AT LAST!

A glimmer of hope from the Government that it will at last take practical steps to oppose the Israeli regime in its genocidal policies. Maybe it's 'too little, too late', but it is also a sea-change in the attitude of our Parliament. Perhaps it was best summed up by the emotional and powerful contribution by the MP for Wrekin, Mark Pritchard (Read below).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9dws0yuaPY

"For many years - I have been in this house for twenty years - I have supported Israel - pretty much at all costs quite frankly, but today I want to say I got it wrong. 

I condemn Israel for what it is doing to the Palestinian people in Gaza and indeed in the West Bank. And I would like to withdraw my support for the actions of Israel right now, for what they are doing right now in Gaza.  

Of course the hostages should be released, of course Israel has the right to exist, of course the Israeli people - the Jewish people - should have the right to live in peace - but so do the Palestinian people. 

I've said it before and I'll say it again, that the life of a Palestinian child is as precious as the life of a Jewish child, and at this particular moment in time - we've had lots of statements over the last eighteen months - this is not only not this Parliament's greatest hour, I am really concerned this is a moment in history, where people will look back and say we got it wrong as a country. 

Can the Minister stand up to our friends and allies in the United States and make a strong stand for humanity, for us to be on the right side of history, to have the moral courage to lead, not just to follow the United States and to make a difference. 

That's why we were all elected here. Let's stand up for life, let's stand up for all children, not just Jewish children." 

MARK PRITCHARD, MP.

Oral statement to Parliament

Minister for the Middle East statement on Gaza

Minister for the Middle East Hamish Falconer made a statement to the House of Commons on Gaza.

Delivered 6th May, 2025

https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/minister-for-the-middle-east-statement-on-gaza#:~:text=We%20strongly%20oppose%20the%20expansion,want%20this%20war%20to%20end.

With your permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, I will make a statement on the Middle East.

Yesterday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that the Israel Security Cabinet has approved a plan to expand and intensify Israel’s military operations in Gaza.

He said that the Israeli Defence Force operations will extend across more of Gaza. Tactics will no longer involve short raids – with the implication that Israel will hold the ground it takes. Reports suggest that the plans could include full military occupation of the entire Gaza Strip. Prime Minister Netanyahu said that Gaza’s population will be moved ‘for its protection’. Tens of thousands of reservists are being called up. In parallel, the Security Cabinet reportedly approved a plan to deliver aid through private companies.

This comes at a time, Madam Deputy Speaker, when the scale of civilian suffering and humanitarian need is already intolerable. More than 52,000 people have now been killed in Gaza. Israel has fully blocked the entry of humanitarian aid for over two months. The World Food Programme says their food stockpile has been exhausted.

These announcements from the Israeli government have rightly sparked grave concern that this conflict, which has already wrought so much bloodshed and suffering, may enter a dangerous new phase.

I know that concern will be felt right across the House.

Let me make the Government’s position crystal clear.

We strongly oppose the expansion of Israel’s operations.

Any attempt to annex land in Gaza would be unacceptable.

Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change.

We want this war to end.

We want an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages, the urgent provision of humanitarian aid and a pathway to a political solution.

Madam Deputy Speaker,

All of us recognise that Hamas continues to hold hostages in the cruellest fashion.

Their actions show the complete disregard for the interests of the Palestinian people.

Hamas must not divert aid for their own financial gain or use civilian infrastructure for military purposes.

We repeat our demand for the immediate release of the hostages.

But an expansion of this conflict is not the route to achieve their safe return.

That is why it is strongly opposed by so many hostage families themselves.

It is negotiations which offer the best hope of ending the agony of those waiting for loved ones held captive, alleviating the suffering of civilians, and ending Hamas’ control of Gaza.

It is evident that Hamas cannot be defeated through military means alone.

And an expansion of military operations will result in the deaths of more innocent civilians, and put the hostages at yet greater risk.

The fighting must stop.

The Government has said since day one in office that the only way to ensure a path towards long-term peace and stability is an immediate ceasefire, the release of hostages, better protection of civilians, and significantly more aid entering Gaza.

Diplomacy is how we ensure security for Israelis and Palestinians - not more bloodshed.

All the people of this region deserve to live in peace, prosperity and security.

