Increasing toll of IDF deaths.
Apparently since the start of the Gazan offensive 888 IDF soldiers (an interesting number!) have been killed. How many more have been injured physically or psychologically is not available but it must run into tens of thousands. To get a flavour of the true experience and feelings of those poor brainwashed soldiers, read the article from Haaritz at bottom of page.
A Colonial Project in Collapse: The Death of Foreign Soldiers Fighting an Illegal Occupation in Palestine
Hat tip Suhair Nafal
The recent deaths of three Israeli soldiers — Shoham Menahem, Shlomo Yakir Shrem, and Yuliy Faktor — illustrate a stark and unsettling reality: Israel continues to send young people, many with no historical or ancestral ties to Palestine, into a war of occupation against an indigenous people fighting for their survival. None of these soldiers were rooted in the land they were ordered to dominate. Nor were their families. Their presence in Palestine is not an accident of geography or culture, but a product of deliberate settler-colonial policy.
For over seven decades, the Israeli state has pursued a demographic engineering project designed to displace and replace the native Palestinian population. This policy, codified in the 1950 Law of Return,[^1] encourages Jews from anywhere in the world to settle in occupied Palestine — often receiving financial incentives, housing, and military training upon arrival. In stark contrast, millions of Palestinians expelled during the Nakba in 1948 remain stateless and barred from returning to their ancestral homes — a clear violation of international law and basic human rights.[^2]
The soldiers who perish in Gaza or the West Bank are often products of a militarized society that indoctrinates youth from an early age into a narrative of entitlement to land stolen through force, displacement, and apartheid. Israeli curricula and media normalize the dehumanization of Palestinians, portraying resistance to occupation as terrorism, while ignoring decades of systematic violence, home demolitions, land theft, and extrajudicial killings carried out by the state.[^3][^4]
These latest casualties are not simply victims of war; they are enforcers of a colonial regime whose legitimacy has been condemned by numerous human rights organizations. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have both declared that Israel operates an apartheid system over Palestinians — a conclusion rooted in extensive legal and factual analysis.[^5][^6]
Their deaths, like those of thousands of other IDF soldiers since October 7, are the tragic result of a morally and legally indefensible project — one that survives only through violence, propaganda, and U.S. military aid. The Zionist enterprise is not a liberation movement; it is a settler-colonial ideology built on erasure and domination.
As history has shown from Algeria to South Africa, no colonial regime — no matter how well-armed — can indefinitely suppress the will of an indigenous population fighting for justice and self-determination. The growing international recognition of Israel’s crimes is not a passing trend. It is a reckoning. And it is long overdue.
References:
[^1]: Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Law of Return, 5710-1950.” https://mfa.gov.il
[^2]: United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), Article 11 (1948). https://unispal.un.org
[^3]: Peled-Elhanan, Nurit. Palestine in Israeli School Books: Ideology and Propaganda in Education. I.B. Tauris, 2012.
[^4]: UN Human Rights Council. “Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel.” (2022) https://www.ohchr.org
[^5]: Amnesty International. Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity, 2022. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/5141/2022/en/
[^6]: Human Rights Watch. A Threshold Crossed: Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution, 2021. https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <jayne.kirkham.mp@parliament.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025, 09:56
Subject: Gaza and the Occupied Territories (Case Ref: JK06695)
From: <jayne.kirkham.mp@parliament.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025, 09:56
Subject: Gaza and the Occupied Territories (Case Ref: JK06695)
Dear Nigel, Thank you for contacting me and for raising your concerns on the situation in Gaza and the other occupied territories.
Like you, I am appalled by the reports coming out of Gaza, in which civilians and aid workers have been killed and I have raised the issue of aid and aid workers particularly with the Prime Minister in Prime Minister’s Questions.
Following the Government of Israel’s announcement of plans to transfer all Palestinian civilians in Gaza to a camp in the city of Rafah, the Labour Friends of Palestine and the Middle East wrote to the Foreign Secretary on 10 July calling for the UK to urgently consider recognising the State of Palestine. As a signatory of the letter, a copy of which is also attached, I will continue to push for this.
After Labour got into power in July 2024, the Government’s legal advisers were asked to look at whether there was any risk that any exports from the UK might be used for military operations in Gaza in violation of international humanitarian law. That legal opinion concluded there was a clear risk that might be the case with some exports and so, as a result, the Government suspended approximately 30 licences for exports to Israel. The situation with export licences is constantly under review.
F35 components that are made in UK factories are not exported to Israel. Under our legal and treaty obligations with 17 other countries they are supplied to a global pool for F-35s. The government has said it could not pull out of the defence programme without endangering international peace.
