Maybe it's not the Jews?

Photo: Al-Monitor

In Friday's Times, there was a quote of the French philosopher Jean Rostand (from 1962) that struck home. "Science had better not free the minds of men too much, before it has tamed their instincts." It was presumably written about the time of the mighty clash of ideologies over Cuba and a year before JFK was shot, about which the term 'conspiracy theorist' was invented. This bowdlerising obloquy shares much in common with 'anti-Semitic' to which you refer. Both act as shields behind which Rostand's quasi-sexual instincts of violent domination and subjugation are allowed to exist. Another of his famous sayings was, ""Kill one man, and you are a murderer. Kill millions of men, and you are a conqueror. Kill them all, and you are a God", which appears particularly pertinent at the present time. Interestingly, in the light of your piece, it is claimed he was the main inspiration for Robert Ettinger's pursuit of cryogenics - the science of eternal life. Ettinger of course, happened to be the son of Russian Jewish immigrants. (Tim Veater)

Maybe It’s Not the Jews

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

24th October, 2022

https://gumshoenews.com/maybe-its-not-the-jews/#comment-147885

Victims of allegedly Muslim bombers at the Boston Marathon, Photo: NYDailyNews.com

It may be recalled that in April, 2019, Elias Davidsson published a satirical essay at GumshoeNews.com. It was a riposte to Christopher Bollyn’s theory of Israel as the boss of the 9-11 disaster.   Davidsson said that Jews had planted incriminating clues (ha ha) to make themselves look guilty. (Example: Hani Hanjour, the bad pilot, was said by an Israeli pilot trainer to have been a good pilot.)

Elias Davidsson was my friend and colleague for many years (he died in 2021) and I have to say that he, as a Jew, was always willing to blame Jews if they deserved it. He worked hard on behalf of Palestinians.  But he did not buy Bollyn’s ideas. I do buy Bollyn’s ideas, but the skepticism of Elias occasionally haunts me.

Today I found a new approach which has shaken me up good. I am eager to share it, but this can be only a rough, hurried sketch. The new bit is not very new; Paul Eisen published it in 2004, under the title “Righteous Jews.”  First, let me prepare you to see where Eisen’s idea fits, in my already somewhat-formed picture of our world.

I was born in Boston in 1947, and was a college student in the marvelous Sixties. During the Sixties, I developed a sense of Jews as justice warriors, especially in the niches of journalism, law, and academia. But I had already known my Jewish neighbors as warm and kind, mainly the mothers. As a Catholic, I envision myself as semi-Jewish.

Now I switch the story to a different era, the 21st Century, when I became a conspiracy theorist. Or you could call me a Machiavellian theorist, which is pretty much the same thing. I was well-read in sociobiology, and had published four books in that field. My 1990 PhD thesis combines an evolutionary analysis with a discussion of war.

I think I should hand my doctoral degree back in, as I did not know about the real stuff.  I sure never dreamed that World War I — “the Great War” — was designed, cruelly, in London by a Lord and an Earl. Personally, as a ‘church girl,’ I had been opposed to the US’s foreign policy in Latin America since the 1970s. But even then, I didn’t “get it” about backroom deals.

Fast forward to today. I am a card-carrying opponent of the boys in the backroom. Not the low echelon ones, the high echelon ones.  The ones so high that, as Orwell said, we don’t know who Big Brother is. I have truly worked hard to gather information in order to identify him. Not to catch him as a prize. Rather, to save my neck from what our bad future looks like. That’s m’goal.

History of Our Bad Future

Some of my buddies have done excellent work tracing the origins of 20th century authoritarianism back to 18th century, or earlier. The hidden hand is usually Jewish. Not always though. Cecil Rhodes, super-Anglican (or so he said), started the ball rolling for the UK group that became the Roundtable, from which you can see the start of the World Government hubris.

