50 police officers arrested in child porn raids Fifty police officers across the UK have been arrested as part of a crackdown on suspected paedophiles who pay to access child pornography websites, detectives revealed today. The officers were among 1,300 people arrested on suspicion of accessing or downloading indecent images of children - some as young as five - from US-based Internet sites.
Thirty-five men were arrested in London this morning as part of the investigation - codenamed Operation Ore - following raids on 45 addresses across the capital.
Lynne Peachey Operation Ore was a British police operation that commenced in 1999 following information received from US law enforcement, which was intended to prosecute thousands of users of a website reportedly featuring child pornography. It was the United Kingdom's biggest ever computer crime investigation,[1] leading to 7,250 suspects identified, 4,283 homes searched, 3,744 arrests, 1,848 charged, 1,451 convictions, 493 cautioned and 140 children removed from suspected dangerous situations[2] and an estimated 33[3] suicides.[4][5] Operation Ore identified and prosecuted some sex offenders, but the validity of the police procedures was later questioned, as errors in the investigations resulted in a large number of false arrests.[3]
Operation Ore followed the similar crackdown in the United States, called Operation Avalanche; in the US 100 people were charged from the 35,000 US access records available.[6] In total 390,000 individuals in over 60 countries were found to have accessed material in the combined investigations.
"Natacha Jaitt had accused Gustavo Vera, a longtime friend of Pope Francis, of being a sex trafficker and a child rapist. During a pre-dawn raid in the early hours of Saturday morning, her dead body was discovered at a resort near Buenos Aires.
"Jaitt claimed in October that Vera was Pope Francis’ “accomplice.” She tweeted: “Justo Gustavo Vera, is a pimp, sex-trafficker, and accomplice of the Pope and, as I predicted, was tried for misappropriation of funds at Alameda and other illegal acts. God will do what is just, someday. Amen.”
"Lifesitenews.com reports: Police arrived at the Xanadu event complex near the capital of Argentina, where Jaitt was found unresponsive in bed. After her death was confirmed, police began investigating. A coroner determined on Saturday that Jaitt died of multi-organ failure; her body showed no signs of violence. She was a widow and mother of two children."
Hi Ed. I just wanted to give you the 'thumbs up' for you interview with Alfred Webre. It was very gallant of you and couldn't have been easy discussing the details in a second language (English) I thought you managed to get some salient points over on the Hampstead affair and particularly as regards the outrageous treatment of Sabine, as if she were a terrorist or child abuser herself. Following her original arrest and bail conditions, I advised when she telephoned me, to stay clear of the subject so as not to give them any excuse to pursue her. Whether she did or not I don't know, but the fact that they used her presentation to the Church of England as a trap and pretext, is particularly reprehensible, it seems to me, for both Church and State. I am glad you have kept in touch with her. I now have a prison address and intend to write a letter of support and as you know I have used my blog - that has now had over 300 000 'hits' - to try to influence opinion, with little success I have to say. High Court injunctions have been applied that make it very tricky and have obviously frightened off any mainstream media treatment of the subject, other than to repeat the government narrative, which is a lie. There could be no more reliable confirmation that the collusion and complicity must go right to the top of the British Government. This is a shocking conclusion and highlights all government assurances to the contrary as hypocritical window dressing. Although there was a "Free Sabine" FB group, this now appears to have been suspended. If so I would be interested to know of any other that you might be aware of. The injustice of a prison sentence, let alone for nine years, needs to be kept in the public eye, although as we have seen with Melanie Shaw, public campaigns can almost be counter-productive, making the State even more repressive and cruel. Your views on any of this would be welcomed. With kind regards, Tim Veater.
