A Charlie Kirk Conspiracy?
21.10.2025: Begin was only the first of the many true terrorists who headed up the Israeli regime posing as "the only democratic government in the Middle East". Is it any wonder that it became the undisputed assassination and genocidal state of the world from its inception to now. The unconstrained murdering of anyone it takes a disliking to or anyone who opposes its crimes, is in its DNA. Israel is the biggest and most dangerous fraud in history, aided and abetted by gentile states it regards with contempt. Even the true explanation of 9/11 and the part Israel played in it, failed to dent American support. Fortunately, its treatment of Gaza may have dented it but is it enough? It is said no American under thirty now supports the Zionist state. It was the reason why vacillating Charlie Kirk had to be removed, but as usual the FBI and CIA work hard to cover Mossad involvement as well as its own. What a can of worms? (TTV)
The Sergeants Affair 
Murdered 82 British soldiersKidnapped two Brits as collateral. When Britain did not meet their demand, they tortured and hung them.
The jews booby-trapped their bodies, which injured a British officer when they were cut down.A note was written that more Brits will continue to get killed.
The person who led this terrorist act, Menachem Begin, ended up becoming Israel's prime minister and received a 
Noble Peace prize.Tyler Robinson can not be guilty as charged!
11.10.2025 46.1 From: https://x.com/search?q=kirk%20video&src=typeahead_click&f=top Moment of bullet impact (high definition) The red area on Kirk's right temple appears to be the entry wound. Note how the intercranial pressure extends the lower jaw skin and between the shoulder blades (scapulae)
46.2 Cerebral fluid being ejected from the area of Kirk's right temple.
46.3 It flies rearward. It cannot be his necklace which remains in place or an ear piece as it is clear he wasn't wearing one. This is the viscous fluid that surrounds the brain and probably brain material itself forced from the bullet hole by the intense pressure inside the skull. The trajectory is wholly consistent with the reported post-mortem observation of damage to brain and C2 - C6 vertebrae.
46.4 Notice how the head is forced back and to his left. If the round red mark and wound on the lower left side of his neck is the exit site of some of the bullet it suggests a downward trajectory from a very high point - even a drone in the sky?
46.5 He keels over, back and to his LEFT, wholly consistent with a projectile from his right -
See also:
https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2025/09/the-killing-of-charlie-kirk-considered.html
https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2025/09/charlie-kirk-killing.html
I have added a question mark to the title, although I am fully persuaded there was one – a conspiracy that is - and for good measure a cover-up. If you find one, you always find the other. In fact we can regard them as Siamese Twins! It is in fact impossible to explain the circumstances of Charlie Kirk's assassination without high level and detailed planning and execution. Incredible as it may seem the prosecuting authorities must either be utterly incompetent or utterly corrupt.
By the same token I am also satisfied that even if Tyler Robinson, the government's preferred killer, was on the roof of the Losee Building, at the Utah Valley University (UVU) with his grand-father's rifle – and it's a moot point – even if he fired off a round – an even bigger moot point – he is decidedly, positively not the killer of Charlie Kirk!
How can I be so sure, a distant, disconnected key-board tapper, with little experience of firing guns and less of investigating the dastardly crime of murder, let alone of someone with such a huge following?
The reason is quite simple. It is a physical impossibility that a gun and bullet, designed to bring down Elk with energy to spare, would be stopped by Charlie Kirk's neck, even if it came into contact with his vertebrae – or any other element of his skeleton or anatomy for that matter. The bullet would have incontrovertibly, inevitably burst its way through his body, leaving a large exit wound as it continued on its way, leaving a hole and blood splatter on the canvas behind.
That it clearly did neither, proves beyond doubt the bullet did not come from the rifle and that if as is claimed Robinson was with it (or not as the case may be) he cannot be the murderer.
This of course is just basic logic but we cannot expect the Utah State Prosecutor, the State Police or the FBI to be endowed with such an essential attribute can we, when within thirty three (33) hours there was an arrest, confession and open and shut case? How stupid we must be to doubt or question the official narrative, despite the simple and unavoidable problem described above?
Notwithstanding this most fundamental of observations, the implausability is increased by what can be observed. The location of the putative shooter on the roof of the Losee – which incidentally and ironically houses the Public Health Faculty – and the known location of of Charlie Kirk when he was shot, roughly 150 yards distant at a ten (10) degree incline and a ten (10) degree proclivity to the left, means that if a bullet was fired from that position, it must have resulted in a frontal or anterior, entry point.