The Russian Revolution of 1917 is now well understood to have been a Jewish thing, and Nesta Webster, writing in 1922, showed the amazing similarity of the Bolshevik takeover of Russia to the “people’s” takeover in the French Revolution of 1789, complete with the banner of “liberty, equality, fraternity.” I see the Biden socialist takeover as following closely along that line. It is sooo dishonest.

This leads me to think that the French, Russian, and Biden revolutions must be in aid of the same “person” — Big Brother.  Yet I definitely do not think this boils down to Jewishness. I think it boils down to takeover for takeover’s sake. Please see my 2022 book, “Keep the Republic, Kill the Takeover.”

Note: As a sociobiologist, I always see social structure as genetically driven. For me, the most likely force behind the takeover is that once you rise too high in the hierarchy, all your effort must go to making sure you don’t fall. This requires elaborate efforts to quash challenges, or make sure your many underlings are not equipped to compete with you. If castration is the solution, fine. Or killing them. Or mind-controlling them. Whatever. Ya gotta do it.

Anti-Semitism

I said that Elias Davidsson’s idea haunts me. I sometimes think that if a non-Jew were the top boss, he (she?) would do well to create a picture of the Jews doing all the bad stuff. Certainly, I’m aware that folks are not allowed to say “It’s the Jews” (cuz you’ll get ostracized for your anti-Semitism). And, I have long noted that this makes you cease your quest.  You give up!

Really, it’s a brilliant strategy. I mean if Big Bro Gentile is the real conqueror, he has eliminated the fray. I lived in Australia where there is a Human Rights program, of which Section 18c forbids you to hurt the feelings of an ethnic group.  My pal, the late Fredrick Toben in Adelaide, was sued by a man, Jeremy Jones, claiming to represent the Jewish Community of South Australia.

Toben said there were no gassings at Auschwitz. He thus lost his life savings for defamation, and was also jailed for contempt of court when he did not clean up his website as ordered. Meanwhile in Germany, tons of people have been judicially punished for questioning the bona fides of the Holocaust. (By the way, there were no gassings at Auschwitz.)

Are you following my drift? I am putting forward the possibility that the major barrier to speaking negatively about “Jews” (by charging you with anti-Semitism) is really a barrier to your chatting about Big Bro Gentile!

Paul Eisen

Now I switch over to Paul Eisen, a London Jew. He favors the work of Israel Shamir, a Russian ex-Jew, but I assume most of Eisen’s work is original.  His main concern is the mistreatment of Palestinians, and at his website, Deir Yassin Remembered, he goes over the eviction of the locals in 1948. Fancy that.

Paul Eisen analyzes what holds Jewry together. He wants Jews to be held accountable for what they do as a group, irrespective of whether they live in Israel or whether they embrace Zionism!  Here are his main points, abridged but unedited, from 2004 (numbering added):