In the recent High Court case on the F-35 components, the two judges said the case was not about whether the UK should supply arms and other military equipment to Israel - because the government had decided it should not. They were being asked to decide on a particular issue: whether the UK "must withdraw from a specific multilateral defence collaboration" because of the prospect that some UK-manufactured parts may be supplied by someone else to Israel. They ruled that the decision was for the Executive to make. The Government has been transparent that it considers the risks to global and national security posed by withdrawing from the pool and breaching the international obligations and potentially grounding our allies and our own F35s would be so dangerous and significant that they will continue to allow British companies to provide components to the global pool. The Government does not supply any arms to Israel itself.
I support the Government’s decision to suspend trade negotiations with Israel, and to sanction individuals and entities involved in settler violence and expansion. That is an important recent step made by the Government and the Israeli ambassador has been summoned to meet the Minister about what is happening in the occupied territories and the Minister has spoken out about it numerous times. The record of his spoken contributions is here:
https://members.parliament.uk/member/5148/contributions#expand-4946673
Despite the glimmer of hope from January’s ceasefire, the suffering in this conflict has worsened. January showed that another path was possible, and we will continue to push the Netanyahu Government to choose this path. Withholding aid and expanding the war is indefensible; it will not bring the hostages home and must stop.
Thank you for the concern that you have shown about this distressing situation.
Yours
Jayne Kirkham MP
TTV Reply to Nigel:
Sadly this letter sums up the problem of the British position. It has been one of 'expressing concern', devoid of any positive proposals or action. It has been nearly two years of empty rhetoric, as thousands of innocent lives have been violently ended or damaged and a region flattened and millions up-rooted and displaced. It has been a con-trick to cover tacit support for the tyrannical brutal regime, whilst saying just enough to maintain political and domestic support.
The failure to clearly condemn the Israel regime's actions; hosting Israeli politicians and delegations; maintaining trade and intelligence links; supplying arms and tactical support; and the recent banning of the Palestinian Support Group, preposterously labelling it as 'terrorist', is undoubted proof of it. The contrast between its approach to Ukraine and Gaza is eye-watering in its hypocrisy.
The techtonic plates of international opinion have shifted: Israel is no longer seen as the innocent victim, with, in Starmer's words, "the right to defend itself", but as a vicious aggressor, bent on territoral conquest and the erradication of its natural inhabitants. A people that has so effectively hyped its past mistreatment by Europians, is now guilty of the same egregious holocausting of Palestinians.
It is about time the British and European elites reflected this sea-change in public opinion, and made clear to Israel its support was at its end by DEMANDING:
1. An immediate no-fly zone over gaza enforced by European and other military powers
2. An immediate end to Israeli bombing of Gaza, the West Bank and all other foreign territories
3. An immediate and total withdrawal of IDF troops from Gaza to behind the previous border.
4. An immediate removal of all administrative and other barriers to the supply of aid to Gaza to be organised by UNWRA only.
5. An immediate end to the settlement programme in the West Bank and associated harassment of Palestinians living there.
6. Recognition of a Palestinian State based on 1967 boundaries.
These demands should be backed by action. For example providing aid and assistance using military assets by sea and air, and responding appropriately if Israel attempts to block it. Providing naval and ground forces to protect the civilian population from attack. By making it clear the sanctions both military and economic that will be imposed if Israel fails to comply.
Of course this would put Britain and Europe at odds with the United States, but that country is also on the move and fissures have already occured in NATO and beyond, questioning old alliances and postures. Israel is weary of war and in no position to take on the world. It is in its own interests to compromise and withdrawal. It is in humanity's interest, including that of Europe, to ensure that it does.
Will it happen? Well of course that is another matter entirely. Regards, Tim.
Gilad Atzmon:
When Zionism Became Judaism
Chabad-Lubavitch is one of the largest and most influential Jewish movements in the world. Chabad has more than 5000 centers all over the world. These centers are located in over 100 countries and all 50 US states.
Pre 1948
Like most traditional Orthodox (especially Chassidic) Judaism, early Chabad leaders (pre 1948) were strongly opposed to Zionism. They saw the movement as a heretical attempt to replace divine redemption with human political action, led by non-religious Jews.
The 5th Rebbe, Rabbi Sholom Dovber Schneersohn (1860-1920), was a vocal opponent of secular Zionism and the Mizrachi movement (religious Zionists).
The 6th Rebbe, Rabbi Yosef Yitzchak Schneersohn (1880-1950), maintained this opposition, viewing the secular Zionist enterprise as spiritually dangerous. In the light of the Holocaust, however, the 6th Rebbe recognised the establishment of Israel (1948) as a ‘practical refuge’ for Jews and began establishing institutions in the Jewish State. The 6th rebbe, before his passing in 1950, also instructed his followers to do everything possible to ensure that territories liberated in any future war remain under Jewish control. This shifted the focus towards the ‘land's sanctity.’
