Sunday, 3 May 2026

The King's 'Speeches'!




King Charles III's speech made a profound impression on the American President, Congress and People. Will it have any lasting positive effect?

by Tim Veater

(See also: Tension, Humor, Power: King Charles’ Speech Shakes Washington Apr 29, 2026 Europe Pulse Podcast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HpLDCW68vM )


Introduction

In 2010 the 'King's Speech' was released to general acclaim, and no less than twelve Oscar nominations, winning four in February, 2011.

In a script by David Seigler and directed by Tom Hooper, it relates a tale of how the shy, insecure King George VI, thrust reluctantly into that position over the abdication of his brother, Edward VIII in 1936, managed to cope with a long-standing speech impediment and stutter, probably resulting from childhood trauma.

Public speaking, an occasional requirement of the prominent hereditary position he assumed, became an unavoidable excruciating necessity both for him and his audience. In the emerging age of radio, it was an even greater and more noticeable disability, which is why the Palace authorities desperately sought a solution. 

What they came up with was the somewhat fraudulent Australian 'speech therapist', Andrew Logue. The film reimagines and recreates their assumed relationship, coping with the King's irracibility and scepticism and negotiating the social divide in an age of hierarchy and deference. 

Whether accurate or not, the point of the film is how persistence and application take down the barriers of class and status, to a relationship based upon mutual respect and affection, to surmount a very human problem. In the wider context it also marks a transition in the development of the British Monarchy, making it less rigid and unapproachable, as exemplified by his daughter, Queen Elizabeth II, whilst managing to retain an indefinable aura of 'E'Etat c'est moi'!

After the longest wait in history, Prince Charles assumed the mantle of Monarch against a background of scandal and doubt, not unlike his grandfather. The parallels of his second son with Edward VIII and to a certain extent himself, are unmistakeable, leaving aside the embarrassment and shame caused by his brother. 

Yet it seems he has emerged victorious and unscathed, largely down to a speech made to the American Congress, which is the subject of my article which follows. Yes, a modern version of 'The King's Speech' written large.

Successful Speech to the American Congress


I think it is fair to say, there is general agreement, that King Charles III's four-day State Visit to the United States of America, has been a resounding diplomatic and personal success - at least on a bi-partisan basis. It promoted themes dear to Charles and his government and diplomatically pushed back against many of Trump's policies and announements. As such, it might also have been applauded by many countries outside the boundaries and natural orbit of the UK.

The achievement was heightened by virtue of the fact that virtually on every front, relations between America and the rest of the world, and particularly members of NATO - the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation - have never been more divisive and fractured. 

Indeed some thought that things were so bad, the trip should have been called off, made even more pressing by the alleged assassination attempt on the President's life only two days before King Charles was due to arrive on the 27th April, 2026 and which he condemned it in his speech. Perhaps we should note the actual assassination of the Iranian Supreme Leader and others, illicited no similar denunciation for obvious reasons.

Nevertheless, with a few undescernible security tweeks, it went ahead largely as planned, to acclamation from virtually all quarters.
The fact that the King judiciously referred to the violence two days before, proved correct the observation by his ex-valet, that he was known to amend a text right up to the last minute before delivery in his desire to get it just right.

He had apparently been working on the speech and its delivery for months. Constitutionally he was thereto deliver the position of the British Government, so it is reasonable to assume it represented a joint effort, but it was unmistakeably in his own style with prominent personal, historical and topical references, including the war in Ukraine. 

Notable for its absence however was any mention of the Epstein affair, the diabolical treatment of Palestinians by Israel or the current American offensive against Iran, threaten dire economic, environmental and military consequences. Obviously some topics are too hot to handle even for a King, if favourable relations were to be retained.

A Warm Reception

Apart from the genuine warmth of welcome and relaxed atmosphere created by President Trump and the First Lady, Melania and all those the King Charles and Queen Camilla came into contact with, it was the two official speeches King Charles delivered, that secured his reputation and place in the history books - in marked contrast it has to be said, to that of the current British Prime Minister, Kier Starmer, who has been roundly criticised by Trump, despite his fawning style.

The first speech was to a packed Congress on Tuesday; the second was more light-hearted one in reply to the toast, later that night at the White House State Banquet. Both speeches are reproduced in full from the official Palace website at the bottom of this article, below.

Both have received a massive number of views on You Tube and other web-sites, it should be said, to general acclaim. With Mark Carney's speech at Davos, they are perhaps the most notable and influential speeches for Western trans-Atlantic relationship of the last decade.

"A Masterclass"

The former in particular has been described as a 'master class' in construction, delivery and impact; in short diplomatic oratory at its best. Its secret was self-deprecating humour, empathy, warmth, positive regard and sincerity, with a stiletto so razor sharp and pointed, the victim hardly noticed the assault, indeed regarding it as curative. I intend to analyse them later.

Whether with time, when the adrenalin wears off, both sides of the Isle keep clapping, remains to be seen, but in the meantime King Charles's reputation as an ethical and effective Statesman has been enhanced and secured. 

The trip, and particularly the way in which he so deftly handled such a delicate situation and so temperamental a President, has silenced his detractors and cemented his reign.

"Signal Honour"

King Charles recognised the signal honour of being invited to address both houses of Congress in his speech. This was only the second time, since his mother, the late Queen, did so in 1991, soon after the first Gulf War in Iraq had ended. 

It cannot be overlooked that war has raged in that region ever since, either initiated by or involving both nations, culminating in the current stand-off with the Islamic Republic of Iran. 

