http://images6.fanpop.com/image/photos/34500000/Madeleine-McCann-a-British-girl-disappeared-on-the-evening-of-Thursday-3-May-2007-the-missing-people-34569254-280-390.jpg
"The True Story of Madeleine McCann | Full Documentary by Richard D Hall"
Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIa5cnji2ys
https://vultureofcritique.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/cppphilar_screenshot-from-2016-11-07-02-40-21.png?w=640&h=542
"Are Clinton Insiders Involved in Child Abduction? A Factual Analysis."
"A conspiracy theory has been promulgated according to which John and Tony Podesta were involved in the abduction of Madeleine McCann."
Here: http://livingresistance.com/2016/11/18/podestas-involved-mccanns-abduction-factual-analysis/Facebook Discussion
Simon Massey I'm sorry. No chance. Madeleine died in the Apt 5A from which her parents claimed she was abducted. The McCanns lied about jemmied shutters, & deleted their call & text records. The Police realised almost immediately that the scene had been faked. Political pressure from British authorities prevented them from arresting the ghoulish couple.
When dogs trained to smell cadaver odour smell cadaver, that means a human being died & left a smell. Dogs found the smell of cadaver AND blood in the Apt 5A. They found cadaver on Kates clothing & in the car they hired weeks after reporting their daughter missing.
I guess it's possible the Podesta's killed Madeleine in Apt 5A, perhaps deliberately & on camera, but not without the McCanns knowing exactly what was going on. It's possible they were there & it's possible they knew Clement Freud. But I have seen only speculation about this, no evidence.
It seems pretty clear the e-fits resembling the Podesta's is a coincidence. No-one abducted any child from Apt 5A. The abduction scenario is to cover the death that the evidence says must have occured. The e-fit in fact looks like Gerry McCann, who probably carried someone elses blonde child around the resort that night to create witnesses to the abduction scenario.
When dogs trained to smell cadaver odour smell cadaver, that means a human being died & left a smell. Dogs found the smell of cadaver AND blood in the Apt 5A. They found cadaver on Kates clothing & in the car they hired weeks after reporting their daughter missing.
I guess it's possible the Podesta's killed Madeleine in Apt 5A, perhaps deliberately & on camera, but not without the McCanns knowing exactly what was going on. It's possible they were there & it's possible they knew Clement Freud. But I have seen only speculation about this, no evidence.
It seems pretty clear the e-fits resembling the Podesta's is a coincidence. No-one abducted any child from Apt 5A. The abduction scenario is to cover the death that the evidence says must have occured. The e-fit in fact looks like Gerry McCann, who probably carried someone elses blonde child around the resort that night to create witnesses to the abduction scenario.
Simon Massey I fear that Michael Shrimpton is a shill for the feds. I do not trust him one little bit. He claimed that the British secret services would never kill anyone, that we're the "good guys". He can't say that & then expect anything else he says to be accepted as fact. He reckons it's the Germans, it's always the Germans with Shrimpton. I don't trust him.
No offence, but any theory that involves an abduction is rubbish. If the Podesta's were involved, they must have been in with the paedo-ring that was clearly at work at the Mark Warner resort that week... Maybe they killed Madeleine on camera but there's no way anyone abducted her.
Again, I have heard claims about the Podesta's being in Portugal that week. I have seen no evidence. I have heard it claimed that they knew Clement Freud but again, I have seen no evidence. If someone can prove that the Podesta's were there & that they knew Clement Freud I'd give the theory more credence. But there's no way they were involved in a kidnapping when the evidence say that Madeleine died in Apt 5A. I guess it's possible that the attempt to sterilise Apt 5A was an attempt to remove Podesta DNA, but I'm unlikely to consider that possibility while I have seen zero evidence of their connections to the case.
If you have seen anything that PROVES the Podesta's presence & their relationship with Clement Freud I'd be happy to revise my postion. But theory without backing is not enough. It might be sound, but it needs supporting evidence. If nothing can be shown that proves the Podesta connection, I'm still fingering the McCanns.