We urge all parties to return urgently to talks, implement the ceasefire agreement in full and work towards a permanent peace.

We continue to use our full diplomatic weight to bring about a ceasefire and end the suffering.

After more than two months of aid into Gaza being blocked, Palestinians continue to face immense suffering.

Essential supplies of food and medicine are either no longer available or quickly running out.

As the UN has said, it is hard to see how, if implemented, the new Israeli plan to deliver aid through private companies would be consistent with humanitarian principles and meet the scale of the need. We need urgent clarity from the Israeli government on their intentions.

We must remember what is at stake. These humanitarian principles matter for every conflict around the world. They should be applied consistently in every warzone.

As we have said repeatedly, humanitarian aid must never be used as a political tool and Israel is bound under international law to allow the unhindered passage of humanitarian aid.

I repeat my call for Israel to engage with partners to allow for a rapid and unhindered resurgence in the flow of aid into Gaza.

We reiterate our outrage at recent strikes by Israeli forces on humanitarian workers, on infrastructure, and healthcare facilities. Israel must do far more to protect the civilian population and humanitarian workers, and hold to account those who are responsible.

Over a year since the appalling attack on the World Central Kitchen in which three British nationals were tragically killed, we continue to press for a conclusion to the Israeli investigation and a decision as to whether criminal proceedings will be brought.

The UN and humanitarian partners must be able to carry out their work in safety, in accordance with their principles. 

Madam Deputy Speaker,

Last week we welcomed Prime Minister Mustafa of the Palestinian Authority to the United Kingdom. We signed a landmark Memorandum of Understanding and confirmed a £101m package of support for the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

We will continue to support the Palestinian Authority as the only legitimate governing entity in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including in Gaza.

During the visit we reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to a two-state solution.

It is only a political horizon towards a two-state solution that can ensure the long-term peace and security of both Palestinians and Israelis.

I commend this statement to the House.

Updates to this page

Published 6 May 2025

WHAT ISRAELI OCCUPATION MEANS TO A PALESTINIAN

Dolores Peers

erotsdSpon5577993 i59a259g8f5cta1fy2M mM4af0:tA fmlu igama07  · 

Fatma Hussein Areib was 11 when she packed up and left her home in Burayr, a village near Gaza that was taken by elite Palmach soldiers during Israel's War of Independence. "My parents were very scared of the war and said we had to leave," she recalls of the moments that forever changed her life. "I held my nephew's hand and we walked a great distance to look for a safe place."

During this displacement march – Burayr is around 18 kilometers (11 miles) northeast of the Gaza Strip – the family made it to the town of Majdal, where Israel's resurrected city of Ashkelon is today.

Majdal later fell, and the Areibs spent a few days there. They then arrived in Deir al-Balah in central Gaza, eventually settling in the Shabura refugee camp in Rafah at Gaza's southern tip. In later years, Fatma married and moved in with her husband in the Jabalya refugee camp in the north, where the couple started a family.

In October 2023, as part of the war that followed Hamas' attack, northern Gazans were ordered to leave their homes. At 86, Fatma Hussein Areib found herself packing up again, but this time she was in a wheelchair. She and her family relocated to Rafah, where they spent around seven months.

Last May, when the Israeli army invaded the area, the family headed back to Deir al-Balah. "There are similarities between the 1948 Nakba and what has been going on in this war now," she told Palestinian news agency Wafa after relocating to Rafah. "The thirst, the hunger and the search for a safe place were the main things back then. But this war now is much harder; entire families have been wiped out."

In a new Hebrew-language book whose title can be translated as "A Lexicon of Brutality," Adam Raz and Assaf Bondy seek to contribute to the Israeli debate on the war in Gaza and its horrific results.

"The lexicon has come out in book form, but it's far from complete – not just because more entries need to be included, but because these entries aren't 'history' but a continuous present," Raz and Bondy write in the introduction. "The entries keep evolving under the shower of shells and missiles, as the pile of bodies in Gaza keeps growing. The rationale behind the policy that produces this is still in power."

We'd like to avoid falling into the symmetry trap that seeks to defuse any deep criticism. The book cries out the language prevalent during the war, but its roots reach well before that, of course.