This affords a certain degree of irony to King Charles' claim, that the American/British relationship secures a benefit, in his words, "Not just of our peoples but of all peoples". Perhaps he should have added, it depends on what country you find yourself in?

I am not sure the peoples of Libya, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Oman, Iran, the Gulf States, not forgetting the tortured people of Palestine itself, would readily agree with that sentiment. Further afield, the benificent results from the relationship have been called into question, even amidst long term allies, not least by the pronouncements and actions of Donald Trump himself. 

A Special Relationship still?

Clearly the purpose of the King's speech was to repair the damage to the NATO alliance in general and the 'Special Relationship' with Britain in particular, drawing on a long shared history through thick and thin. In essence it was an appeal to both the American head and heart. 

It went down very well in the room but whether it will have any lasting or practical effect in the Legislature or more importantly the Executive, remains to be seen.

Indeed the whole question as to whether there is still a 'special relationship' at all has been called into question by no less a person than the new British Ambassador. 

In leaked comments, Christian Turner stated, "Special relationship’ is a phrase I try not to utter because it’s quite nostalgic, it’s quite backwards-looking, and it has a lot of sort of baggage about it. I think there is probably one country that has a special relationship with the United States – and that is probably Israel." (https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/28/world/us-special-relationship-israel-uk-ambassador-turner-intl )

The statement caused waves in Westminster corridors but it was only what everyone knew or suspected, particulary since Trump has taken office. Christian Turner had taken over from the debacle of the brief Peter Mandleson appointment, which revealed deep moral turpitude and nearly ended Starmer's political career - and still might! The political ramifications have still not fully played out.

It prompted one of the best questions to the Prime Minister, certainly from Ed Davy the Leader of the Liberal Democrats. "Having sacked an American Ambassador for lying, do you now intend to sack his replacement for telling the truth?" 

It is self-evident from the three billion dollars a year handed to Israel in a long-term agreement, the billions more for armaments, the billions more the US spends itself, to defend Israel and pursue its wars (the current Iran conflict is costing at least a billion a day, without even including the huge cost to infrastucture) that America has a wierd and deep relationship with that country. 

It is a relationship of Jewish elites, not of the general population, that surveys have shown is negative to Israel and against the current war with Iran.

Charles a frequent visitor

Charles may have visited America twenty times but this was the first as King. 

On the other hand Netanyahu has visited Trump seven times in just a year. They say they are the best of friends but the relationship is very different to that with Britain. It is very dark and drowning in death, destruction and potential nuclear risk. Even Trump must realise he has ditched a true friend for a dangerous interloper. 

It is clear for all his arrogant bluster, Trump is controlled by either bribe, fear or blackmail, which of course is where the Epstein Files come in. Trump knows Mossad has the power and ability to reveal all, as Epstein worked for them, and what he knew, they knew. The 'honey trap' was set decades ago.

Israel's 'love-hate' relationship with Britain

Israel has had, over more than eight decades, a love hate relationship with Britain and the British Empire. It was largely thanks to Britain as the administrative power over Palestine that European Jews got a foothold in that land, resulting in a self-governing state in 1948 - the year King Charles was born - and importantly Palestinians didn't. It has been the root of all the violence and instability since.

I have a strong suspicion - call it a hunch - that Israel did not want this State Visit or its success. A reproacement between America and NATO is not necessarily in the interests of Israel, particularly as increasingly belligerent Turkey is a Member. What would be the the position of Article Five, if hostilities broke out between them? Which side would America be on?

Is it merely coincidence only two days prior the suspicious violent took place disrupting the annual press event that had the potential to scupper the visit? Similarly is it a coincidence that a stabbing, following on from a Synnagog attack in North London should precede the trip pushing it off the front page of the Times, an Israel supporting paper? 

I ask the question. Others may be able to answer them. I won't dwell on the fact this 'anti-semitic' event is front page news, whilst over forty thousand (yes 40,000!) including many 'anti-muslim' in nature, are hardly worthy of being reported. (https://www.instagram.com/reels/DXy0VnaInW6/ https://benkinsella.org.uk/knife-crime-statistics/ )

Forward Sir Lancelot!

Into this frebrile and potentially explosive situation, in full sight of the world's media, good Sir Lancelot, or should I say St. George, ventured forth to slay the metaphorical dragon, and did so without even raising a sweat! (Now where have I heard that topic before?)

Charles' great strength as the first in line of succession in the British Royal Family, is his longevity on the international stage and relative permanence, so he could recall the personal connection with the iconic figures of Churchill and Eisenhower in the 1950's - and of course countless others, should he have wanted to. 

It is his direct familial connection with historic events, such as America's war for independence against George III - his reference to "a tale of two Georges" -  and even the iconic 1215 Magna Carta signed by his ancestor King John; his constitutional position of representing Britain, yet being semi-detached from the political forces that shape it, affords him an indefinable quality and charisma. A "Majesté célèbre".

It is doubtful there is any other person in the world that can compete with his C.V. on the world stage. When linked to humility and empathy, the charm is irresistable, as the massive adoring crowds wherever he went, is proof. So many hands to shake, so many quips to make, so many hugs and kisses to take. This is a very modern version of Monarchy on display. PR gold!

Contrast in Styles

No doubt part of the reason for his positive psychological impact on American politicians and people, was precisely because of the sharp contrast of personality and style with that of the American President. We may all have elements of the braggart and bully inside us, but most will view these traits as undesireable and strive to keep them under control. 

