Sunday 24 February 2019

FLIGHTS OF FANCY? Calum Douglas investigation into Flight 77

1 comment:

  1. Am I overlooking something but does not this evidence if reliable suggest TWO aircraft? Namely a conventional one, whether Flight 77 or a substitute fly the trajectory described; i.e. OVER the Pentagon; whilst simultaneously a Cruise missile or similar did the damage shown? Incidentally the fuselage of a plane is largely made of low mass/weight alloy. Only the two engines situated far apart on the wings have the mass to do structural damage to reinforced concrete. Clearly one central hole cannot be reconciled with an aircraft but fits precisely the sort of damage a high explosive missile would cause. The absence of any aircraft debris including the titanium engines is not only conclusive proof that this was NOT a passenger aircraft but also the politicians and military hierarchy in charge at the time must be guilty of a fraud and crime of heinous proportions for which they have never been prosecuted. Who can we say in the machinery of American Government has not been complicit? What credibility on ANY subject can it therefore claim? In the light of it, why should we have ANY faith in American justice or anything it says or does. It must in fact be a thoroughly CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.