Post 1967
The 1967 Six-Day War was the critical turning point for world Jewry Chabad included. Israel's military victory, including the capture of East Jerusalem, the Western Wall, and Judea & Samaria (West Bank), was seen by many religious Jews, including Chabad, as a profound divine intervention and a step towards redemption.
The 7th Rebbe's Leadership: Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994), who became Rebbe in 1951, embraced this perspective fervently. He saw the newly accessible holy sites, especially the Western Wall, as unparalleled opportunities for Jewish spiritual connection and the advancement of the Judaic cause.
Under the 7th Rebbe, Chabad's support for Israel transformed. Chabad became known for its strong support for the IDF,its commanders and its actions (war crimes included) . Zionism became a core Judaic religious duty based on:
1.Pikuach Nefesh: The supreme commandment to protect Jewish lives against all odds.
2. The Sanctity of Eretz Yisrael: The land itself, especially the liberated biblical heartland (Judea, Samaria, Gaza, Golan, East Jerusalem), was intrinsically holy. Settling it and ensuring Jewish control was a religious obligation tied to the Divine promise.
3. Messianic Fulfillment: The 6th Rebbe saw Israel's existence and its victories, particularly in 1967, as clear signs of the unfolding Messianic process. Protecting and building up the land was preparing for the ultimate redemption.
STILL IT CONTINUES! IT HAS TO STOP.
In just 48 hours, my city lost more than 50 people.
Not numbers.
People.
Names I knew.
Faces I loved.
Men I grew up beside.
Families who sat on their doorsteps. Children I watched grow up —
Now buried beneath rubble.
Now just silence where life once was.
Among the many lives stolen, two names broke me completely:
Hamed Suleiman Abu Khoti, 48 years old
and
Hussein Mohammed Abu Khoti, 35 years old.
They were cousins.
They died together.
Not in battle. Not with weapons.
But under the weight of a war that shows no mercy — not even to the sick, not even to the kind.
Hamed married my aunt, but he treated me like his own son.
When I was a child, he took me in the car on his wedding day.
I still remember dancing with him —
me, just a boy, and him, full of joy and warmth.
He loved me so much, he named one of his sons Fares, after me.
In recent years, Hamed was fighting cancer.
He used to travel to Jerusalem for treatment —
until the siege made even medicine unreachable.
Five days ago, I spoke to him.
He was weak. Tired.
He told me quietly:
“Maybe death is more merciful than this life.”
He didn’t die from cancer.
He died from an Israeli airstrike.
He died in his home — not a battlefield, not a hospital.
A man fighting for his life… until war made even that impossible.
Beside him died his cousin, Hussein —my childhood classmate.
We sat in the same classrooms, shared the same breaks, the same childhood dreams.
He grew into a man who worked with his hands and heart.
A traveling electrician, Hussein repaired fridges, washing machines, lights —going from house to house helping people live a little better in a place filled with hardship.
He was one of those quiet heroes who didn’t ask for recognition —
just a chance to help.
In a place where everything is broken, Hussein spent his life fixing what he could.
Now both are gone.
Hamed leaves behind his wife Reem,
and five children —
two of them were wounded during the first displacement from Khan Younis.
They were taken to Qatar for medical treatment.
But their father didn’t make it out.
He died before he could hold them again.
And Hussein —he leaves behind neighbors who depended on him,
and a silence no one can repair.
What kind of world kills a man dying of cancer?
What kind of justice allows an electrician to be erased with a missile?
This is not collateral damage.
This is the deliberate destruction of life, of love, of people who were simply trying to survive.
I have mourned over 50 people in two days.
I don’t know how to carry this grief.
I don’t know how to keep breathing when everything familiar is turning into names on a list.
But I write this so the world won’t forget.
Say their names.
Hamed Suleiman Abu Khoti, 48.
Hussein Mohammed Abu Khoti, 35.
They were not terrorists.
They were not threats.
They were family men. Workers. Fighters for life.
Hamed fought for his life — and lost to a war with no mercy.
Hussein fixed what was broken — but no one could fix what broke that day.
May they rest in peace.
May their memories live longer than this silence.
And may justice find its way to Gaza —before there’s no one left to name.
الله غالب
Fares Abulebda
15 July 2025
Pay attention to them, not to me.
From: https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-07-03/ty-article-magazine/.premium/idf-soldiers-reveal-what-no-one-in-israel-wants-to-hear-about-months-of-fighting-in-gaza/00000197-cf00-dcbf-abd7-df3d0ea30000?fbclid=IwY2xjawLjNe9leHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHtTd5m2wfCWO7Cp421q1Ml95CS4QJLJuyGuw1LFeMferpiIuCgcA_li3INOe_aem_j2SnpJ3-6zbaVlOLuKvAhA
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.