No offence, but any theory that involves an abduction is rubbish. If the Podesta's were involved, they must have been in with the paedo-ring that was clearly at work at the Mark Warner resort that week... Maybe they killed Madeleine on camera but there's no way anyone abducted her.
Again, I have heard claims about the Podesta's being in Portugal that week. I have seen no evidence. I have heard it claimed that they knew Clement Freud but again, I have seen no evidence. If someone can prove that the Podesta's were there & that they knew Clement Freud I'd give the theory more credence. But there's no way they were involved in a kidnapping when the evidence say that Madeleine died in Apt 5A. I guess it's possible that the attempt to sterilise Apt 5A was an attempt to remove Podesta DNA, but I'm unlikely to consider that possibility while I have seen zero evidence of their connections to the case.
If you have seen anything that PROVES the Podesta's presence & their relationship with Clement Freud I'd be happy to revise my postion. But theory without backing is not enough. It might be sound, but it needs supporting evidence. If nothing can be shown that proves the Podesta connection, I'm still fingering the McCanns.
Angela Power-Disney I agree with you....it is awful the controlled release of SOME truth peppered with many jokers in the pack which seems to be the case with SHRIMPTON as in defending the likes of Lord Bramhall HarveyProctor etc so yes I am with you on that....although sometimes it is worth extracting the TRUTH they spill as long as one knows when the red herrings are flying ....I also do not buy the abduction thing and believe it was either a planned party ending in a snuff movie or a planned party that resulted in a death not intended but nonetheless filmed and released...I got that intel a while ago and not via Shrimpton and work on one premise of a matter is confirmed at the hands of two or three witnesses....the evidence for the connection with Freud and the Podestas is definitely extant...research was being documented originally on REDDIT until that forum got shut down interestingly the CEO of Reddit found to have been in a cannibalism forum himself for quite a while. The evidence collating has switched to two other forums the names of which escape me but will come back with them or you can google ....I hear you on truth without documentation is insufficient to move forward on....research documenting and collating in detail is hugely important ...if I don´t get back with the two arenas where the docs are being centralised poke me or inbox me for reminder please
Simon Massey "I also do not buy the abduction thing and believe it was either a planned party ending in a snuff movie or a planned party that resulted in a death not intended but nonetheless filmed and released...I got that intel a while ago and not via Shrimpton and work on one premise of a matter is confirmed at the hands of two or three witnesses..."
When I first got to the Madeleine McCann Abduction or Scam page from which I was recently evicted for Pizzgateing the place up a bit (lot) this theory was poo-pooed & often that sort of speculation was discouraged or simply prevented. I & others have offered insurmountable evidence that this sort of thing doesn't just go on, it goes on A LOT & for anyone who has looked into it a little deeper, the upper echelons of our so-called rulers appear riddled with an interest in the most vile of crimes! This possibility is now being given a fair shake while the Pizzagaters are being closed down.
Back on Pizzagate proper. I've seen the claims in many places & they go like this. "Our anonymous source in the FBI tells us Podestas were in Portugal...". There's no way this is good enough. We need something in the public domain, something published in media to show this as fact. If the Podesta's have been photgraphed in Portugal, or with Clement Freud or with any of the McCanns & their Tapas cohorts, fine.
I could come up with an anonymous source saying, "this dude who used to work for Sky news told me that he over-heard Cliff Richard talking about... but he told me never to reveal his name". & Voila, rumours started.
We don't want rumours, because when the media starts rabbiting about us idiots buying into unsubstantiated theories we do not want that to be true. We need to stick with claims that we can back with evidence or risk credibility.
When I first got to the Madeleine McCann Abduction or Scam page from which I was recently evicted for Pizzgateing the place up a bit (lot) this theory was poo-pooed & often that sort of speculation was discouraged or simply prevented. I & others have offered insurmountable evidence that this sort of thing doesn't just go on, it goes on A LOT & for anyone who has looked into it a little deeper, the upper echelons of our so-called rulers appear riddled with an interest in the most vile of crimes! This possibility is now being given a fair shake while the Pizzagaters are being closed down.
