Grace Millane murder trial: Accused admits to disposing of body | nzhera...

The Grace Millane Murder

Video inconsistencies and modifications.





Please note the change in shoes between the night he meets Grace Millane and the next day when he buys a case in the morning, from leather shoes to fancy trainers with white soles. But more importantly how apparently after going back to the murder room with cleaning products he messaged a friend to meet at "Revelry" @ 0:16 but note he's back in his leather shoes. He has also put on his light blue over-shirt again.

When next video purports to show him returning to the room, the over-shirt has disappeared! This is not explained and highly unlikely. Then he says he gets back to the hotel and he is shown with cleaning products and a carpet cleaning machine. @ 1:27 He's back in his trainers now and perhaps more important he appears to be wearing light coloured track suit bottoms unlike the jeans worn when he is buying the products or when he meets his friend.

Compare also the T-shirt when he is in the lift here @ 1:27 and what appears to be a more tailored shirt in the lift @ 1:44 the subject is in the light coloured trainer bottoms again supposedly with Grace Millane in the suitcase.

I previously commented on the way he moved it as if it was very light. This moment has now disappeared.

He claims to have put all clothing items from the room in a park waste bin. This is extraordinary. Did this include the items of his own clothing that he had changed out of? What happened to his leather shoes he had been wearing on and off? Surely police would have itemised every item found in the room yet the interviewing officer seems to accept there was nothing there.

Shots of the white bed appear to show no signs of "rough sex", blood or anything of the claimed violence.

Blood stains are claimed on the floor but it is not explained how they got there. No evidence appears to be presented by the pathologist or any other source of injuries commensurate with blood loss. So what caused the staining put down to blood and why the carpet cleaner if there were no injuries other than bruising of the neck linked to strangulation?

The accused is apparently being interviewed by a junior uniformed constable in a major murder investigation in a capital city. Really? Is this how New Zealand detectives work? Then he says he inflicted no injuries that would cause her to die yet there are alleged large blood stains on the carpet.

The pathologist refers only to a neck bruise as the cause of death. So where did all the alleged blood staining, claimed to be Ms Millane's come from? Why are not injuries that might have caused blood loss, referred to?

The suitcase and descriptions of "human remains" in it are very strange. First the problem of getting a body of the size shown into a case of the size shown, that the accused states made him physically sick, and in the short time between death and discovery, (7 days) the body would have been still intact and complete, indeed must have been for the pathologist still to observe bruising to the neck in such detail. The term "human remains" is only ever used to refer to badly decomposed bodies or skeletal remnants of the deceased.

All questions as they occur in a very strange case overall.

@ 5:15 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsfiGT-anww an identical case to the one he shown returning to the hotel with, and which it is claimed he used to convey the body, is actually shown in the hotel room after the event!!! Is this the same one or did he have two of an identical sort?


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10338384/grace-millane-trial-pictures-grave-suspect/


Note in video below arriving hotel with case at 08:14.  But another video shows him buying it 08:26. Thus the claim is made he arrived back at the hotel with it BEFORE he had purchased it!!!! A slight problem with the sequencing there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vBunHeWNIE