"Villony (sic) Comes to Town"

Janice McKay, Clinical Psychologist, wrote Villony Virus for adults to read to children aged around five to eleven years to assist with conversations about Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and other community health episodes.

This story is about a virus (Villony) who comes to town and how it impacted on a family. The story explains the changes that had to be made, with specific reference to separation from grandparents.

This book is intended to educate children, to help them realise that others may feel as they do, to reassure them that they will be okay, and to give them hope for the future. Children can learn a few basic strategies to help cope with stress and change. Parents can draw on these ideas to help communicate with their children. This is not a therapeutic manual and does not take the place of treatment if children have anxiety or other mental health or behavioural problems. Nor does this book cover the vast array of experiences in varied family situations.

If you are concerned about your child – if there is a change in their behaviour, appetite, sleep or if they are more withdrawn or irritable than usual – then please seek advice from your doctor.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Villony-Virus.../dp/1922440221

 There is reality. And then there is how it is portrayed. The two are not the same but in the minds of children (and adults) the way they are perceived is fundamental to the way in which they are responded to. This is part of the whole problem of the so called 'Covid-19 epidemic'. If ever there was a designer bug with a designer result, this is it. The basic biological entity has been 'humanised' and given a devilish and dangerous character, out of all proportion to its true nature. In a sophisticated operation, whole nations and untold millions of people, have been terrorised and a totally false narrative projected, so that those at no risk at all, believe they are on the very precipice of extermination. This book takes as its starting point, the psychological damage caused to children! Once this belief has been induced, a gigantic secondary operation of mass vaccination of a largely untested, either for efficacy or side-effects, vaccine is planned to be rolled out, enlisting the army to do so, probably on the back of more propaganda. Future normal life may be impossible without it. "The villony (sic) that comes to town" (is it significant that it is a spelling mistake is embedded in an educational booklet?) sums the subject up. Villainy suffuses the topic, but villainy is the province of ingenious and moral human beings, not inert chains of RNA. The villainy rests with the people that directed and worked in the labs making the stuff, and the political leaders who have used it to implement a well documented plan. Sadly I doubt this booklet will say anything about that! https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=rainbow

Idiots or criminals playing with the Nation's health?

Dear Mr Hancock

Can you confirm that you have received the following email/letter, either in whole or part, from Dr Mike Yeadon?

Dear Mr Hancock,

I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32years working in pharmaceutical R&D, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco - acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&D.

I have read the consultation document. I’ve rarely been as shocked & upset.

All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in development for more than a few months.

If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent.

This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information. My concern does not arise because I have negative views about vaccines (I don’t).

Instead, it’s the very principle that politicians seem ready to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of development should not be made available to subjects on anything other than an explicitly experimental basis. That’s my concern.And the reason for that concern is that it is not known what the safety profile will be, six months or a year or longer after dosing.You have literally no data on this & neither does anyone else.

It isn’t that I’m saying that unacceptable adverse effects will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it is that you have no idea what will happen yet, despite this, you’ll be creating the impression that you do. Several of the vaccine candidates utilise novel technology which have not previously been used to create vaccines. There is therefore no long term safety data which can be pointed to in support of the notion that it’s reasonable to expedite development & to waive absent safety information on this occasion.

I am suspicious of the motives of those proposing expedited use in the wider human population. We now understand who is at particularly elevated risk of morbidity & mortality from acquiring this virus. Volunteers from these groups only should be provided detailed information about risk / benefit, including the sole point I make here. Only if informed consent is given should any EXPERIMENTAL vaccine be used. I don’t trust you. You’ve not been straightforward & have behaved appallingly throughout this crisis. You’re still doing it now, misleading about infection risk from young children. Why should I believe you in relation to experimental vaccines?

Dr Michael Yeadon

Thank you

With respect

Mark Golding

PATENTS FOR BIOMETRIC COVID-19 TESTS WERE ACQUIRED IN 2015 & 2017:

Atomic Bombshell: Rothschilds patented Covid-19 biometric tests in 2015. and 2017: https://silview.media/.../atomic-bombshell-rothschilds...

. Video: https://brandnewtube.com/.../rothschilds-patented-covid...

.

First Registration: The Netherlands, 2015

Source: Dutch Government patent registry website: https://nl.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?II=0...

#

Info (verbatim copy):

A method is provided for acquiring and transmitting biometric data (e.g., vital signs) of a user, where the data is analyzed to determine whether the user is suffering from a viral infection, such as COVID-19. The method includes using a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage, which is transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone. To ensure that the data is accurate, an accelerometer within the smartphone is used to measure movement of the smartphone and/or the user. Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19. Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.

Second Registration: Us, 2017

Source: https://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2017/0229149.html