"Plebs omnis plaudit ut me minore sepius audit."
TREBLE BELL, COMBE RALEIGH CHURCH, DEVON.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYZWJ-cVwb8
Thursday, 27 October 2022
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Abraham Vater. 1724
Google Translate
A very rare case. With a Partial View of the Objects, Communicating to Mr. Abraham Vater, Prof. Med. Wittemb. R.S.S.
A woman of middle age, in the last year, after a blow from the back, through a bath and subsequent cooling, Coryza, one night she fell into a black cataract, or a feral drop: for in the morning she awoke from sleep she felt blinded by the use of her eyes, without any externally visible defects in her eyes. After the use of real medicines, various laxatives and blood-purifying agents, with similar dressings, together with a decent diet, his sight gradually returned, but he was old enough to notice that his sight was worn out, and strange phenomena occurred in him.
On January 24, 2022 Senator Ron Johnson invited a group of world renowned doctors and medical experts to the U.S. Senate to provide a different perspective on the global pandemic response, the current state of knowledge of early and hospital treatment, vaccine efficacy and safety, what went right, what went wrong, what should be done now, and what needs to be addressed long term. This 38 minute video highlights the 5-hour discussion.
Click here for the entire event video: https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-.
An Intercept investigation based on over 5,500 pages of @nihgov documents has uncovered a litany of mishaps in U.S. labs, including in highly secure biosafety level 3 and biosafety level 4 labs. Many of the incidents involved less dangerous pathogens that can be handled with basic safety equipment, and most did not lead to infection. But several accidents happened while scientists were handling deadly or debilitating viruses in highly secure labs, and a few did lead to illness. “People have it in their minds that lab accidents are very, very rare, and if they happen, they happen only in the least well-run overseas labs,” said Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University and an advocate for better biosafety standards. “That simply isn’t true.” The United States has the most robust biomedical funding in the world, and controversial breakthroughs in science often come from American labs. Yet the United States lacks a central framework for lab oversight. The United States has a patchwork of regulations and guidelines covering lab biosafety. Safety training can vary widely from one institution to the next. Experiments involving certain pathogens and some research funded by the U.S. government is subject to oversight, but critics say that other areas are like the Wild West. Unless they work with the most dangerous pathogens, biolabs don’t have to register with the U.S. government. As a result, there is little visibility into the biosafety of experiments carried out by private companies or foundations. “Your favorite tech billionaire could, with their own money, do basically whatever the hell they want with any pathogen,” said Rocco Casagrande, managing director of Gryphon Scientific, a biosafety advisory firm that has advised NIH on biosafety standards. “They could take the measles virus and intentionally try to make it vaccine-resistant and more pathogenic in their garage. If they’re doing it for legitimate research purposes in their own minds, they can do so wildly, unsafely, and no one can stop them.” Read more from Mara Hvistendahl via the link in our bio. Illustration: Alex Williamson for The Intercept
Covid Vaccinations - "Nothing to worry about" then?
This:
Then this:
Quote: "I am not going to waste your time going over the mountainous evidence and statistics that show, we the Australian people, have been deceived. We have been lied to. (Applause) We must face reality. The Covid gene based vaccines have undoubtedly failed to live up to expectations.
Andrew Bridgen Calls Out UK Institutions For Covering Up Jab Harms
Despite it being virtually impossible to find a copy of the debate in question, the disgraceful apathy of MPs is demonstrated in Dr John Campbell's video below. Besides Bridgen making his case, only FIVE MPs bothered to turn up. This replicates the earlier debate described. MPs are obviously deaf, dumb and blind to the havoc that was caused by the government's Covid policy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fb9E3cOPi-c
These so-called vaccines do not prevent infection, they do not prevent transmission and they are not keeping people out of hospital. These vaccines are not safe. They have caused more death and serious adverse effects of any drug in the history of medicine."
Despite the expert opinion of the Australian pharmacist above, as far as the British Government is concerned, there is nothing in Covid vaccines or their roll-out to worry about. Indeed nothing to worry about in its covid policy generally. Clearly it regards everything in the 'Big Pharma Garden' is lovely and the 'roses' there, by any other name, would smell as sweet.
