Tuesday 12 September 2023

Google Censorship of Blogger Posts



16.9.2023: The stats relating to the quantity of midazalam used in 2020 are instructive and inditing. As I have suggested from that time, the spike in deaths in the largely cohort of elderly in an institutional setting, was likely and primarily caused by medical and organisational intervention NOT an infectious virus. The peaks thereafter (from December 2020) are closely correlated to the roll out of the vaccine and its boosters. In both categories it has been the medical interventions that have been the true cause in related illness and death, although the government has studiously ignored, denied and intentionally not set up the measures, statistical and otherwise, to prove it. The topic has been far worse than a fiasco, which is why government is obstructive of any proper enquiry, instead hiding behind an irrelevant one set up to fail.

EVERYONE in the world should be required to listen to this expert doctor!

https://odysee.com/@Voorwaarheid:1/2023-09-22-Toespraak-Dr-Mccullough-Bij-Europees-Parlement:b?fbclid=IwAR32h_uwmfj1UK14jdERVFP5IlvG0QjbsOiz5xOCCsbsi3HxGZKvW9zew8s


(Via Silvano Trotta): I know, the numbers are so enormous that it's beyond comprehension for many. But don't forget that there is massive over mortality in countries that have massively vaccinated, not in those that haven't. The media in charge is hiding this, so sir and ma'am "anyone watching the media" ignore it.
But for those who care, a study in 17 countries found a “certain causal link” between all-cause mortality spikes and rapid COVID-19 vaccines and recalls.
They also found that the 17 countries, which represent 10.3% of the world’s population, experienced unprecedented increases in all-cause mortality, which corresponds directly to vaccine and callers rollouts.
Through a statistical analysis of mortality data, the authors calculated that the risk of lethal injection toxicity increased significantly with age, but averaged 1 death per 800 injections, all ages and countries combined.
According to this calculation, with 13.5 billion injections administered through September 2, 2023, researchers estimate there have been 17 million deaths due to COVID-19 vaccination (± 500,000) worldwide since the vaccine was deployed.


"Hello,
As you may know, our community guidelines
(https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy
) describe the boundaries for what we
allow – and don't allow – on Blogger. Your post titled ‘’ was flagged to us
for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted
the post, previously at
Why was your blog post deleted?
Your content has violated our misleading content policy. Please follow
the community guidelines link in this email to learn more.
If you wish to request a review of the post, click the following link:
This will trigger a review of the post.
We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make
sure that they are in line with our standards, as additional violations
could result in termination of your blog.
For more information, please review the following resources:
Blogger community guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/contentpolicy
Yours sincerely,
The Blogger Team"



I have recently had (at least) two articles deleted by nameless Google individuals after alleged anonymous 'referrals' or complaints. (For a non technical person such as me, it is difficult to tell exactly what articles have been deleted over time although in the past I have noticed I could not locate some that I knew I had written)

As a naive person I had been under the impression that the authorship and opinions expressed were mine alone, and that the platform was committed to free speech, where ideas challenging the prevailing narrative, could be posted for all to see and form their own opinions about. I now know my naivety was well rewarded.

I reproduce the Google Blogger Content Policy below. On the face of it, it appears a well-meaning and sensible policy to protect viewers and society more generally from dangerous or damaging material but as with all well-meaning rules and initiatives, the Devil is not only in the detail but how it is applied in specific cases. 

It may take on the appearance of objectivity but in practice subjective decisions are made to an essentially hidden agenda. Some - primarily official - opinions, trump others, even where the facts point in a different direction.  Some complaints or 'referrals' obviously carry more weight than the right of individuals to express themselves freely on important topics. 

Where articles can be deleted without explanation as to what is actually deemed to have breached the Content Policy or who registered a complaint and the reasons for it, takes us back to Mediaeval Venice and the Inquisition, though fortunately sans actual torture, though the instuments of it are alluded to. (See the 'Enforcement' section of the policy)  Galileo escaped the thumbscrew only on condition of agreeing to remain forever silent and not offend the 'truth' - which was in fact a lie. Those that lie are always motivated to silence those that challenge it.

Times may have changed and we like to think we and they are more enlightened, but opinion is still seen as dangerous by some. Never was this more obvious than with the subject of 'Co v id' that has dominated the public discourse for three years or more, particularly in the Western World. 

It has been projected as a medical 'pandemic' and emergency to facilitate interventions that have themselves proved dangerous. It has inspired an unprecidented media campaign to influence attitudes and behaviour, matched only by a converse effort to stifle opposition to it and the dissemination of alternative views. 