Charles' speech was carefully crafted and almost flawlessly delivered. (There was I believe one anecdotal faux pas that I shall refer to later) His humorous asides, though scripted, were good natured and genuinely funny. The speech proved that the ancient art of oratory, even in this age of advertising and AI, still possesses emotional power to persuade.

The humour contrasted with the seriousness. It was the 'spoonful of sugar that helped the medicine go down'. It was 'British humour' not American, yet in most part it worked. It possessed literary and ironical depth, which from You Tube commentators with a mass following, I gathered was not always understood. They also contained deeper inference which afforded them quality. It may be useful to consider them more carefully.

The Jokes!

1.  As Oscar Wilde said“We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language!”

One young American commentator looked askance, asking "Oscar who?" Of course Oscar Wilde was the celebrated, flamboyant and ultimately tragic Victorian literary genius, extolling his 'aesthetic' ideals to both Europe and America. He wrote 'The Importance of Being Earnest' and other plays, and was noted for his erudition, conversational gymnastics and mastery of double meaning and oxymoron. He had a talent for turning received opinion on its as in the above example. He brought down and reduced to poverty and obscurity for his love of a younger man - whether physical or not - and the hypocrisy of high Victorian society.

The use of the quote was thus apposite on so many levels, setting the tone and theme of the whole speech, namely the closeness yet strangeness of the British/American relationship. The errant child taking after the father, but determined to go its own independent and foolish way.

2.  "As you may know, when I address my own Parliament at Westminster, we still follow an age-old tradition and take a member of Parliament ‘hostage’, holding him or her at Buckingham Palace until I am safely returned. These days, we look after our ‘guest’ rather well – to the point that they often do not want to leave! I don’t know, Mr Speaker, if there were any volunteers for that role here today...?"

This comment is self-deprecatorily and anachronisticallyfunny at face - 'those weird British customs' - but it is also clever for its illusion to the current American scene. Trump was not present. Was he being held hostage by the legislature or by private financial interests. Would he be returned? "Don't get too comfortable in your palace Mr President - you are only a temporary guest. Don't act as if you own the joint!"

3. "This is a city which symbolises a period in our shared history, or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my five-times Great Grandfather, King George III. King George never set foot in America and, please rest assured, I am not here as part of some cunning rearguard action!"

Charles Dickens, the famous Victorian author, spent his life recovering from a traumatic industrial childhood to describe and empathise with the struggles of the poor and working class. His 'Tale of two cities', published in 1859, alluded to in Charles' joke, is a story about two similar but contrasting cities, Paris and London, during and immediately after 'the reign of terror'. So no reference to Trump and the Middle East there then!

The novel begins with the famous lines: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way—in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only."  

Note how contemporary and appropriate that quote is today. The moral of the story is that terror and war are ultimately superceded by peace and prosperity and that old enemies can become friends, when more sensible policies prevail.

The second part of his joke relates to "a rear-guard action". Reassuring the audience the mission was peaceful and friendly, hopefully lulling them into blissful receptance. I can't help being reminded of the Greek motto: "Beware of strangers bearing gifts" - in this case a brass ship's bell inscribed 'HMS Trump'! (Whoever at the Foreign Office or Palace came up with that one deserves a pay grade)

4.  "The Founding Fathers were bold and imaginative rebels with a cause. 250 years ago (or, as we say in the United Kingdom, just the other day....) they declared Independence."

This got a standing ovation (one of twelve!) from the elected members. At its face it was a congratulation for rebellion he terms 'bold and imaginative'. Is there here a hint that the Congress and/or people should be more assertive? The 'just the other day joke' also carries with it the suggestion that in historical terms, America is the junior partner and still has much to learn. Some may say it comes too late to save the moral reputation of the empire it has created.

And at the State Dinner....

5.  "I cannot help noticing the ‘readjustments’ to the East Wing, Mr. President, following your visit to Windsor Castle last year. I am sorry to say that we British, of course, made our own attempt at real estate redevelopment of the White House in 1814."

A rather tongue in cheek reference to Trump's 'Ballroom' that has had a mixed reception blaming it on an attempt to ape Windsor Castle - a most subtle put-down.

6.  "My family’s history remains reflected in your maps, which read rather like our Christmas card list across the ages – North and South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and the cities of Charleston (a particular favourite of mine, obviously), Georgetown (and, for that matter, Georgia), Annapolis, as you mentioned, and (further favourites) Prince William County and Williamsburg."

A not too subtle case of one-upmanship to a President who loves naming buildings and places after himself. 'Trump Tower' obviously pales into insignificance in comparison. After the 'Gulf of Mexico', watch out all you cities and states!

7.  "This said, our French friends can feel equally at home with a glance at a map. Indeed, you recently commented, Mr. President, that if it were not for the United States, European countries would be speaking German. Dare I say that, if it wasn’t for us, you’d be speaking French!"

Another deft and wickedly funny put-down, not merely because it is true (Of course the French backed the American Rebellion but were eventually defeated both in Canada and the new 'United States') but because Trump actually made the remark in Davos where they do actually speak German!

8.  "When my mother visited in 1957, not the least of her tasks was to help put the “Special” back into our Relationship after a crisis in the Middle East. Nearly seventy years on, it is hard to imagine anything like that happening today...."

An example of comic yet painful irony. In a breach of diplomatic and personal protocol, Trump claimed King Charles fully supported America's action against Iran. No one knows for sure what his views are and most believe this is yet another example of Trump's unreliable hyperbole. Britain under Starmer, who Charles referred to as "My Prime Minister" has undoubtedly and shamefully backed Israel in its genocidal actions, killing hundreds of thousands in the process but it has drawn a line at supporting America and Israel against Iran. Charles saying he supported it, is therefore highly unlikely.

