Covid Vaccinations - "Nothing to worry about" then?
This:
Then this:
Quote: "I am not going to waste your time going over the mountainous evidence and statistics that show, we the Australian people, have been deceived. We have been lied to. (Applause) We must face reality. The Covid gene based vaccines have undoubtedly failed to live up to expectations.
Andrew Bridgen Calls Out UK Institutions For Covering Up Jab Harms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L47SxUaf8sY
Andrew Bridgen SUSPENDED from Parliament:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfwwX0bCf2E
Despite it being virtually impossible to find a copy of the debate in question, the disgraceful apathy of MPs is demonstrated in Dr John Campbell's video below. Besides Bridgen making his case, only FIVE MPs bothered to turn up. This replicates the earlier debate described. MPs are obviously deaf, dumb and blind to the havoc that was caused by the government's Covid policy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb9E3cOPi-c
These so-called vaccines do not prevent infection, they do not prevent transmission and they are not keeping people out of hospital. These vaccines are not safe. They have caused more death and serious adverse effects of any drug in the history of medicine."
Dr. Phillip Altman. BPharm(Hons) MSc. PhD.
Despite the expert opinion of the Australian pharmacist above, as far as the British Government is concerned, there is nothing in Covid vaccines or their roll-out to worry about. Indeed nothing to worry about in its covid policy generally. Clearly it regards everything in the 'Big Pharma Garden' is lovely and the 'roses' there, by any other name, would smell as sweet.
On Monday 24th October, in the middle of a political storm that was gripping the nation, a petition (No. 602171) that had garnered over a 100,000 votes was debated by MPs in Parliament. Political turmoil related to the resignation of Liz Truss as Prime Minister after only forty four days in office, and the choosing of a replacement as Leader of the Conservative Party and thus Prime Minister, was rife. As everyone must now know, only a few days later, with both Boris Johnson and Penny Mordaunt dropping out of the race, Rishi Sunak, was appointed Prime Minister - the first of Indian descent.
It should be noted that the Government had already announced the setting up of a comprehensive enquiry into the Covid epidemic and the Government's response to it. See: http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2022/05/inquiry-into-british-government.html
However as Sir Christopher Chope (I had the pleasure of witnessing his father, a circuit judge in action many years ago) pointed out, only after he had made representations, was vaccine safety and efficacy included in the terms of reference in that inquiry. Government and political parties as demonstrated by the contributions of the Labour Shadow Health Secretary and the representative of SNP have shown a dogged refusal to recognise the significance of its own MRSA and ONS statistics, as well as a mass of other evidence, and opinion. All hide behind the totally unproven claim that the vaccines had prevented millions of deaths and ended the epidemic.
The full Hansard transcript can be found here: https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-10-24/debates/FF880636-BC3B-4BDB-A5E0-D6D4B82B2888/Covid-19VaccinesSafety
The live recording of proceedings in full, though difficult to locate (the YouTube search engine would not bring it up!) can be viewed here:
From this and the images above, it may be seen that despite the undoubted importance of the subject and the fact that more than 107,000 members of the public had signed the petition, of about 620 MPs, such is the apathy and complacency of our elected legislators, only 14 or 15 MPs bothered to turn up to discuss it.
The unintended - or intended - consequence of this was that the said debate was hardly reported by main stream media. Yet again by sleight of hand, the serious topic of harm caused by government covid policy generally, and by dangerous vaccines specifically, passed largely unnoticed by the public at large and no substantive commitments to review the policy were made by the government. The appeal in the petition to appoint a Royal Commission to look into the matter was rejected.
Presumably therefore people, including children over the age of twelve, will continue to be encouraged to take the jab; illness and death will continue to be caused; unknown long term effects will with time become apparent; there will be no legal recourse for those damaged; pharmaceutical companies will continue to make huge profits at the cost of government and taxpayer; government will fail to research properly the adverse effects; and everyone pushing or facilitating the roll out will remain in denial and unaccountable.
The petition submission stated as follows:
“There has been a significant increase in heart attacks and related health issues since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines…This needs immediate and full scientific investigation to establish if there is any possible link with the Covid-19 vaccination rollout.
It is the duty of the Government to ensure that the prescribed medical interventions of its response to Coronavirus are safe. We believe that the recent and increasing volume of data relating to cardiovascular problems since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout began is…enough…to warrant a full Public Inquiry.”
"Throughout my speech, I will point out why I do not think that the Government should launch a public inquiry into vaccine safety; it would be a waste of taxpayers’ money, and is not necessary for reasons that I will discuss."
Clearly therefore he came to the subject with a preformed antagonism to the notion of investigating covid vaccine safety. He was not open minded, quite the reverse. It was obvious from his remarks that he was in effect the mouthpiece of the MHRA and the apologist for his political party and government. Sir Christopher Chope put it succinctly when he said, "My hon. Friend showed himself to be rather the victim of producer capture—the producer in this case being the MHRA." Colburn proved the partisan nature of his contribution by admitting, in contrast to a million others not watched or even been aware of the 2022 Oracle Film called "Safe and Effective: A second Opinion", or indeed any other programme or outlet that took an opposing view. The film may be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o (Now blocked by You Tube for no proper reason) here: https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
As we have discovered with the inquiry into child abuse, which recently reported after nearly eight years and nearly two hundred million pounds spent, and described by one witness as "Not worth the paper it was written on", or the enquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire in which over seventy people died but not one prosecution started, there is certainly reason to question whether any government enquiry is value for money. However to deny yet another into covid vaccine adverse effects specifically does not mean the government should not take on board the obvious concerns and study them carefully. Given the very clear evidence - micro-biological, medical, clinical, experiential and statistical - it would be absolutely reckless for it not to do so. Having largely wasted some £440 BILLIONS on Covid measures and cost the economy billions more, it is rather amusing to see government jib over ensuring they are not killing or injuring people.