Assaf Bondy

As the authors put it, as words lose their moral gravitas, it's more important than ever to observe how the Israeli discourse shapes the collective consciousness about the Palestinians. This shaping creates a violent reality that ties in directly to the 1948 Nakba, when more than 700,000 Arabs fled or were expelled from their homes during the War of Independence.

According to Raz and Bondy, the use of militaristic, aggressive and violent language not only minimizes the Palestinians' humanity, it shapes perceptions of reality and public behavior. Analysts, politicians and other people in key positions manipulate words and phrases and in the end control Israelis' thoughts and behavior.

Part of the war goals

It could be that if Fatma Hussein Areib's story were reported in the wider Israeli media today, it would be filtered through neutral phrases, hiding the tragedy. We would probably see anchorman Dany Cushmaro interviewing experts like retired general Giora Eiland, who would explain that "there are no uninvolved people in Gaza" and that the only solution is the "Generals' Plan," which champions the blocking of food supplies.

Military analyst Nir Dvori would read out "the IDF spokesperson's comment," telling how Israeli forces had taken the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza-Egypt border, so people like Fatma had to evacuate to "humanitarian zones."

Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would probably stress the need for "depopulation" and "voluntary emigration," noting that this was part of the "war goals." To him, as to most studio guests, Fatma and everyone in Gaza are an "existential threat," so "Gaza should be leveled" by "strategic bombing."

In "A Lexicon of Brutality," Raz and Bondy have compiled around 150 phrases including "no uninvolved people in Gaza," "starvation," "transfer" and "Nakba 2023" that have peppered the Israeli discourse during the war. We see these phrases in the work of journalists, researchers and human rights activists.

"We wanted to take these commonly used phrases, like the song 'Harbu Darbu,' and ask that readers stop for a moment and see what this phrase means, and how by normalizing it we're becoming a brutal society," says Bondy, a sociologist.

"We don't ignore the horrors that Hamas perpetrated against us Israelis. We also don't ignore the horrors perpetrated by Hamas against Palestinians.

6:29 A.M. is not the starting point of the tragedy we are living through. People who insist that it is seek to conceal the context, the history of repression.

From 'A Lexicon of Brutality'

"But we'd like to avoid falling into the symmetry trap that seeks to defuse any deep and genuine criticism. The book cries out the language prevalent during the war, but its roots reach well before that, of course."

The book opens with the phrase "6:29 A.M." – when Hamas' onslaught across the border region began. According to Bondy and Raz, "6:29 A.M. is not the starting point of the tragedy we are living through. People who insist that it is seek to conceal the context, the history of repression – 6:28 A.M. Every action, anywhere and anytime, comes in a context."

According to Raz, a historian and researcher at the Akevot Institute for Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Research, "Understanding the context allows us to understand why we reached a reality where thousands of Palestinians were willing to perpetrate horrors against Israeli civilians and foreign nationals. This context also works in the other direction: why so many Israelis were willing to legitimize the bombing and starving of the civilian Palestinian population, as well as a policy of untrammeled firepower.

"The rationale behind the military's operations in Gaza and the West Bank wasn't born on October 7. You can go back to the starting point: 1948. Israel deported hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, destroyed villages, allowed the public to loot the property of their former neighbors, to dry out orchards and fields, and to use great physical violence."

Phrases like "Second Nakba" and "Nakba 2023" in "A Lexicon of Brutality" convey the Palestinians' perception of the war, amid images of mass graves in Gaza, mass killing and bodies strewn in the streets. These terms are also used by Israelis.

In November 2023, Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter was asked by Channel 12 whether images of people fleeing northern Gaza could be compared to images of the Nakba. He replied: "We are now in fact unleashing the Gaza Nakba." When asked again whether this was a "Gaza Nakba," he said: "The 2023 Gaza Nakba. This is how this will end."

In 2021, Raz wrote about the 1948 Deir Yassin massacre in Haaretz, where, using testimonies and documents, he put together a chilling picture of killings by Israeli soldiers during the War of Independence. The unveiling of minutes from cabinet meetings in 1948 reinforced the realization that the government was aware of what was happening and that the Deir Yassin massacre wasn't unusual.

