Friday, 13 December 2024

 


Depressing December


A profound silence descends upon us

Because it is December.

The bare branches all turn fawn,

Shorn of their dying leaves;

The muslin sky betrays a faded light,

The morning air hangs heavy -

The remnant of a frost-filled night.

No morning movement is discerned.


At the dog-end of the calendar,

Or summit of the year;

Yet also at its gutter point,

Suffuced with doubt and fear,

No bird, no song, no cheer,

Just morbid silent atmosphere.


So to compensate we make a noise

And substitute with fun and toys;

Make up the lack of warming sun,

With brandy tots and blazing fires

And fill the absence with our greed,

Our best and worst desires.


Pretending all is well, sending

Goodwill to every man and woman too,

Whilst at the same time

Bombing all to hell and back!

A thousand infants in their numbered sacks

Point tiny fingers at us from their graves,

In high-pitched voices pose the question,

Why, why were we not good enough to save?”


Even sans a foot, a hand, a leg,

Without even arms to beg,

Not yet aware the cruel irony

That awaits the innocent

At end of year and distributed fates.

So very apt this dark and dismal

December-tide, so lacking hope

It cannot be denied.


The brutal works of man

Are there for all to see in Gaza;

Pity and compassion are all amiss,

Hang limply from the Christmas tree

And hollow is the rotten stump

Of our claimed, much vaunted, humanity.


Buried the remnants of a Christian past,

In acrid smoke of lies of 'self defense',

We miserably fail the acid test

And all the angels wail amidst the dust.

Our so called values evaporating like mist,

Dispelled by swish of devil's tail.


Old shuffling Andrew Porter used to say,

We shouldn't celebrate but rather pray

And seek forgiveness for our sins.

As children we thought him silly, strange,

But now much older I agree and vote with him.

Sack cloth, ashes and hair shirt

Are more December di rigueur than paper hats.

Funereal garb should be the 'Order of the Day'.



"The Prince of the Power of the Air?"



Looking for prophetic answers?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mSiOauiY1s


'BRIGHT SPARK' ?

Yesterday (17.12.2024) we had two brief 'outages' that of course closed everything down. I then had to jump innumerable technical hurdles to get back onto the platforms. No explanation or apology for the inconvenience caused emanating from the supplier. We must take it in our stride and thank god we have any. In the past 'outages' were almost never known. Now they seem almost common place. The electricity supplier puts them down to freak weather but since when has freak weather not been a feature of the British climate? My guess this is rather something to do with the unreliable generating capacity of wind and sun, topped up by gas and electrons. As usual it's a bit of a mess driven not by scientific engineering but by the latest trends in popular thinking. We sit on a bed of perfectly good fuel but arn't allowed to use it, whilst China opens another coal-fired boiler every week. Cheap energy is the bedrock of any modern economy. It is part of the reason why China is booming and Europe is stagnating. For all the highly educated clever people we produce, we always seem to end up being run by unprincipled fools!


Tuesday, 10 December 2024

 Yet again suspicious identification confusion around New York health boss killing!




High profile killings in America and elsewhere, always arouse my interest (and suspicions!) especially if they contain familiar elements relating to dates, timing, names, places and other strange or anomalous features.

The arrested suspect Luigi Mangione, is referred to by the Mail as the 'Hot Assassin' over a handsome, smiling bare-chested photograph. This is in sharp contrast to the police photograph circulated below. 

He was located relatively quickly in only four days (6th to 10th December) over 300 miles away from Manhattan, where the shooting took place, in Altoona, Pennsylvania, interestingly in a McDonalds. I have previously drawn attention to how often that brand is linked to high profile tragic events.

It is said he "was acting suspiciously" but there is scant information on how he got there from New York, why that location was chosen, or what actually led to his identification and arrest.

The 'before and after' photographs appear to show the same person but a very different demeanour. Compare and contrast the following two images that contain similar stylistic elements. Was this intentional for artistic effect?



The Times has drawn attention to a disturbing aspect to the case here https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/luigi-magione-suspect-internet-obsessed-n7fmsqmtr inasmuch it claims the Internet has become obsessed with him and with 'hot assassins' generally. A Google search of the term certainly brings up a plethora of cartoon and other imagery.  Has popular media turned killers into heroes?