Back on Pizzagate proper. I've seen the claims in many places & they go like this. "Our anonymous source in the FBI tells us Podestas were in Portugal...". There's no way this is good enough. We need something in the public domain, something published in media to show this as fact. If the Podesta's have been photgraphed in Portugal, or with Clement Freud or with any of the McCanns & their Tapas cohorts, fine.
I could come up with an anonymous source saying, "this dude who used to work for Sky news told me that he over-heard Cliff Richard talking about... but he told me never to reveal his name". & Voila, rumours started.
We don't want rumours, because when the media starts rabbiting about us idiots buying into unsubstantiated theories we do not want that to be true. We need to stick with claims that we can back with evidence or risk credibility.
Simon Massey Simon Massey https://www.facebook.com/occult911 This guy Ramsey's fb page is excellent. I already pulled this Jimmy Comet/Instagram that I hadn't seen before. The 49th most powerful person in Washington DC sees himself as Pan. Great.
Tim Veater The suspect images were put out by the Met Police in 2012 apparently. One problem is that there is no background to explain where they come from especially as only one man was seen carrying a child (allegedly) and the distance and darkness could not possibly produced a facial likeness. So who provided the description based on what circumstances? There is no doubt the likeness is there and the fact that two brothers are replicated makes this so unlikely by chance alone as to be virtually impossible. The fact that it now appears that both have actively engaged in preferences that suggest at least an interest in sado masochist tendancies involving children, concrete links to Clement Freud property and person, wiped E-mail history prior to the disappearance date, photographs with uncanny likeness to Madelaine herself in Podesta presence or premises, suggestions they were in Portugal at the time of her disappearance, all hugely increase the weight of circumstantial evidence that they WERE involved in some way. The cadaver evidence in flat and car is not of course necessarily evidence that it was Madelaines dead body that was there - it could have been another body. That the trained dogs did not 'lie' cannot I think be doubted. Who knows what went on in that flat before or after Madelaine was reported missing. The DNA evidence is harder to explain away but we should be aware that DNA can come from any number of sources and to find it only confirms that persons bodily fluid were in the places located. So if the facial impressions could not have come from the crime scene itself how could they come to be? That is something only the Metropolitan Police can tell us. But is it possible they were actually based upon the Podesta brothers themselves because other information became available to the investigators that implicated them? In the absence of other explanations, that seems to be the only that stands up to scrutiny. As for the ostensibly plausible Shrimpton, his obsession with only the Germans being the bad guys, whilst the Americans, Israelis and British are nothing but gentlemen, fatally undermines whatever else he says. Further the fact that no one has been arrested or charged on the back of his 'reliable' information, speaks volumes. The possibility therefore exists that his well crafted theories are designed to deflect attention away from the true causes and perpatrators.
"ALL FALSE FLAGS" INTELLIGENCE OFFICER STATES.
ReplyDeletehttp://wakingtimesmedia.com/us-intelligence-officer-every-single-terrorist-attack-us-false-flag-attack/
The danger of concentrating on just one or two cases is that the generality and extent of the problem is overlooked. That I think is part of the purpose. The latest appears to be a six year old Oxfam case that now fills the headlines. Meanwhile the rampant street violence, crime figures and all the rest are pushed to the inside pages. Much better we concentrate on old events and 'historic' cases, rather than face up to the very real issues and dangers of the here and now. As regard child abduction and disappearance, the sitiuation is very much worse than is generally realised and government has done very little to acknowledge or record it. Just occasional cases get publicised whilst literally hundreds of cases get virtually no notice at all. And this excludes a rampant market in lost asylum seeking children, many of whom apparently end up under the control of predators because they are a valuable commodity for those who want to abuse them. Given the Met Police's utter failure to investigate other notable cases, it is a continuing mystery why they have devoted such energies and resources to the McCann, without it must be noted, any real sign of success. The McCann case is unique for sure but not for the reasons generally assumed.
ReplyDelete