Today, phrases in "A Lexicon" such as "depopulation," "rubble," "voluntary emigration" and "Amalekites" – mentioned in the general Israeli debate and by politicians alike – give Palestinians a feeling of déjà vu. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even said on October 29, 2023: "This is our second War of Independence …. This is our life's task; it's also my life's task."

In Deir Yassin and Kafr Qasem the killing was done at close range. Today, a pilot drops a one-ton bomb on a humanitarian zone, sometimes without knowing what he's bombing.

Adam Raz

As Raz puts it, "Minutes from cabinet meetings in 1948, released after decades and still not in full, show that alongside decision-makers' awareness of events on the ground such as expulsions and acts of massacre and looting, some also expressed shock. It's obvious that many cabinet members realized that their deeds would shape the society taking shape.

"The current government stands out . ... That is, there is an explicit policy of transfer, murder and starvation, and this is leading more and more people in Israel and around the world to blame Israel for perpetrating the crime of crimes: genocide."

Raz adds: "In Deir Yassin and Kafr Qasem the killing was done at close range. Today, a pilot, maybe a [left-wing] Meretz voter, drops a one-ton bomb on a humanitarian zone, sometimes without knowing what he's bombing. The next day he opens Haaretz, reads a story and gets angry. He's not willing for his country to act with such brutality. There's no doubt that the conditions of the fighting have changed."

According to Bondy, notable about the current war "is the brutal use of words. There's no longer any shame or desire to conceal. That's what's so unique about this war. From the first moment, the leaders have been saying exactly what they're going to do – and they do exactly that.

"This is so shocking that we decided that, rather than focus on the actual deeds or a legal analysis of the deeds, we would focus on the language that lays bare so much of the deeds but mainly the reality we live in."

Some of the phrases in the book refer directly to Israeli society such as "Israeli flag." "Already during the judicial overhaul in the months before the war, the center and left appropriated the national flag after it had been a staple of right-wing displays such as the Flag March in East Jerusalem," Raz and Bondy write.

"The waving of flags at protests reflected a war over 'the home,' over the country, over the essence of the regime." But the two authors add that "the flag also expresses the exclusion of Israeli Palestinians from the protest against the war, as well as for a hostage deal.

"Waving the flag does reflect an honest desire to topple the current bloody government, but it also sometimes indicates an acceptance of the reality of recent decades: occupation, Jewish supremacy, settler violence and the theft of Palestinian property. This was evident when many people were moved when they saw our brave soldiers raising the flag in Gaza in November 2023 (and many times since)."

Nothing new

The deeper you delve into the phrases in "A Lexicon of Brutality," the more you realize that the contemporary linguistic strategy reflects a perception of Palestinians that began in 1948 and is still going strong.

For example, "humanitarian zones" replaces the "security zones" seen in previously censored documents in the state archives. That phrase substitutes for the transfer of Palestinians after their cities were taken in 1948.

According to Jaffa resident Ismail Abu Shehade in one document, "They surrounded us with barbed wire and three gates; we could only leave the zone to work in one of the citrus orchards around town, which required confirmation from our employer."

Today, however, no free movement is allowed in Gaza, and a Palestinian moving around is taking a risk, as told by Aisha, a former Gaza City resident who relocated to the Muwasi area in southwest Gaza, which was declared a humanitarian zone.

"We're afraid to go back to the city because we're scared we'll run into the army and be shot at," she told Haaretz. "The sense is being stranded and under threat of death because humanitarian zones sometimes get bombed, too."

In 1948, the phrase "voluntary emigration" was employed to cushion a policy of displacement in moderate, emotionless words. According to minutes from cabinet meetings, Minority Affairs Minister Bechor-Shalom Sheetrit addressed the displacement of Palestinians in the central city of Lod.

"According to military estimates, 3,000 residents remain. Forty-eight hours after the conquest, no residents remain in either Lod or Ramle. I wasn't aware of, nor could I get a response, on whether those residents have been displaced by force or voluntarily.

"If they left voluntarily, that's their own business. If they have been displaced by force, this must be sorted out.

"The [Arab] population around the country, mainly in the cities, has greatly decreased. In the villages where some residents remain, a constant war [of words] is going on with the army on whether to leave them alone or displace them. My demand is to set a clear line of action that will prevent the lawlessness that has taken root on our side."

