Covid Vaccine caused deaths in New Zealand.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1731460039980855632

The Vigilant Fox 

@VigilantFox

Subscribe

This statistician and whistleblower, Barry Young, 56, has been arrested by New Zealand authorities for exposing this data: Mr. Young examined connections between specific COVID-19 vaccine batches and mortality rates. What he found was alarming: Batch ID 1: Total Vaccinated 711, Death Count 152, 21.38% Dead Batch ID 8: Total Vaccinated 221, Death Count 38, 17.19% Dead Batch ID 3: Total Vaccinated 310, Death Count 48, 15.48% Dead Batch ID 4: Total Vaccinated 364, Death Count 37, 10.16% Dead Batch ID 6: Total Vaccinated 1006, Death Count 101, 10.04% Dead Batch ID 2: Total Vaccinated 1018, Death Count 98, 9.63% Dead Batch ID 7: Total Vaccinated 38, Death Count 3, 7.89% Dead Batch ID 72: Total Vaccinated 5882, Death Count 278, 4.73% Dead Batch ID 62: Total Vaccinated 18173, Death Count 831, 4.57% Dead Batch ID 71: Total Vaccinated 11019, Death Count 498, 4.52% Dead The underlying mortality rate in New Zealand should be only 0.75%, said Young. So the odds of all these deaths happening by chance is approximately 100 billion to 1. "So statistically, what we're saying is that there is no chance that this vaccine is not a killer," declared Young. Steve Kirsch (

@stkirsch

) earlier today said: "The data is legit; that's why they are arresting Barry. He's a hero for exposing the truth."

Tim Veater writes:

"The killer vaccine in New Zealand." As I reported several years ago from research in America, the cauasal death rate in the Pfizer vaccine (up to 20%) is batch related. This is very important and suggests the batches differed significantly in their propensity to cause illness or death. It makes the interpretation of the data more difficult owing to the averaging effects across the treated population. 

But there are also other variables that have to be considered. For example the number of times a jab was given (the so-called boosters'); the average age of the cohort treated; the age, fitness and health of the participants; other mitigating factors such as hereditary, social and environmental ones. All of these may have the effect of heightening or lessening the risk of the vaccine interacting with potency of the vaccine batch itself. 

That government should have used all its economic and propaganda power, stopping only just short of making it mandatory, on the public including children as young as five, was not only reckless but also criminal. It has done its best to suppress the truth but it will eventually emerge although no one will be held responsible. 

So far Hancock has been offered up as the imbecilic scapegoat, whilst the 'foul-mouthed' Cummins, as the 'malign actor', and Johnson as 'bamboozled' by the stats. However, the problem goes much deeper and wider, into the whole concept of the danger posed by microbiological pathogens, and the philosophical underpinnings of our approach to threat and risk; and of the medical establishment's attitude and commitment to vaccination and chemical intervention. 

The latter refuses to acknowledge any suggestion of adverse effects and this is replicated by Government. For example, instead of admitting the whole lock-down policy was fundamentally flawed - in fact quite ludicrous - Hancock in mitigation, suggested it should have been introduced much earlier, completely missing the point that the 'first wave' of deaths was largely CAUSED by it! 

Predominantly the very elderly and infirm in institutional and medical settings, died in their thousands because they were given the wrong treatment or denied care, whilst the general population, not at significant risk, were locked down and suffered the social, psychological and economic adverse effects, including illness and self harm. 

Not satisfied with this litany of mistakes, a programme of mass vaccination was introduced, which almost immediately (December 2019/January 2020) resulted in an increase in related illness and deaths (morbidity and mortality) Only Bridgen in Parliament has propounded this line of observational and logical reasoning based on the evidence. 

No one in Government has accepted it although without fanfare it has back-tracked on child vaccination for Covid at least. The short and long-term adverse effects of childhood vaccination is still strenuously denied of course. As I have always said, the SARS Cov (2) debacle will go down in history as the most egregious, and yes 'malign', public health disaster, ever.

Momzilla

@MomzillaGood2go

Canadians are to believe that the 2021 Jabs lowered Covid deaths by 9%, while deaths from Unknown Causes went up 38% over 2020 with no Jab. People must demand their Members leave the W.H.O. https://ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-4623…

Replicated in another WEF scam here:

Darren Street 

odroSptnse456hilhaig02i072427h1ia1f3c2la020lc7152hgf1gcgthml  · 

An example of ‘net zero’ madness

This is a Tesla battery. It takes up all of the space under the passenger compartment of the car.

To manufacture it you need:

--12 tons of rock for Lithium

-- 5 tons of Cobalt minerals

-- 3 tons of mineral for nickel

-- 12 tons of copper ore

You must move 250 tons of soil to obtain:

-- 12 kg of Lithium

-- 30 pounds of nickel

-- 22 kg of manganese

-- 15 pounds of Cobalt

To manufacture the battery requires:

-- 100 Kg of RAM chips

-- 200 kg of aluminum, steel and/or plastic

The Caterpillar 994A is used for the earthmoving to obtain the essential minerals. It consumes 264 gallons of diesel in 12 hours.

Finally you get a “zero emissions” car.

Presently, the bulk of the necessary minerals for manufacturing the batteries come from China or Africa. Much of the labor for getting the minerals in Africa is done by children! If we buy electric cars, it's China who profits most!

BTW, this 2021 Tesla OEM battery is currently for sale on the Internet for $4,999 not including shipping or installation.

Update: What’s very interesting about a public post is the sheer number of ‘sparse’ or dead accounts that come out of the woodwork in ‘support’ of such an industry and then start saying how bad the petrol and oil industry is.

Now let’s get this straight, the oil industry is not squeaky clean and there are very obvious downsides but these electric vehicles are NOT the answer.