9.  "Indeed, such was the closeness, that Sir Winston, whilst staying here in the White House – in one of the rooms you showed us upstairs - emerged naked from the bathtub to discover the door opening as President Roosevelt came in for a chat. With rapier wit, the President cast aside any embarrassment by declaring that, ‘the Prime Minister has nothing to conceal from the President of the United States’."

And so to the one 'faux pas' I noticed at the time. Was it accidental or intentional? The crucial funny line "the British Prime Minister has nothing to hide from the President of the United States," was spoken by Churchill not Roosevelt. It is a small but noteworthy error in an otherwise faultless speech. (https://richardlangworth.com/churchills-naked-encounter )

10.  "So tonight, Mr President, I am delighted to present to you – as a personal gift – the original bell which hung on the Conning Tower of your valiant namesake. May it stand as a testimony to our Nations’ shared history and shining future. And should you ever need to get hold of us... well, just give us a ring!"

A diplomatic master-stroke appealing to Trumps ego and vanity, yet humbling in its effect, reminding him of the long naval association that he had unfairly and rudely criticised. As to, "Give us a ring" an appeal to maintain contact and accessibility.

11.   "Indeed, we have followed the voyage of Artemis II – or Artemis the Second, as my family and I might like to call her! – with close attention. Now, I know you have big plans for the Moon, Mr. President, but I’ve checked the papers and I rather suspect it is already part of the Commonwealth, I’m afraid!"

A joke but also barely camouflaged reference to keep off Canada and Greenland and even latterly perhaps the Falkland Islands! Cuba watch out.

12.  "And in sport, in just a few weeks, the United States and Canada will be among those to welcome the world as hosts of the FIFA World Cup. So in one sense, Mr President, as Heads of State, we are joint hosts!We call this game, by the way, “Football”, Mr. President... And I can only say as the Head of State of five competing countries, I will be watching the matches closely and with great enthusiasm. After all, we always like favourable odds..."

Another one-upmanship joke and a neat reminder of his Oscar Wilde quote at the beginning. It is a reminder that in 'football' at least, England still beats America hands (or feet) down!

13.  "Thank you, Mr. President and Mrs Trump, for your splendid dinner this evening which, may I say, is a very considerable improvement on the Boston Tea Party! So, whether your cup contains tea, wine, Scotch whisky, bourbon or even cola, let us raise our glasses and voices as we toast the past, the present and the future of our two proud and allied nations:"

The 'Boston Tea Party' was of course the signal moment the settlers marked their rebellion from the Crown, by tipping an important cargo of tea into the harbour. If Britain had a drink symbolising the country, it was tea, often from plantations with slave labour. It is a sad and sobering fact, that Britain which spearheaded individual freedom, championed and praised by the King in Washington, is today under a Starmer Government, defending genocide and locking up those who protest against it!

What a note to end on. "Perfidious and hypocritical Albion"! 




The King’s Address to the Joint Meeting of Congress in Washington on 28th April, 2026

  

Mr. Vice President, Mr. Speaker, Members of Congress, representatives of the American People across all states, territories, cities and communities.

I would like to take this opportunity to express my particular gratitude to you all for the great honour of addressing this Joint Meeting of Congress and, on behalf of The Queen and myself, to thank the American people for welcoming us to the United States to mark this semi-quincentennial year of the Declaration of Independence.

And for all of that time, our destinies as Nations have been interlinked. As Oscar Wilde said, “We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language!”

Ladies and gentlemen, we meet in times of great uncertainty; in times of conflict from Europe to the Middle East which pose immense challenges for the international community and whose impact is felt in communities the length and breadth of our own countries.

We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from this great building that sought to harm the leadership of your Nation and to foment wider fear and discord. Let me say with unshakeable resolve: such acts of violence will never succeed. Whatever our differences, whatever disagreements we may have, we stand united in our commitment to uphold democracy, to protect all our people from harm, and to salute the courage of those who daily risk their lives in the service of our countries.

Standing here today, it is hard not to feel the weight of history on my shoulder – because the modern relationship between our two Nations and our own peoples spans not merely 250 years, but over four centuries. It is extraordinary to think that I am the nineteenth in our line of Sovereigns to study, with daily attention, the affairs of America. So, I come here today with the highest respect for the United States Congress; this citadel of democracy created to represent the voice of all American people to advance sacred rights and freedoms. Speaking in this renowned chamber of debate and deliberation, I cannot help but think of my late mother, Queen Elizabeth, who, in 1991, was also afforded this signal honour and similarly spoke under the watchful eye of the Statue of Freedom above us. Today, I am here on this great occasion in the life of our Nations to express the highest regard and friendship of the British people to the people of the United States.

As you may know, when I address my own Parliament at Westminster, we still follow an age-old tradition and take a member of Parliament ‘hostage’, holding him or her at Buckingham Palace until I am safely returned. These days, we look after our ‘guest’ rather well – to the point that they often do not want to leave! I don’t know,

Mr Speaker, if there were any volunteers for that role here today...?