On the date of the murder (6.12.2024) Vogue carried an article by Emma Specter entitled "Why Do We Love a ‘Hot’ Felon—and What Does It Say About Us?"  She was certainly 'hot off the blocks' with it - composed, printed and published the very same day!

What is more surprising is the fact that the article contains details what we might normally expect to be only in the possession of the police. A bullet casing marked with words "deny, defend, depose", referring to the claimed philosophy of certain health insurers. 

Other facts regarding his movements before and after, including reference to how he 'flirted with his female hotel receptionist'. How was she able to obtain these intimate details the very same day, before the assailant was even positively identified?

And then there is that date!  Six, twelve, twenty-four! Certainly something of a coincidence if nothing else. If said Mangione ('Man alone?) was indeed the shooter, nothing is revealed as to how the victim was chosen and more importantly how Mangione knew where he was, where he would be, how he identified him, how a plastic gun down-loaded from the internet, complete with silencer, was able to deliver fatal 9mm shots?

This would obviously require intelligence and planning of a high order, as we are led to believe this was a targeted killing and not just an indescriminate one, yet again we note an absence of planning in respect to the getaway.  True assassins ensure they have thought and planned for that equally well. Usually only patsies get caught. Professional assassins make sure they don't, but conversely amateurs don't find their targets so easily.

The Guardian reports, "The suspect in the shooting death of the UnitedHealthcare CEO, Brian Thompson, screamed: “This is completely out of touch and an insult to the intelligence of the American people” on Tuesday before he fought being extradited from Pennsylvania to face murder charges in New York."  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/dec/10/unitedhealthcare-shooting-suspect-court-screams

Whatever could this mean? My mind unavoidably darts back to Lee Harvey Oswald's last words before he was shot dead, surrounded by policemen. Perhaps there is no equivalence between the two or maybe there is? Only a few know.  A young man, probably completely innocent of the crime for which he was convicted, sits incommunicado in an American Federal prison with a death threat still hanging over him. And lets not even mention Guantánamo Bay.

The Vogue article referred to above, illustrate it with an image of Zak Efron playing the part of Ted Bundy the notorious serial killer.  It is not accidental. So violence and beauty are merged. Evil is glamourised. Perhaps it was always so? This murder certainly contains the necessary ingredients. Whether everything is as reported or asked to believe, is another matter.

A leading detective was once reported as saying, "In crime there is no such thing as coincidence." I agree with him. The instances of events not being as they were projected by the authorities are legion and I have discussed many of them in this Blog as have others. That is why there is always part of me that is sceptical. We should always ask ourselves why out of the innumerable crimes of violence, only some gain immediate attention and coverage, such as was the case with this one? Was the event planned and designed to be such?

One reason for high-profile crimes lies in their value to distract from other events either domestic or foreign. So in that context it certainly helps to take the heat off Biden scandalously protecting his son from prosecution both past and future. It just so happens it also perfectly aligns with dramatic events in Syria - an obvious US/Israeli operation as previously announced back in 2003 by Wesley Clarke, albeit somewhat delayed. 

I have heard via the BBC that Israel has carried out over 200 bombing raids in Syria since the collapse of Assad's government and read elsewhere that Israeli tanks are now positioned in the vicinity of Damascus!

What a coincidence?





 






Following from AOL https://www.aol.co.uk/news/man-apprehended-connection-york-assassination-183227965.html

Luigi Mangione has been arrested in New York







Police in New York have charged a man with murder after the assassination of healthcare chief executive Brian Thompson.

Luigi Mangione, a 26-year-old Ivy League graduate, was arrested in a branch of McDonald’s on Monday following a five-day manhunt.

Wearing a dark sweatshirt and flanked by local police and NYPD detectives, Mr Mangione arrived at a Pennsylvania court where he was arraigned on a string of gun offences. Manhattan officials later filed charges including an official allegation of murder.

Police said Mr Mangione had been carrying a 3D-printed, homemade “ghost” pistol and silencer that matched images of the weapon used to shoot Mr Thompson, a handwritten manifesto filled with grievances against “corporate America”, and multiple fake ID cards.

The three-page letter found in Mr Mangione’s bag reportedly contained the words: “These parasites had it coming…I do apologise for any strife and trauma, but it had to be done.”

Mr Mangione’s cover photograph on his X page, formerly Twitter, appears to show an X-ray of a posterior spinal fusion in the lower lumbar region.