Media platforms have been in the vanguard of this operation and I have felt its consequences. You quickly discover you tow the official line or you have no platform. Youtube, Nextdoor, Twitter (as was) Facebook and now Google have all intervened to exclude my impersonal, reasoned, scientific argument. 

Like Andrew Bridgen MP others not only walk out, they attempt every means possible, to prevent the truth being told. Not that I wish to compare myself to Andrew Bridgen either for impact or suffering but I and a significant number of others have felt the impact of daring to challenge the official narrative.

The two articles of mine that have been deemed to break the Blogger Policy, both covered the topic referred to above. The first was entitled "The covid death-rate scandal", the second "Covid vaccine adverse effects. Take at your peril".  

The first used official figures to illustrate the increased post-vaccination death rate and referenced a YouTube video by Dr. John Campbell discussing it. The second, published an artical by David Dickson quoting offical figures and again referenced a video bt Dr. John Campbell. It also quoted from one of Pfizer's own research documents verbatim.  

How either of these posts could have broken Google's content policy defeats me, unless the interpretation of the policy is intentionally slanted to reflect (huge) vested interests and to remove anything that disturbs the prevailing government line:  "Move along, nothing to see here."

The sinister side to this is, as I have said, you are not allowed to know what it was specifically that was deemed to have broken the code, or who it was who lodged an objection or the grounds of doing so. No doubt those that actually read my Blog will be relieved to know they are being protected from such harmful material, whilst the true effect might actually be the total reverse.

I shall now wait in awe to see whether the invigilators deem this unacceptible also?


A South African court has ordered that the Pfizer vaccine contract between the SA Government & Pfizer be made public.
It‘a reasonable to assumed that the terms and conditions in this contract would be very similar for every nation.
Clause 5.5 provides,
Purchaser (the government) further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.
So while poltiticans around the world were assuring the public that the vaccines were "safe & effective" - they’d signed a contract acknowledging that the long-term effects & efficacy of the Vaccine were not known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that were not known.




 

Who owns Google now?
Alphabet Inc.
Google / Parent organization
Image of Who owns Google now?
Alphabet Inc. is an American multinational technology conglomerate holding company headquartered in Mountain View, California. It was created through a restructuring of Google on October 2, 2015, and became the parent company of Google and several former Google subsidiaries.
 Wikipedia






By 
NATHAN REIFF
 
Updated December 27, 2022
Reviewed by 
KHADIJA KHARTIT

https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/011516/top-5-google-shareholders-goog.asp

Alphabet Inc. (GOOG, and GOOGL) is a holding company and parent of Google. The company provides software and Internet-related services including web browsing and search, cloud computing, streaming entertainment, and mobile operating systems, among others. The parent also is involved on a broad array of businesses, including cloud computing, software and hardware, advertising services, and mobile and desktop applications. The company, originally called Google, was founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin in 1998. Now, more than two decades later, it has grown into one of the most-visited websites globally.1

This growth has transformed Alphabet into one of the largest companies in the world, with a market capitalization of nearly $1.9 trillion. The company has trailing 12 month (TTM) net income of $62.9 billion and TTM revenue of $220.3 billion. All of these figures are as of Oct. 7, 2021.2 Alphabet has three classes of shares. The ticker GOOGL represents the company's class A shares and are traded as common stock, with a one-share-one-vote structure. GOOG represents Alphabet's class C shares, which have no voting rights. The company also has class B shares, which are held by the founders and other insiders and which have 10 votes per share. Alphabet's class B shares are not publicly traded.

The top individual insider shareholders of Google are Larry Page, Sergey Brin, and Sundar Pichai, and the top institutional shareholders are Vanguard Group Inc., BlackRock Inc. (BLK), T. Rowe Price Associates Inc., and FMR LLC.











Blogger is an American online content management system founded in 1999 which enables its users to write blog with time-stamped entries. Pyra Labs developed it before being acquired by Google in 2003. Google hosts the blogs, which can be accessed through a subdomain of blogspot.com. Wikipedia

Owner: Google
Date launched: 23 August 1999
Written in: Python
Written in: Python
Founder(s): Evan Williams, Meg Hourihan



Blogger content policy

Blogger is a service for self-expression and communication. We believe that Blogger increases the availability of information, encourages healthy debate and makes possible new connections between people. It is our belief that censoring this content is contrary to a service that bases itself on freedom of expression.

However, in order to uphold these values, we need to curb abuse that threatens our ability to provide this service and the freedom of expression that it encourages. As a result, there are some boundaries on the type of content that can be hosted with Blogger. The boundaries that we've defined are those that both comply with legal requirements and that serve to enhance the service as a whole.

