Friday 17 July 2020

  More Covid 19(84)Nonsense Required Reading



Even with all the statistical and diagnostic 'fiddling', the so-called 'epidemic of fatalities' is over. Please note the terrific increase in deaths attributed to the disease occurred immediately after the 'lock-down' and other measures were introduced by the government. This raises the important question as to whether it was Covid 19 or the lock-down measures themselves that caused it?

The affected were predominantly over eighty and/or with other significant health issues, of whom over 90% were in an institutional (hospital or nursing home) setting. It is a moot point therefore the part actually played by Covid in their death, or whether it resulted directly from the measures introduced, such as poorer medical and/or psychological care. 

In any event the graph and the vital statistics associated with it, do not support a continuation of all the social controls imposed, at such cost, on the general population, which in any event are contradictory and irrational throughout, let alone tightening them as is the case with the requirement to wear masks on public transport and in shops, although the former has more sense than the latter.

The following two pieces provide deeply worrying takes on government intent and should be read by all.


Stolen from a local site but you ALL need to read this !
Have a think...
“It's just a mask" will turn into "It’s just a vaccine," very quickly. In less than 5 months, our government has successfully divided the country into "obedient mask wearers”, and "selfish people who refuse to wear masks.”
In less than 5 months, our government has dictated which events are acceptable and we are allowed to attend, and which are not allowed. Violent riots are acceptable and encouraged, while family gatherings and celebrations are not allowed. Standing in a graduation line is a "safety hazard,” but lining up at big-box stores is not.
In less than 5 months, our government succeeded in closing family-owned businesses, while enriching large corporations it has vested interests in.
In less than 5 months, our government persuaded the people to believe that a cashless society is a good thing—in the name of a government-sponsored virus.
In less than 5 months, our government closed down schools, and permanently "restructured" education moving forward—under the guise of “public safety.”
In less than 5 months, our government demonstrated how easily fearful people assimilate to lifestyle restrictions that have NO scientific premise. Our government has instilled fear as the ruling principle in the majority of the population in the UK. But the citizens are not afraid of the people in power, who are responsible for the removal of their freedoms and livelihoods. Instead, they are fearful of their neighbors, family, human contact, and the air they breathe. Our government manufactured hysteria.
In less than 5 months, our government reduced a free people into slaves to the very system that oppresses them. People who are wearing masks "for the greater good”, will be the first to sign up for the new vaccine which will have zero longitudinal safety tests. What's more disturbing, is this vaccine will be used by our government as the standard deciding factor in our lives moving forward. Do you still think “It’s just a mask”? Wait until you are told that you cannot enter a store without proof of having the Covid-19 vaccine. Wait until you cannot go out into public places, travel, shop, or go to a doctor, without proof you are not a “risk” to others.
You do realize that our government has successfully dictated to us when we are allowed to be outside, where we are allowed to go, and how our children will be educated—in less than 5 months. A majority of the population follow their illegal dictates blindly, all because they are told to do so. They will also repeat this behavior with the vaccine for their government-sponsored “virus.” It was NEVER about a mask, it was always about control.



Robert Horton KNOW THE LAW!
Remember, according to social distancing shop staff cannot “touch” you or come within 1 metre without breaking guidelines, (but of course they touch everything your buying) and if you refuse to wear a mask in their shop cannot physically 
throw you out, but can only call the police to enforce a government 'guideline'. The big problem for the police is that that would be breaking the Law if they tried to enforce a 'guideline', because police can only legally enforce Criminal Law.
If the police detain you, or arrest you because, naturally, you have refused to cooperate, they are then guilty of unlawful detention, which comes under the criminal code of 'kidnapping'.
If they try to fine you, without first 'kidnapping' you, you are not obliged to give them any information, not even your name, and without your name they cannot issue a fine.
If they find out your name, by whatever means and then issue a fine, you can simply state that you refuse to accept or pay any fine and they will then be obliged to caution you, which would be totally illegal since you will not have committed any crime (guidelines being optional to follow) and again, they would not be enforcing any law.
Know the difference: Guidelines come under 'civil law' and crimes come under 'criminal law'. The police are not allowed to enforce 'civil law' - only the local authority and the civil courts can attempt to do that. So, demand that the Court issue you with a date for an appearance, and when/if you go to court your defence will be illegal detention and kidnapping, and in the civil court you will be able to demand substantial compensation as a counter-claim from the police, plus insist that criminal charges are brought against the arresting and detaining officers.

Now, nobody says that it will get to that stage, indeed it would be very unlikely to, but can you imagine how the Courts will be clogged up for years, perhaps decades, trying to process those awkward bastards who had the bald-faced cheek to know the Law and also know their civil rights.

PS: Ensure you use your phone and record the whole event, to be used as leverage and evidence. But just remember this one fact - the police cannot enforce civil Law and therefore have no rights in determining whether or not you have to wear a mask, just because the government says so. That process would be called a 'dictatorship' and we are not quite there yet, despite this government's valiant attempts to make it so.