The term "looting," also in "A Lexicon," isn't new either. This phenomenon happened in 1948, as described by Raz in his Hebrew-language book "Looting of Arab Property in the War of Independence." "In the lexicon we show that commanders allowed soldiers to loot. This is a combination of greed and revenge against Palestinians," he says.

"What's so surprising here is that in 1948 this was nothing to boast about. No opinion pieces came out in favor. But today, there are videos of soldiers looting that are almost pornographic. That is, they see it as something positive. They expect to earn cultural capital from their looting."

Some of the phrases are context-dependent. For example, the phrase "The IDF still has a lot of work to do" recalls Smotrich's remarks in 2021 when he addressed Arab lawmakers from the Knesset podium. "You are here by mistake," he said. "Ben-Gurion didn't get the job done and didn't throw you out in 1948."

Raz: 'Today, there are videos of soldiers looting that are almost pornographic. That is, they see it as something positive.'

Raz sees this as one link in a long chain. "Nothing is new here. When they talk about 'starvation,' Israel didn't begin depriving Palestinians of food just now. It has been counting calories for them for years, on both sides of the Green Line."

He backs his claims with documents from the early '50s, when Bedouin in the Negev were concentrated in a certain area after the War of Independence.

"This was done to take over fertile land and, in part, to control Palestinians' nutrition," Raz says. "You can't understand the current policy of starvation if you believe that it came out of nowhere. Israel has been blockading Gaza for many years."

He says that practices currently in use in Gaza such as "house burnings" and "kill zones" (phrases in "A Lexicon" ) are nothing new. The only difference is "in intensity, not the rationale. Israel has been controlling the movement of Palestinians and taking over their land since 1948."

Despite the brutal language and harsh reality, Bondy is still looking forward to the future. "We have hope that Israeli society has not yet leaped into the abyss, hope that at least some people who read this book will attend protests and hold up another sign next to the sign calling for the release of the hostages," he says.

Bondy hopes that "more people will call – around the dinner table, in living rooms and at protests – for an end to this terrible war; that some of our readers will do something for more coexistence in the region."

'Depopulation' and 'Kill zone': Brutality lexicon exposes how Israelis talk about the war https://www.haaretz.com/.../00

Resigned Israeli helicopter pilot labels his government "Jewish Suprematist Nazis" and explains why:

https://www.facebook.com/reel/667147595931965/?s=single_unit&__cft__[0]=AZWY2wa9bzINJhMy4CnQoyvXT8F-Y1wfmqGWb_wG8Nn4MqOEsiZOCaXnV2Ho_1L3BFOwWFnAG4kKtlIuhTTHvpSJggZUWnfq_w31oJDVG46Lu3tGEFEtgqSOCu2Xo4Og8-39dcWtf-vMpb7XTAXf2doInXoJY6GZdWsUHu1ifR9D5w9Mbx4pLODJsZatuChSqza_Ic1aU89RCrDP9ABUQF56yMd5gbTPkEAujreMzqQYQE2K7ZiQO1Un4vS06Yxovx8vici0x8pBea3rLChoV8fr&__tn__=H-y-R

 

PROJECT EARTH™

ShareTweet

Speaking for the Earth Since 1969

Welcome to the Conversation

Table of Contents

Special News Bulletin:

A Prayer for Intervention

5/21/2014—BY ADAM TROMBLY—On the evening of August 28^th 2013 I sat in my Aspen office typing into my computer. The FLIR IndentiFINDER 2 radiation meter sat on my desk taking gamma radiation/isotope/neutron measurements of the ambient air. Every twenty minutes the instrument takes a two-minute sample of the gamma radiation emitted by radionuclides present in the air we are breathing. 

Aspen has a relatively high background radiation level hovering around .1100 microsieverts/hour. Contributions to this background come from radon, K-40 and other NORMs (Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials). The IdentiFINDER 2 instrument has preset alarm levels that go off when readings exceed the legally mandated “safe” level for the United States. Normally these spikes in the background radiation occur a few times an hour at the 8,000-foot altitude of our offices there, so it is no surprise to see occasional short-lived events.

However, on this night I looked down on the instrument and noticed that the entire “Finder” function screen was red. This was not a normal spike. It was a continuous Alarm. I took the instrument outside to see if this was something occurring inside the building or if there was something more serious going on. 

