Saturday 13 January 2024

AOL Censorship!



18.1.2024: 

18.1.2024:  This is AOL for you. It blocks anything and everything I comment on, none of which actually contravenes their 'guidelines'. Freedom of expression on these platforms? You must be joking.
"Your comment on "Watch: Russia’s most advanced tank destroyed by US Bradley fighting vehicle" violates the community guidelines and has been rejected
publisher's logo
Timothy Thu 18 Jan 2024 05:40:58 PM
'Just hugely depressing.'"
How does suggesting a 'gung ho' piece on blowing up a tank and killing its young occupants "Depressing" contravene AOL's standards unless it supports and condones war atrocities?

Your comment on "Post office owner says Horizon system was used to frame him for wife’s murder" violates the community guidelines and has been rejected
publisher's logo
Timothy Sat 13 Jan 2024 01:22:24 PM
As we saw with the Bulley case, once police are fixated on a theory, all others are abandoned, and conflicting evidence, as with the discovered items and 'lost' hair sample, not followed up. The urge to get a conviction and prove the police right, over-powers objectivity and justice. We see this all the time both in failing to prosecute when it should, and prosecuting when it shouldn't. 'Justice' in Britain is very often a 'hit or miss' affair.


AOL for some reason rejects all and any of my submissions to comment. This must be automated as my 'appeal' against the rejection was also rejected immediately. It seems therefore, that for some unexplained reason, AOL is operating a blanket ban on me expressing any opinion. This certainly appears to be counter to its declared support for free speech. There follows a copy of the comment AOL stated infringed its 'Community guidelines'.

"As we saw with the Bulley case, once police are fixated on a theory, all others are abandoned, and conflicting evidence, as with the discovered items and 'lost' hair sample, not followed up. The urge to get a conviction and prove the police right, over-powers objectivity and justice. We see this all the time both in failing to prosecute when it should, and prosecuting when it shouldn't. 'Justice' in Britain is very often a 'hit or miss' affair."
Apparently AOL is well known for censoring free speech as in the following:

OPINION

From the Right: AOL has joined the 'Dark Side' against free speech




'Trust in one another'  The voice of the WEF.

Did you see Cameron before the Foreign Affairs Committee? Enough to make you puke. The callousness of government is breathtaking. The same phenonenom is apparent with excess vaccine deaths here: https://parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/664b688c-cf82-4280-8d3d-8a2169c78d11?_gl=1*meyp0i*_ga*OTIwMTI3NDkuMTcwNDc5MDM3NA..*_ga_L0NJWDWMGN*MTcwNTM5MDg5Ni42LjAuMTcwNTM5MDg5Ni42MC4wLjA
Government doesn't really give a toss about injustice or mass killing unless it suits a political agenda.
The speech in this 'mini' debate by the Labour Opposition spokesperson on health (Obena Oppong-Asare) was just about the worst, except for her fellow Labour MP. Just diatribe and drivel. As the Minister herself said, "The Elephant in the room was whether the vaccines had caused the excess deaths." Note it is now a given that for the past three years there WERE many thousands of excess deaths (as I have predicted and described throughout). Government and its agencies just will not reveal the details. They are terrified that the truth will evidence a scandal even greater than that of the Post Office prosecutions. They are being dragged, fighting and screaming to admit what a calamitous policy lock-down and vaccinations were.

The article on which I commented is here:


Post office owner says Horizon system was used to frame him for wife’s murder


Updated 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.