The boy in a black mask behind the perspex screen in the Co-op upbraided me for ignoring the 'one way' system that has been introduced (I didn't notice I was supposed to trail back the way I had come to comply) not once but TWICE, before and after the purchase, lecturing me on it being "Only common decency". Having been banned from Lidl's after an altercation with a fat woman wearing gloves (but no mask) who attacked me verbally for standing too close, fully supported by the management, it is becoming increasing clear that unless you comply with these stupid rules, obtaining any food will become increasingly difficult. Yet these Supermarket chains that have been so complicit in support of the Government 'guidance', and in stoking the culture of fear and distancing with constant 'big brother' messaging, signage, bouncers, queues, hand wash stations and the rest of the ridiculous paraphernalia of psychological conditioning, are riddled with contradiction and inconsistency. Some employees wear plastic gloves and face masks, others don't. Some wear them one day and not another. Staff themselves understandably ignore 'social distancing' as they go about their work stocking shelves, whilst those behind plastic screens in face masks, order you to "Step Back!" In Lidl's all pastries were placed in paper bags and I was told off for touching them, the bags note not the contents. Now they have reverted to open pastries on open shelves, arguably open to all or any contamination. Nor does it seem to have dawned that the shop is full of un-packaged goods, where cross contamination could occur, were it a possibility. The Government and these national outlets stand condemned of stoking and enforcing a national paranoia verging on the psychotic, for no genuine reason, with no scientific foundation, soon to be extended and reinforced by the blanket requirement to wear masks. Of course it is a field day for every busybody and nobody, who wishes to impose their stupid bureaucratic rules on others, just wishing to go about their business in as normal a way as possible. To those amazed and incredulous over how Hitler was able to set the world ablaze, murdering millions, he did it this way, in imperceptible steps of compliance, until only compliance or death remained the options. It is the duty of every English person to resist in whatever way they can, this creeping, pernicious threat to our ancient liberties and freedoms, before the opportunity of doing so, itself disappears.

Image may contain: text

Image may contain: 2 people

10 comments:

  1. French Virologist, Who Discovered HIV, Says Coronavirus Originated In A Lab
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usyQgPU-VrI

    For those who want to get behind the blanket media propaganda!

    ReplyDelete
  2. 18 Coronavirus Autopsies (This is what they found in the Brain) | COVID-19

    18 Coronavirus Autopsies (This is what they found in the Brain) | COVID-19

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sweden’s Covid Expert Says ‘World Went Mad’ With Lockdowns
    By Niclas Rolander
    June 24, 2020
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-24/sweden-s-epidemiologist-says-world-went-mad-imposing-lockdowns?fbclid=IwAR2HuqlYcE3PnTutRueqJCUwM1Lu2l_1jyjw4wR7kNMMTqMNRVv3660y55E

    ReplyDelete
  4. Visiting Lidls or any national supermarket chain, has now become abuse TORTURE either from paranoid customers or officious employees, revelling in their new found power to instruct and cajole. There is no consistency or uniformity and the rules are ridiculous, but this does not stop interfering busy bodies from imposing their opinion or orders. This is undoubtedly mass psy-op, with no scientific justification, to impregnate the population with irrational fear, both of a bug and of one another. Amazingly the country has bought it and towed the line and now must be masked for absolutely no reason. Could there be a worse calumny imposed on the people by its so called 'representative' government?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The boy in a black mask behind the perspex screen in the Co-op upbraided me for ignoring the 'one way' system that has been introduced (I didn't notice I was supposed to trail back the way I had come to comply) not once but TWICE, before and after the purchase, lecturing me on it being "Only common decency". Having been banned from Lidl's after an altercation with a fat woman wearing gloves (but no mask) who attacked me verbally for standing too close, fully supported by the management, it is becoming increasing clear that unless you comply with these stupid rules, obtaining any food will become increasingly difficult. Yet these Supermarket chains that have been so complicit in support of the Government 'guidance', and in stoking the culture of fear and distancing with constant 'big brother' messaging, signage, bouncers, queues, hand wash stations and the rest of the ridiculous paraphernalia of psychological conditioning, are riddled with contradiction and inconsistency. Some employees wear plastic gloves and face masks, others don't. Some wear them one day and not another. Staff themselves understandably ignore 'social distancing' as they go about their work stocking shelves, whilst those behind plastic screens in face masks, order you to "Step Back!" In Lidl's all pastries were placed in paper bags and I was told off for touching them, the bags note not the contents. Now they have reverted to open pastries on open shelves, arguably open to all or any contamination. Nor does it seem to have dawned that the shop is full of un-packaged goods, where cross contamination could occur, were it a possibility. The Government and these national outlets stand condemned of stoking and enforcing a national paranoia verging on the psychotic, for no genuine reason, with no scientific foundation, soon to be extended and reinforced by the blanket requirement to wear masks. Of course it is a field day for every busybody and nobody, who wishes to impose their stupid bureaucratic rules on others, just wishing to go about their business in as normal a way as possible. To those amazed and incredulous over how Hitler was able to set the world ablaze, murdering millions, he did it this way, in imperceptible steps of compliance, until only compliance or death remained the options. It is the duty of every English person to resist in whatever way they can, this creeping, pernicious threat to our ancient liberties and freedoms, before the opportunity of doing so, itself disappears.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mike Newey Would you have preferred that the government had done nothing and just let the virus take it's course/toll?