The readings outside were worse than those inside. It turned out that the entire Roaring Fork River Valley from Independence Pass to Glenwood Springs was much “hotter” than normal. Apparently, the rains that had visited the valley over the week before had been “Fukushima Rains”. These rains are contaminated by the ongoing and unmitigated catastrophe in Northern Japan.

The instrument recorded increases in Cesium 137 and 134, Wg-Pu, Rg-Pu (Weapons Grade Plutonium, Reactor Grade Plutonium), Iodine-131, and many other pathogenic isotopes. These are all unwanted and undesirable invaders. No sane, healthy person would ever willingly invite these pathogenic guests.

We and other colleagues have been monitoring increases of all of these radionuclides and highly energetic neutrons, which are constantly flowing from Fukushima (and other nuclear reactors) wherever we have travelled throughout the world. Just seeing those readings on the meter did not surprise us. It is the new Fukushima Normal.

Even so, the constant flow of red across the screen of our meter was not normal and signaled a potential harvest of dis-ease, mutagenesis and eventual death from a variety of cancers or just as likely, heart disease. There is nothing “theoretical” about this. 

Was this the reason the Obama Administration had impeded so many of our colleagues and our own access to good truly professional radiation measurement instruments until two years after the start of the radioactive assault on Earth? Was this why the Obama Administration was proposing new significantly higher maximum permissible daily exposure for the People of the United States of America? How often were these “events” happening around the world? 

Without proper instrumentation how would anyone even know that they, their children, their grandchildren, mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, friends and neighbors are all being subjected to dramatically increased probabilities for slow and tortuous death? Why weren’t those who did have sanctioned access to good radiation monitoring and identifying instruments at taxpayer funded Universities and Public Agency Laboratories saying anything? Since when is this kind of abuse of an entire global population normal? Seriously…

Then it occurred to me that I also had a responsibility to stay balanced and not allow the events of the evening to dictate my neurochemistry. I breathed and cleared my head and heart. Even with my mind and heart in a more balanced state, the concern did not disappear. 

The next day the alarm levels continued. I had never seen such a dramatic acute local example of the increased radiological contamination resulting from Fukushima-Daiichi. The really stunning fact is that the radiation levels we were seeing those few days in August do not get close to exceeding the newly proposed Obama ionizing radiation exposure standard inspired by the new Japanese standard which increased daily dose criteria for the Japanese public up to 100,000 times formerly permissible levels. 

What possible rationale could there be to raise the daily gamma ray and radioisotope exposure levels for the population of any country? Who, in the face of recent events could possibly make a compelling argument to build NEW NUCLEAR REACTORS in the United States? How could anyone convince a “free people” or their “representatives” to “just say yes” to more isotopes in our rooms?

Easy. Just drum the nuclear industry hyperbole about “safe, clean and economical” energy into people’s heads, OUR HEADS. It has never been any of those things.

Just pretend to the Japanese People and the rest of the world that the death of Fukushima-Daiichi Plant Manager Masao Yoshida from esophageal-cancer has nothing to do with his exposure to astronomical levels of radiation at the crippled plant. Then elevate Masao Yoshida to “hero” status for “preventing a nuclear disaster”, as if the Fukushima-Daiichi meltdowns had ended splendidly, instead of acknowledging this as the worst single ongoing environmental catastrophe in history. 

Are we to ignore Katsutaka Idogawa, the former Mayor of the town of Futaba in Fukushima Prefecture, when he claims the Japanese Government is killing its own people? “This is killing children. They die of heart conditions, asthma, leukemia, and thyroiditis. Lots of kids are extremely exhausted after school; others are simply unable to attend PE classes. But the authorities still hide the truth from us, and I don’t know why. Don’t they have children of their own? It hurts so much to know they can’t protect our children.”(http://rt.com/shows/sophieco/fukushima-disaster-radiation-children-740/ )

The Former Prime Minister of Japan, Naoto Kan says, “I believe that now is the crucial time for us to eliminate nuclear power.” In testimony given after his resignation he also warned “the politically powerful nuclear industry is trying to push Japan back toward nuclear power despite “showing no remorse” for the accident.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/asia/japans-naoto-kan-condemns-nuclear-power.html?_r=0 )