Following from Daily Mail https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14177517/luigi-mangione-injury-sex-brian-thompson.html


The alleged killer is referred to by the Mail as



















Another 'Martin'.

RJ Martin lived with Mangione for six months in 2022 and was stunned at news of the murder he is accused of carrying out 


LIVE: Defense Attorney Thomas M. Dickey, representing suspec… 
See more
LIVE: Defense Attorney Thomas M. Dickey, representing suspect charged in UnitedHealth executive killing, speaks to media
Defense Attorney Thomas M. Dickey, who's representing the suspect in the case of murdered UnitedHealth executive Brian Thomson, speaks to the media from Altoona, Pennsylvania.
New York prosecutors filed a murder charge against the suspect in the killing of UnitedHealth executive Brian Thomson, a brazen shooting that set off a manhunt that culminated in his capture in Pennsylvania earlier on Monday.
The suspect, Luigi Mangione, 26, was also denied bail for the second time, a day after he was taken into custody at a fast food restaurant after a sprawling five-day manhunt.
Keep up with the latest news from around the world: https://www.reuters.com/


From:  https://www.aol.co.uk/news/luigi-mangione-notebook-reveals-chilling-094508952.html

Luigi Mangione seen being taken into the Blair County Courthouse on Tuesday (Pittsburgh Post-Gazette)

Luigi Mangione allegedly laid out his plot to kill UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in a spiral notebook, including a chilling “to-do list” and plans considering using a bomb in the Manhattan attack.

The notebook was found alongside a 262-page manifesto, a ghost gun, silencer and false ID cards in the shooting suspect’s possession at the time of his arrest at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, Monday, according to CNN.

Inside the notebook was a to-do list outlining tasks to be completed to carry out the killing, as well as notes that justified those plans, a source told the network.

In one of the notes, Mangione allegedly mused about different methods of murder, including the possibility of bombing Manhattan.

But, the note shows the 26-year-old suspect decided against using explosives over concerns this “could kill innocents”, the source said.

(Ed. This sounds a trifle contrived and far-fetched. Is there any indication Mangione had the wherewithal/expertise to manufacture or handle explosives?)

The source added that the notebook shows the suspect decided to carry out a more targeted attack, musing what could be better than “to kill the CEO at his own bean-counting conference.”



New York Police Department Chief Detective Joe Kenny said the suspect mentioned going to the conference site in the notebook, CNN reported.

In another passage, Mangione allegedly wrote about Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, the source said.

Prior to the shooting, Mangione had given Kaczynski’s manifesto a positive review on Goodread and urged members at his book club to read his memoir.

Along with the spiral notebook, the three-page, 262-word handwritten manifesto has been described by police as a “claim of responsibility” for the shooting.

Kenny said its content hints at a motive, indicating “ill will towards


Always interesting to see the angle the BBC takes on such events!!!

 Here: 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8nk75vg81o

 "The dark fandom behind healthcare CEO murder suspect"


Thursday, 28 November 2024

 What happens to Coroners' reports?




Nearly 600,000 people die in England and Wales every year from a multiplicity of causes, 'natural' or otherwise. Of these in 2022, over 36,000 resulted in a Coroner's Court Inquest, which endeavours to attribute a general cause to the death. 

Coroners are one of the oldest judicial appointments. It can be traced back 910 AD and King Alfred but up to recent times has been a local government function in England and Wales, independent of Central Government and the rest of the judicial system. 

As from 2009, although still located within local government, Coroners have come under the jurisdiction and general direction of the central government Justice Department. This may have both its pros and cons in sensitive cases, where political issues may be involved. In the investigation of deaths, the Coroner works closely with the police and other agencies such as the Health and Safety Executive.

A coroner's court is required when a death is reported to the coroner and an inquest is needed when: 
  • The cause of death is unknown 
  • The death may have been violent or unnatural 
  • The death may have occurred in police custody or prison 
  • The cause of death was not found during the post mortem 
  • The deceased was in the care of the state at the time of death
The following findings are possible:

• Natural causes 
• Accident or misadventure 
• Suicide 
• Narrative, which enables the Coroner to describe briefly the circumstances by which the death came about 
• Unlawful killing (or lawful killing) 
• Alcohol 
• Drug related 
• Industrial Disease 
• Road Traffic Collision 
• Neglect (usually contributing to another conclusion, eg natural causes) 
• Open, meaning that there is insufficient evidence to decide how the death came about – the case is left open in case further evidence appears. 