1. Jews have certainly suffered but their suffering remains unexamined and unexplained. The Holocaust, now the paradigm of Jewish suffering, has long ceased to be a piece of history, and is now treated by religious and secular alike, as a piece of theology — a sacred text almost — and therefore beyond scrutiny. And the suffering never ends. No matter how much Jews have suffered they are certainly not suffering now, but for many Jews their history of suffering is not just an unchallengeable past but also a possible future. So, no matter how safe Jews may be, many feel just a hair’s-breadth away from Auschwitz.
2. If Jews think that they are a people with a religious link to a land and have a deep wish to ‘return’, why should we care, so long as the land is not already populated by Palestinians? And if Jews feel that they are special and that God has made some kind of special arrangement with them, so what, so long as this does not lead them to demand preferential treatment and to discriminate against others? And if Jews feel that they have suffered like no-one else on the face of the earth, fine, so long as they do not use this suffering to justify the imposition of suffering on others and to blackmail morally the whole world into quiescent silence.
3. Jewish notions of specialness, chosen-ness and even supremacism, are fine for a small, wandering people, but, when empowered with a state, an army and F16s become a concern for us all.
4. It is a state that both believes, and uses as justification for its own aggression, the notion that its very survival is always at stake, so anything is justified to ensure that survival. Israel is a state that manifestly believes that the rules of both law and humanity, applicable to all other states, do not apply to it.
5. Israel is a client state of America, serving American interests or, more particularly, the interests of its power elites. This view is underpinned by the obvious importance of oil, the huge strategic importance of the region and the fact that, if Israel did not further the interests of those who control America, then we can be sure America would not support Israel. Also, there is no doubt that, in the IDF, America has found a marvellously flexible and effective force, easily aroused and let loose whenever any group of Arabs get a little above themselves.
6. The details of the workings of AIPAC and others, and the mechanics by which these groups exert pressure on America’s lawmakers and governors, have been dealt with elsewhere; we need only note that this interest group is undoubtedly extraordinarily effective and successful. Not just a small group of Jews supporting Israel, as its supporters would have us believe, these are powerful and committed ideologues: billionaires, media magnates, politicians, activists and religious leaders. In any event, the power of the Jewish lobby to make or break pretty well any public figure is legendary — not for nothing is it often referred to simply as “The Lobby.”
7. The overwhelming majority of Jews in America live their lives just like any other Americans. They’ve done well and are undoubtedly pleased that America supports their fellow Jews in Israel but that’s as far as it goes. Nonetheless, an awful lot of Jews certainly do control an awful lot of America. … over its blood and its brain. It is in finance and the media that we find a great many Jews in very influential positions.
8. And there would probably be nothing wrong with this were it not for the fact that these same people who exert so much control and influence over American life also seem to refuse to be held accountable. It is the surreptitiousness with which Jews are perceived to have achieved their success which arouses suspicion. Jews certainly seem cagey about the influence they have. Just breathe the words “Jewish power” and wait for the reaction.
9. Old anti-Semitic myths about Jewish dual loyalty. The idea that American intervention in Iraq, the one viable military counterweight to Israeli hegemony in the Middle East and therefore an inspiration to Arab and Palestinian resistance, primarily serves Israeli rather than American interests has also been consigned to the nether world of mediaeval anti-Semitic myth. The suggestion that those Jews around the president act from motives other than those to promote the interests of all Americans is just anti-Semitic raving. And maybe they’re right. Perhaps those who promote Jewish interests are in fact promoting American interests because, for now at least, they appear to be one and the same.
10. During even the most terrible times of Jewish suffering such as the Crusades or the Chmielnitzky massacres of seventeenth century Ukraine, and even more so at other times in history, it has been said that the average peasant would have given his eye-teeth to be a Jew. The meaning is clear: generally speaking, and throughout most of their history, the condition of Jews was often far superior to the mass of the population. Ukrainian massacres took place in the context of a peasant uprising against the oppression of the Ukrainian peasantry by their Polish overlords. As has often been the case, Jews were seen as occupying a traditional position of being in alliance with the ruling class in their oppression of the peasantry.
11. The fact is that one may question the Armenian genocide, one may freely discuss the Slave Trade, one can say that the murder of millions of Ibos, Kampucheans and Rwandans never took place and that the moon is but a piece of green cheese, but one may not question the Jewish Holocaust. Why? Because, like the rest of the Jewish history of suffering, the Holocaust underpins the narrative of Jewish innocence which is used to bewilder and befuddle any attempt to see and to
12. Judaism is at least at the historicheart of Jewishness and, whatever else may bind Jews together, it is certainly true that religion plays an important part. Second, for a group of people who have retained such a strong collective identity with no shared occupation of any land, language, nor even, in many cases, a culture, it is hard to see what else there could be that makes Jews into Jews. Surely for Jews, in the absence of other, more obvious factors, it is precisely such a spirit that has enabled them to retain their distinctive identity for so long and in the face of such opposition.
13. They should take a leaf from Henry Herskovitz. He is part of an organisation called Jewish Witnesses for Peace, which holds silent vigils outside synagogues on shabbat. Of course, all the other Jewish activists are shrieking at him that you mustn’t target Jews for protest, that you must draw a distinction between Jews, Israelis and Zionists, that you’ll only alienate the people we want to engage…. but he doesn’t care…. Henry also knows that to say that Jews in America individually and in their religious and community organisations should not be held accountable for what is happening is a lie and discredits all Jews before the non-Jewish world.
14. Why should ‘the Jews’ not be as accountable as ‘the Americans’ and even ordinary Jews as accountable as ordinary Americans? Why do we not picket the offices of the Anti-Defamation League … or even the homes of Abe Foxman, Edgar Bronfman and Mort Zuckerman in the U.S.? Why do we not heckle Alan Dershowitz and Melanie Phillips? What about the U.K. Chief Rabbi who in his time has had lots to say about Israel and Palestine? Why do we not take the struggle to every synagogue and Jewish community centre in the world? After all, every Shabbat a prayer is said for the state of Israel in every mainstream synagogue … why should these Jews who choose to combine their prayers and their politics be immune while at prayer from our legitimate protests at their politics? And for those few Jews who are really prepared to stand up and be counted for their solidarity with Palestinians, why can we not still give to them due honour?
15. The answer is that we are frightened. Even knowing that Jews are responsible and should be held accountable, still we are frightened. We are frightened because criticism of Jews with its woeful history of violence and discrimination seems just too dangerous a position to take — it may open the floodgates to a burst of Jew hatred. Perhaps most of all, we are frightened of the conflicted inner passions that confound us all whenever we come to look at these things.Does speaking the truth about Jewish identity, power and history lead to Jews being led to concentration camps and ovens? Of course it doesn’t! It is hatred, fear and the suppression of free thought and speech which leads to these things — whether the hatred, fear and suppression is directed against Jews or by Jews.

