In God we trust (because when it comes to 'terrorism' and war, we sure can't trust our governments)


https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&q=in+god+we+trust+images&tbm=isch&source=univ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjw1ZzS6ejiAhUKRhUIHUBiBtAQsAR6BAgHEAE&biw=1280&bih=881#imgrc=M6j8NVlOSyPc8M:


Deceit and Cover-up. The two pillars of government.

It is seventy years since the publication of George Orwell's '1984'.

It came a few years after the most destructive war in the history of the world. It marked a nadir in human civilisation, proving that there was no cruelty or evil, to which nations and individuals would not stoop, to gain ascendancy. Paradoxically of course, all combatants claimed to have 'right' on their side and to be fighting for the highest motives. It was ethical aspirations that fired the various political initiatives when hostilities finally came to an end in 1945. 

The First World War which lasted from 1914 to 1918, was meant to be 'the war to end all wars', but within twenty years the nations of the world were prosecuting an even bigger one. They haven't stopped since. About 250 killing fifty million people it is estimate. 

The first conflict spawned the League of Nations which failed to stop Mussolini bombing Abyssinia or Hitler invading Czechoslovakia or Poland. The second world war engendered the United Nations, which many regard as equally impotent. As long as nation states are opposed to one another and prepared to use their enormous military might to get their own way, continuing conflict seems inevitable.

The Nuremberg trials and the International Court of Justice established in its wake, held out the promise that evil doers would be held to account whoever they were. This was perhaps a simplistic aspiration. More realistically it seems only the defeated are pursued and the powerful victors of military conflict can still get away with anything. No one has been charged with the events of 9/11 or the illegal wars that followed them.

Relief and optimism reigned after the devastation and terror of war but almost immediately this crumbled in the face of the epic stand-off between the east and west and their differing political and economic systems. In this context, a new nation was born in the Middle East called Israel that has dominated the international stage ever since, causing a continuing risk of war, that threatens to envelop the whole world yet again. There is every reason to believe events are being fabricated to provide the pretext for war against Iran at this very moment!

The late 1940's was also the time that Orwell formulated his dystopian view of the future, which to greater or lesser extent we now experience, even it took rather longer to materialise. Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World' (1932) pre-dated him in the futuristic genre by seventeen years but together they created something of a self-fulfilling prophesy.

I suggested at the beginning of this piece that deceit and cover-up had become the principle characteristics of modern government throughout the world and that western democracies are not exempt. The world is too big a stage, so let us just concentrate on Britain, currently flailing in the quick-sand of 'Brexit'. However the quick-sand of deceit and cover-up is, I would argue, far more corrosive and dangerous. The corollary is widespread hypocrisy and denial of the reality. Mr Johnson it would seem is ideally qualified to head up the government.

Orwell, real name Eric Blair,  portrayed in '1984' - a society that was one in which social control was exercised through disinformation and surveillance. How can we not conclude that these have indeed become the watchwords of our current government, and increasingly so? The process is camouflaged and gilded but inexorable. It is inevitable only if we allow it to be. Only truth facilitated by transparency can stop it. Both are in short supply when it comes to terrorism and war.

One of the events that proved the authenticity of the prediction and the devastating impact of it, was the notorious 'dodgy dossier', used to justify two disastrous and illegal wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, both pursued on a criminally false prospectus. It notoriously 'sexed up' the the non-existent threat of chemical and biological weapon attack. Neither the materials or delivery weapons existed except in the possession of those nations that laid claim to the charge. In another little twist of fate, it was not Eric Blair but Tony Blair who was ultimately responsible. Well I never! I doubt if Eric saw that one coming.

But the even greater deceit and cover-up which still continues to this day - a knowing denial that implicates all governments that are party to it - were the events of 9/11 in New York and Washington, that have been proved time and time again not to be as officially described. We may be assured the British Government has known this for a long time - it may even have known it at the time - yet it has chosen to perpetuate the lie. This fact alone must prove my assertion that deceit and cover-up are endemic; that our own government has betrayed our trust; that it cannot be trusted on any issue, particularly where terrorism or military threats are alleged.

