Tuesday, 15 December 2020

 Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics (2)






There is a saying in the computer world, "Rubbish in, Rubbish out" (RIRO) That is what the British people have been subjected to. Yet people still fail to realise its significance for day to day life. They have been blinded by centrally generated fear and apprehension. The problem kicked off with wildly pessimistic projections from Imperial College based on a completely false model. The obsession with the 'R-number' was another crass mistake. Natural immunity obtained from previous SARS type bugs was underestimated as was little understood natural immunity as has been demonstrated by children clearly not previously exposed. The two tests used to produce these maps (PCR in particular) are fatally flawed. The only really reliable statistic is DEATH with distinctive flu-like symptoms. This peaked in March, April and May but even this should be treated with great caution. Despite this particular bug having been around since at least last December (it has been recorded much earlier) deaths only started a precipitous rise AFTER government measures were introduced. It is therefore a moot point as to whether it was the bug or the measures that caused the spike. That increased mortality overwhelmingly affected the old and sick in nursing homes and hospitals often linked to policies of 'Do Not Recusitate' (DNR) linked to the manipulation of the statistics whereby anyone who died with flu like symptoms - a normal winter phenomenon - or without, was declared a Covid case. Rather than these unreliable and misleading 'infection' charts, only hospital admissions from identifiable symptoms and deaths statistics AS RELATED TO NORMAL ONES are reliable on which to base policy and behavioural judgements. Reference to these proves WE ARE NOT IN AN EPIDEMIC and both flu rates and hospitalisations from that cause are seasonally NORMAL. Everything else is government hype that has not only had severe economic consequences (the debt burden surpasses even WWII!) but has actively CAUSED deaths in a younger group of people from depression, isolation and treatable disease. These are the realities that people fail to realise. As has previously been stated, there are lies, damn lies and statistics, and the above map is an a classic example.


See also:  https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=statistics

11 comments:

  1. The RISK FACTORS for severe symptoms and death in England are now clear: old age; serious underlying illness or conditions; race (coloured men three times more likely than white!) ; obesity ; occupation, life-style and poverty (probably); those in an institutional or hospital setting. These should be distinguished from the premature deaths now emerging from the disruption to treatments for other conditions caused directly by over-reactive Covid policies. The two have been and no doubt will be entangled.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Age and sex are major variables. Men appear to be more susceptible than women and age is inversely proportional, meaning that the younger the person the less likely the serious consequences. Related bugs have of course been around for decades and the extent to which these have imparted a natural amount of T-cell immunity has been underestimated. What makes children immune, even though not previously exposed to this or similar bugs, has not been explained.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The PCR test is unreliable as an indicator of disease or infection. It has been utterly discredited. It is qualitative test not a quantitative one, and can react as readily to the common cold as much as any more serious condition. Nor has it been shown to correlate in any way with either serious disease or death. The more that tests are carried out, the more likely it is that the numbers of meaningless 'positives' will go up. In other words whether it goes up or down has no practical significance for human health one way or another and such graphs should be placed in the receptacle where they belong!

    ReplyDelete
  4. 16 Glaring Parallels Between the 9/11 and COVID Ops
    Published 2 months ago on October 21, 2020
    By Makia Freeman

    https://thefreedomarticles.com/9-11-covid-similarities-16-glaring-parallels/

    ReplyDelete
  5. A song for the moment? "The only way is UP!"


