Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 9/11 health consequences. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query 9/11 health consequences. Sort by date Show all posts

Thursday, 13 September 2018

The serious adverse health consequences of 9/11 still being felt!


September 11: nearly 10,000 people affected by 'cesspool of cancer'



John Mormando is trying to bring awareness to breast cancer he believes he contracted while working close to Ground Zero.
John Mormando is trying to bring awareness to breast cancer he believes he contracted while working close to Ground Zero. Photograph: Christopher Lane

From: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/sep/10/911-attack-ground-zero-manhattan-cancer


John Mormando was in the best shape of his life – a marathon runner and triathlete training for an Ironman competition – when he noticed a small bump on his chest this past March.
He had it checked out by a doctor, and soon received the shocking diagnosis: breast cancer.
“I was floored. I was totally floored,” he said.
Mormando, 51, was at a loss to explain his rare diagnosis – fewer than 1% of breast cancer cases occur in men, and he has no family history of the disease. Then colleagues reminded him of the months he worked close to the site of the 9/11 terrorist attack on New York’s World Trade Center.
Tens of thousands of people who lived or worked in the neighborhood at the time found themselves breathing in air thick with toxic fumes and particles from the pulverized, burning skyscrapers. Many have since become sick, many have died and new cases are still occurring all the time that are linked back to the poisons that were in the air around the wreckage. The latest example is a cluster of men who have developed breast cancer, including Mormando.
Now a commodities broker at the RJ O’Brien office in the city, he worked at the time at the New York Mercantile Exchange, a block away from the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan, where extremists flew hijacked passenger jets into the center’s twin towers that morning in 2001, causing their collapse shortly afterwards.
The site of the towers became known as Ground Zero and the attacks, which involved two other hijacked jets, one that was flown into the Pentagon and one that was brought down in a field on its way to Washington DC, collectively known as 9/11.
“We went back to work exactly one week after 9/11, while the towers were still burning and everything else crumbled around us. We were told that the air was fine, and we needed to get back to work,” he said. “It was ridiculous. It was horrible. The smell downtown was as pungent as you could imagine. There were buildings still on fire. Those buildings burned for months.”
Mormando, who is undergoing chemotherapy, is one of at least 15 men who spent time near Ground Zero and have now been diagnosed with breast cancer, according to their attorney, Michael Barasch. There are likely many more.
The new cluster of male breast cancer diagnoses is just one face of a health crisis that is only getting worse 17 years after the terrorist attacks.
As people who lost loved ones in the attack on lower Manhattan will gather on Tuesday once again to mark the anniversary, on the site of the towers,New York is nearing a grim milestone: 10,000 people diagnosed with cancer linked to 9/11.
Male breast cancertypically affects only one in 100,000 men each year.
Michael Guedes, a retired NYPD sergeant who rushed to Ground Zero, and in the following months worked at Fresh Kills landfill on Staten Island digging through the debris and remains that had been taken there, said future health consequences had been the last thing on his mind. “You really don’t think about it. You just want to get the job done,” he said last week.
Guedes, 65, was diagnosed with breast cancer three years ago after his girlfriend found a lump on his chest. He went through surgery, chemotherapy and radiation, and remains on medication.
“Had she not found it, I would have died of it, I’m sure. At least I have a fighting chance,” he said.
“I didn’t fit the mold. I didn’t have a family history,” he said. “I know more [people] are going to get sick. It’s something I hate to say, but there’s no doubt in my mind. I’ve always been a very private person. I like my privacy. On something like this, I just can’t stay quiet.”
Jeff Flynn, 65, said before he received his diagnosis in 2011, he didn’t even know it was possible for a man to get breast cancer. “All the blood just drained out of my face. Your life changes instantly,” he said.
Flynn worked for a data storage company near the World Trade Center, and returned soon after the attacks to help companies get back up and running. “I could actually taste the air. It was foul,” he said.
Still, it took him a while to connect the dots between the time he spent around the wreckage and his cancer. Once he did, he signed up for the health program.
At a forum at the National September 11 Memorial & Museum at Ground Zero last week, FBI director Christopher Wray said he had lost three colleagues who responded to the 2001 attacks in the last six months alone, and called for more people to sign up for government programs aimed at detecting and treating illnesses linked to the toxic debris and particles that exuded from the wreckage of the skyscrapers.
There were 9,375 members of the World Trade Center Health Program certified as having a related cancer as of the end of June, according to the program. An additional 420 members who had cancer have died.
In all, more than 43,000 people have been certified with a 9/11 related health condition.
The toll on first responders has been well documented – 182 members of the New York Fire Department alone have died due to such illnesses. But the carnage goes much further – affecting many who were lower Manhattan residents, office workers, teachers and students at local schools.
“This is very democratic toxic dust. It doesn’t matter whether you’re a student or a firefighter or a gazillionaire at Goldman Sachs. It is affecting everybody and killing everybody,” Barasch said.
His firm represents 25 people who were high school or college students at the time of the attacks, and were diagnosed with cancer in their 20s and 30s.
Many more have chronic respiratory and gastrointestinal illnesses, including graduates of Stuyvesant high school, three blocks from the twin towers, where students evacuated on the day of the attack and returned less than a month later.
Lila Nordstrom, 34, who was a senior there on 9/11 and now has gastro-esophageal reflux disease, said the scope of the health crisis struck her when she was at a dinner party in her 20s with a group of classmates and the topic of the illness came up. “Every single person at the table had it,” she said.
Nordstrom founded the group StuyHealth to help other young survivors. “We are so young, and this is not a choice we made for ourselves. We were minors. We know that it wasn’t safe down there now, and we know the Environmental Protection Agency didn’t tell us the truth about that,” she said.
The head of the EPA at the time has admitted she was wrong to assure the public that the air around Ground Zero was safe.
Survivors are speaking out to encourage others to sign up for the health program and get checked. Anyone who lived, worked or went to school near the site and develops a related illness is eligible for health care and possible compensation under the Zadroga Act.
The United Federation of Teachers has also contacted staffers who were working at a dozen lower Manhattan schools in 2001, urging them to get checked.
Among them was Maria Sanabria, 52, formerly an assistant teacher at the Leadership and Public Service high school, who onthat horrific day fled the school. More than 15 years later, she was diagnosed with thyroid cancer. Two of her former colleagues have died of cancer. “I was really scared,” she said.
Advocates are already gearing up for another fight in Congress, with the victim compensation fund set to expire in December of 2020 unless lawmakers vote to extend it. The health program, by contrast, is funded for 75 years.
“Cancer has no deadline. It’s not going to stop magically in December of 2020,” Barasch said. “There’s no statute of limitations on cancer.”
The fund has awarded more than $4.3bn so far to more than 19,000 first responders and survivors.
Few federal agents have joined the program, even though many were exposed to the toxic dust, officials say.
FBI agent Lu Lieber was a responder at Ground Zero and recalled getting in her car on 12 September 2001 and turning on the air conditioner. It spit out dust, which remained in the heating system for months. She has been diagnosed with two forms of cancer. “Lower Manhattan evolved into a cesspool of cancer,” she said.
Even the memorial is changing to recognize the fact that the attacks have continued to claim lives years after the towers fell. A new path lined with stones is planned to pay tribute to those who have died from illnesses linked to all the toxins released at the attack site.
“The toll will be, I think, beyond our comprehension,” said the museum president Alice Greenwald.