He reiterates the government's stance that Covid has killed tens of thousands and that the vaccines had prevented more deaths, both of which claims are hugely questionable. He says,
"It is worth remembering that, for the first 26 months of the pandemic, over 178,000 people across the UK died within 28 days of a positive covid-19 test. It remains my position that vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from covid-19."
It would be worth noting if the assumptions and conclusions in that statement were true but they are not. The tests used were never intended to be diagnostic and were/are utterly unreliable. A positive test means you are neither suffering illness or are infective. Even if a person died within 28 days of a positive test this does NOT mean they died from Covid. There are hundreds of anecdotal reports of doctors being pressurised to attribute Covid as a cause of death or contributing factor when it wasn't. Nor is the fact that flu has always claimed the lives of the elderly which morphed into the new cause. Nor is it possible to distinguish death put down to Covid which were actually the result in lack or care or new protocols.
This claim as to cause of death and the efficacy of the vaccine to prevent it, is shot through with so many errors, and position that relies on it to argue there is no need for an enquiry, or at least independent research, is immediately suspect. The true evidence is that the vaccines are ineffective, hence the need for continual 'boosters' and the statistical evidence of hepatisation after inoculation; that they do not prevent infectivity (recently admitted by Pfizer); and in fact by the MHRA's own 'Yellow Card' reporting system, caused more serious adverse effects and deaths of any new medical procedure in recent times.
Colburn's attempt to downplay the MRHA's own reporting statistics revealed his ignorance and bias. The figures he gave, even without factoring in their under-representation of the extent of the probem, are startling and concerning. How could anyone dismiss them with a wave of the hand and as he did by associating them with irrational protestors in his constituency?
"As of 28 September 2022, in the UK, 173,381 yellow cards had been reported for Pfizer-BioNTech; 246,393 for AstraZeneca; 42,437 for Moderna; 14 for Novavax; and 1,848 for vaccines where the brand was not specified. For Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna, the reporting rate is about two to five yellow cards per 1,000 doses administered." That's over 460,000 serious adverse effects with a total of about fifty million shots administered to date. In other words a serious adverse effect for one in every fifty shots! And it takes no account of the under reporting of up to ten times nor of over two thousand reported deaths!
His pathetic attempt at dismissing the significance of these figures was as follows:
"The use of the yellow card scheme has been used as an example of why vaccines do not work, but it is important to note that the scheme is a self-reporting system. It cannot be used to prove a causal link between reported symptoms and potential damage caused. The reported reaction could have occurred regardless of the vaccine, or the person reporting could have no knowledge
of the relationship between that symptom and the vaccine; it may have occurred even if the person had not been vaccinated altogether. I could get on the phone to the yellow card scheme right now and say that I have a side effect from a vaccine—I could completely make it up. The scheme has no verification process."Does he really think that nearly half a million reports mean nothing, that people blithely go to the trouble of reporting serious conditions just for the sake of it? If he is right, then the Yellow Card reporting system should be scrapped and replaced with something more reliable. As far as I am aware its reliability and voracity has never been questioned before or its statistics subjected to such weasel-wise, uninformed attack.
The only rational explanation for rejecting its own statistics is that for some quite amazingly inexplicable reason, the Government is so deeply committed to a huge mistaken philosophy of misapplied confidence in vaccination, misapplied to these experimental, untested vaccines that to investigate or draw back would be a tacit admission of a gigantic blunder. In fact the biggest public health blunder in recorded history.
Nothing the Minister for Health said in response inspired much confidence that the government was dealing with the matter with the urgency or importance it deserves. Where is the advice to the public on the adverse effects? It spent over a £billion pounds on pushing the vaccines. How much has it spent warning people? It was convinced by totally unreliable predictions and statistics. Why is it so reluctant to treat the MRSA and ONS figures with the seriousness they deserve? Why despite the American disastrous child adverse effects reported in the United States is it still pushing vaccines on children and using highly unethical psychologic methods to do it? See: http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2022/10/nhs-involved-in-deeply-unethical-child.html Can you believe our own government and medical authorities are prepared to put the present and future health of our children at risk, even when there is no discernible benefit. This is TOTAL MADNESS!
Yet again this event proves our parliamentary representatives care nothing for our health and welfare; are deaf to the concerns of over one hundred thousand petitioners; the opposition parties are complicit; MPs operate in a miasma of denial and self deceit, unprepared to face up to facts or begin to recognise colossal error they have made, let alone start to put it right.
Following from: https://gumshoenews.com/covid-vaccines-injure-the-heart-and-cause-myocarditis/#comment-148325
In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”
What a Joke!!!!
"Died Suddenly" : https://gumshoenews.com/died-suddenly-prepare-for-the-storm/
ReplyDeleteA List of Post-Vaccination Resources – Help Us to Help You
ReplyDeleteBY RHODA WILSON ON OCTOBER 3, 2022
https://expose-news.com/2022/10/03/a-list-of-post-vaccination-resources/?fbclid=IwAR3fJuy80Qil9NlOL-Jz1mqNofdU2IiJuTFRP9TwWTW05PNQQ5bylX6cNBg