On Monday 24th October, in the middle of a political storm that was gripping the nation, a petition (No. 602171) that had garnered over a 100,000 votes was debated by MPs in Parliament. Political turmoil related to the resignation of Liz Truss as Prime Minister after only forty four days in office, and the choosing of a replacement as Leader of the Conservative Party and thus Prime Minister, was rife. As everyone must now know, only a few days later, with both Boris Johnson and Penny Mordaunt dropping out of the race, Rishi Sunak, was appointed Prime Minister - the first of Indian descent.
However as Sir Christopher Chope (I had the pleasure of witnessing his father, a circuit judge in action many years ago) pointed out, only after he had made representations, was vaccine safety and efficacy included in the terms of reference in that inquiry. Government and political parties as demonstrated by the contributions of the Labour Shadow Health Secretary and the representative of SNP have shown a dogged refusal to recognise the significance of its own MRSA and ONS statistics, as well as a mass of other evidence, and opinion. All hide behind the totally unproven claim that the vaccines had prevented millions of deaths and ended the epidemic.
From this and the images above, it may be seen that despite the undoubted importance of the subject and the fact that more than 107,000 members of the public had signed the petition, of about 620 MPs, such is the apathy and complacency of our elected legislators, only 14 or 15 MPs bothered to turn up to discuss it.
The unintended - or intended - consequence of this was that the said debate was hardly reported by main stream media. Yet again by sleight of hand, the serious topic of harm caused by government covid policy generally, and by dangerous vaccines specifically, passed largely unnoticed by the public at large and no substantive commitments to review the policy were made by the government. The appeal in the petition to appoint a Royal Commission to look into the matter was rejected.
Presumably therefore people, including children over the age of twelve, will continue to be encouraged to take the jab; illness and death will continue to be caused; unknown long term effects will with time become apparent; there will be no legal recourse for those damaged; pharmaceutical companies will continue to make huge profits at the cost of government and taxpayer; government will fail to research properly the adverse effects; and everyone pushing or facilitating the roll out will remain in denial and unaccountable.
The petition submission stated as follows:
“There has been a significant increase in heart attacks and related health issues since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines…This needs immediate and full scientific investigation to establish if there is any possible link with the Covid-19 vaccination rollout.
It is the duty of the Government to ensure that the prescribed medical interventions of its response to Coronavirus are safe. We believe that the recent and increasing volume of data relating to cardiovascular problems since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout began is…enough…to warrant a full Public Inquiry.”
Elliot Colburn (Carshalton and Wallington) (Con) who moved the motion (according to Wikipedia) was selected as the Conservative candidate for Carshalton and Wallington on 11 February 2019 elected as an MP in the 2019 general election with a majority of 629 votes He is vice-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on HIV/AIDS. Colburn is gay and has a partner, a local Councillor, to whom he is engaged. In his spare time he has been a Scout leader. He opened his remarks with the following:
"Throughout my speech, I will point out why I do not think that the Government should launch a public inquiry into vaccine safety; it would be a waste of taxpayers’ money, and is not necessary for reasons that I will discuss."
Clearly therefore he came to the subject with a preformed antagonism to the notion of investigating covid vaccine safety. He was not open minded, quite the reverse. It was obvious from his remarks that he was in effect the mouthpiece of the MHRA and the apologist for his political party and government. Sir Christopher Chope put it succinctly when he said, "My hon. Friend showed himself to be rather the victim of producer capture—the producer in this case being the MHRA." Colburn proved the partisan nature of his contribution by admitting, in contrast to a million others not watched or even been aware of the 2022 Oracle Film called "Safe and Effective: A second Opinion", or indeed any other programme or outlet that took an opposing view. The film may be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o(Now blocked by You Tube for no proper reason) here: https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective
As we have discovered with the inquiry into child abuse, which recently reported after nearly eight years and nearly two hundred million pounds spent, and described by one witness as "Not worth the paper it was written on", or the enquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire in which over seventy people died but not one prosecution started, there is certainly reason to question whether any government enquiry is value for money. However to deny yet another into covid vaccine adverse effects specifically does not mean the government should not take on board the obvious concerns and study them carefully. Given the very clear evidence - micro-biological, medical, clinical, experiential and statistical - it would be absolutely reckless for it not to do so. Having largely wasted some £440 BILLIONS on Covid measures and cost the economy billions more, it is rather amusing to see government jib over ensuring they are not killing or injuring people.