See also: 

9/11 – The Unreported Health Disaster. – Tim Veater

Posted on May 27, 2014

Friday, 20 February 2015

9/11 – The Unreported Health Disaster. – Tim Veater

9/11 – The Unreported Health Disaster. – Tim Veater
9/11 – The Unreported Health Disaster.

Many, including the writer, have highlighted the likely longer-term
psychological and physical health consequences of the collapse of the World
Trade Centre Buildings on the 11th September, 2001.

Leaving aside the contaminants created by burning and crushed materials,
including heavy metals, dioxin and silica, the fact that the buildings were
loaded with at least four hundred tons of fire retardant asbestos – a well-known
pulmonary carcinogen that may take up to thirty years to reveal itself – meant
that the post-collapse fine respirable dust that filled the air was bound to be
highly dangerous to those unfortunate enough to have breathed it. The health
consequences are slowly being reported and the extent of the human disaster
revealed. (1)

No-one with a modicum of knowledge about the building or environmental heath,
for which read port and municipal authorities and other federal and state
agencies, could have been in any doubt about this. Their culpability rests not
only on the limited steps they took to advise and protect those required to
enter the area, many being their own employees for whom there is a quite
specific legal duty of care, but in actually encouraging the public to re-enter
the zone on the stated opinion that it was safe to do so. This was counter to
all reasonable assumptions and before the necessary analytic steps to prove it
had been carried out had been carried out. (Indeed undue and unseemly haste to
remove the aftermath of an undoubted crime scene appears to have been the order
of the day) That such advice could be put out by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) amongst others, beggars belief.  Subsequently in an
attempt to repair its reputation, it has claimed it was pressurise
d to supply the false opinion whereby thousands more were undoubtedly put at
risk. (2)

Quite incredibly it has been compounded by an apparent reluctance on the part of
government either national or local, to monitor the physical environment for
contaminants or fund proper mortality and morbidity incidence studies of those
exposed. Indeed quite the reverse/ the statistics that are available are
apparently “classified”.