Note the first interview took place from 10.30 pm in the evening of a nine year old girl who made serious allegations of abuse, yet she is not supported by any independent adult. This is a clear breach of established police rules for interviewing people let alone children. Why? Following the second interview shown on the 11th November, 2014, the children were removed from their mother (abducted?) by the police/social workers, on the pretext of protection, despite the fact that her mother had never been accused of cruelty. Incredibly the natural father who DID have documented cases of violence against his wife and children has subsequently been afforded full parental control. The second interview is also carried out without an independent adult supporter and the interviewing policeman (DC Martin) seems only interested in pressing the importance of not lying (the sub text of which is that she was) and in pursuing a theme of her step-father abusing her with her mother's support. He ignores her poignant prefix that "We were used to hurting". Any genuine interviewer would have picked up on this and asked what she meant but he ignores it completely, interested only in constructing an exagerated case against Abraham, also ignoring her statement that "He is kind." Throughout these interviews, the substantive claims are not pursued whereas the inferior ones (however undesireable they may appear) were. This was an obvious tactic adopted to lessen the importance of the one and increase the importance of the other, later used by the Judge to excuse a proper police investigation and to justify the decision to remove the children from their mother and locate them with their father whom they had accused of unspeakable acts. The tactic is so transparent to be chilling. Note also the dramatic change in body language (slumped in the chair) at the third interview (17.9.2014) when this child's psychological stability had been further assaulted by having been removed from her mother to a state of fostering limbo. Her brother exhibits similar changes in body language. Clearly both were under direct or indirect influence to retract their extensive, corroborative previous testimony which the police tried desperately to suppress, subsequently continued by the British Family and Criminal Courts. With the aid of the internet, literally millions have now seen the interviews and made their own minds up as to the truth of their original allegations, the seriousness of which is only exceeded by the extent of the concerted effort to rubbish them as 'hoax', that reaches to the very top of the British legal, political and information establishment. Only one conclusion can be drawn: that there has been an egregious 'cover-up', either to control the reputational damage to church and state or worse that elements of the British State with enormous power and influence were party to it!
At 22 mins on this video a first hand account of how MI5 tried to get Tommy Robinson to work for them "to control the situation if there's a terrorist attack."
50 police officers arrested in child porn raids
ReplyDeleteFifty police officers across the UK have been arrested as part of a crackdown on suspected paedophiles who pay to access child pornography websites, detectives revealed today.
The officers were among 1,300 people arrested on suspicion of accessing or downloading indecent images of children - some as young as five - from US-based Internet sites.
Thirty-five men were arrested in London this morning as part of the investigation - codenamed Operation Ore - following raids on 45 addresses across the capital.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-151784/50-police-officers-arrested-child-porn-raids.html
Lynne Peachey Operation Ore was a British police operation that commenced in 1999 following information received from US law enforcement, which was intended to prosecute thousands of users of a website reportedly featuring child pornography. It was the United Kingdom's biggest ever computer crime investigation,[1] leading to 7,250 suspects identified, 4,283 homes searched, 3,744 arrests, 1,848 charged, 1,451 convictions, 493 cautioned and 140 children removed from suspected dangerous situations[2] and an estimated 33[3] suicides.[4][5] Operation Ore identified and prosecuted some sex offenders, but the validity of the police procedures was later questioned, as errors in the investigations resulted in a large number of false arrests.[3]
Operation Ore followed the similar crackdown in the United States, called Operation Avalanche; in the US 100 people were charged from the 35,000 US access records available.[6] In total 390,000 individuals in over 60 countries were found to have accessed material in the combined investigations.
The Catholic Church - not the exception but the rule?
ReplyDeleteThe woman who outed Pope Francis’ close friend as a serial child rapist was found dead early Saturday morning by Argentinian police.
https://newspunch.com/woman-outed-popes-friend-child-rapist-dead/?fbclid=IwAR2BG0Kp9lopIR3ttxEaEnk_mnEOiX4hpwN3nwb_KtBpxUZ6Zc1Z2poIjSk
"Natacha Jaitt had accused Gustavo Vera, a longtime friend of Pope Francis, of being a sex trafficker and a child rapist. During a pre-dawn raid in the early hours of Saturday morning, her dead body was discovered at a resort near Buenos Aires.
"Jaitt claimed in October that Vera was Pope Francis’ “accomplice.” She tweeted: “Justo Gustavo Vera, is a pimp, sex-trafficker, and accomplice of the Pope and, as I predicted, was tried for misappropriation of funds at Alameda and other illegal acts. God will do what is just, someday. Amen.”
https://twitter.com/NatachaJaitt/status/1046685292680368130?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
"Lifesitenews.com reports: Police arrived at the Xanadu event complex near the capital of Argentina, where Jaitt was found unresponsive in bed. After her death was confirmed, police began investigating. A coroner determined on Saturday that Jaitt died of multi-organ failure; her body showed no signs of violence. She was a widow and mother of two children."