He reiterates the government's stance that Covid has killed tens of thousands and that the vaccines had prevented more deaths, both of which claims are hugely questionable. He says,
"It is worth remembering that, for the first 26 months of the pandemic, over 178,000 people across the UK died within 28 days of a positive covid-19 test. It remains my position that vaccination is the single most effective way to reduce deaths and severe illness from covid-19."
It would be worth noting if the assumptions and conclusions in that statement were true but they are not. The tests used were never intended to be diagnostic and were/are utterly unreliable. A positive test means you are neither suffering illness or are infective. Even if a person died within 28 days of a positive test this does NOT mean they died from Covid. There are hundreds of anecdotal reports of doctors being pressurised to attribute Covid as a cause of death or contributing factor when it wasn't. Nor is the fact that flu has always claimed the lives of the elderly which morphed into the new cause. Nor is it possible to distinguish death put down to Covid which were actually the result in lack or care or new protocols.
This claim as to cause of death and the efficacy of the vaccine to prevent it, is shot through with so many errors, and position that relies on it to argue there is no need for an enquiry, or at least independent research, is immediately suspect. The true evidence is that the vaccines are ineffective, hence the need for continual 'boosters' and the statistical evidence of hepatisation after inoculation; that they do not prevent infectivity (recently admitted by Pfizer); and in fact by the MHRA's own 'Yellow Card' reporting system, caused more serious adverse effects and deaths of any new medical procedure in recent times.
Colburn's attempt to downplay the MRHA's own reporting statistics revealed his ignorance and bias. The figures he gave, even without factoring in their under-representation of the extent of the probem, are startling and concerning. How could anyone dismiss them with a wave of the hand and as he did by associating them with irrational protestors in his constituency?
"As of 28 September 2022, in the UK, 173,381 yellow cards had been reported for Pfizer-BioNTech; 246,393 for AstraZeneca; 42,437 for Moderna; 14 for Novavax; and 1,848 for vaccines where the brand was not specified. For Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna, the reporting rate is about two to five yellow cards per 1,000 doses administered." That's over 460,000serious adverse effects with a total of about fifty million shots administered to date. In other words a serious adverse effect for one in every fifty shots! And it takes no account of the under reporting of up to ten times nor of over two thousand reported deaths!
His pathetic attempt at dismissing the significance of these figures was as follows:
"The use of the yellow card scheme has been used as an example of why vaccines do not work, but it is important to note that the scheme is a self-reporting system. It cannot be used to prove a causal link between reported symptoms and potential damage caused. The reported reaction could have occurred regardless of the vaccine, or the person reporting could have no knowledge
of the relationship between that symptom and the vaccine; it may have occurred even if the person had not been vaccinated altogether. I could get on the phone to the yellow card scheme right now and say that I have a side effect from a vaccine—I could completely make it up. The scheme has no verification process."
Does he really think that nearly half a million reports mean nothing, that people blithely go to the trouble of reporting serious conditions just for the sake of it? If he is right, then the Yellow Card reporting system should be scrapped and replaced with something more reliable. As far as I am aware its reliability and voracity has never been questioned before or its statistics subjected to such weasel-wise, uninformed attack.
The only rational explanation for rejecting its own statistics is that for some quite amazingly inexplicable reason, the Government is so deeply committed to a huge mistaken philosophy of misapplied confidence in vaccination, misapplied to these experimental, untested vaccines that to investigate or draw back would be a tacit admission of a gigantic blunder. In fact the biggest public health blunder in recorded history.