“More than five years after the attacks, government agencies at all levels
continue to show little interest in conducting a scientific assessment of the
nature and scope of ensuing contamination or in acknowledging actual and
potential adverse health consequences.” (3)

Such negligence can only be explained in terms of an intentional, wilful,
deceitful cover-up of the risks and an immoral dereliction of duty on the part
of government, for which it stands accountable.

A number of leading scientists have pointed to the strange phenomena associated
with the event, including multiple explosions, pyroclasatic flow (4) and
so-called “dustification”. (5)

To these we must now add the suggestion, not beyond the realms of possibility,
given the enormity of the crime itself, that nuclear detonations might have been
involved!

The main support for this theory is the pattern of disease and otherwise
inexplicable huge increase in multiple myeloma – a form of cancer uniquely
associated with a limited number of causative agents including radiation.

The following is taken from the “Veterans Today” website:
” Then again, there is no evidence that small amounts of radiation could have
caused the massive spike in cancers, with up to 70% of the tens of thousands of
first responders suffering according to Dr. Norton. The cancer is multiple
myeloma.  The number of victims who have thus far applied for benefits from the
2.7-billion-dollar 9/11 fund, as reported …. is 69,900. There is one known
direct cause for this disease, exposure to a nuclear explosion. Multiple myeloma
is also known as “the Hiroshima disease.” Studies at both Los Alamos and
Livermore Labs show little increase, no more than 4%, for minor radiation
exposure. There are no other established factors, no “toxic soup” that can cause
this disease.”” (6)

Isn’t it time the american people and other governments who’s nationals have
been affected, demanded action by the American Government proper and full
disclosure of the medical facts so that the world can form an opinion. The
precedent set after Hiroshima and Nagasaki was conspicuously not followed. I
wonder why? END.






Friday, 12 June 2020

A 'STEP BY STEP' GUIDE TO WORRYING WORLD-WIDE DEVELOPMENTS

View image on Twitter
There is no end to the predictive programming. This one is 'bat-shit crazy': The reverse side of the 25-cent coin depicts a Samoan fruit bat mother with her pup clinging to her wings released by the US Mint on Feb. 3, 2020.


Authored by a member of a group that wants to remain anonymous. The unabridged article can be viewed here: 
 http://www.marcvandelft.nl/corona-crisis/Manual.pdf?fbclid=IwAR32RLpIS4GiOLAZ9Omu_L4mdMx5qrhQfHU-75osNJBmU37R3cArw-VaWcU

The following is a 'step by step' guide to what we believe are the worrying international developments, the objective of which is to spread awareness in the general public, crucial if the dangers described are to be frustrated. 

https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.marcvandelft.nl%2Fcorona-crisis%2FManual.pdf%3Ffbclid%3DIwAR1VyAxWGx7Kia-RBL48Ca3JtslA4JCF60DOr0IjeEH2kisTBZ7cT_X9EFk&h=AT3ssV_SDv90WNbikGfKwUs28JHFcpNE49-wESam-dCwS6zK1ys8gkRAn3rTshD1ebL_6ScHKJiNfbJf3MehOH6EkOl1jB1tAcqixiOXFhkgn23GfNZiGUL_ecrApbf5v08

We believe what is now unfolding can be compared to Thomas Mann's brilliant novel 'Der Zauberberg'. The hero of it, Hans Castorp, suffering from TB, resides in the comfortable bubble of a mountain health resort, isolated from the outside world.  When he recovers from the illness, he returns to it, only to discover Europe is ravaged by World War I, where he will most likely die. We believe that unless people choose to leave their 'bubbles', they may wake up to a society far more dangerous and dystopian.


There appears to be a covert agenda behind the government measures all around the globe, and our estimation is that, as time progresses, more and more of this agenda will become clear to ever more people. None of us can now afford the luxury of remaining in the bubble of our comfort zones. 


As a group, we have known about the most horrendous government schemes for more than ten years now, and we feel it is our moral duty to inform you. In this manual, we take one step at a time. It isn’t our aim to convince you of anything, but simply to present facts in a certain order, so you can then form you own opinion on the basis of these facts.