As I look back across the centuries, Mr Speaker, there emerge certain patterns; certain self-evident truths from which we can learn and draw mutual strength. With the Spirit of 1776 in our minds, we can perhaps agree that we do not always agree – at least in the first instance! Indeed, the very principle on which your Congress was founded – no taxation without representation – was at once a fundamental disagreement between us, and at the same time a shared democratic value which you inherited from us. Ours is a partnership born out of dispute, but no less strong for it... So perhaps, in this example, we can discern that our Nations are in fact instinctively like-minded – a product of the common democratic, legal and social traditions in which our governance is rooted to this day. Drawing on these values and traditions, time and again, our two countries have always found ways to come together. And by Jove, Mr. Speaker, when we have found that way to agree, what great change is brought about – not just for the benefit of our peoples, but of all peoples.

This, I believe, is the Special ingredient in our Relationship. As President Trump himself observed during his State Visit to Britain last Autumn, ‘The bond of kinship and identity between America and the United Kingdom is priceless and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable.’

This is by no means my first visit to Washington, D.C. – the capital of this great Republic. It is in fact my 20th visit to the United States, and my first as King and Head of the Commonwealth. This is a city which symbolises a period in our shared history, or what Charles Dickens might have called ‘A Tale of Two Georges’: the first President, George Washington, and my five-times Great Grandfather, King George III. King George never set foot in America and, please rest assured, I am not here as part of some cunning rearguard action!

The Founding Fathers were bold and imaginative rebels with a cause. 250 years ago (or, as we say in the United Kingdom, just the other day....) they declared Independence. By balancing contending forces and drawing strength in diversity, they united thirteen disparate colonies to forge a Nation on the revolutionary idea of ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’. They carried with them, and carried forward, the great inheritance of the British Enlightenment – as well as the ideals which had an even deeper history in English Common Law and Magna Carta.

These roots run deep, and they are still vital. Our Declaration of Rights of 1689 was not only the foundation of our constitutional Monarchy, but also provided the source of so many of the principles reiterated – often verbatim – in the American Bill of Rights of 1791. And those roots go even further back in our history: the U.S. Supreme Court Historical Society has calculated that Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 Supreme Court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances. This is the reason why there stands a stone, by the River Thames at Runnymede where Magna Carta was signed in the year 1215. This stone records that an acre of that ancient and historic site was given to the U.S.A. by the people of the United Kingdom, to symbolise our shared resolve in support of liberty, and in memory of President John F. Kennedy.

Distinguished members of the 119th Congress, it is here in these very halls that this spirit of liberty and the promise of America’s Founders is present in every session and every vote cast.

Not by the will of one, but by the deliberation of many, representing the living mosaic of the United States. In both of our countries, it is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse and free societies that gives us our collective strength, including to support victims of some of the ills that, so tragically, exist in both our societies today.

And, Mr. Speaker, for many here – and for myself – the Christian faith is a firm anchor and daily inspiration that guides us not only personally, but together as members of our community. Having devoted a large part of my life to interfaith relationships and greater understanding, it is that faith in the triumph of light over darkness which I have found confirmed countless times. Through it I am inspired by the profound respect that develops as people of different faiths grow in their understanding of each other. It is why it is my hope – my prayer - that, in these turbulent times, working together and with our international partners, we can stem the beating of ploughshares into swords...

I am mindful that we are still in the season of Easter, the season that most strengthens my hope. It is why I believe, with all my heart, that the essence of our two Nations is a generosity of spirit and a duty to foster compassion, to promote peace, to deepen mutual understanding and to value all people, of all faiths, and of none.

The Alliance that our two Nations have built over the centuries – and for which we are profoundly grateful to the American people – is truly unique. And that Alliance is part of what Henry Kissinger described as Kennedy’s ‘soaring vision’ of an Atlantic Partnership based on twin pillars: Europe and America. That Partnership, I believe Mr. Speaker, is more important today than it has ever been.

The first reigning British Sovereign to set foot in America was my Grandfather, King George VI. He visited in 1939 with my beloved Grandmother, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother. The forces of Fascism in Europe were on the march, and some time before the United States had joined us in the defence of freedom. Our shared values prevailed.

Today, we find ourselves in a new era, but those values remain.

It is an era that is, in many ways, more volatile and more dangerous than the world to which my late Mother spoke, in this Chamber, in 1991.

The challenges we face are too great for any one Nation to bear alone. But in this unpredictable environment, our Alliance cannot rest on past achievements, or assume that foundational principles simply endure. As my Prime Minister said last month: ‘ours is an indispensable partnership. We must not disregard everything that has sustained us for the last eighty years. Instead, we must build on it’.

Renewal today starts with security. The United Kingdom recognizes that the threats we face demand a transformation in British defence. That is why our country, in order to be fit for the future, has committed to the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War – during part of which, over fifty years ago, I served with immense pride in the Royal Navy, following in the Naval footsteps of my Father, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh; my Grandfather, King George VI; my Great-Uncle, Lord Mountbatten; and my Great-Grandfather, King George V.

This year, of course, also marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11. This atrocity was a defining moment for America and your pain and shock were felt around the whole world. During my visit to New York, my wife and I will again pay our respects to the victims, the families, and the bravery shown in the face of terrible loss. We stood with you then. And we stand with you now in solemn remembrance of a day that shall never be forgotten.

In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, when NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time, and the United Nations Security Council was united in the face of terror, we answered the call together – as our people have done so for more than a century, shoulder to shoulder, through two World Wars, the Cold War, Afghanistan and moments that have defined our shared security.

Today, Mr. Speaker, that same, unyielding resolve is needed for the defence of Ukraine and her most courageous people – it is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace. From the depths of the Atlantic to the disastrously melting ice-caps of the Arctic, the commitment and expertise of the United States Armed Forces and its allies lie at the heart of NATO, pledged to each other’s defence, protecting our citizens and interests, keeping North Americans and Europeans safe from our common adversaries.

