Thursday 24 October 2024

Another nail in the right of people to examine, investigate and challenge official narratives of terrorist or other events in Great Britain.  

Roll-on 1984, where there is only one 'truth' - that of the Government. And forget the Courts protecting the right of free expression in a repressive state. 

The High Court has found against Richard D. Hall, and that he breached the criminal tort of 'harassment' under the Harassment Act 1997.  Hall in a previous hearing was barred from presenting factual information to support his claims.  How can this be natural justice?

29.10.2024:  Sam T. Abraham

Earlier today your foreign secretary David Lammy said calling Israel's assault on Gaza a genocide "undermines the seriousness" of past genocides, where millions were killed, implying that the legal definition requires a threshold of deaths that Gaza has not yet reached.
15h
Reply
Sam T. Abraham If so utterly disgusting. As I have said elsewhere, the Western strategy is to down-play and normalise the obscenities in Gaza and elswhere committed by Isreal - presumably because it is fully implicated in them. Britain will never again be able to lay claim to its 'moral values' or prosecute 'terrorists' without running the risk of outright ridicule or being struck with a lightening bolt from heaven!


See also: MANCHESTER 'BOMBING' - FREE SPEECH AT STAKE. The Trial of Richard D. Hall. @  https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2024/10/manchester-bombing-free-speech-at-stake.html

From Facebook:

Greetings,
Thank you to everyone who has so far made a donation to my legal case.
In this video I provide an update ...
If you wish to view the details of the claim being made against me, you can find the claim and the defence from this link provided by Andrew Johnson
...
If you wish to donate you can find details here ...
Thank you,
Richard

  

I wonder if somebody can clear this up regarding the Manchester inquest. No family members were at the pre-inquest hearing according to news reports. But the press must have been there as they have reported what was presented at the hearing. If the media were allowed to attend, why were the public not allowed to attend? - What is the point of allowing the press to attend but not the families? I find it hard to believe that of the relatives of 22 people, not one person did not wish to, or was not allowed to attend? - Inquests are public hearings - that is the point of inquests that they are public so that justice is seen to be carried out.
I've just spoken to a solicitor who states that the families do have the right to attend the pre-inquest hearing, but that often they will ONLY attend the main hearing, not the pre-inquest.


Cornwall schoolgirl wins award in memory of girl killed in Manchester Arena attack

Ruby is the first-ever winner of the national award after Saffie Roussos' parents were determined she be remembered for more than just the youngest person killed in the bombing


Ruby Reid is the first winner of the Saffie's Smile Award


A schoolgirl from Cornwall is the first ever winner of a national award created in memory of the little girl who was killed in the bombing at Manchester Arena. The Saffie’s Smile Award is dedicated to Saffie Roussos, who died in the terror attack at the Ariana Grande concert in 2017.

Her parents, Andrew and Lisa, wanted to create a positive memory of their daughter rather than for her to simply be remembered as the youngest person to die in the bombing. They teamed up with the Sun newspaper to establish an award which celebrates children aged 16 and under who have shown remarkable character and have gone above and beyond to support others.

After receiving entries from across the country, Andrew and Lisa chose Ruby Reid, from St Blazey, as the first winner. The Roussos family surprised Ruby with her award at Longleat Safari Park in Wiltshire last month while the teen was fulfilling a lifelong dream of feeding giraffes.

Ruby, 16, acts as the main carer for her mum Emma Burr, 55, who has ME - also known as chronic fatigue syndrome - and depression. Ruby was also diagnosed with depression when she was around nine years old after being bullied in school, and on October 4, 2020, her big brother Charley, 25, took his own life after being unable to cope with lockdown.

Emma said it came as a huge surprise to her to learn that her daughter had won and she had to keep it a secret from Ruby until they went to Longleat. She explained: “I got a call and was told we were going to Longleat as Ultra VIPs and to meet Andrew and Lisa.

“So, we went and had our hair and makeup done, got in a Jeep with a videographer, a photographer, and the hair and makeup artist. Ruby was so excited to be in an actual safari park. We went off to feed the giraffes, then Andrew and Lisa appeared to give Ruby the news that she had won.

