Coronavirus Partygate?

Boris Johnson, the British Prime Minister finds himself on a sticky wicket! It is a given that the members of opposition parties would like to have him gone but when members of his own side get itchy feet and twitchy writing hands, his future becomes ever more tenuous. I have an image of him hanging from the White Cliffs of Dover by his finger nails, whilst members of his cabinet stand around with arms crossed expressing concern. 

His ship may well be holed below the water line. And as so often happens, the cause is a relatively innocuous one of civil servants partying during lock-down. Clearly they weren't persuaded by the bilge they put out for everyone else to follow. They were right but of course that can't be admitted. The pretence must be maintained that all the measures were necessary and effective. 

The opposition's attack comes in the form of first the hypocrisy, second the contempt to those who followed the rules, third the PM allegedly lying about them and his knowledge of them. Significantly it is not about the necessity of instigating the measures or their huge cost in both lives and money in the first place. Why? Because that would implicate all in the Parliament on both sides, who gullibly bought the government's argument and so nonchalantly voted away fundamental freedoms.

For two years or there about, I have been a voice challenging the Government's approach to Coronavirus. Not a lone voice but feeling like it in a highly controlled and yes censored internet medium. Not quite a lone voice as the massive public demonstrations and a significant number of eminent medical experts have concurred with my view. Unfortunately our voices have been drowned in a multi billion propaganda exercise in an incestuous confluence of Government, 'Big Pharma' and the media. 

Finally it seems the Prime Minister and Government have reconsidered the wisdom of it's lock-down measures and repealed most of them. (They nevertheless lay dormant in the legislative cupboard) Even the requirement that all NHS and care home staff should be vaccinated by the first of March as a condition of employment, is now being reconsidered. 

From the start of this so-called pandemic, I have questioned the approach to it besides the nature of its origins. These views have been mocked and criticised but I believe that time will prove they were wholly justified. Suggestions that the virus was intentionally created and dispersed by a Chinese laboratory, initially dismissed as mere 'conspiracy' have now been shown to be the most likely explanation. The timing immediately prior to the World Military Games in Wuhan is so coincidental that it cannot be easily dismissed as other than intentional. 

The deep and largely secretive involvement of the United States, with Dr Fauci taking a pivotal role, has been fully exposed in Congressional and other forums. We live in a world where exponential sums are spent on largely unmonitored military and secret services, yet we are amazed when these are applied to rogue exercises and experiment. 

Some may see parallels with the Salisbury 'Novichok' attack. That allegedly used a 'weapons grade nerve agent' and caused a local lock-down. The source was Russia. This time it is a biological agent coming from China. It is of course coincidental that relations with both of those nations have declined. Indeed at the very time Boris is under attack he found a whistle-stop visit to Ukraine absolutely essential! 

In both of these events the British biological and chemical establishment at Porton Down was involved. In the former in trying to identify the Novichok agent. In the second but less well advertised trying to get to the bottom of the SARS Cov-2  coronavirus. Despite the obvious risk, it was to Porton Down that the Queen made one of her first visits after her isolation at Windsor in October 2020. The laboratory has been deeply involved in evaluating Lateral Flow Tests as an alternative to the PCR test that has fuelled the misleading 'case' figures. One wonders what else the scientist there know?  https://www.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/media_wysiwyg/UK%20evaluation_PHE%20Porton%20Down%20%20University%20of%20Oxford_final.pdf

No one really doubts that an infective agent was let loose on the world, the product of US funded 'gain of function' research in China. The only unproved area is whether this was accidental or part of intentional plan. The fact that there were multiple warnings and exercises that spookily replicated the later event, certainly are grounds to suspecting the latter, as do similarities with other terror related events that have plagues the west for the past decade. The leading role of the medically unqualified Bill Gates and his multi-billion foundation in pushing a vaccine and population control agenda, cannot be discounted as being an important factor.