Our defence, intelligence and security ties are hardwired together through relationships measured not in years, but in decades.

Today, thousands of U.S. service personnel, defence officials and their families are stationed in the United Kingdom, as British personnel serve with equal pride across thirty American States. We are building F-35s together. And we have agreed the most ambitious submarine programme in history – AUKUS – in partnership with Australia, a country of which I am also immensely proud to serve as Sovereign.

We do not embark on these remarkable endeavours together out of sentiment. We do so because they build greater shared resilience for the future, so making our citizens safer for generations to come.

Our common ideals were not only crucial for liberty and equality, they are also the foundation of our shared prosperity. The Rule of Law: the certainty of stable and accessible rules, an independent judiciary resolving disputes and delivering impartial justice. These features created the conditions for centuries of unmatched economic growth in our two countries. This is why our governments are concluding new economic and technology agreements – to write the next chapter of our joint prosperity and ensure that British and American ingenuity continues to lead the world.

Our nations are combining talent and resources in the technologies of tomorrow: our new partnerships in nuclear fusion and quantum computing, and in A.I. and drug discovery, holding the promise of saving countless lives.

More broadly, we celebrate the $430 billion in annual trade that continues to grow; the $1.7 trillion in mutual investment that fuels that innovation; and the millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic supported across both economies. These are strong foundations on which to continue to build, for generations yet unborn.

Our ties in education, research, and cultural exchange empower citizens and future leaders of both countries.

The Marshall Scholarship, named after the great General George Marshall, and the Association of which I am so proud to be Patron, are emblematic of the connection between our two nations. Since its founding, more than 2,300 scholarships have been awarded, opening doors for Americans from all walks of life to study at the UnitedKingdom’s leading universities.

So as we look toward the next 250 years, we must also reflect on our shared responsibility to safeguard Nature, our most precious and irreplaceable asset.

Millennia before our Nations existed, before any border drawn, the mountains of Scotland and Appalachia were one; a single, continuous range, forged in the ancient collision of continents.

The natural wonders of the United States of America are indeed a unique asset, and generations of Americans have risen to this calling: indigenous, political and civic leaders, people in rural communities and cities alike, have all helped to protect and nurture what President Theodore Roosevelt called ‘the glorious heritage’ of thisland’s extraordinary natural splendour, on which so much of its prosperity has always depended.

Yet even as we celebrate the beauty that surrounds us, our generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical natural systems, which threatens far more than the harmony and essential diversity of Nature. We ignore at our peril the fact that these natural systems – in other words, Nature’s own economy – provide the foundation for our prosperity and our national security.

The story of the United Kingdom and the United States is, at its heart, a story of reconciliation, renewal and remarkable partnership.

From the bitter divisions of 250 years ago, we forged a friendship that has grown into one of the most consequential Alliances in human history.

I pray with all my heart that our Alliance will continue to defend our shared values, with our partners in Europe and the Commonwealth, and across the world, and that we ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward-looking.

Mr. Speaker, Mr. Vice-President, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, America’s words carry weight and meaning, as they have since Independence. The actions of this great Nation matter even more. President Lincoln understood this so well, with his reflection in the magisterial Gettysburg Address that the world may little note what we say, but will never forget what we do. And so, to the United States of America, on your 250th birthday, let our two countries rededicate ourselves to each other in the selfless service of our peoples and of all the peoples of the world.

God bless the United States and God bless the United Kingdom.


The King's State Dinner Speech on 29th April, 2026

From:  https://www.royal.uk/news-and-activity/2026-04-29/a-speech-by-his-majesty-the-king-at-the-white-house-state-dinner

Mr. President, First Lady,

My wife and I are most grateful to you for your generous hospitality as the United States celebrates this very special anniversary year of the Declaration of Independence.

May I also just start by paying tribute to your own courage and steadfastness, as well as to your security services for their swift actions on Saturday evening in preventing further injury. My thoughts and sympathies are with you, the First Lady and all those guests for whom this must have been a very upsetting incident. As the words of that famous anthem remind us, this is the land of the free and home of the brave as your own response demonstrates. What used to be called in the last War in the United Kingdom, Keep Calm and Carry on...!

I now realize, to my amazement, that my first visit to this remarkable country was over fifty years ago and, Mr. President, the golden threads of history and heritage between our lands are also embodied in your own family story, whose roots trace back to the beautiful landscapes of Britain’s Outer Hebrides and continue, as we know, in the great golf courses of the Highlands. I can only imagine the immense pride with which your own dear Mother, indeed both your Parents, must be looking down on the great office to which you have been elected for a historic second term.

And if I may say so, it is a particular pleasure to be back in this wonderful building, the heart of your democracy. On this occasion, I cannot help noticing the ‘readjustments’ to the East Wing, Mr. President, following your visit to Windsor Castle last year. I am sorry to say that we British, of course, made our own attempt at real estate redevelopment of the White House in 1814.

I am so glad we have an important opportunity, at this critical time, to renew those bonds of history and friendship between our Nations and our peoples. Two and a half centuries ago, the United States of America was founded through an audacious and visionary act of self-determination. From the beginning, the American character has been defined by courage, tenacity and the spirit of adventure. As the direct descendant of King George III, I know this is a Nation that never gives up.