TWENTY STEPS TO AWARENESS



INTRODUCTION 

We are now living in a crucial moment in the history of mankind. It is of vital importance to have an understanding of what is now unfolding in order to be able to influence the outcome. Fortunately, the number of people who are aware  is growing but needs to expand if disastrous consequences to humanity are to be avoided in the next few years. Hopefully this document will inspire others to do likewise.

We have found information suggesting that there are reasons behind government measures and that unchallenged, a covert plan is being wheeled out on an unsuspecting public. We have witnessed the formation of multiple separate groups that, although having insight, are insular, so that general awareness is limited, which we are trying here to correct.

People differ in their interpretations of what is needed. Some see Donald Trump as a hero, another sees him as a villain. We take the view that it doesn't really matter, because it only obscures the more important issue.  Contentious issues such as ‘chem-trails’, the ‘Illuminati’,  9-11, ‘Qanon’, are similarly secondary. This is about joining forces on the basis of common ground. People need to subsume their differences in order to unite against the common enemy.


CORONAVIRUS CASE STUDY


At least deep down, everyone will have a feeling that there is something strange about the uniform measures that many governments have taken worldwide. 


Another ‘side effect’ of the government measures is that the number of suicides has risen dramatically: https://abc7news.com/suicide-covid-19-coronavirus-rates-during-pandemic-death-by/6201962/. 

At the same time, more and more information is appearing indicating that the mortality rate of the current virus is no higher than that of an ordinary flu (https://californiaglobe.com/section-2/coronavirushysteria-the-numbers-dont-warrant-the-media-hype/). 

Isn’t it striking, too, that none of the government advice deals with things like healthy nutrition, vitamins such a 'C and D, enough exercise, doing things that bring joy, etc., known to reinforce the essential human immune system? And isn’t it strange that such news doesn’t appear in the mainstream media?

Obviously, all of the above-mentioned measures have  considerable negative side effects. It is only logical that these could have been predicted and planned for, but despite detailed legislation, the general impression was one of panic and chaos.  

People will recall the attacks of 9/11 were said by leading politicians to have been 'completely unforeseeable' and could not have been predicted, despite previous attacks of a similar kind that exercises had anticipated. In similar vein, governments have demonstrated unpreparedness (absence of PPE, testing equipment, immigrant testing and control etc) for the Coronavirus outbreak, despite clear evidence of pre-dating anticipation.

Some examples of the specific expectation of a Coronavirus pandemic follow. The content and timing of these events and documents either display extraordinary prescience, or god forbid the sort of planning with numerous other so-called unexpected 'terrorist events'. 

A.  In the 2018 report Road Map for the Implementation of Actions by the European Commission  announced that the project for mandatory vaccination of each and every world citizen is to be completed by 2022,  See: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf  

B.  The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) 2019 Annual  Report: 'A world at Risk', strongly hints at a second wave,  See: https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf utm_source=mandiner&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=mandiner_202004.
The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB), a new body set up under the aegis of the WHO and the World Bank Group to monitor the world’s readiness to respond to outbreaks and other health emergencies with the financial support provided by the Government of Germany, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, and Resolve to Save Lives.". It had has its origins in the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa but  convened the first meeting on 10th Sept, 2018. The board aims to publish its first report on the global state of preparedness in September 2019. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/10-09-2018-global-preparedness-monitoring-board-convenes-for-the-first-time-in-geneva  The timing could hardly be more propitious but not quite 9/11!

C.  Event 201  was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated  response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic.Similar to the Center’s 3 previous exercises—Clade X, Dark Winter, and Atlantic Storm—Event 201 aimed to educate senior leaders at the highest level of US and international governments and leaders in global industries.

"Fifteen global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future."

"The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. The Event 201 pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, vividly demonstrated a number of these important gaps in pandemic preparedness as well as some of the elements of the solutions between the public and private sectors that will be needed to fill them. 
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation organised the event and jointly proposed these recommendations."

It cannot escape notice how the Gates Foundation keeps cropping up whenever pandemic or vaccination programmes are considered, not to mention tracking technology. Imperial College London, whose Ferguson models predicted 500,000 UK deaths, had apparently been the beneficiary of over £200 million in Gates Foundation grants.