In most cases the Coroner sits alone, but in a relatively small number of the more high profile or contentious ones, it it is held with a Jury that decides on the verdict on the Coroner's recommendation. In 2023 there were 474 such (representing 1% of all inquests). In the same year, 891 were suspended and not resumed because they were subject to criminal proceedings. 

As from the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, that inaugurated a 'Chief Coroner' at the Ministry of Justice, Rule 43 reports were replaced by 'Reports on Action to Prevent Future Deaths'.  For short they can be referred to as PFDs or PFD reports or Regulation 28 Reports. The Chief Coroner expects to receive around 600 of these a year and publishes them on his web-site. (See: https://www.judiciary.uk/courts-and-tribunals/coroners-courts/reports-to-prevent-future-deaths/ )  However little is known or collated on the practical result of these recommendations. Which is where the following initiative comes into play.

Death may be inevitable for everyone, but knowing the how and why have long been considered important in creating a safe and healthy environment. The Coroner's Inquest plays a central role in this process and in a relatively few cases, making recommendations for prevention.  Knowing what happens to these is a very grey area that requires further clarity and transparency if they are to be effective. This might include a statutory duty on those individuals or organisations on whom they are served, to indicate what steps have been taken to comply.



The Preventable Deaths Tracker newsletter provides unique summaries of coronial data to help learn lessons from inquests for public health and safety. If you enjoy it, consider supporting this work for only £5.99 a month (£1.38 a week!), you’ll gain access to all articles, the archive, and the comment section.


Coroners have been sending reports to organisations to take action to prevent future deaths for over 11 years. However, no one is responsible for understanding who receives these reports, whether they respond, and if action is taken. The Preventable Deaths Tracker is changing this: the only platform that provides real-time statistics.

To highlight what the Preventable Deaths Tracker’s databases can do, I’m launching a new series to share specific analyses on the organisations receiving coroner reports. Today, I’m starting with Ambulance Trusts - the service we rely on in emergencies, often matters of life or death.

217 coroners’ reports

There are 11 Ambulance Trusts in England and Wales. Collectively, coroners sent 217 reports to Ambulance Trusts between July 2013 and 24 November 2024. One-fifth (22%) of reports were sent to the Welsh Ambulance Services, and one-tenth (12%) were sent to the London Ambulance Service.

Every organisation that receives a coroners’ report should respond to all (100%) reports by law. The South East Coast and Yorkshire Ambulance Services have the best response rates, with two-thirds (67%) of all their responses published. The London Ambulance Service has the worst response rate, with only one-third (35%) of reports with published responses.

Support the Preventable Deaths Tracker by becoming a subscriber.

Trends over time

Ambulance Trusts received the most (16%) reports in 2019, with trends dropping during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Do Ambulance Trusts track their reports?

Organisations don’t publish statistics on how many reports they receive from coroners and what actions they take to prevent future deaths. Sharing this information would build a national learning culture where similar organisations could adopt similar actions.

To understand whether Ambulance Trusts were capturing (and hopefully using) this information, I asked them. The majority (54%) of Ambulance Trusts initially refused to share any information, citing that it was already available via the judiciary website. But as I’ve mentioned before, the entire “system” relies on email exchanges, so not all written reports get published. After explaining this, one-third (36%) of Ambulance Trusts continued to refuse to share any information, including:

  1. London Ambulance Service NHS Trust,

  2. East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust,

  3. East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust, and

  4. Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust.

The remaining Ambulance Trusts shared all or some of their data. When comparing the information shared with the Judiciary website, three Ambulance Trusts underreported (i.e. the Trusts are missing reports), and two Ambulance Trusts reported more reports (i.e. the judiciary website is missing reports). It’s a mess.

The Welsh Ambulance Services University NHS Trust reported that since 2022, they’re using a national database 'Once for Wales' Datix Cymru system to record its inquest management. So, it’s great to hear work is being done to improve data capture, but English Ambulance Trusts (and the other 2,000+ organisations that receive coroners’ reports) now need to follow.

The Verdict

The lack of any “system” to track and use coroners’ reports is a missed opportunity. Local approaches to improve data capture are a positive start, but a national approach is needed. Until then, the Preventable Deaths Tracker will keep tracking.