NHS involved in deeply unethical child vaccination campaign.
Quote: "I am not going to waste your time going over the mountainous evidence and statistics that show, we the Australian people, have been deceived. We have been lied to. (Applause) We must face reality. The Covid gene based vaccines have undoubtedly failed to live up to expectations. These so-called vaccines do not prevent infection, they do not prevent transmission and they are not keeping people out of hospital. These vaccines are not safe. They have caused more death and serious adverse effects of any drug in the history of medicine."
Dr. Phillip Altman. BPharm. MSc. PhD.
The following photograph and text appeared on a local news site 'nextdoor' on the 22nd July, 2022 and keeps re-appearing. Significantly, numerous critical comments are removed immediately, whilst the advert remains. This is obviously a campaign, paid for with people's taxes, and with the agreement of the platform, that allows no discussion or dissent. (I might add that an attempt to to post this on 'Facebook' disappeared without explanation as I was typing it!) It is totalitarian propagandism, specifically designed to operate on the minds of parents and their children. Given the recognised dangers, it is overtly sinister. Check it out for yourself and see if you agree.
NHS Cornwall and Isles of Scilly
Communications and engagement manager Matt Rajczi
Children friendly vaccination clinics with therapy dogs. Therapy dogs 🐶 Molly, Monty, Rio, Bongo, Bear and Aggie look forward to all the children over the age of 5 coming in for their COVID vaccinations over the next few days. They will be at the following clinics and they are all open for walk-ins as well as bookings:
-Saturday (tomorrow) from 9.30am until 4pm at the Royal Cornwall Showground in Wadebridge -Saturday (tomorrow) from 10.30am until 1pm at Helston Football Club -Sunday from 10am until midday and from 2pm until 4.30pm at Bodmin RFC -Monday from 3.30pm until 6pm at the Royal Cornwall Showground in Wadebridge Book an appoint here: http://ow.ly/wfZ750K2pPH or just walk in 🙂It is disturbing from a number of angles, the first obviously that it is pushing experimental co v id vaccines on a particularly vulnerable cohort, that statistically does not need or benefit from it. This is medically inexcusable on the longstanding principle of 'At least, do no harm'. No one knows the long-term effects on the developing bodies of children, but all the indicators from the adverse effects reported, would in any sensible mind, suggest extreme caution is required before giving it to children. In adult women, the reported interference with reproductive systems, should be enough to warn against it being applied to children and young people. The incidence of heart and blood disorders in young healthy people, should be enough to prohibit its use in children and adolescents. That the government and NHS persists with this crazy policy, is both inexplicable and contemptable.
Note how the advert is designed to appeal to parents and children. This is applied psychology at its worst. Where is there evidence of the necessary 'informed consent' to be part of a chemical trial necessitating injecting children from five years up with an experimental substance, now after nearly two years, with a mountain of evidence that it is positively dangerous in thousands of cases. Indeed how one may ask, can children be capable of informed consent? It is quite impossible - the responsibility passes to the parent or guardian. Can we be sure the hundred thousand vulnerable children in care are not being taken advantage of?
Note how the term 'Children friendly vaccination clinics with therapy dogs' with accompanying photo image, is used to make the process more acceptable. Note also the use of masks (except for the dog!) suitably child-friendly, to press home a quite irrational fear and response, the child not being at significant risk and the mask irrelevant to it. This is all psychological conditioning targeting the young for a very questionable objective. Could there be anything more insidious or objectionable?
Although the advert appeared in July and referenced particular events, the advert keeps reappearing with a contact internet address, so presumably is still in operation at certain centres? This is just a tiny fraction of the huge effort the government put into its advertising effort that cost the Treasury over a billion pounds, part of the grand total of some 440 billion spent and wasted, on the co v id measures! There is however something particularly diabolical when it is directed specifically at children with campaigns of this sort.
Meanwhile of course NHS waiting lists (currently seven million) or times been longer, or death rates been higher. The vaccine roll out and associated 'lock-down', contrary to the propaganda, has patently been ineffective and in fact probably contributed to the underlying 20% increase in deaths. What a mad 'health world' we live in?
