The absurd nature of our Security State.


https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html



All media attention has focused on the melee on the bridge in which an acknowledged 'terrorist' was it seems, shot dead, when he could have been arrested. Yet the circumstances surrounding the deaths of Merritt and Jones have remained opaque to say the least. Presumably there is video of this, but nothing has emerged. Did these stabbings occur inside the building or outside of it? Are we sure that the man on the bridge carried them out or could it possibly have been someone else, so far unidentified? What reliable evidence has been produced that clearly shows Us man Khan doing it? Of course questions still remain how the latter was able to travel to London, despite wearing an electronic tag and well outside his permitted area, without MI5 being fully aware; or able to gain access to a conference on crime, with fake suicide vest and two large knives without being challenged; or why a conference full of ex-criminals was not provided with security vetting at the door or CCTV; or how Khan, out of all the attendees was able to locate and target the one person in charge of organising the event.


https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html

Despite apparently acting alone and unaided, remarkably ISIS (which we were all told had been defeated and eradicated) subsequently claimed responsibility for the attack. If this is correct it would prove a fundamental flaw in security surveillance procedures, given this was a known and convicted terrorist out on licence. Would not the communications of such a person continue to be monitored by GCHQ as a prime target? We are told we ALL have to be monitored, but not apparently convicted terrorists breaching their licence conditions. If so this case is a model of the absurd nature of our security state.


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/london-bridge-attack-latest-news-narwhal-tusk-lukasz-poland-a9229016.html



Of course, as always the story has now moved on to heroes, vigils, mass mourning, and memes of togetherness, forgiveness and love, whilst the hard questions are skated over on the winter ice.

In this Times video https://youtu.be/GzBFK_EXE9U white artic lorry straddles highway @ 0:27 secs.
But then @ 0:36 secs. no sign of lorry straddling highway.

How can both be of the same incident????

Is it a signal by the off duty Transport Policeman? And if so what for? https://www.bitchute.com/video/W8Nae59U8TkR/?fbclid=IwAR0lSTGZK_d-ugLyjdxYUxOCGYxh8wl_rZN0majR6unJOEWOWcHyefQq9A4




Then subsequently some very strange stuff that went viral about the death of the Queen from an heart attack!!!
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/technology/the-real-story-behind-rumours-queen-was-dead-royal-navy-makes-red-faced-apology-and-admits-gibbo-whatsapp-text-that-sparked-worldwide-scare-was-from-military-exercise/ar-BBXQrBS?ocid=spartandhp

A user called 'Gibbo', wrote on the group chat: 'Queen's passed away this morning, heart attack, being announced 930 AM tomorrow (sic).' 

The message also says: 'Channel dash 0800 tomorrow in full number 1s, in your black kit bag you need: 1 set of 3s 1 set of 4s Underwear and socks for 2 weeks (sic).'

The screengrabs claim to give instructions sent to guards.

But the comrades are uncertain of Gibbo and one called Ricey says he has text another 'guy in the guards' to confirm.  

Other users in the group chat include 'Burnsy', 'Cheeks', 'Josh' and 'Morty' who are understood to have been between serving military personnel.

Within 24 hours, it has been shared by thousands of people worldwide, with hashtags #GodSaveTheQueen, #QueenDead and #BuckinghamPalace trending on Twitter.  

Royal Navy officials have confirmed that the message was part of a practise military exercise. 

It is believed that someone received the exercise recall message and thinking it to be real, then forwarded it on further.  

Servicemen based at the Royal Navy Air Station (RNAS) Yeovilton had been practising for an Operation London Bridge recall - the codename used for when the Queen dies.

A Royal Navy spokesman said: 'We can confirm an internal exercise took place at Royal Naval Air Station Yeovilton in line with established contingency plans for recall of personnel.

'These exercises are conducted on a regular basis and no significance should be drawn from the timing of the exercise.

'While the exercise was conducted properly, we regret any misunderstanding this may have caused.'

Buckingham Palace was forced to respond after the maelstrom of social media speculation, with a royal spokeswoman downplaying the rumours and saying it was 'business as usual'.   

Former paratrooper Alfie Usher shared the initial WhatsApp message to his Facebook followers on his Fill Your Boots UK military humour page.