THE MARK OF THE BEAST? The Agenda behind Bill Gates Vaccine & ID2020 : Coronavirus Conspiracies

What has covid19 revealed about British culture? How has the media reacted?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qs5ryRCBmM

New Culture Forum Channel

59.5K subscribers

SUBSCRIBED

In the third week of the UK's coronavirus lockdown, CounterCulture discusses the state of our culture and whether it is generally in good health. What can we expect to happen in our culture in the weeks and months ahead. How have we reacted as a nation? How have our institutions handled the crisis? How has the media portrayed the situation and how open has it been to differing opinions? The panel this week: Peter Whittle (Host: Founder & Director of the New Culture Forum) Daniel Johnson: Founding Editor of The Article & contributing editor to The Critiic. Brendan O'Neill: Columnist, Podcaster & Editor of Spiked Online Rafe Heydel-Mankoo of the New Culture Forum, Historian & Broadcaster

Veater Ecosan1 minute ago (edited)

The deaths from Covid-19, despite everyone a person tragedy, are still within historic levels of winter flu. This is seldom referred to by the media and is a major defect. It raises the question, 'Why'? Why were previous epidemics not responded to in the same hysterical and extreme manner? Culturally, the main lesson we take from it, is that it is relatively easy to persuade getting on for seventy million people, to suspend all their powers of reason and be subsumed into a quite unnecessary state of paranoia and servility. http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/

Veater Ecosan1 second ago

As to the lack of preparedness, I refer everyone to the relevant Act and Regulations, passed by Parliament. They were enacted virtually without scrutiny or debate, despite containing quite extraordinary and alarming incursions into personal freedom. Some might think this was not accidental. What is clear, is that such complicated legislation could not have been created over night, or even within the time frame of the Coronavirus outbreak. They must have been prepared well in advance. So obviously Government WAS prepared. The question is was it there for any epidemic or for this one particularly. If the latter, preparedness always raises troublesome, even sinister, questions.

Show less

REPLY

Veater Ecosan1 minute ago (edited)

The deaths from Covid-19, despite everyone a person tragedy, are still within historic levels of winter flu. This is seldom referred to by the media and is a major defect. It raises the question, 'Why'? Why were previous epidemics not responded to in the same hysterical and extreme manner? Culturally, the main lesson we take from it, is that it is relatively easy to persuade getting on for seventy million people, to suspend all their powers of reason and be subsumed into a quite unnecessary state of paranoia and servility. http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/



Note how (below) coronavirus imagery has been merged with LGBT and children.  "You are not alone" seems to be the ironic, if not mocking, government slogan!








Today (17.4.2020) the London Times was wrapped in it.

‎Jamie York‎ to CRoNa (vrus) and Glbal Ag€nda.

5 hrs · 

Excerpts:

“...the British Government is effectively endorsing the breeding of distrust in society, the erosion of public assembly, the isolation and state-sanctioned euthanasia of the elderly, the emerging police state, snitch lines, loss of dignity and livelihoods, greater dependency upon the state for survival, depression, suicide and voluntary incarceration.

“The UN has issued a warning that the economic downturn could "kill hundreds of thousands of children in 2020". Gates, the WHO, the British Government and UNICEF are focused on global immunisation for a "pandemic" that is not living up to the alarmist virtual projections sponsored by Gates and the Big Pharma complex, while children really will start to die from malnutrition, neglect and a myriad of consequence of extreme poverty generated by the "steepest downturn since the Great Depression of the 1930s" (IMF)....

“ID2020 is promoting the concept that there is a need for universal biometric verification, because "to prove who you are is a fundamental and universal human right," as asserted on the ID2020 website. An article by journalist Kurt Nimmo for Global Research dismantles the "humanitarian" alibi for tyranny.

OffGrid Healthcare explains:

What they really want is a fully standardized data collection and retrieval format, and cross-border sharing of identities of the entire population of the planet, in order for the stand-alone AI-powered command center to work without a hitch, and for purposes of calculating everyone's potential contribution, and threat to the system.

Nimmo describes the potential for Covid–19 to be used as cover for mandatory biometric ID. An April article carried by Reuters confirms the suspicion that biometric ID might soon be introduced, ostensibly to "help verify those who already had the infection and ensure the vulnerable get the vaccine when it is launched". This may sound perfectly sensible to those who are buying the government strap-lines on Covid–19 but — as Nimmo warns us — "COVID–19 is the perfect Trojan horse for a control freak state itching to not only micromanage the lives of ordinary citizens but also ferret out critics and potential adversaries and punish them as enemies of the state."

“In December 2019, researchers at MIT created a "microneedle platform using fluorescent microparticles called quantum dots (QD) which can deliver vaccines and at the same time, invisibly encode vaccination history in the skin": the QDs can be detected by specially adapted smartphones. The "new normal" will mean we are tracked and monitored by our own communication systems to an even greater and more intrusive extent.

Following from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e423NpckOPc&fbclid=IwAR2Z_xcCJXQJI9u2VtAXA9FNBptjxBW54FWwYvZgBqBsCZM-hEX62YxfCts&app=desktop