19.10.2022 Ros Anstey
Who's to say you are right and we are wrong Tim? I sometimes despair with all this controversy. Cant we just get on with our lives without all these controversy theories springing up all the time? It is so depressing and just eats our lives away...😢😢😢
Reply to Ros Anstey So you obviously think it is better to look away and ignore what I consider to be the biggest health policy fraud in our history. Literally thousands upon thousands have been injured and killed because of it. What could be more important than trying to break though the ignorance, complacency and conformity, as I and many others, have endeavoured to do for over two years? People don't have to agree with my view and everybody needs to make up their own minds about risks and the best way to avoid them, but unfortunately that was near impossible under the barrage of government misleading information and rules and the virtual censorship of opposing medical and other opinion. This is still the case and I am sorry it depresses you, but sadly the real world often has that effect. The bottom line is protecting vulnerable children of 5 years and up from a dangerous product that has been shown to have serious reproductive consequences. This is down-right evil policy from our 'wonderful' NHS. Trying to get the truth out there is a thankless task as Dr Vernon Coleman has proved. This did not stop all his depressing predictions coming true. See: https://www.vernoncoleman.com/main.htm For the revealing insight into the affair by an Undertaker see: https://www.facebook.com/100084693445725/videos/3302471269999052/
A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19
Institute of Pathology ’Georg Schmorl’, The Municipal Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstrasse 41, 01067 Dresden, Germany
Abstract
The current report presents the case of a 76-year-old man with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination. The patient was first vaccinated in May 2021 with the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vector vaccine, followed by two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in July and December 2021. The family of the deceased requested an autopsy due to ambiguous clinical signs before death. PD was confirmed by post-mortem examinations. Furthermore, signs of aspiration pneumonia and systemic arteriosclerosis were evident. However, histopathological analyses of the brain uncovered previously unsuspected findings, including acute vasculitis (predominantly lymphocytic) as well as multifocal necrotizing encephalitis of unknown etiology with pronounced inflammation including glial and lymphocytic reaction. In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.
To the 'nextdoor' platform before it's deleted: "arthur jackson The point you don't seem to appreciate is these Covid-19 'vaccines' are NOT the same as traditional ones. They are experimental genome RNA replicas with man-made inserts, some with HIV homology. No one really knows what is being injected into them. The whole exercise is a huge experiment and people are the unwitting participants. This is not scare-mongering, it is scientific FACT as is the unprecedented direct and indirect ill-health they have caused reflected in the morbidity and mortality statistics and the bunged up NHS waiting lists. I and others have been castigated for urging people to see through the government/big pharma propaganda, but I'm afraid common sense was driven out by atavistic fear and compliance."
ReplyDeleteA letter to me: "Hi Tim.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your letter. I think it took me around a week to smell the very fishy smell coming out of the covid narrative. I haven't conformed since and as you know, once you see it, you can't unsee it.
Around me, within a few hundred yards, we have several people collapse onto their faces. They don't even have time to put their hands out to protect themselves. In roads, their houses and public spaces. Most have been badly injured with broken noses and arms. And brain bleeds which cause lasting damage. None of them have connected the fact to their recent receipt of a mRNA shot.
The ward in St Austell hospital (24 beds) that is for people recovering after surgery is now almost entirely full of people who have collapsed. Hospitals and hospital staff know this and yet, it's a well kept secret amongst them.
I believe I may have been one of the earlier victims of selected DNR here in this country. On March 4th 2020 (the day before anyone had died of c19 in the country and before any announcements of lockdowns, I was found unconscious with a serious case of CO poisoning. (I had been unconscious for 4hrs and was in a very bad state). Paramedics turned up (after an hour and a quarter on a slow night), put me in the ambulance and then stayed park in a quiet country lane for an hour. No treatment. Nothing. Just chatter.
Eventually I was taken to Treliske. The A&E dept was like the Marie Celeste. No people waiting and empty beds. Then I was abandoned more or less. No doctor attended, no pain assessment (the pain in my head and spine was extraordinary) and most important of all, still no oxygen. I literally begged for oxygen but none came. My partner turned up and asked again for gas to the chattering nurses. Still none came. Eventually a doctor stood in the doorway and told me to go. My partner had left to go to work so I had no way of getting home. I was covered from hair to feet in vomit and faeces (this happens when you're dying) but told to sit in the waiting room with other people for hours until I could get someone to collect me.
I wrote to the hospital after two days about this. They investigated and eventually replied that 'A doctor should have attended. A pain assessment should have been done. I shouldn't have been left for hours in filthy clothes. I should have been given oxygen. For we apologise. We will learn from this'.
From that time I have had permanent throat ulcers, burning lungs, kidney disfunction, broken teeth, mouth lesions, many teeth extracted due to ulcers, hair loss, anaphylaxis etc etc. Signs of an autoimmune disease. Of course, the gassing could well be the cause but the negligence of the hospital contributed. They have admitted negligence but block me getting a diagnosis and therefore treatment at every turn.
My thoughts are that they took one look at my age (63 at the time) and DNRd me. I didn't die so they sent me home. Clearly the emptying of the hospitals had already started and the policy of no treatment too. I may well have been labelled as a covid death had I not survived. Possibly the first one in the UK. Not and honour I aspired to.
We know there is oppression of anyone who speaks against the narrative. I see bullying in your case with people 'ganging' up on you. I despise this mob mentality and only have admiration for anyone who speaks up. I learnt that challenging those with cognitive dissonance is pointless as their reaction is hostility and ad hominem attacks. I changed my approach to what I call 'sowing seeds' and use humour whenever I can to pre-empt the following anger or annoyance. This drip feed gives people the chance to go away and maybe, think a little.
As for the rest, they'll never wake up.