Nothing the Minister for Health said in response inspired much confidence that the government was dealing with the matter with the urgency or importance it deserves. Where is the advice to the public on the adverse effects? It spent over a £billion pounds on pushing the vaccines. How much has it spent warning people? It was convinced by totally unreliable predictions and statistics. Why is it so reluctant to treat the MRSA and ONS figures with the seriousness they deserve? Why despite the American disastrous child adverse effects reported in the United States is it still pushing vaccines on children and using highly unethical psychologic methods to do it? See: http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2022/10/nhs-involved-in-deeply-unethical-child.htmlCan you believe our own government and medical authorities are prepared to put the present and future health of our children at risk, even when there is no discernible benefit. This is TOTAL MADNESS!
Yet again this event proves our parliamentary representatives care nothing for our health and welfare; are deaf to the concerns of over one hundred thousand petitioners; the opposition parties are complicit; MPs operate in a miasma of denial and self deceit, unprepared to face up to facts or begin to recognise colossal error they have made, let alone start to put it right.
In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”
Finally! Medical Proof the Covid Jab is "Murder" : Dr. Vernon Coleman.
Monday, 24 October 2022
Maybe it's not the Jews?
Photo: Al-Monitor
In Friday's Times, there was a quote of the French philosopher Jean Rostand (from 1962) that struck home. "Science had better not free the minds of men too much, before it has tamed their instincts." It was presumably written about the time of the mighty clash of ideologies over Cuba and a year before JFK was shot, about which the term 'conspiracy theorist' was invented. This bowdlerising obloquy shares much in common with 'anti-Semitic' to which you refer. Both act as shields behind which Rostand's quasi-sexual instincts of violent domination and subjugation are allowed to exist. Another of his famous sayings was, ""Kill one man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a God", which appears particularly pertinent at the present time. Interestingly, in the light of your piece, it is claimed he was the main inspiration for Robert Ettinger's pursuit of cryogenics - the science of eternal life. Ettinger of course, happened to be the son of Russian Jewish immigrants. (Tim Veater)
Victims of allegedly Muslim bombers at the Boston Marathon, Photo: NYDailyNews.com
It may be recalled that in April, 2019, Elias Davidsson published a satirical essay at GumshoeNews.com. It was a riposte to Christopher Bollyn’s theory of Israel as the boss of the 9-11 disaster. Davidsson said that Jews had planted incriminating clues (ha ha) to make themselves look guilty. (Example: Hani Hanjour, the bad pilot, was said by an Israeli pilot trainer to have been a good pilot.)
Elias Davidsson was my friend and colleague for many years (he died in 2021) and I have to say that he, as a Jew, was always willing to blame Jews if they deserved it. He worked hard on behalf of Palestinians. But he did not buy Bollyn’s ideas. I do buy Bollyn’s ideas, but the skepticism of Elias occasionally haunts me.
Today I found a new approach which has shaken me up good. I am eager to share it, but this can be only a rough, hurried sketch. The new bit is not very new; Paul Eisen published it in 2004, under the title “Righteous Jews.” First, let me prepare you to see where Eisen’s idea fits, in my already somewhat-formed picture of our world.
I was born in Boston in 1947, and was a college student in the marvelous Sixties. During the Sixties, I developed a sense of Jews as justice warriors, especially in the niches of journalism, law, and academia. But I had already known my Jewish neighbors as warm and kind, mainly the mothers. As a Catholic, I envision myself as semi-Jewish.
Now I switch the story to a different era, the 21st Century, when I became a conspiracy theorist. Or you could call me a Machiavellian theorist, which is pretty much the same thing. I was well-read in sociobiology, and had published four books in that field. My 1990 PhD thesis combines an evolutionary analysis with a discussion of war.
I think I should hand my doctoral degree back in, as I did not know about the real stuff. I sure never dreamed that World War I — “the Great War” — was designed, cruelly, in London by a Lord and an Earl. Personally, as a ‘church girl,’ I had been opposed to the US’s foreign policy in Latin America since the 1970s. But even then, I didn’t “get it” about backroom deals.
