In 1996, CNN founder Ted Turner told Audubon magazine that there are “billion(s) of us on this little earth swimming around in space, and there’s too many of us.”
“If we had a much smaller population…we could cut back to 250 million—350 million people.”
Precisely what the above billionaires discussed is unrevealed.
Depopulation was likely a key topic with no further elaboration.
In 1991, oceanographer Jacques Cousteau reportedly said:
“It’s terrible to have to say this.”
“World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”
Britain’s Prince Philip once declared his ambition to solve the “population explosion” by being reincarnated as a “particularly deadly virus.”
Even famed philosopher Bertrand Russell said the following in “The Impact of Science on Society:”
“I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing.”
“War so far has had no great effect on this increase…(P)erhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective.”
If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full.”
“(T)he state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it?”
“Really high-minded people are indifferent to suffering, especially that of other people’s.”
In 2003, David Rockefeller said the following in his memoirs:
“Some…believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will.”
“If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
Even Plato said that ruling authorities “aim…to preserve the average of population.”
“There are many other things which they will have to consider, such as the effects of wars and diseases and any similar agencies, in order as far as this is possible to prevent the State from becoming either too large or too small.”
“Now these goings on must be a secret which the rulers only know, or there will be a further danger of our herd…breaking out into rebellion.”
Launched in 1992, the UN-sponsored Agenda 2021 said the following:
“The growth of world population and production combined with unsustainable consumption patterns places increasingly severe stress on the life-supporting capacities of our planet.”
Agenda 2021 implied support for but stopped short of overtly calling for depopulation.
On video no longer available, Bill Gates called for mass-jabbing — with depopulation in mind left unstated.
He supports the culling of world populations, eliminating countless numbers of unwanted people.
His mass-jabbing campaigns have been disastrous in nations where implemented.
Last year, Italian lawmaker Sara Cunial called for halting plans to mass-jab for flu/covid because of figures like Gates behind the scheme, saying:
“For decades, Gates has been working on depopulation policy and dictatorial control plans on global politics, aiming to obtain the primacy on agriculture, technology and energy.”
She denounced enormous harm he caused by promoting mass-jabbing in underdeveloped countries, adding:
His foundation was involved in sterilizing countless numbers of women in Africa and paralyzing many thousands of children in India and elsewhere.
His goal is global depopulation on a massive scale, along with tyrannical social control worldwide.
Years earlier, he called for developing new vaccines to “reduce population.”
He lied claiming no link exists between vaccines and contraction of potentially deadly or disabling diseases.
In 1974, Henry Kissinger’s secret National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) called for drastic global depopulation.
Developing nations are resource rich, he said. They’re vital to US growth.
He called for eliminating what he considers useless eaters, saying:
“Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World.”
Supporting involuntary mass sterilizations, he pushed for birth control made a prerequisite for US aid to eliminate hundreds of millions of unwanted people by 2000, millions more annually.
A year ago April in a WSJ op-ed, he called for “develop(ing) new techniques…technologies…and vaccines (for use in) large populations” — with depopulation in mind left unexplained.
His “liberal world order” is code language for despotism with a friendly face.
It’s convincing people to go along with what harms them — including ruler/serf societies, ordinary manipulated to go along with losing all rights, convincing them it’s beneficial or necessary for the greater good.
Things are in an earlier stage of far greater draconian harshness to come.
Most people in the US/West have either been convinced to unwittingly go along with the diabolical scheme or remain indifferent toward combatting it.