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjD3EVC1-zU

    ReplyDelete
  6. There are so many clarifications required before anything can be taken from this graph, the most basic being what is it based on, an unreliable test or actual symptoms of related illness? I assume it is a graph of positive tests which rely on many factors: how many are carried out (obviously the more tests the more likely positives) , who and where. More can be expected in certain groups, such as health workers and the elderly so if a disproportionate sample is from these groups expect the graph to rise. If the positive tests bear no relationship to illness or death, they are of course quite pointless. In other words whether going up or down, such graphs should be taken with the utmost caution, either to suggest things are getting better or worse. Only hospitalisations for covid-like symptoms, set against the normal yearly average are anyway reliable indicators. Not even the overall death rate is reliable without clarification, as the shut-down has actually CAUSED an increase in unrelated deaths as what was created in the care home sector and since by disrupting normal life saving treatments and responses plus an increase in self harming. The fact that this is effectively the third lockdown where so called preventive measures have been in place, is practical proof positive that they are quite ineffective in disrupting the spread of a micro organism, if indeed it exists. Please not it has NEVER been isolated from a human being or demonstrated to have passed from one person to another in the UK as confirmed by the Department of Health although others have claimed to have done so. The relationship between humans and microscopic organisms is far from simple and subject to a multiplicity of factors still not fully understood. (See: https://www.researchgate.net/.../Has_SARS-CoV2_been...
    ) which makes the simplistic treatment by government and media as inane as it is useless.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ASYMPTOMATIC TRANSMISSION DISPROVED!
    Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 didn’t occur at all, study of 10 million finds
    Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.
    Wed Dec 23, 2020
    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds

    ReplyDelete
  8. ALL the covid statistics are unreliable and misleading. A positive covid test does NOT mean either illness or infectivity. Fact. Yet it is fuelling all the panic and damaging lock-down measures. We really need a more balanced and realistic assessment of the true risk posed by this microscopic entity.The point is not that some people are in hospital, unfortunate as that is, but whether there is any significant difference to the normal state of affairs at this time of the year, requiring all the extreme measures put in place, not to mention their total ineffectiveness by virtue of the fact that apparently they are still required. Mortality and morbidity statistics are fraught with difficulty as they incorporate so many factors influencing the figures. For example it is very difficult to tease out the effect of the alleged virus from the other causes of illness and death such as the removal of care to the elderly. Interference with treatments of other serious conditions, reluctance or inability to access GP or Emergency Services and self harm all have an adverse effect on the death rate, which incorrectly may be placed at the door of the dreaded covid. SARS Cov-2 may exist but its real consequences have been much exaggerated with disastrous consequences elsewhere to both health and economy.

    ReplyDelete
  9. https://www.facebook.com/663251520811711/videos/1425129044342325/

    Dolores Cahill PhD is interviewed by Liam Galvin. "I Would Sue For Murder if Someone Forcibly Injected Me With The Vaccine!"
    Dolores Cahill Phd is interviewed by Liam Galvin. "I Would Sue For Murder if Someone Forcibly Injected Me With The Vaccine!"

    ReplyDelete
  10. John Ødemark
    badge icon
    The official narrative makes zero sense at all. A few sources pointed to a very different story. The police officer who was shot and killed was about to expose corruption within the Met and needed to be silenced, other sources have a slightly different angle ....... there was no shooting, no one died (including the gunman) it was another false flag to assist in bringing in new legislation ....... When we venture from the narrative there are always several alternatives available and depending upon the source each one has a different political bias angle ......... the weird thing tho' is most of the alternative interpretations all have a masonic undertone that has nothing to do with the story's content and everything to do with the furtherment of restrictions of the public in and around the given area
    · Reply · 10m
    Tim Veater
    badge icon
    John Ødemark I have seen those theories. Certainly very strange about the official version. Needless to say the media has been quite useless at posing the very obvious questions: How come a man arrested for an ammunition charge could be arrested without being frisked for weapon(s); where the weapon was hidden; how he managed to retrieve it with his arms handcuffed behind his back; why the weapon was not located in the station search; how he was able to access and fire a gun whilst surrounded by policemen in the custody suite; how he was able to raise his arms to shoot the Sergeant in the chest; how and where he was able to shoot himself; what weapon was used?

    ReplyDelete
  11. "This is really global economic war. Much more like a coup d'tat than a magic virus. How can you herd all the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them knowing? 1. The invisible enemy. 2. Divide and rule. It's working with many people. You are trying to centralize economic and monetary control at a time of reset." Catherine Austin Fitts. https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR16MXI7ukyNv265eZBC695Nvp783X8wyBGhrqlov53w71WrOeCzGzv0Zdg&v=C1-0XKYAZII&feature=youtu.be

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.