Fast forward to today. I am a card-carrying opponent of the boys in the backroom. Not the low echelon ones, the high echelon ones. The ones so high that, as Orwell said, we don’t know who Big Brother is. I have truly worked hard to gather information in order to identify him. Not to catch him as a prize. Rather, to save my neck from what our bad future looks like. That’s m’goal.
History of Our Bad Future
Some of my buddies have done excellent work tracing the origins of 20th century authoritarianism back to 18th century, or earlier. The hidden hand is usually Jewish. Not always though. Cecil Rhodes, super-Anglican (or so he said), started the ball rolling for the UK group that became the Roundtable, from which you can see the start of the World Government hubris.
The Russian Revolution of 1917 is now well understood to have been a Jewish thing, and Nesta Webster, writing in 1922, showed the amazing similarity of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia to the “people’s” takeover in the French Revolution of 1789, complete with the banner of “liberty, equality, fraternity.” I see the Biden socialist takeover as following closely along that line. It is sooo dishonest.
This leads me to think that the French, Russian, and Biden revolutions must be in aid of the same “person” — Big Brother. Yet I definitely do not think this boils down to Jewishness. I think it boils down to takeover for takeover’s sake. Please see my 2022 book, “Keep the Republic, Kill the Takeover.”
Note: As a sociobiologist, I always see social structure as genetically driven. For me, the most likely force behind the takeover is that once you rise too high in the hierarchy, all your effort must go to making sure you don’t fall. This requires elaborate efforts to quash challenges, or make sure your many underlings are not equipped to compete with you. If castration is the solution, fine. Or killing them. Or mind-controlling them. Whatever. Ya gotta do it.
Anti-Semitism
I said that Elias Davidsson’s idea haunts me. I sometimes think that if a non-Jew were the top boss, he (she?) would do well to create a picture of the Jews doing all the bad stuff. Certainly, I’m aware that folks are not allowed to say “It’s the Jews” (cuz you’ll get ostracized for your anti-Semitism). And, I have long noted that this makes you cease your quest. You give up!
Really, it’s a brilliant strategy. I mean if Big Bro Gentile is the real conqueror, he has eliminated the fray. I lived in Australia where there is a Human Rights program, of which Section 18c forbids you to hurt the feelings of an ethnic group. My pal, the late Fredrick Toben in Adelaide, was sued by a man, Jeremy Jones, claiming to represent the Jewish Community of South Australia.
Toben said there were no gassings at Auschwitz. He thus lost his life savings for defamation, and was also jailed for contempt of court when he did not clean up his website as ordered. Meanwhile in Germany, tons of people have been judicially punished for questioning the bona fides of the Holocaust. (By the way, there were no gassings at Auschwitz.)
Are you following my drift? I am putting forward the possibility that the major barrier to speaking negatively about “Jews” (by charging you with anti-Semitism) is really a barrier to your chatting about Big Bro Gentile!
Paul Eisen
Now I switch over to Paul Eisen, a London Jew. He favors the work of Israel Shamir, a Russian ex-Jew, but I assume most of Eisen’s work is original. His main concern is the mistreatment of Palestinians, and at his website, Deir Yassin Remembered, he goes over the eviction of the locals in 1948. Fancy that.
Paul Eisen analyzes what holds Jewry together. He wants Jews to be held accountable for what they do as a group, irrespective of whether they live in Israel or whether they embrace Zionism! Here are his main points, abridged but unedited, from 2004 (numbering added):
Jews have certainly suffered but their suffering remains unexamined and unexplained. The Holocaust, now the paradigm of Jewish suffering, has long ceased to be a piece of history, and is now treated by religious and secular alike, as a piece of theology — a sacred text almost — and therefore beyond scrutiny. And the suffering never ends. No matter how much Jews have suffered they are certainly not suffering now, but for many Jews their history of suffering is not just an unchallengeable past but also a possible future. So, no matter how safe Jews may be, many feel just a hair’s-breadth away from Auschwitz.
If Jews think that they are a people with a religious link to a land and have a deep wish to ‘return’, why should we care, so long as the land is not already populated by Palestinians? And if Jews feel that they are special and that God has made some kind of special arrangement with them, so what, so long as this does not lead them to demand preferential treatment and to discriminate against others? And if Jews feel that they have suffered like no-one else on the face of the earth, fine, so long as they do not use this suffering to justify the imposition of suffering on others and to blackmail morally the whole world into quiescent silence.