For anyone new to the topic - can there be such an animal? - the free-falling twin towers were not brought down by planes but by carefully controlled demolition. Building Seven, not hit by any plane, could only have been brought down by the same method. Microscopic particles prove specialist military explosives were used. Radiation and asbestos made claims of safety ludicrously reckless as subsequent deaths have proved. 

Throughout, both Israeli and Jewish interests were uniquely and critically involved in concert with leading American political figures. The alleged perpetrators could not have flown the planes as alleged and many have subsequently been proved to be still living in various locations. A missile not a plane flew into the Pentagon and was knowingly allowed to do so. The target was the only unit investigating a missing 2.3 trillion from the Pentagon budget, announced only the day before by Donald Rumsfeld, but never heard of again. The  inquiry - as with the JFK assassination - 
was carefully orchestrated whitewash and cover-up.

The British Government is fully aware of ALL of this, yet it remains silent, compliant, in fact complicit in perhaps the biggest and most outrageous criminal fabrication known in the history of mankind. If it were to challenge the story, we would still have to ask why it has taken so long?  Nor is it likely it would improve diplomatic relations between Britain and the United States at this precarious time. Indeed it would be likely to rupture them just so long as the American political establishment maintains the lie. How likely is it that the presumptive PM elect, Boris Johnson, would take such a precipitous risk when trade between the two countries take on 'convoy' proportions?

So we are unlikely to be faced with truth or transparency any time soon. Worse, we must treat all information emanating from government with the greatest suspicion, particularly when it has terrorist or military connotations. The perspicuous and courageous - you have to be if you challenge the government narrative - Richard D Hall opines, that most terrorist events that have affected western  democracies, and no doubt many other states, are planned and executed not by the people who are blamed, but by secret elements of those governments themselves - and I agree with him. 

Others such as Webster Tarpley, David Ray Griffin, James Corbett, Michel Chossudovsky,  Christopher Bollyn and Ole Dammegard (to name but a few) based on their detailed and extensive independent research, have come to the same conclusion. Significantly utilizing regular search engines such as 'Google', it is very hard to find these authors listed. For example the Guardian's 'Twenty Best Books on 9/11' doesn't mention one. In other words the cover-up extends right across the media.

Orwell suggested an increasing invasive state, 'Thought Police' and 'big brother is watching you.' Increasingly we are being coerced into acceptable speech, so as not to offend some sensitivity or other and a subtle form of thought policing is in process. A popular TV programme was based on the 'Big Brother' idea. Apparently we have an endless fascination with watching one another, especially if intimacy is involved, despite its corrosive effect on both participant and voyeur. We also discover we are all being monitored now, not only by a plethora of street cameras - which incidentally never seem to work when they are actually needed - but by the computers we use which can be interrogated by the police and can be accessed by the government departments, such as the NSA and GCHQ but every nation has one, with their huge monitoring resources.

Huxley portrayed a world in which humans were engineered and stratified according to intelligence and wealth, where survival increasing depended on indoctrination and mind control using chemicals - so-called 'Soma'. In a country and world where the rich few own an ever bigger percentage of the wealth and where the gap between rich and poor widens, not least by government policy, it is hard not to see the truth of his prediction.

On last night's Question Time - mind control dressed as discussion - four out of five panellists were forced to admit to taking banned substances. Similarly six out of seven candidates for the PM post have now admitted doing the same. Ministers such as Michael Gove in charge of a system which incarcerated and harassed pot smokers, indulged in much stronger stuff. 

Much like the scandal of child abuse in high places, the deceit and cover-up to protect the system has been rife. Maybe it is unavoidable given human nature and a clear distinction should be drawn between private and public life. However when it comes to fabricating terror as an excuse to go to war, we need to demand honesty and transparency, and always be sceptical of the official account, because we know we have been consistently lied to in the past. Who really believes, as Mrs May apparently did, the Novichok story? 

We are no doubt pleased to note, as was HM the Queen, to honour both the head of MI5 and MI6 (Andrew Parker and Alex Younger)
with knighthoods in the birthday honours list. They no doubt deserve it. After all they are charged with maintaining the sophisticated system of deceit and cover-up, by which we are all allegedly kept safe.

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=israel+9%2F11