My family’s history remains reflected in your maps, which read rather like our Christmas card list across the ages – North and South Carolina, Virginia, Maryland, and the cities of Charleston (a particular favourite of mine, obviously), Georgetown (and, for that matter, Georgia), Annapolis, as you mentioned, and (further favourites) Prince William County and Williamsburg. This said, our French friends can feel equally at home with a glance at a map. Indeed, you recently commented, Mr. President, that if it were not for the United States, European countries would be speaking German. Dare I say that, if it wasn’t for us, you’d be speaking French...! Of course, we both love our French cousins greatly, and we three states are not only bound by our shared values, but by a profound belief that, together, we are more than the sum of our parts.

Out of the fires of a bitter and bloody Revolutionary War, the triumph of the father of this country, George Washington, and his fellow founders, was to forge a democracy founded upon the rights to liberty and the Rule of Law.

The story of Britain and America is one of reconciliation, from adversaries to the closest of allies; not always, perhaps, following the straightest path. As you said yourself, Mr President, during your own State Visit at Windsor Castle last year, ours is an unbreakable bond of history and heritage, culture and commerce, industry and invention – and we are determined to face the future together.

Tonight, we are here to renew an indispensable alliance which has long been a cornerstone of prosperity and security for both British and American citizens. Our people have fought and fallen together in defence of the values we cherish. Across the ocean, and from coast to coast, we have traded, innovated and created together. We have stood together through the best and worst of times.

However, the challenges we now face, from those who wish us harm across the world, to balancing the risks and opportunities of powerful new technologies, to the threats to the very international rules that have allowed us to trade and have kept power in balance for eighty years; those challenges encourage us to reaffirm, tonight, the basis on which our partnership has been built.

And yes, we have had our moments of difficulty even in more recent history. When my mother visited in 1957, not the least of her tasks was to help put the “Special” back into our Relationship after a crisis in the Middle East. Nearly seventy years on, it is hard to imagine anything like that happening today....

But it is not hard to see how important the relationship remains, in matters both seen and unseen.

My mother’s first Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill, understood this so well. But then he himself was half American – a tradition of shared transatlantic heritage which I am pleased to say is alive and well in the White House today! Indeed, such was the closeness, that Sir Winston, whilst staying here in the White House – in one of the rooms you showed us upstairs - emerged naked from the bathtub to discover the door opening as President Roosevelt came in for a chat. With rapier wit, the President cast aside any embarrassment by declaring that, ‘the Prime Minister has nothing to conceal from the President of the United States’. This warmth came after testing times between our leaders in the early 1940s.

The kinship and friendship of many centuries provided great reassurance to my late grandfather King George VI, as it did to my late Mother.

It means every bit as much to me.

Of course, my late Mother met no fewer than thirteen serving Presidents – thankfully, all of them fully clothed! The first President I had the honour of meeting – at the age of ten, in 1959, when he came to Balmoral – was President Eisenhower, who had served as the Supreme Commander of the Allied Expeditionary Forces during World War II at a most critical time in the darkest days of the 20th century. American leadership helped rebuild a shattered continent playing a decisive role as a defender of freedom in Europe. We – and I – shall never forget that, not least as freedom is again under attack following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Today, our partnerships in NATO and AUKUS deepen our technological and military cooperation and ensure that, together, we can meet the challenges of an increasingly complex and contested world. And speaking of submarine alliances, there was one particular AUKUS predecessor, launched from a UK shipyard in 1944, that served for the majority of her life attached to the 4th Submarine Squadron in Australia, playing a critical role during the war in the Pacific.

Her name? HMS Trump.

So tonight, Mr President, I am delighted to present to you – as a personal gift – the original bell which hung on the Conning Tower of your valiant namesake. May it stand as a testimony to our Nations’ shared history and shining future. And should you ever need to get hold of us... well, just give us a ring!

For 250 years, the ingenuity and imagination of the people of the United States have been an inspiration to the world. This land of opportunity has nourished some of humanity’s greatest minds, from the industrial age to the space age. So many miracles of the modern world have been and still are invented in America. Indeed, we have followed the voyage of Artemis II – or Artemis the Second, as my family and I might like to call her! – with close attention. Now, I know you have big plans for the Moon, Mr. President, but I’ve checked the papers and I rather suspect it is already part of the Commonwealth, I’m afraid!

On this week’s visit, I look forward to meeting the people and communities of this dynamic country, including celebrating some of the work my King’s Trust has been doing in those communities, helping give young people the chance to succeed across America, in this year when we mark 50 years of the Trust, can you believe it?

Every year, millions of Britons journey to this remarkable country to experience its glorious national parks, soaring mountains and ancient forests. From the peaks of the Pacific Northwest to the rugged shores of the Atlantic, from the vast expanses of the West to the sweeping prairies and canyons, the natural beauty of this land is found in every corner.

And in sport, in just a few weeks, the United States and Canada will be among those to welcome the world as hosts of the FIFA World Cup. So in one sense, Mr President, as Heads of State, we are joint hosts!

We call this game, by the way, “Football”, Mr. President... And I can only say as the Head of State of five competing countries, I will be watching the matches closely and with great enthusiasm. After all, we always like favourable odds...

This city, Washington D.C., is the home of more Shakespeare Folios than anywhere in the world. 82 copies are carefully preserved and shared at The Folger Library. And at this time where the search for peace in the world, is more crucial than ever, I can only turn to Shakespeare’s genius to remind us of the plea for peace, spoken by the Duke of Burgundy at the conclusion of Henry V -

“my speech entreats, that I may know...why gentle Peace should not...bless us with her former qualities.”