DEVELOPMENTS IN HOLLAND



They are not normal, and shouldn't be in a democratic society either ". According to the Order, emergency regulations provide plenty of space and a new law is not necessary. (https://bit.ly/nw-adviesnova
)

And the College of Human Rights also delivered an opinion: https://bit.ly/nw-mronline

These advice are valuable but not binding during the approval process.
𝗩𝗥𝗔𝗔𝗚𝗧𝗘𝗞𝗘𝗡𝗦
The bill brings a lot of questions. Submission comes at a time when the figures of the RIVM look positive: the number of hospital recordings and corona deaths has decreased drastically in recent weeks and is steadily heading towards the zero line. See the report ′′ Epidemiological situation COVID-19 in the Netherlands 5 June 2020 ": https://bit.ly/nw-rivm-rapport
.

Of course it is in the public interest to ensure that numbers do not rise drastically again. But there are other, less far-reaching possibilities for this, which do not affect our freedom, fundamental rights and human values.
I wonder:
✨ Why at the moment many rules, punishments and extensive powers for the government in the law?
✨ Why a 1,5 meter rule in the law, also for outside? (https://bit.ly/nw-buiten
, https://bit.ly/nw-smartexit
)
✨ Why the high fines?
✨ Why the possibility of prison and community service?
✨ Why now the possibility of breaching our domestic right?


It would be expected that there will be less heavy rules now than at the beginning of the crisis, but nothing is less true.
Furthermore, the law would be in the interest of public health. If it really is:
✨ How is it that the new rules have undeniable negative consequences for our health? (https://bit.ly/nw-artsen
, https://bit.ly/nw-contact-levensbehoefte
)
✨ Then why is it allowed that the law will cause huge economic and social damage, which also has major consequences for our wellbeing and our health? (https://bit.ly/nw-cbs

, https://bit.ly/nw-schade-smartexit
, https://bit.ly/nw-ira
)
✨ Why is not (also) deployed to improve our resistance and is the advice of 1600 care professional not taken seriously? (https://bit.ly/nw-leefstijl

, https://bit.ly/nw-zelfzorg
)

I've always learned that the means must sacred the end. A mosquito won't kill you with a rocket launcher. When I look at the figures of the RIVM and the intended purpose of the law, I see no reason to use these far-reaching, freedom restrictive means and understand the critical attitude of the advisory parties (see above).
I also find it incomprehensible that this law was not discussed during the press conference of Wednesday 5 June. There was mainly talk about ′′ the large package of relaxation ", as Rutte calls it, not about this emergency law, which is a large rule and penalty increase for an indefinite period.
𝗩𝗜𝗝𝗙 𝗩𝗢𝗢𝗥 𝗧𝗪𝗔𝗔𝗟𝗙 𝗘𝗡 𝗪𝗔𝗧 𝗞𝗔𝗡 Í𝗞 𝗗𝗢𝗘𝗡?
As far as I'm concerned, everyone should be aware of the consequences of this bill. We can then take joint action to prevent this proposal from being approved. Fortunately, the newspaper and journal have picked up the subject, but it's still five to twelve.
After the (non-binding) advice of the Council of State, only the First and Second Chamber can stop the law. We can help with that by letting us know:
✅ Sign the main petitions: https://bit.ly/nw-smartexit
, https://bit.ly/nw-petitie
, and https://bit.ly/nw-petitie-vw

✅ Join the Facebook group ′′ NO against 1,5 meters ": https://bit.ly/nw-fb-nee

, at https://www.1.5xbeter.nu
 and https://viruswaanzin.nl

✅ Share this post with as many people as possible or write a piece about it yourself
✅ Inquire your friends and neighbors


If you have any more ideas to spread this news or stop the law approval, please share it with mi
)
Criticism of proposal corona law - Mr. Online
The Dutch Order of Lawyers is critical of the legislative proposal Temporary law measures COVID-19. According to the College of Human Rights, ' human rights risk s' are attached to the law. The law is designed to create a legal basis for corona measures in the other half meter society for a longer term. These are now based on emergency regulations. Legislation [...]



This article explains that the coronavirus bill app confers arbitrary detention powers to the police, immigration officers and public-health officials.
They can detain and isolate ‘potentially’ infectious people.
Any member of the public, including children, could be forcibly detained, isolated, quarantined in an as yet unidentified location. It also enables authorities to forcibly take biological samples from people for testing.
Now let's combine this information with the fact that Matt Hancock wants to mandate the track and trace app and let me paint you a picture.
It's September.... "the second wave" of a virus that has only killed 350 people under 65 with no other morbidities in the UK hits...Again (Or at least the BBC tells you it has)... The app becomes mandatory. It alerts them that you are "potentially infectious"... And you need to be quarantined away from your family. You know, for safety.
That "as yet unidentified location" that they refer to? I'd place a bet that that's when the Nightingale centre suddenly starts getting used.
I hope I'm wrong.