— The foregoing 15 points, and more, are found at deiryassin.org. Paul Eisen is a justice warrior.  Didn’t I tell you Jews are like that?

Conclusion

Ah, I see that Eisen is not exactly going down the road I predicted.  His quest is to find blame for specific events.  Who knows, maybe all manner of horrible things in the world are happening at the command of Big Bro Jew, not Big Bro Gentile.

If I had to bet my house on it. I’d go for Big Bro Gentile. That would also entail my shifting the identity of the author of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It’s a big ask, but I calculate that the group at the top must be ethnically mixed.

Say, let’s find out. Let’s interrogate anyone who looks guilty, and make them rat on each other. I can help you here. I have a list of people of varying religions, races, and nationality who have done a bonzer job of false flags, such as at the 2013 Boston Marathon. Quite possibly they were mind controlled to do it, but in any case, we need to know. We can offer amnesties.

We need to know. We need to know. LET’S FIND OUT.

When all the trends, events and narratives are common to a geographical or socio/political region, the obvious conclusion is that there is a common denominator/controlling mind. I believe this has had its locale in Anglo/American alliance, facilitated by normal diplomatic channels but operating secretly beneath it, in concert with global interests and organs. Its apotheosis was the so called attacks on America in 2001, which were actually an internally organised outrage and coup, which allowed all of the outrages that followed, that have essentially caused the various crises from which we now suffer. All American aligned countries were complicit in the chicanery, and have been party to all the fraudulent memes ever since, by which I mean all the 'fears' of climate, terrorism, overwhelming immigration, financial melt-down, fuel and food shortages, 'right wing extremism', 'Muslim extremism', 'anti-Semitism', Russian interference and threat to the west, Chinese ditto, infectious disease and war. They all facilitate an increased and arbitrary restraint of human individuality and freedom and corresponding in State power. Strangely all these things only make the fabulously wealthy wealthier and the generality poorer and more confined. In the end, that, I suppose, is its purpose, but people can only see each of these phenomena in isolation rather than the bigger historical picture. It is probably why it continues largely unchallenged.