“They felt she embodied everything Saffie was. Her liveliness. Her passion, her ability to make everyone smile and her kindness. Ruby felt she didn’t deserve it but Andrew and Lisa, who not for one moment felt like strangers, said she was exactly the person they were looking for.”

Saffie Roussos was the youngest person killed in the Manchester concert bombing 
As well as winning the first ever award, Ruby and her family were presented with a trip to New York City, the place where Saffie’s Smile Award was initially launched in July. Ruby will now celebrate her 17th birthday in New York - and it just so happens that she and Saffie share the same birthday.

“We’ll be taking [Saffie] with us, back to New York which she loved,” Emma said. “Remembering her spirit, the lives she touched and not for how she died but how she lived. I’m not quite sure how I’ll manage it but I’ll put every penny into making sure [Ruby] goes.

“We can’t thank the Sun newspaper or Saffie’s mum and dad, Andrew and Lisa, for giving [Ruby] this amazing opportunity. I only wish that it was her brother taking her not me but he”ll be there with us.” ARTICLE ENDS.


BBC NEWS: 

Manchester Arena attack: Saffie Roussos' father plans to sue MI5

  • Published

FAMILY HANDOUT

The father of the youngest victim in the Manchester Arena attack has said he intends to sue MI5.

The head of the security agency said it was "profoundly sorry" that it did not prevent the suicide bombing which killed 22 people in 2017. 

The apology followed a public inquiry which found MI5 missed opportunities to stop the attacker Salman Abedi.

Andrew Roussos, whose daughter Saffie was killed, told Times Radio that "MI5 have, for me, most of the blame".

He said families of some of the other victims had indicated they might join him in legal action.

Twenty-two people were killed and hundreds were injured when Abedi detonated his device after an Ariana Grande concert on 22 May 2017.


Lisa Roussos, seen with her husband Andrew, underwent months of treatment after being injured in the attack

Speaking about the plan to sue MI5, Mr Roussos told Times Radio: "It's the only way to learn, everybody learns by hitting them hard in the pocket, I am sorry to say.

"At 2017 we were at the highest alert and everybody was warned of an attack in this country and MI5 who their sole job - they are well-funded and well-equipped - had 22 pieces of information about Salman Abedi.

"So if they would have learnt lessons they wouldn't have allowed Abedi to walk into that arena.

"So yes MI5 have, for me, most of the blame."

On Thursday, inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders said intelligence could have led to Manchester-born Abedi being followed to the car where he stored explosives, which were then moved to a flat to assemble the bomb.

He said that, if MI5 had acted on the intelligence received, the 22-year-old could also have been stopped at Manchester Airport on his return from Libya four days before the attack.

Watch: Inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders speaks of "significant missed opportunity"

In a rare public statement, MI5 director-general Ken McCallum said: "I am profoundly sorry that MI5 did not prevent the attack."

He added "had we managed to seize the slim chance we had, those impacted might not have experienced such appalling loss and trauma".

Mr Roussos said Abedi "should not have made it to that arena that night, there were too many missed opportunities".

He described his eight-year-old daughter as a "human magnet full of love", adding that he "can't accept apologies for losing Saffie, I want Saffie back in my life and I can't have that.

"If you want to make an apology something meaningful, apologise from day one - that would mean a lot more than waiting for an inquiry to see if you are - in any way, shape or form - to blame for this attack."

His solicitors at Broudie Jackson Canter are looking at a possible High Court claim based on the Human Rights Act, which protects the right to life.

Following Thursday's publication of the third and final report from the inquiry, MI5 said it had made more than 100 improvements since the attack.

It followed two reports, published in 2021 and 2022, which were highly critical of the private companies and public authorities involved with the arena and the emergency response. ARTICLE ENDS.







Martin Hibbert and another -v- Richard D Hall

High CourtKing's Bench DivisionMedia and Communications ListJudgment

Skip to related content

Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 2677 (KB)
Case No: KB-2023-002102

In the High Court of Justice
King’s Bench Division
Media and Communications List

22 October 2024

Before:

The Hon. Mrs Justice Steyn DBE

Between:

Martin Hibbert

Eve Hibbert (by her mother and litigation friend Sarah Gillbard)

-v-

Richard D Hall







No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.