With humanity’s fate at stake like never before, there’s no greater urgency than taking a stand now against what no one should tolerate
13.7.2023: re. 'Black Death' and the 'Great Plague' just two more notable of many. The former in around 1349, the latter principally in London in 1665 but two distinct illnesses. The former seems to have been a virulent form of influenza that swept the whole of Europe, killing a third to a half of the population; the latter a form of pyaemia resulting in the famous 'buboils' or supporating lymph nodes. Plagues of one sort or another often followed bad harvests and the famines that resulted. Crowded towns, poor sanitation, hygiene and diet made people very susceptible. Even relatively healthy places like Pensford had many recorded outbreaks. Finding the consecrated space to bury the bodies must have been a headache and of course in the worst cases, there was anonymous mass burial beyond the perimeter of the town, some of which still exist. These events have left a lasting existential scar that goes some way towards explaining the quite irrational response to the recent Covid episode. The health of the population and the sophisticated methods of treatment to day cannot be compared to those of 350 and 750 years ago, although of course modern populations are 'plagued' by a whole range of new conditions and diseases, created by the very ingenuity and affluence that dismissed the old ones.
11.7.2023: a TRILLION blown on the Covid con, much of it on corruption; coronary and associated deaths now running at around 90,000 above average, probably as a result of dangerous inadequately tested novel vaccines; a concerted effort by MPs to ignore the facts and shoot the (Budgen) messenger; but plenty of time to revel in whether a few words here and there infringed someone's feelings. A classic case of the 'bike shed phenomenom' or the fish not discovering salt water. The best conspiracies are those that cannot be traced to their source. There is a term for it, "Plausible deniability". Johnson like Trump had to be got rid of because he was too popular and because there would have been no Brexit without him. He was undoubtedly pulled down by the same forces that set him up and Parliament was happy to magnify a splinter, whilst blind to a beam.
From gumshoenews: https://gumshoenews.com/the-war-against-humanity/
You think I'm exaggerating? The predicted 'next wave'?
Rees-Mogg on
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdJyWNVEYfw
17.7.2023: The whole of nature is a paradoxical tension between competition and cooperation. It is everywhere in plants and animals - in all organic life and in perhaps the inorganic too. The insular plant/animal/organism versus or in harmony with its environment, whether microscopic or macroscopic. It's creation versus entrophy; life versus death in everything temporal. However only humans appear to have free will, conscious choice, ethics, to determine how they play this cosmic game. No other species has our understanding or the power to influence global systems, either to enhance or destroy them. That is why moral philosophy matters at every level but probably most importantly at the top where decisions are made. Human civilization has come a long way in millenia. For the majority life has never been so long or so good, and this has been facilitated by scientific and technical progress, but it has been essentially selfish, blind to the horrors inflicted on others and careless to the damage done to the rest of the world. Our thinking has been short-term and blind to consequences. We still make the same mistake, so that we ignore the many adverse effects of current popular 'green' policies, that may well turn out more destructive of nature than their prior alternatives. Consumption and pollution are the two great threats, but those that preach, are usually the biggest offenders. Humans are in competition with one another and with the eco-systems on which they depend, but their ultimate survival also depends on a spirit of cooperation and empathy for the other. They must limit their desire to exploit natural resources and in the process contaminate the world. It is our only home in a limitless alien universe. Without it our destruction as a species is assured. (TTV)
18.7.2023: Funerals are strange occasions. A mixture of happiness and sadness. I suppose in going to funerals we are reminded of our own, yet like to think this could never happen to us. It's always for the other person, but as John Donne reminds us, "Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee." The older we get the more our friends, aquaintances and national figures drop away. The list grows and grows, and with it the cultural and social landscape changes. There is a sense of unreality about it all, that mental fixures are no longer there, that past events are just memories and all of life will evaporate in a sigh. With every funeral it is necessary to mentally recalibrate as we witness the friends of our youth become inexplicably old, and we laugh at the comedy of it all; the inevitability of the passing; the common fate of all living things. How to respond? Do we say, "Let us eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die"? or do we take a puritanical view that, "After death the judgment" and so lead God-fearing lives? I really have no idea. I have been to happy funerals and miserable ones. Increasingly people have shifted from preferring black to "bright colours should be worn" and from grieving to celebration. It is a reflection of a more profound shift in our beliefs and outlook. Christian theology has been replaced by a much more digestible alternative, that death really does signal the end and if you haven't done it by then, you never will. We are all pagans now and pagans always knew how to celebrate death.