We rely on blog readers to report content that they find inconsistent with Blogger's community guidelines. If you encounter a post that you believe violates community guidelines, please report it using the 'Report' link located in the navigation of most blogs. If you are unable to find the link on the blog, you can still report suspected violations here.

Community guidelines

Our community guidelines play an important role in keeping the open web a welcoming place to create. Please respect these guidelines. We may update our policies from time to time, so please check back here. Note that when applying the policies below, we may make exceptions based on artistic, educational, documentary or scientific considerations or where there are other substantial benefits to the public from not taking action on the content.

Adult content

We do allow adult content on Blogger, including images or videos that contain nudity or sexual activity. If your blog contains adult content, please mark it as 'adult' in your Blogger settings. We may also mark blogs with adult content where the owners have not. All blogs marked as 'adult' will be placed behind an 'adult content' warning interstitial. If your blog has a warning interstitial, please do not attempt to circumvent or disable the interstitial – it is for everyone’s protection.

There are some exceptions to our adult content policy:

  • Do not use Blogger as a way to make money on adult content. For example, don't create blogs that contain ads for or links to commercial porn sites.
  • We do not allow illegal sexual content, including image, video or textual content that depicts or encourages rape, incest, bestiality or necrophilia.
  • Do not post or distribute private nude, sexually explicit or non-explicit intimate and sexual images or videos without the subject’s consent. If someone has posted a private nude, sexually explicit or non-explicit intimate and sexual image or video of you, please report it to us here.
Child sexual abuse and exploitation

Do not create, upload or distribute content that exploits or abuses children. This includes all child sexual abuse materials. To report content on a Google product that may exploit a child, click Report abuse. If you find content elsewhere on the Internet, please contact the appropriate agency in your country directly.

More broadly, Google prohibits the use of our products to endanger children. This includes but is not limited to predatory behaviour towards children such as:

  • ‘Child grooming’ (for example, befriending a child online to facilitate, either online or offline, sexual contact and/or exchanging sexual imagery with that child);
  • ‘Sextortion’ (for example, threatening or blackmailing a child by using real or alleged access to a child’s intimate images);
  • Sexualisation of a minor (for example, imagery that depicts, encourages or promotes the sexual abuse of children or the portrayal of children in a manner that could result in the sexual exploitation of children); and
  • Trafficking of a child (for example, advertising or solicitation of a child for commercial sexual exploitation).

We will remove such content and take appropriate action, which may include reporting to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, limiting access to product features and disabling accounts. If you believe a child is in danger of or has been subject to abuse, exploitation or trafficking, contact the police immediately.

Dangerous and illegal activities

Do not use this product to engage in illegal activities or to promote activities, goods, services or information that cause serious and immediate harm to people or animals. While we permit general information for educational, documentary, scientific or artistic purposes about this content, we draw the line when the content directly facilitates harm or encourages illegal activity. We will take appropriate action if we are notified of unlawful activities, which may include reporting you to the relevant authorities.

Harassment, bullying and threats

Do not harass, bully or threaten others. We also don’t allow this product to be used to engage or incite others in these activities. This includes singling someone out for malicious abuse, threatening someone with serious harm, sexualising someone in an unwanted way, exposing private information of someone else that could be used to carry out threats, disparaging or belittling targets of violence or tragedy, inciting others to carry out these activities or harassing someone in other ways. Keep in mind that online harassment is illegal in many places and can have serious offline consequences for both the harasser and the target. We may take appropriate action if we are notified of threats of harm or other dangerous situations, which may include reporting you to the relevant authorities.

Hate speech

Do not engage in hate speech. Hate speech is content that promotes or condones violence against, or has the primary purpose of inciting hatred against, an individual or group on the basis of their race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, age, nationality, veteran status, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or any other characteristic that is associated with systemic discrimination or marginalisation.

Impersonation and misrepresentation of identity

Do not impersonate a person or organisation or misrepresent yourself. This includes impersonating any person or organisations that you don’t represent or providing misleading information about a user/site’s identity, qualifications, ownership, purpose, products, services or business.
This also includes content or accounts misrepresenting or concealing their ownership or primary purpose such as misrepresenting or intentionally concealing your country of origin or other material details about yourself when directing content about politics, social issues or matters of public concern to users in a country other than your own. We do allow parody, satire and the use of pseudonyms or pen names – just avoid content that is likely to mislead your audience about your true identity.

Malware and similar malicious content

Do not transmit malware or any content that harms or interferes with the operation of the networks, servers end user devices or other infrastructure. This includes the direct hosting, embedding or transmission of malware, viruses, destructive code or other harmful or unwanted software or similar content. This also includes content that transmits viruses, causes pop-ups, attempts to install software without the user’s consent or otherwise impacts users with malicious code. See our Safe Browsing policies for more information.