Notwithstanding the danger posed by this enhanced version of a longstanding flu-causing organism, the reaction of the British Government to it was irrational and disproportionate. It was driven by a combination of factors that have not been fully studied or explained but they all came to bear on the machinery of government and particularly the Cabinet Office and 10 Downing Street. 

The evidence of the PM's Special Advisor, Dominic Cummings, proves that he argued strongly for the lock-down measures. He has argued they were not introduced early enough. He was reinforced by alarmist and wildly pessimistic modelling projections by Neil Ferguson at the partly Gates funded Imperial College. The psychologist dominated SAGE group, supported the strategy and devised a very successful fear campaign, totally ignoring the very obvious and predictable physical, psychological, social and economic adverse consequences of the severe lock down policies.

An MP close to the Prime Minister has confirmed that faced with all the siren voices and prognostications of hundreds of thousands of deaths, despite his reservations, he could not take the risk of opposing the measures proposed. Of course he himself succumbed to a viral infection that required hospitalisation. It was a useful propaganda tool though no one besides Johnson and the doctors know how really serious it was. He certainly did not look well for a time afterwards but there is no indication he passed it to anyone else. 

Indeed there is little evidence of its epidemiological transmissibility, although from the mass advertising campaign, the public was to regard it as highly infectious. Even before the measures were introduced, The Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) recommended the organism be downgraded from a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID) and this happened on 19th March 2020. Yet the unprecedented authoritarian regime continued as if it were. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/high-consequence-infectious-diseases-hcid#status-of-covid-19

Panic and fear seem to have been the principal levers, although we cannot rule out an intentional national social experiment with very dark overtones, that became very apparent in the deployment of the police and their methods, to ensure compliance. No one can now on calm reflection surely believe the measures were not a blatant and obscene over-reaction and an exercise in totalitarian government.

The unnecessary emotional suffering caused has largely gone unreported but has recently been brought into stark contrast by the scandal of Number 10 parties. It seems that those in government never believed their own hype and rules. This was a 'con' from the beginning and some us could see it.

Early on I pointed out the huge disparity between the notifiable disease statistics and those claimed for Covid deaths. (From March 2020 Covid 19 was made a Notifiable Disease but the figures ran at about a tenth of those claimed for Covid deaths)  This disparity has recently been supported by another indicator, that only in about 17,000 cases over two years, was Covid mentioned on death certificates without other underlying or probably primary causes. It is the old question of dying with or of Coronavirus. Even this figure has to be massaged to fit the narrative:  https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2022/01/26/to-say-only-17000-people-have-died-from-covid-19-is-highly-misleading/

This is but one of many reservations over how statistical information was interpreted and manipulated to suggest many more deaths were caused by the infective agent and that it was far more virulent and a health risk than it actually was. From a public health point of view this is unforgivable, as the long term consequence is the undermining of public trust in all medical advice. 

The misinformation has been continued regarding the necessity and efficacy of the vaccination programme, let alone how coercion and discrimination have been used to force it on people, who whatever reason have declined to take it. No official publicity has been given to the thousands of adverse effects and deaths attributable to the vaccines. I believe the official figures greatly underestimate the problem. But far worse I believe the statistics point to a chilling conclusion: that the lock down and vaccination measures have themselves caused the two spikes in the observed death rate. 

Of course the government is yet to concur. How can it? It would have to admit killing people off on a scale only matched by war.

Having invested so much in a fundamentally erroneous position, the government and leading politicians are understandably loathe to admit their error. Despite the obvious failure of the vaccination programme - why else would a so called 'booster' be required if even two jabs were effective? - it still must be presented as a triumph of science and achievement. If everything about the approach adopted was a failure, who will take responsibility for the four hundred billions, including at least eight billions in direct and largely unrecoverable fraud, wasted on it? Clearly no one. In this context, the parliamentary 'head hunters' for Downing Street parties, can only viewed as a farcical distraction.

So I believe and have argued throughout, that not only were the government's rules ineffective, they were positively damaging and dangerous!