Jewish notions of specialness, chosen-ness and even supremacism, are fine for a small, wandering people, but, when empowered with a state, an army and F16s become a concern for us all.
It is a state that both believes, and uses as justification for its own aggression, the notion that its very survival is always at stake, so anything is justified to ensure that survival. Israel is a state that manifestly believes that the rules of both law and humanity, applicable to all other states, do not apply to it.
Israel is a client state of America, serving American interests or, more particularly, the interests of its power elites. This view is underpinned by the obvious importance of oil, the huge strategic importance of the region and the fact that, if Israel did not further the interests of those who control America, then we can be sure America would not support Israel. Also, there is no doubt that, in the IDF, America has found a marvellously flexible and effective force, easily aroused and let loose whenever any group of Arabs get a little above themselves.
The details of the workings of AIPAC and others, and the mechanics by which these groups exert pressure on America’s lawmakers and governors, have been dealt with elsewhere; we need only note that this interest group is undoubtedly extraordinarily effective and successful. Not just a small group of Jews supporting Israel, as its supporters would have us believe, these are powerful and committed ideologues: billionaires, media magnates, politicians, activists and religious leaders. In any event, the power of the Jewish lobby to make or break pretty well any public figure is legendary — not for nothing is it often referred to simply as “The Lobby.”
The overwhelming majority of Jews in America live their lives just like any other Americans. They’ve done well and are undoubtedly pleased that America supports their fellow Jews in Israel but that’s as far as it goes. Nonetheless, an awful lot of Jews certainly do control an awful lot of America. … over its blood and its brain. It is in finance and the media that we find a great many Jews in very influential positions.
And there would probably be nothing wrong with this were it not for the fact that these same people who exert so much control and influence over American life also seem to refuse to be held accountable. It is the surreptitiousness with which Jews are perceived to have achieved their success which arouses suspicion. Jews certainly seem cagey about the influence they have. Just breathe the words “Jewish power” and wait for the reaction.
Old anti-Semitic myths about Jewish dual loyalty. The idea that American intervention in Iraq, the one viable military counterweight to Israeli hegemony in the Middle East and therefore an inspiration to Arab and Palestinian resistance, primarily serves Israeli rather than American interests has also been consigned to the nether world of mediaeval anti-Semitic myth. The suggestion that those Jews around the president act from motives other than those to promote the interests of all Americans is just anti-Semitic raving. And maybe they’re right. Perhaps those who promote Jewish interests are in fact promoting American interests because, for now at least, they appear to be one and the same.
During even the most terrible times of Jewish suffering such as the Crusades or the Chmielnitzky massacres of seventeenth century Ukraine, and even more so at other times in history, it has been said that the average peasant would have given his eye-teeth to be a Jew. The meaning is clear: generally speaking, and throughout most of their history, the condition of Jews was often far superior to the mass of the population. Ukrainian massacres took place in the context of a peasant uprising against the oppression of the Ukrainian peasantry by their Polish overlords. As has often been the case, Jews were seen as occupying a traditional position of being in alliance with the ruling class in their oppression of the peasantry.
The fact is that one may question the Armenian genocide, one may freely discuss the Slave Trade, one can say that the murder of millions of Ibos, Kampucheans and Rwandans never took place and that the moon is but a piece of green cheese, but one may not question the Jewish Holocaust. Why? Because, like the rest of the Jewish history of suffering, the Holocaust underpins the narrative of Jewish innocence which is used to bewilder and befuddle any attempt to see and to
Judaism is at least at the historicheart of Jewishness and, whatever else may bind Jews together, it is certainly true that religion plays an important part. Second, for a group of people who have retained such a strong collective identity with no shared occupation of any land, language, nor even, in many cases, a culture, it is hard to see what else there could be that makes Jews into Jews. Surely for Jews, in the absence of other, more obvious factors, it is precisely such a spirit that has enabled them to retain their distinctive identity for so long and in the face of such opposition.
