Saturday 7 March 2015

Hampstead Alleged Abuse. Open Letter to High Court.

Dear Mr Clark,

I feel obliged to write to you regarding the above, in a case that is currently pending before Her Hon Judge Dame Pauffley. The case has attracted international attention, so I am sure I am not the only one to express concern regarding it. The eyes of the world are upon what has happened to date and the need for a speedy and just resolution in the best interests of the children involved. The process and outcome will be viewed as an acid test, in the context of numerous recent high profile cases, most recently in Oxford, of both Judge Pauffley's public pronouncements and the whole British justice system.

We are not in a position to know whether the well publicised claims of the children, are true in fact or not. We are however able to conclude that they have been remarkably consistent and detailed, displaying anatomical, physiological, geographical and procedural information, that in children of that age is highly unlikely to have been gained from imagination or coaching alone, even were that to be the case. Perhaps more importantly the information has been corroborated (incredibly ignored by police) by medical, behavioural and third party evidence. In short their statements have been credible and compelling and must not be dismissed out of hand, as appears to have been done so far.

Secondly, were we to accept that the children's testimony was embroidered, exaggerated or even inaccurate, in part at least, it is thoroughly consistent in this regard at least, that the natural father is the subject and focus of the specific claims of abuse. This is corroborated by other evidence of related violence, in which the police were involved, that led to the mother being given full custody and limitations placed on his access, which it is alleged he flouted, seeing the children, it is claimed by them, daily. They also claim they were under threat of death by him were they to reveal what he had done. Yet despite this, quite incredibly, he has apparently been afforded access to the children by the Family Court, whilst the mother, against whom no suggestion of abuse has been levelled, indeed both children in police interviews repeatedly restated her love and care, has been forced to flee the country, on threat of arrest!

Thirdly, in view of the nature of the allegation by two young children, of both rape and murder, the police approach has been as inexplicable as it has been incompetent. As far as it appears, no concrete steps were taken to properly inquire into the specific allegations, either to substantiate or disprove them. This repeats what has been revealed most recently in the Oxford and Rotherham cases - i.e. a refusal to believe or to act on information received.

This is then compounded by the way the children were treated in three interview situations that are now widely available on the internet. Can it be right that these highly vulnerable children were questioned by a male officer, alone and unsupported? Has the Metropolitan Police learned nothing in such cases? Further that the evidence is there to see that the officer in question appears unable or unwilling to seek detailed information about the alleged abuse or to follow natural lines of enquiry provided by the children's statements. Rather quite the opposite, on the third occasion, seeks to prompt confusion and retraction, upon which flimsy basis the police decide no further action is necessary. In contrast to this inactivity, "ten burly officers", could be provided, to arrest, without warrant, the mother at her home?

What sort of 'topsy turvy' - even corrupt - country are we living in, when officers sworn to protect life and property and uphold the law, operate in such a perverse fashion?

In the light of all this, I sincerely hope that justice will at last prevail, and the High Court at least can be trusted to secure it, by returning the children without further delay to their mother or at least the maternal grand parents, who appear more than competent to provide them with a safe and caring home, that all the grandeur of the British State has so far, conspicuously failed to do.

Yours sincerely,

Tim Veater.


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. Brilliantly well put. The way this has been handled by so called professionals has left me very, very concerned for the poor children, their mother and maternal grandparents. I really hope justice is served but I am far from hopeful. The establishment just reeks of corruption, and is rotten to the core.

  3. Thanks for your appreciation Annski. We all await the outcome of the Family Court proceedings and hope against hope for the children's sake, that they are returned to their grand-parents at the earliest opportunity, and put all this (insofar as it is possible) behind them. You may have seen some of my other observations on this and the Inquiringminds site? There is much more that could be said but we have to be circumspect until the judgement is out as I am sure you understand. I started a complimentary petition to Sabine's that you may like to sign. The more the better. Regards, Tim.

  4. As we all learned, the 'Family Division' of the High Court and even the Court of Appeal, wretchedly let the mother and children down in this case. More importantly, justice was blatantly not served and any faith we had in the British Justice System to protect the weak and defenceless, severely undermined. Whatever has been the subsequent outcome, the case will stand for ever as a lighthouse to the dark and rocky hinterland of the British State, far more interested in protecting its image and institutions than protecting the mothers and fatherless. Perhaps we should not be surprised - it is only one of the most recent and notorious of a long line of them. Judges have proved themselves callous and complicit in facilitating unspeakable crimes against children and will for ever carry it to their graves. A deep dark world exists that the government has left no stone unturned to keep hidden and out of the public eye. The innocent have been pursued and prosecuted to keep them silent. The guilty have been exonerated. The irony of course is, that in implementing this successful but corrupt campaign to protect the institutions of the state, they have ensured that the population can no longer have any faith in them. How this case fits the general mould that has been increasingly revealed, involving members of the Royal Family, the pinnacle of the constitution itself. We tragically are faced by a collapse in the criminal justice system. Covid proved neither government nor police were on the side of common decency or the people. Now we have economic catastrophe looming and with it possible civil unrest whilst the country is flooded by economic migrants from devastation and chaos we have caused abroad. Who or what is behind it all we cannot say, but that it is all inter-related and inter-connected, cannot be denied. Like sour milk, the Hampstead case has left a damning bitter taste that will never fade however much dark forces might wish it to.


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.