Thank you, Mr. President and Mrs Trump, for your splendid dinner this evening which, may I say, is a very considerable improvement on the Boston Tea Party! So, whether your cup contains tea, wine, Scotch whisky, bourbon or even cola, let us raise our glasses and voices as we toast the past, the present and the future of our two proud and allied nations:


To the United States, and the United Kingdom. God bless both our countries.



Tuesday, 28 April 2026

 

A FEW MORE POEMS


Porthgwarra

by Tim Veater



Yesterday, I thought, “Tomorrow,

I'll do a trip, and venture to Porthgwarra.”

And so I did, and so I saw,

A newly appeared and terrifying thing:

In modern parlance, a 'Sink Hole'.

In fact a collapsed sea cave,

Unfenced and shear.

I stood entranced and petrified,

Requiring nerve to stand beside,

The unguarded edge and lear.


Where fathoms far below,

The rounded boulders,

Of an ocean floor appeared.

In dread imagination feared

It might collapse some more,

Even the very location where I stood.

Or what creatures plunged with it,

When all the ground had disappeared,

Or if by chance an unspecting walker,

Had slid into that ghastly abyss.


It was with some relief,

I walked away from it,

On narrow sandy path,

Past monoliths of granite,

Lichen-whiskered with salty time,

Topped by a cap of mustard yellow;

Buttoned on one side, white with Thrift,

The other, Bluebelled Oxford blue,

Led back to Porthgwarra Cove.

And there, next to the tumbling stream


Out to the limitless sea,

I sat and ate my quiche lorraine

And gazed in wonder

At the tireless, timeless waves.

Aware alone, I sat again,

After the many years had passed,

A vista dotted with yellow flags and gorse,

The spotted gold of lovers lost

And passions drained,

Into the blue and icy main.


The endangered Choughs,

Which protected, about here live,

In formal black, fly by aghast

And squawk their scornful laughter

At the curs-ed human far below,

Prayerfully partaking his repast,

Whilst rugged cliffs resist the ocean's roar,

Of Neptune's hammer blows.



The long love that in my thought doth harbour]


The long love that in my thought doth harbour 
And in mine heart doth keep his residence, 
Into my face presseth with bold pretence 
And therein campeth spreading his bannèr. 
She that me learns to love and suffèr 
And wills that my trust, and lust’s negligence 
Be reined by reason, shame, and reverence, 
With his hardiness takes displeasùre. 
Wherewithall unto the heart’s forest he fleèth, 
Leaving his enterprise with pain and cry, 
And there him hideth, and not appearèth. 
What may I do when my master fearèth? 
But in the field with him to live and die 
For good is the life, ending faithfully.


Thomas Wyatt, (1503 - 1542) a prolific poet, is accredited with introducing the fourteen line sonnet to England. The above is a take on Petrarch's (1304 - 1374) 'Amour che nel penser'.


WIKI:  "As the book fell open, Petrarch's eyes were immediately drawn to the following words from St Augustine's Confessions:

"And men go about to wonder at the heights of the mountains, and the mighty waves of the sea, and the wide sweep of rivers, and the circuit of the ocean, and the revolution of the stars, but themselves they consider not.[23]

"Petrarch's response was to turn from the outer world of nature to the inner world of "soul":

"I closed the book, angry with myself that I should still be admiring earthly things who might long ago have learned from even the pagan philosophers that nothing is wonderful but the soul, which, when great itself, finds nothing great outside itself. Then, in truth, I was satisfied that I had seen enough of the mountain; I turned my inward eye upon myself, and from that time not a syllable fell from my lips until we reached the bottom again. ... [W]e look about us for what is to be found only within. ... How many times, think you, did I turn back that day, to glance at the summit of the mountain which seemed scarcely a cubit high compared with the range of human contemplation[23]"

Lost Love by Tim Veater

Larger than life it got away,
Oh for the grace to let it go.
Where is the joy that went astray?
Gone on the howling gale that blows!
Familiar the face that looks my way.
Who would have guessed they knew me so?
Funny the funny games we play,
Making so sure that no one knows.

Bleached the colours. Faded the hues.
Where is the orchard that once we grew?
Gone in the chilling swirling river,
Blown by the wind, swept with a shiver -
Playing the part of the indifferent swinger -
Mountain peaks shrouded in icy-blue.


April 2026 by Tim Veater


So it is April yet again,

Yet again, yet again.

I like the sound of it,

Like a distant train,

Like a distant train,

Travelling the tracks,

Clicking the cracks,

Of an earthly time machine,

Thrusting its way, ever onward,

Into a tunnel of love,

Never to be seen again.


This little blue orb,

In its beautiful garb,

Is set like an opel in space

All blackness around

And ne're ever a sound

Until Artemis too,

Splashes down on its face

And the smell of the sea

And the sound of the waves

Salt splashing the ears

With an earthy refrain.


It's April again

Now freshened with rain

As the photons of light

Kiss the leaves,

For here it is yellow and green

And everyone's seen

What in April the sunlight can do,

To this small patch of garden I view.

Though none can explain

Whether particle or wave

Or absolutely nothing, tis true.


The light from a star

Falls right where we are

And somehow makes everything glow,

From the eye to the brain

I'll say it again

It's a mystery no one can know.

Exquisite, unique,

Of its beauty I speak

This April, this Spring,

Of it let us sing, 

Ere we drown in a blood-thirsty stew.


My gggGrandfather Thomas Veater's (1787 - 1857) mother was a Rose and he married a Parfitt

A lot of Gloucester 'Bishops' back along.

Robert Bishopp

Birth 1585 • Norwich, Norfolk, England

Death 1660 • Norwich, Norfolk England