Wells Cathedral Clock
"Let nothing perish."
How close are we to perishing again?
Belfield of course has been silenced by the police in concert with the BBC using the harassment legislation. He is only one of many. The charge of harassment is now being used far beyond what it was intended for (the jilted lover, the creepy snoop) to cover anyone who fixates on public or private figures for whatever purpose, be it good or bad. I'm sure I do not need to tell you. As to your suspicions of Rich Planet and the man behind it, I do not share your view, and believe he is genuine and his opinion pretty close to accurate on the subjects he investigates or airs with others. They all seem pretty sound to me. If you have seen his latest, unsurprisingly he is being targeted now by the BBC with the same charge of harassing victims, a charge I think he effectively rebuts. He has also been blocked by YouTube. He must be aware of the dangers posed by this increasingly anti-libertarian state, wishing to cover up heinous crimes and deceptions, whilst pretending to honesty and transparency. The basic rule is the state will allow individuals free expression as long as nobody listens but watch out should you ever get a regular following as of course Belfield and Hall have done.
https://deadline.com/2022/09/alex-belfield-bbc-presenter-jailed-five-years-stalking-1235121403/
https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m001ds10/panorama-disaster-deniers-hunting-the-trolls
From the above Tom Rawstorne article in the Daily Mail:
"Lisa Bridgett was chatting on her mobile while waiting to pick up her daughter from an Ariana Grande concert when a shrapnel-packed bomb exploded. ‘It was a large blast from the left-hand side,’ she recalls. ‘Everything was so quick, but everything was in slow motion.’
The blast at 10.31pm on May 22, 2017, broke her right ankle, severed the middle finger on her left hand and inflicted lacerations to her legs and face. The phone, held to her ear, prevented even more serious injury, diverting a steel bolt packed inside the bomb.
Despite her horrific injuries and multiple operations, Mrs Bridgett knows she is one of the ‘lucky ones’."
Yet again in a claimed terrorist event a remarkable miraculous account of a mobile phone saving a person from much more serious injury. Apart from the unlikelihood of the claim it replicates exactly an incident in the Paris bombings, also highly suspect.
Note how Rawstorne's article sets the scene for less freedom of expression, with the following:
"There is a growing call for a law to prevent people from denying ‘historical events’.
‘We have a law of libel that protects people, and in the same way there should be a law that prevents people on social media from spreading false information that can harm people who have already been seriously harmed,’ the Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, said last week.
‘Victims should be prevented from being retraumatised by denying the historical facts of what happened to them. They should have their right to the facts about what happened protected.’
A statement of the obvious. But one that, in the modern world, no longer goes without saying."
Needless to say the issue turns around what are 'historical events'. Are they descriptions of what really happened or only those accounts put out by the government and approved by them? We have noted on multiple occasions how the latter cannot be trusted when high politics or military operations are involved. That should act as a warning to us all when even tighter controls are being proposed. Following on from the gaoling of Alex Belfield, I am in no doubt that Richard T Hall is now in the cross hairs of the deep state, using the MSM and particularly the BBC, to prepare the ground. Even the official inquiry threw up enough suspicious issues to raise serious questions over the validity of the official account. It is notable that Rawstorne does not engage with Hall's factual assertions but just seeks to denigrate his character and misrepresent them, a sure sign of evil powers and intentions.
"Time waits for no man."
All I do is read and write and most days go out on my bike.
I sometimes do the chores both inside the house and out of doors.
Several times a day I feed the cat. She's very choosy what is what;
Only the best chicken does she eat, with biscuit sprinkled to replete.
The Rayburn also must be fed, to keep it burning hot and red,
For which to bunker I must go, to fill the coal hod bending low.
The washing up too must be done, on daily basis or very soon
It fills the sink with grease and grime, that quickly tends to undermine,
A well ordered kitchen, meals on time.
Occasionally I get the vacuum cleaner out and swear at Henry - such a clumsy lout.
Though dumb, he makes an awful noise, sucking up, the dust destroys
My cob webbed mind and cob webbed gloom, as with what angst I sweep the room.
Yet still despite my best designs, I never seem to clear my mind
Of all the bric-a-brac and jumble gathered there, on floors and shelves and on the stairs.
A cornucopia of things to think, to write, to say, recurring themes that come what may,
Persist, to tantalise the head, a constant irritant instead,
Observing this short life is one big pointless chore, you either learn to love,
Or what is more - it will surely take you down.
@Granny Annie It cannot be coincidence that Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand have followed identical paths, to a large extent aping America, in wars abroad, terrorist events at home, covid panic and lock-downs to name but a few. Of course all of these have justified and facilitated repressive laws that remove historic and fundamental freedoms, almost without a word of dissent from representative bodies. Public reservations and opposition has been supressed and labelled 'right wing extremism and conspiracy theory. Sovereign states thousands of miles apart do not replicate the same phenomena without a 'controlling mind' and central planning. These are not isolated events with arbitrary responses, but coordinated and purposeful, inherently deceitful, but for what purpose and by whom is still in the realms of conjecture. Certainly as in the criminal fraud of 9/11, certain names are obvious suspects. Inevitably they have to be in positions of power and influence, are probably but not necessarily extremely wealthy, but must be part of a network, which by it very nature must be secretive.
To A P-D: The Hampstead case (again!) It was a can of worms, which if allowed to be opened, threatened the reputation of the state, involving as it did both State controlled education and religion. At an even deeper level I feel sure this was an entrapment and/or espionage operation of individuals in the Hampstead catchment area known to the SS. We all know how the '33rds' were woven into the mix. To keep up appearances there had to be an element of investigation but carried out in such peremptory fashion that it could be closed down within weeks. The children had to be removed from the mother, not that they were then in any danger, but because it was essential to shut them up and to that end they were skilfully guided towards retractions - even if partial. Anything they said that supported their account was discredited or ignored; anything that undermined it readily accepted. All normal protocols for dealing with such a case were abandoned (for example the accused was immediately informed of the allegations, no attempt was made to seize electronic equipment, the children were interviewed without an adult representative present, verbal allegations were intentionally not pursued) and the subsequent Family Court hearings were a travesty of justice. None of this would have been possible without directives from the highest levels of the police and Home Office. The secret government's reaction to the story breaking on the internet confirms this was not a little local difficulty, but a full-scale damage limitation exercise and cover-up. Just as the reaction to the McCann case and the 14 million spent on it proves Government complicity, so the reaction to Hampstead proves something much deeper and darker.
Finally! Medical Proof the Covid Jab is "Murder" : Dr. Vernon Coleman.
Lord Jonathan Sumption 'A State of Fear: Covid-19 and Lockdowns'
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.