Anyway, all the best. "
Tim Veater
ReplyDelete1 year ago
It is not that I disbelieve there is a bug that can cause a serious disease but that I am very sceptical about how the risk has been presented, namely that everyone is at equal risk requiring everyone to adopt the behavioural changes required by law. Nor do I accept that masks, disinfectants, closures, and social distancing have been in any way effective in controlling the incidence of disease. The media has uniformly ignored the epidemiological evidence of all the contributory factors that should have been the focus of control but hasn't. Age, sex, race, disease, institutional settings have overwhelmingly affected the chances of contracting symptoms and subsequent prognosis but have not been addressed. Similarly the significant adverse effects of vaccination have been virtually ignored. All these factors should have required a much more nuanced public information campaign and public policy. For example normality of social intercourse and business should have been aimed at, whilst focusing on the cohorts at higher risk, rather than promoting a general paranoia and lock down, the economic and psychological consequences of which may be permanent. The most egregious example of bad policy was in relation to schools and school children. The evidence suggests that lock down policies do nothing to curb the incidence of disease, whilst at the same time causing many other profound adverse effects. Nor should generalised vaccination with substances, proved to involve serious biological reactions in about 3% of cases, be promoted to the low risk groups (healthy under 65's) Vaccination passports with their significant social and economic ramifications should be out of the question. There needs to be a truly independent investigation into the Covid statistics as to their accuracy (PCR tests are clearly unreliable) as is the actual cause of death in cases. This should be done in parallel with deaths that have followed closely on vaccination, ascribed to Covid, rather than the complications of the jab itself. Unfortunately, so much money (billions of pounds) have been expended by government on largely pointless policy, besides the vested interest of big pharma, a truly independent inquiry into these issues is highly unlikely, and as with 9/11, a largely false narrative and the wrong policy will continue to be promulgated to the general public. veaterecosan
To John Holmes The principle of 'vaccination', long established, is that with an inert version of the bug, it trains the bodies anti bodies to react if invaded by a live one. This is second best to having the real disease and surviving it. Once the the body is so attuned, or by inherited immunity from the mother, protection exists largely for life. The very fact you have to have five or more shots of the same vaccine is proof positive it is not a vaccine in the traditional sense and more important, does not work. Pfizer has recently acknowledged neither does it prevent infectivity. On the downside, in scientific studies it has been proved that the more booster shots you have the more likely and serious are the adverse reactions. This should give anyone contemplating having one, second thoughts.
ReplyDeleteThis Matt Letissier interview with the undertaker John O'Looley (despite his rather unfortunate name) is a must-watch! https://www.bitchute.com/video/NyEjwTIQwHds/
ReplyDeleteA follow-up letter from 'Jane' and my reply:
ReplyDelete"Morning Tim.
Yes, you're welcome to put my story on your blog. After I wrote my letter of complaint to the hospital a couple of days later, they took a month to look into and then admit negligence etc. The letter finished with the instruction that, if I wasn't satisfied with this outcome I could report further to the ombudsman. So I did. They told me I would have a case worker allocated. It took a year to get one. He told me that I would need to take my case to a medical negligence insurance company. So I did. A couple of them and they said, despite have the letters of admission of negligence, they couldn't help.
In fact, I didn't really want compensation. I wanted some kind of recognition for the indifference and incompetency of the NHS because, for sure this is happening across the board. To let people know that with all the doorstep clapping, what is actually going on is a very different story. The NHS we once knew is long gone. We are pushed or lead towards private practice but until that happens (for all its sins), there is a gaping void of health care in this country.
And of course, the more sinister vaccination programs which will send us until early graves.
I'm a smallholder. I'm fit, strong and pragmatic. People need to wake up as we've said thousands of times. Those who don't see it now, never will. they are programmed. I made an FOI to RCHT at the end of 2020 asking how many people had died 'of' covid without pre-existing condition to date. The reply was ONE person in a year over 3 hospitals. When speaking to my GP, when I told him about this, he said, its NONE.
Many of them know the lie that is being told but wish to safeguard their considerable pensions so sell their souls to the devil.
Shame on them.
So we continue to sow seeds.
My I have the name of your blog again please?
Best."
"Hi Jane, The sun has just come out here, which always helps to brighten the day. Thank you for this follow-up. It illustrate the huge gap between theory and practice, and how difficult it is to get any semblance of accountability from bureaucracies such as the NHS. As regards co v id, it and the medical profession generally are in a state of denial, although increasingly doctors and scientists are appreciating the dangers and calling for the vaccines to be withdrawn. Some like Dr Vernon Coleman, banned by many platforms for his views, has been warning of the consequences for years. Even Pfizer's own past top virologist, Mike Yeadon, was ignored. Yet despite this, the NHS and this platform still push 'booster' and inexcusably to children over twelve. In my view this is not only reckless but positively criminal! I will if I may add your latest to my blog with just your Christian name identifier. It and many other articles on this and other subjects may be found here: "
OUTRAGEOUS! What is the NHS up to endangering children?
ReplyDeleteSouthampton pop-up Covid jab clinic giving 36 children a higher dose of the Covid-19 vaccine.
15,005 views 31 Oct 2022
'These children have been given, not twice the dose they should have been, but three times the dose they should have been given'
Retired Consultant Paediatrician Dr Ros Jones discusses a Southampton pop-up Covid jab clinic giving 36 children a higher dose of the Covid-19 vaccine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxqXr9cUp74