    A good question with not an easy answer. I have never argued that there should have been no government response, but there is clear evidence that the response taken probably made matters far worse. It is also clear that it was based on the hugely misleading Ferguson/Imperial College model forecasts and greatly exaggerated fatality rate, but also introduced the panoply of lock-down and social distancing controls that are unsupported by ANY scientific data, that have had their own serious adverse health consequences, as with delayed cancer treatment and other procedures. Ludicrously, now the epidemic is over, greater mask wearing is ordered. If it had been effective it would have been introduced at the beginning not the end. It confirms suspicions voiced by some, that this is social control not disease control. Deaths increased precipitously AFTER measures were introduced which should tell us something. It is generally agreed that those measures exacerbated not reduced the deaths which of course were predominantly in those over 70 with pre-existing serious illnesses. The measures themselves have had catastrophic economic and health consequences, both physical and mental, across the board, yet to be fully evaluated. Nor has the government said anything, despite the billions spent on intelligence services and biological research, on the CAUSE of the outbreak, which as several experts in the field of genetics have pointed out, could not have been accidental or unplanned. This in itself is highly suspicious. Whether the government over reacted because it was mislead into thinking the virus was more dangerous than it was, or used it as an excuse for pre-planned changes (the extensive and complicated emergency legislation was already prepared) is an open question, as is yours.

    ReplyDelete
  7. RFK, Jr. talks with Dr. Andy Wakefield about his new movie, 1986: The Act.
    5,108 views•12 Jul 2020

    For thousands of parents with vaccine-injured children, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) conjures up sadness, betrayal of trust, disappointment and anger. But what does the rest of the public think? Most people don’t even realize the NCVIA exists! They are still under the rosy misconception that vaccines are safe and effective and that our legislators and public health officials would never do anything that would knowingly hurt America’s children. We need to educate them. That is where 1986: The Act comes in.

    Viewers will learn how “The Act” turned fairness and the US court system on its head. Touted at the time as a helpful, non-adversarial alternative to long, protracted court battles, it actually turned into anything but; where the vaccine- injured linger without help, parents rack up medical bills and wait years for monetary relief which seldom comes, and government lawyers take home fat paychecks for their efforts against families. This corrupt system ensures that consumers pay the tab and vaccine manufacturers laugh all the way to the bank.

    The film is available to stream on demand.

    3

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqf0Bb2U79o&pp=wgIECgIIAQ%3D%3D&fbclid=IwAR2ShBpzMwxnYTrok0Gw2OtXy0rLrpHW0nTN2C37RlTUub1bcnXqu0PPqOA

    ReplyDelete
  8. Now the so-called 'epidemic' is over a requirement to wear masks! But only in shops and public transport? This is obviously the height of stupidity but it promotes and perpetuates unnecessary fear and suspicion which seem to be the main objectives of government policy whilst hoping for 'a second wave'. This is undoubtedly an infringement of civil liberties and a very ugly example of social and psychological conditioning that has already had deep adverse effects on people generally and children in particular. (Recent reported child referrals up 30%) Any careful examination of the facts and of the requirements show them to be greatly exaggerated and misrepresented, yet people have been brainwashed by the blanket media and government propaganda. Coronavirus is clearly an intended disaster, planned well in advance with very, very sinister objectives as this mask thing is but the latest iteration. There is nothing to back up the fear-mongering or the measures now imposed to further it. The message is clearly: "Conform or Starve", the next stage being obligatory testing (as has already happened for some), obligatory vaccination with all its dangers, obligatory chipping, no health privacy (I have just had a letter from my doctor confirming this move) Masks and all the other paraphernalia are just the start of the slippery slope you can be sure and should be resisted in any way possible, not welcomed with open arms. "Beware those who arrive bearing gifts." http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2020/07/more-covid-1984nonsense-required.html

    ReplyDelete
  9. HIV-1 GP41 in SARS-Cov-2 by Dr. Paul Cottrell

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNyNaga-iCA

    ReplyDelete
  10. The lunacy gets ever greater. So if true, as common sense would suggest, that if you are in a household where someone has the flu you are more likely to catch it, what in hell's name was the point of 'lock-down' confining everyone together and preventing them from getting fresh air? Everywhere we see the same infection graph. It is the natural history of a disease and has nothing whatsoever to do with government lock-down policy. Yet politicians fraudulently claim credit for it, whilst denying their true responsibility for the increase in deaths from treating the old and ill despicably and by disrupting all other essential treatments and medical procedures. Only a totally incompetent or malign government could be responsible for this catalogue of disasters. http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2020/07/more-covid-1984nonsense-required.html

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.