a Russian sphere of influence that America and the West has sought to erode. The 2013/14 Ukrainian 'revolution' was orchestrated and facilitated by essentially the American military and CIA, which has continued to displace Russian influence. This and the build up of NATO weaponry, linked to economic sanctions, can only be viewed as undeclared war on Russia, which has legitimately viewed it as such. In fact the present incursion of Russian troops into Ukraine and its relative failure, was no doubt all part of a predicted and planned outcome by the West, to destabilize the region, just as it has done in other areas of the world over at least the last two decades. The only conceivable reason for this destructive madness, is American (with Britain as always holding on to its coat tails) economic and military hegemony, with 'follow the money' and 'Cui bono' as always, being the watch words.
ReplyDeleteTim Veater
ReplyDeleteYou only have to contrast Britain's attitude to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israeli invasion of Palestine to see the double standards and the rationale behind it!
Russia is not my enemy. How could it be? Nor is it my friend. It is a corrupt, backward country that is the prisoner of its past as is every nation. But nor am I taken in by the partisan position taken by western governments that this is all about democracy and freedom, the good and the bad, the right and the wrong, the former being the west and the latter Russia. That is a very inaccurate and naive interpretation but one that is pushed by Western leaders and generally soaked up by the populace. It worked with 9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Gaza, 7/7, Boston, 'Islamic terror', Covid and now Ukraine. However this time it threatens the obliteration of civilization and humanity as we know it. The stakes and therefore the idiocy have never been higher.
ReplyDeleteBuffalo, New York: Some very bizarre visual aspects to this incident. What the hell was he wearing in his court appearance? Why not in hospital? Was the suspect injured or not? Body armour protected him but he took it off before arrest? This would normally lead in America to the suspect being shot dead. Why not this time? Note no longer 'Islamist extremist'. Now it's ' white right wing extremist.' Ten dead. Where are the ambulances?
ReplyDeleteAre the figures reliable is the first question to ask. Then compare the 2020/2022 overall death rates with the average ones for a true indication of excess deaths. Then examine other non-covid reasons for deaths in the elderly. After all that you may be able to come up with a more accurate picture of what went wrong and the utter insanity of all the public policies surrounding it. https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=covid+deaths
ReplyDeleteUkraine War. This was a conflict engineered years ago in Washington. It's purpose obvious: to gain control of Ukrainian assets and punish Russia for obstructing western plans in Syria. As always it has little or nothing to do with 'freedom' and 'self determination' although of course these are the buzz words used to sell the plan.
ReplyDelete