Hi Ed. I just wanted to give you the 'thumbs up' for you interview with Alfred Webre. It was very gallant of you and couldn't have been easy discussing the details in a second language (English) I thought you managed to get some salient points over on the Hampstead affair and particularly as regards the outrageous treatment of Sabine, as if she were a terrorist or child abuser herself. Following her original arrest and bail conditions, I advised when she telephoned me, to stay clear of the subject so as not to give them any excuse to pursue her. Whether she did or not I don't know, but the fact that they used her presentation to the Church of England as a trap and pretext, is particularly reprehensible, it seems to me, for both Church and State. I am glad you have kept in touch with her. I now have a prison address and intend to write a letter of support and as you know I have used my blog - that has now had over 300 000 'hits' - to try to influence opinion, with little success I have to say. High Court injunctions have been applied that make it very tricky and have obviously frightened off any mainstream media treatment of the subject, other than to repeat the government narrative, which is a lie. There could be no more reliable confirmation that the collusion and complicity must go right to the top of the British Government. This is a shocking conclusion and highlights all government assurances to the contrary as hypocritical window dressing. Although there was a "Free Sabine" FB group, this now appears to have been suspended. If so I would be interested to know of any other that you might be aware of. The injustice of a prison sentence, let alone for nine years, needs to be kept in the public eye, although as we have seen with Melanie Shaw, public campaigns can almost be counter-productive, making the State even more repressive and cruel. Your views on any of this would be welcomed.
ReplyDeleteWith kind regards, Tim Veater.
Note the first interview took place from 10.30 pm in the evening of a nine year old girl who made serious allegations of abuse, yet she is not supported by any independent adult. This is a clear breach of established police rules for interviewing people let alone children. Why? Following the second interview shown on the 11th November, 2014, the children were removed from their mother (abducted?) by the police/social workers, on the pretext of protection, despite the fact that her mother had never been accused of cruelty. Incredibly the natural father who DID have documented cases of violence against his wife and children has subsequently been afforded full parental control. The second interview is also carried out without an independent adult supporter and the interviewing policeman (DC Martin) seems only interested in pressing the importance of not lying (the sub text of which is that she was) and in pursuing a theme of her step-father abusing her with her mother's support. He ignores her poignant prefix that "We were used to hurting". Any genuine interviewer would have picked up on this and asked what she meant but he ignores it completely, interested only in constructing an exagerated case against Abraham, also ignoring her statement that "He is kind." Throughout these interviews, the substantive claims are not pursued whereas the inferior ones (however undesireable they may appear) were. This was an obvious tactic adopted to lessen the importance of the one and increase the importance of the other, later used by the Judge to excuse a proper police investigation and to justify the decision to remove the children from their mother and locate them with their father whom they had accused of unspeakable acts. The tactic is so transparent to be chilling. Note also the dramatic change in body language (slumped in the chair) at the third interview (17.9.2014) when this child's psychological stability had been further assaulted by having been removed from her mother to a state of fostering limbo. Her brother exhibits similar changes in body language. Clearly both were under direct or indirect influence to retract their extensive, corroborative previous testimony which the police tried desperately to suppress, subsequently continued by the British Family and Criminal Courts. With the aid of the internet, literally millions have now seen the interviews and made their own minds up as to the truth of their original allegations, the seriousness of which is only exceeded by the extent of the concerted effort to rubbish them as 'hoax', that reaches to the very top of the British legal, political and information establishment. Only one conclusion can be drawn: that there has been an egregious 'cover-up', either to control the reputational damage to church and state or worse that elements of the British State with enormous power and influence were party to it!
ReplyDeleteSee: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaagxEh67EI&t=3500s
ReplyDeleteAt 22 mins on this video a first hand account of how MI5 tried to get Tommy Robinson to work for them "to control the situation if there's a terrorist attack."
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnQ3pmDjfkc
https://www.facebook.com/miketarraga1/videos/252364545896154/?notif_id=1586449623814201¬if_t=live_video_explicit
ReplyDeleteJon Wedger was live.
5 hours ago ·
Following
Live from Brixton London
#HAMPSTEAD, BBC, NEW YORK TIMES & CHILD PORNOGRAPHY
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUj5F_Mtn8Q