Tuesday, 12 March 2024


Hampstead Hoax ?

The title of this Channel Four/Story Films film, leaves little to the imagination. Of course all these programmes - and I use the term advisedly - leave out the important constituents of the children's and mother's testimony. Expect another white-wash!


22.3.2024: Anyone who watches the original interviews will realise what a corrupt police and court process it was, with dire implications for our legal and media systems. I'm trying to think who was the Prime Minister, Justice Secretary, Home Secretary, Director of Public Prosecutions and Metropolitan Police Commissioner at the time? See: https://www.youtube.com/@KaneSlater2024/videos


Children interviews:




It's interesting that this programme that stars an Ukrainian mother in Britain, is followed by another that is clearly anti-Russian. 

Watch Live: 20 Days in Mariupol



This is all sophisticated propaganda with clear attitudinal aims. Hopefully people will see through it. Thank you Channel 4, well known to be under the lash.





Delighted that Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax was picked up so favourably in the papers this weekend.

Thank you to Peter Beard and Story Films for backing this films from the earliest of days, and for all of your support and wisdom.

Thank you to Channel 4 and Shaminder Nahal for the trust you placed in me to tell this story.

Thanks to an incredible team who pulled out all the stops - especially Lorenzo Levrini and the genuis that is Mr Simon McMahon. Thanks to Ed Harcourt-Smith for leaning so fully in to the madness.

Huge thanks to the mums for standing up and speaking out for what’s right and the truth, and for so bravely telling your stories.

Please do tune in - Monday 11th March, Channel 4, 9pm - or catch up on All4.

Complimented by Josh Wilkins here: https://storyfilms.tv/story-films-team/


EVENING STANDARD REVIEW (The 'flaws' are discussed - see below)

"Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax on Channel 4 review - a chilling warning tale
"Despite flaws, this gripping documentary is a reminder of just how dangerous conspiracy theories are." https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/tvfilm/accused-the-hampstead-paedophile-hoax-review-channel-4-b1144449.html
"Conspiracy theories are a defining feature of 21st century life. You are only ever a quick Google search away from a documentary linking Israel to 9/11, or articles claiming that Covid was created in a military lab in the US.

"But in recent years, discussions that were once confined to the dark corners of internet chatrooms have exploded into the political mainstream. Leaders on the far right speak of a shadowy “deep state” controlling global affairs, while as many as 16 per cent of Americans subscribe to the QAnon theory that Donald Trump is leading a war against a cabal of Satan-worshipping paedophiles."

"SABINE MCNEILL. A GERMAN CONTRIBUTOR IN THE FILM WHO WAS JAILED FOR INTERNET STALKING
CHANNEL 4"

"Conspiracy theorists are often opportunistic grifters. Some are in it for power; others are in it to make a small fortune spouting crackpot ideas to a gullible audience on YouTube or Rumble. But the most sinister are those like McNeill, for whom there can be no redemption or path back to reality: they genuinely believe every word they say."

"While the documentary does an excellent job of telling the four wronged women’s stories, Turner makes an unusual choice to dub the audio from her interviews with the real mothers onto the actors. Presumably, this was intended to increase the sense of authenticity, but it unfortunately produces a clunky mess and there are actors whose voices do not match their faces at all.

"The technique was also recently used in Apple TV’s The Enfield Haunting, where tapes from the 1970s were dubbed clumsily onto scenes played by actors. It feels like a gimmick more than something that adds value.

"Despite its flaws though, Accused: The Hampstead Paedophile Hoax is a compelling story, brilliantly told, and a chilling reminder that conspiracy theories are not just the harmless spoutings of lunatics on the margins of society."



Tim Veater
Eduard De Boer I caught it half way through. It's the second bite at the cherry by that company. It's purpose was clear from its title: the whole Hampstead thing was a big HOAX, the children were tortured to say what they did, the Hampstead parents were the victims of cruel harassment. As usual with careful editing this thesis was supported, all the people who took a stand were mad or bad. I too have and had serious reservations about some of the 'actors', both here and abroad, but nothing to shake my belief in the voracity of the childrens' testimony or the corrupt way it was handled. I have serious reservations behind the company and its motivation. It would be interesting to see who actually funds it just as it would be interesting to know who was actually behind 'Hoaxstead Research'. It doesn't take much imagination to think who might be. It fits a pattern of not too subtle rubbishing of reality and expunging the past. It is deeply disingenuous and manipulative, posing as the opposite. The State is determined to expunge all traces of these inconvenient truths. Richard D Hall is the latest target of television, media and sponsored individuals working together to prevent western narratives being challenged from 9/11 onwards. Assange is still incarcerated without charge. Alex Belfield was gaoled in much the same way as Sabine. All the 90's claims of a political paedophile ring have been debunked and the principal accuser gaoled for lying. See how the programme fits the government agenda of media control with perfect timing. The government message is that 'satanic' child abuse is pure fantasy, whilst being instrumental in the murder of untold thousands of children in at least two theatres of war, yet no one says what could be more 'satanic' than that.

14.3.2024
Sabine Kurjo McNeill
Tim Veater "evil and/or foolish" - Thank You for reminding me of Anna Pauffley's formulation in her judgment. Jon Wedger recommends complaining to Ofcom which has to be done within 20 days.
Sabine Kurjo McNeill I am glad you survived your incarceration so well Sabine. The above film was obviously an unethical parody of a 'hatchet job', where sedulous editing can prove Stalin a saint or St Francis, a sinner. As I have said elsewhere, Richard D Hall is currently in the cross hairs for his work on the Manchester scam, using very similar techniques, although he had the good sense to refuse to cooperate with the BBC unless given an assurance he had editorial control over the content. Of course they refused and so did he, yet they still invaded his privacy to record an interview and interviened to disrupt his YouTube and other legitimate business activity. The media take on his case, the missing Nicola Bulley incident and the Hampstead one, all helpfully dovetail with Government plans and policy, as with this https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68556914 and this https://www.gov.uk/.../a-guide-to-the-online-safety-bill.... I have always thought and argued, that the approach of the police, courts, government and media's to the Hampstead case, proves that its implications go far deeper and darker than even the alleged abuse of children.

The following video and text:

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.