They should take a leaf from Henry Herskovitz. He is part of an organisation called Jewish Witnesses for Peace, which holds silent vigils outside synagogues on shabbat. Of course, all the other Jewish activists are shrieking at him that you mustn’t target Jews for protest, that you must draw a distinction between Jews, Israelis and Zionists, that you’ll only alienate the people we want to engage…. but he doesn’t care…. Henry also knows that to say that Jews in America individually and in their religious and community organisations should not be held accountable for what is happening is a lie and discredits all Jews before the non-Jewish world.
Why should ‘the Jews’ not be as accountable as ‘the Americans’ and even ordinary Jews as accountable as ordinary Americans? Why do we not picket the offices of the Anti-Defamation League … or even the homes of Abe Foxman, Edgar Bronfman and Mort Zuckerman in the U.S.? Why do we not heckle Alan Dershowitz and Melanie Phillips? What about the U.K. Chief Rabbi who in his time has had lots to say about Israel and Palestine? Why do we not take the struggle to every synagogue and Jewish community centre in the world? After all, every Shabbat a prayer is said for the state of Israel in every mainstream synagogue … why should these Jews who choose to combine their prayers and their politics be immune while at prayer from our legitimate protests at their politics? And for those few Jews who are really prepared to stand up and be counted for their solidarity with Palestinians, why can we not still give to them due honour?
The answer is that we are frightened. Even knowing that Jews are responsible and should be held accountable, still we are frightened. We are frightened because criticism of Jews with its woeful history of violence and discrimination seems just too dangerous a position to take — it may open the floodgates to a burst of Jew hatred. Perhaps most of all, we are frightened of the conflicted inner passions that confound us all whenever we come to look at these things.Does speaking the truth about Jewish identity, power and history lead to Jews being led to concentration camps and ovens? Of course it doesn’t! It is hatred, fear and the suppression of free thought and speech which leads to these things — whether the hatred, fear and suppression is directed against Jews or by Jews.
— The foregoing 15 points, and more, are found at deiryassin.org. Paul Eisen is a justice warrior. Didn’t I tell you Jews are like that?
Conclusion
Ah, I see that Eisen is not exactly going down the road I predicted. His quest is to find blame for specific events. Who knows, maybe all manner of horrible things in the world are happening at the command of Big Bro Jew, not Big Bro Gentile.
If I had to bet my house on it. I’d go for Big Bro Gentile. That would also entail my shifting the identity of the author of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It’s a big ask, but I calculate that the group at the top must be ethnically mixed.
Say, let’s find out. Let’s interrogate anyone who looks guilty, and make them rat on each other. I can help you here. I have a list of people of varying religions, races, and nationality who have done a bonzer job of false flags, such as at the 2013 Boston Marathon. Quite possibly they were mind controlled to do it, but in any case, we need to know. We can offer amnesties.
We need to know. We need to know. LET’S FIND OUT.
When all the trends, events and narratives are common to a geographical or socio/political region, the obvious conclusion is that there is a common denominator/controlling mind. I believe this has had its locale in Anglo/American alliance, facilitated by normal diplomatic channels but operating secretly beneath it, in concert with global interests and organs. Its apotheosis was the so called attacks on America in 2001, which were actually an internally organised outrage and coup, which allowed all of the outrages that followed, that have essentially caused the various crises from which we now suffer. All American aligned countries were complicit in the chicanery, and have been party to all the fraudulent memes ever since, by which I mean all the 'fears' of climate, terrorism, overwhelming immigration, financial melt-down, fuel and food shortages, 'right wing extremism', 'Muslim extremism', 'anti-Semitism', Russian interference and threat to the west, Chinese ditto, infectious disease and war. They all facilitate an increased and arbitrary restraint of human individuality and freedom and corresponding in State power. Strangely all these things only make the fabulously wealthy wealthier and the generality poorer and more confined. In the end, that, I suppose, is its purpose, but people can only see each of these phenomena in isolation rather than the bigger historical picture. It is probably why it continues largely unchallenged.