Tim VeaterKay Jo Jo Just more of my manic mind-stream. As mindful or as mindless as you want to make it. It was prompted by reports of a funeral where everybody had a great time remembering the deceased. I can't help wondering if funerals haven't become exercises in entertainment and denial, to the exclusion of the reverential and profound. Maybe that's a good thing, who knows?
Reply
- 3m
Tim VeaterJust something for me to whitter on about.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk2j5D-y_oM
20.7.2023: It's not just closing down accounts. The Halifax had a large 'Rainbow Flag' on the wall behind the counter. When I started to enquire why it was there I was told in no uncertain terms it was not my business and I wasn't allowed to express any opinion on it in the bank. When I stood there open mouthed, the female clerk told me to leave. Apart from the ridiculous and bossy rules during covid (stand here, stand there, wear a mask, move back from the counter etc) I had always had pleasant, cordial relations with the staff. Of course the paradox is that the bank felt free to exercise its right to supporting and promoting a political lobby group, but if the customer does it, they take the risk of having their account removed. This is not banking but social control. It is using accounts as a means of enforcing the banks opinions and agenda onto its cusyomers. That I would suggest is not only unethical. It is unconstitutional and this from organisations that only recently looked to government and ultimately the tax payer, to save their skins. Unless stopped, the sinister aspects of this policy are clear. https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2023/
10.8.2023: IT'S A COAL NIGHTMARE! Some of us still rely on coal to heat our homes, water and cook. It is a brilliant fuel but it is becoming increasingly difficult to get hold of it. In the past I have always ordered and paid for it in May. It is now well into August and my local merchant still can't tell me what the price will be or allow me to order for the winter period. Apparently the anthracite I use has to come from Latvia and has still not arrived. The supply has obviously been disrupted but no one can tell me what is the true situation. Calls to the coal merchant result only in an assurance they will call me when supplies arrive but they can't say when. No information has been forthcoming from them as the winter fast approaches. The situation is unprecedented. Even in war, you could still get a ton of coal. Government policy is clearly at the root of the problem, dictated by crazy 'net zero' objectives that are determined to ruin the country and make life unbearable for most. Of course the irony is that in Britain, coal is both plentiful and one of the few natural resources. The industry based on it was decimated largely for political and cabalistic reasons dating back to Mrs Thatcher's personal world view. (Oh those dirty, beer-swilling miners) Current 'Green Agendaists' will if not stopped, have us back in the dark ages. No coal, no oil no fossil fuels of any kind, until we all sit in the cold and dark. Our national life appears to be currently run by idiots that think CO2 is the source of all evil - what could be further from the truth? - and that even if Britain were to reach its self destructive net zero targets, it would only contribute 1% to world figures overall. I am dependent on my ancient Rayburn and it only burns smokeless fuel. Electric has been made prohibitively expensive directly by government policies. Gas is unavailable. We have been made hostage to fortune by the fools who, in their ivory towers have lost contact with reality and what is good for the nation and its populace.
Dr. Coleman: Deadly Covid-19 jab will kill more people than will die in Ukraine
There is now no doubt that the covid-19 jab is a deadly fake vaccine – useless but far more dangerous than depleted uranium grenades or cluster bombs. Like bombs, missiles and bullets, its only conceivable purpose is to kill people.
The evidence that the over-promoted, over-sold covid-19 jab is the most dangerous pharmaceutical product ever used is denied only by the fools or touts of the conspirators and the pharmaceutical industry. I have repeatedly warned that the covid-19 jab could cause or exacerbate a huge range of serious health problems – including heart disease, clotting problems and cancer. And as I warned two and a half years ago, the immune system problems caused by the “vaccine” are deadly, writes Dr. Vernon Coleman .
Read on –
https://www.frontnieuws.com/dr-coleman-dodelijke-covid-19-prik-zal-meer-mensen-doden-dan-er-zullen-sterven-in-oekraine/
Who are those who believe governments do not plan and assist GENOCIDE?
Anyone?
You?
If so, just look at all the genocides since 1900, just for a start.
If so, condemn your own children and grandchildren to death.