Misleading content

Do not distribute content that deceives, misleads or confuses users. This includes:

Misleading content related to civic and democratic processes: content that is demonstrably false and could significantly undermine participation or trust in civic or democratic processes. This includes information about public voting procedures, political candidate eligibility based on age/place of birth, election results or census participation that contradicts official government records. It also includes incorrect claims that a political figure or government official has died, has been involved in an accident or is suffering from a sudden serious illness.

Misleading content related to harmful conspiracy theories: content that promotes or lends credibility to beliefs that individuals or groups are systematically committing acts that cause widespread harm. This content is contradicted by substantial evidence and has resulted in or incites violence.

Misleading content related to harmful health practices: misleading health or medical content that promotes or encourages others to engage in practices that may lead to serious physical or emotional harm to individuals or serious public health harm.

Manipulated media: media that has been technically manipulated or doctored in a way that misleads users and may pose a serious risk of egregious harm.

Misleading content may be allowed in an educational, documentary, scientific or artistic context, but please be mindful to provide enough information to help people understand this context. In some cases, no amount of context will allow this content to remain on our platforms.

Non-consensual explicit imagery (NCEI)

Do not store or distribute private nude, sexually explicit or non-explicit intimate and sexual images or videos without the subject's consent. If someone has sent a private nude, sexually explicit or non-explicit intimate and sexual image or video of you, please report it to us here.

Personal and confidential information

Do not store or distribute other people’s personal or confidential information without authorisation. This includes sensitive information, such as UK National Insurance numbers, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, images of signatures and personal health documents. In most cases where this information is broadly available elsewhere on the Internet or in public records, like national ID numbers listed on a government website, we generally don’t process enforcement actions.

Phishing

Do not use this product for phishing. This includes soliciting or collecting sensitive data such as passwords, financial details and National Insurance numbers.

Regulated goods and services

Do not sell, advertise or facilitate the sale of regulated goods and services. Regulated goods and services include alcohol, gambling, pharmaceuticals, unapproved supplements, tobacco, fireworks, weapons or health/medical devices.

Spam

Do not spam. This may include unwanted promotional or commercial content, unwanted content that is created by an automated program, unwanted repetitive content, nonsensical content or anything that appears to be a mass solicitation.

Violent organisations and movements

Known violent non-state organisations and movements are not permitted to use this product for any purpose. Do not distribute content that facilitates or promotes the activities of these groups, such as recruiting, coordinating online or offline activities, sharing manuals or other materials that could facilitate harm, promoting ideologies of violent non-state organisations, promoting terrorist acts, inciting violence or celebrating attacks by violent non-state organisations. Depending upon the content, we may also take action against the user. Content related to violent non-state organisations may be allowed in an educational, documentary, scientific or artistic context, but please be mindful to provide enough information to help people understand the context.

Unauthorised images of minors

Do not store or distribute images of minors without explicit consent from the child's parent, guardian or legal representative. If someone has stored or distributed an image of a minor without necessary consent, please report it to us.

Violence and gore

Do not store or distribute violent or gory content involving real-life people or animals that’s primarily intended to be shocking, sensational or gratuitous. This includes ultra-graphic material, such as dismemberment or close-up footage of mutilated corpses, and graphic material, such as content containing significant amounts of blood. Content may be allowed in an educational, documentary, scientific or artistic context, but please be mindful to provide enough information to help people understand the context. In some cases, content may be so violent or shocking that no amount of context will allow that content to remain on our platforms. Lastly, don't encourage others to commit specific acts of violence.

Enforcement of Blogger's content policy

Please report suspected violations of community guidelines to us using the 'Report' link located in the navigation of most blogs or by clicking here.

When something is reported, it's not automatically removed. Reported content is reviewed by our team to verify that it violates those community guidelines. If the blog does not violate our guidelines, we will not take any action against the blog or blog owner. If we find that a blog does violate our community guidelines, we take one or more of the following actions based on the severity of the violation:

  • Put the blog or post behind a sensitive content warning interstitial
  • Unpublish the post, making it only available to the blog author
  • Delete the offending content, post or blog
  • Disable the author's access to their Blogger account
  • Disable the author's access to their Google Account
  • Report the user to law enforcement

We may also take any of the actions above if we find that a user has created several blogs engaging in repeated abusive behaviour. If you have had a blog disabled, do not create a replacement blog that engages in similar activity.

©2023 Blogger - Privacy policy
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)