Only one injury is observable on Charlie Kirk. (This of course does not rule out other injuries only observable post morten) This is a red circular mark on the left side (RHS as viewed from the front) of his neck. This is milliseconds later associated with blood loss, leaving a stain down his white T-shirt, as one would ecpect as the area contains important veins and arteries (Carotid artery and Jugular vein) as shown in the following illustrations.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
In the following screen grab, the injury site can be clearly seen. If the rifle shot came from the top of the Losee Building, this must be the entry wound as there is no other. This would suggest given the necessary trajectory and the anatomy shown above, not only would the bullet have likely missed the vertebrae entirely but meeting only about four inches or 100 mm of flesh and muscle, there would vave been effectively nothing to impede its route into the material behind. That this did not happen and we are now told the vertebrea C2 to C6 (FIG. 4) were shattered, this is further anatomical confirmation that the bullet did not enter from the front.
FIG. 4.
It is important to emphasise it is reported, there was no exit wound at the back that further rules out the frontal shot from the rifle in the suggested position. We are forced to conclude that if the red spot is the mark of an entry wound, the bullet must have come from somewhere to Kirk's left, but if in fact it is the evidence of an exit wound it must have come from his right.
FIG.5. From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7gQadWvKk4
Now a further point from the geometry of the wound and whether it was entry or exit. Some on-line videos have suggested that the bullet came from somewhere elevated to Kirk's left and the red mark and wound is where it entered. However this presents a problem reconciling the trajectory to the vertebrae damage. The wound is low down in the neck and if continuing down ward would more likely have damaged C7 and T1 and then ended up in the right side of the chest or thorax, if it didn't escape the body completely. This also of course would implicate a less powerful weapon than that accused.
However a bullet coming from Charlie's right (our left) fits the circumstances far more accurately. First there is the visible evidence of him being thrown to his left and back. This cannot be reconciled with a force of around a thousand foot-pounds coming from his left. Further an elevated angle to the right side of his head would approximate to an exit wound low down on the left side of his neck.
It would also account for the C2/C6 damage and the instantaneous demise. Only an autopsy can settle these issues, including what blood vessels were severed, as there is an issue as to whether the blood flowed or spurted under pressure. It is possible the heart stopped instantaneously or the carotid was missed. It is also noticeable from the available video, that the physical and physiological changes that occurred – the ballooning of the neck and the upward shift of his top to his left in mere micro-seconds - suggest a kinetic energy arriving from Kirk's right.
For all these reasons, I believe the official version of the rifle shot from the Losee is utterly untenable and the theory that it came from Kirk's left far less likely that it came from somewhere to his right. From what elevation and direction can only be determined by the entry wound, internal damage and final resting place of the bullet, either iside or outside the body.
This is what makes the autopsy findings, their veracity and clarity so important. It also makes the confusion over whether, when, where and by whom it was carried out so crucial. Given the public nature of the incident, the fact that it was murder and the high profile of the person involved, it is utterly incredible that there should have been any doubt or confusion as to its implementation. We can only observe that it appears to have highly irregular and suspicious.
So to conclude this part of the discussion, I can only reference my old friend Sherlock Holmes once again, namely that when you have positively eliminated an explanation, what explanations remain, however implausible, must contain the answer. A frontal shot from the rifle identified must for all the reasons stated, be ruled out. Therefore whatever bullet entered Charlie Kirk, killing him instantly, must have come from a different weapon and a different location. Overwhelmingly that appears to be from somewhere on his RIGHT. Of course locating its exact location and sourse is a wholly different matter. There are however some interesting possibilities and indicators.
17.10.2025: James 11th made me laugh. Thanks for that. They were turbulent times for sure when people took their politics and religion seriously. The Duke of Monmouth was a bit of a flamboyant pop star though was undermined by his illigitimacy and of couse came to a rather humiliating bad end begging forgiveness from his uncle without success. His 'rabble army' consisted of mainly of tradesmen and small holders from Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire, steeped in protestantism and anti-popery, beguiled by what Monmouth seemed to offer. The nation was deeply suspicious of what James II was up to, particularly in regards to his secret negotiations with the Catholic King of France, swapping fealty for big financial support so he could dodge Parliamentary conditions to tax raising. Thirty five years previous, it had been the Crown v. Parliament and Cromwell came out on top. Five years later it was the much more savvy and disciplined Duke of Orange that made James run away, and laid the seeds for rebellions in 1715 and 1745 and for centuries more in Ireland, of which the 'Orange Order' and the 'troubles' is a remnant. We are all children of time and prisoners of history!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.