The World Health Organization’s annual Global Cancer Report for 2014 says that we can all anticipate a “tsunami of cancer” throughout the globe from now until 2030 and beyond. The Report states that there are very real concerns that the global health system could be “overwhelmed” by this tidal wave of victims. However, when it comes to citing the cause for this high tide of death, the report says it is our “life styles and aging populations”. There is neither mention of Fukushima nor the tsunami of cancer already being reported in many places around the world since the inception of the disaster. With so many of the world’s Governments subservient to the nuclear industry, maybe the WHO just doesn’t want to take those nuclear bullies on. 

In the United States “We the People “ were tricked into electing a mouthpiece for the nuclear industry, in effect empowering that industry to seize control of the Executive Branch of the United States Government. Excelon Corporation, a corporate global nuclear power, which brought us Three Mile Island, and financed much of Mr. Obama’s rise to power, now calls itself “The Presidents Utility”. After all, it’s own man is the United State’s Chief Executive Officer. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/us/politics/ties-to-obama-aided-in-access-for-exelon-corporation.html)

Sound familiar? It’s all a House of Cards.

With his endless stream of questionable “Executive Orders” truncating more and more of the rights of the American People, Barack Obama has DICTATED THAT NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS BE BUILT IN THE UNITED STATES, whether we want this or not. 

Damn the Radiation! Damn the Mass Murder! 

Full Speed Ahead!!!

Once again, I find that I need to remind myself to feel beyond the tyranny. We all need to stay awake enough to feel beyond the tyranny and not let it dominate our hearts and minds. We need to judge ourselves to be better than what has come to be defined as “human”. 

The more we love one another and communicate that love with and to one another worldwide the more we can cohere and focus that Power. We need to do this for the sake of our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren in such a way that the Shout of our Shared Clarity resounds causally, throughout all of the lands of Earth such that fundamental change becomes the norm because we ourselves are manifesting it. 

We need to collectively remember our vast capacity as expressions of Spirit or Infinite Transparent Luminous Clarity, of Love in action, of healing in action, of transformation in action in order to meet this day, which is now upon us. 

This is Judgment Day. The “human species” is in the process of judging itself to be unworthy of life itself. Let us have better Judgment than that. Let us accept the intrinsic abundance of that which is Infinitely Present Everywhere and build our new world on this basis. 

Many of us will die trying, but considering the fact that we are being poisoned so mercilessly by the voluminous outgassing of the reactors of Fukushima-Daiichi, we might as well do our best to live with integrity and love. It may seem a bigger step for some than for others but it is a step we all must take. 

We must draw upon the Boundless Energy of Infinite Being, the Space beyond the primitive concepts of relativistic time and space. We must “Be the Prayer”. We must not allow anyone to lie and obfuscate about the Isotopes in our rooms.

At 3:00 in the morning of August 30^th, 2013 we went to bed praying for intervention. We were tired and in need of renewal. We simply asked for a sign, a little flexure of spiritual muscle. We needed an indication that we are still in a process where higher intelligence can intervene. We breathed and breathed our feeling prayer. 

I contemplated that in the volume of space occupied by a mustard seed enough actual Power is present to transform far more than our little valley of the Roaring Fork. Why not relate to this Space, this Infinite and Luminous Being, our Source and Substance, Our Very Nature, Infinitely Present Everywhere with our feeling breath such that we focus and draw the Power for change into the very fabric of our daily lives.

We awoke at 7:30 and felt so much better. It was a soft surprise. Clarity had cleared away the nuclear fog. 

The meter sat on a stool by the bed. I reached for it and saw that the Alarm status had ceased and that the background radiation was less than a third of what it had been a few hours before. My thyroid glands no longer tested positive for Iodine-131. Even the soils, which had indicated contamination the day before, now produced readings that were better than normal. Something had definitely happened. 

A couple of other people who were monitoring the local environment also noticed the dramatic abatement of the event. One of them asked me if we “had developed a new technology at the Institute for Advanced Studies to alleviate radiation from the environment?”

I told him no. He responded, “Then what just happened?” like he was deeply shaken by the positive turn of events. “We just prayed; that’s all. We just prayed.”

5/21/2014—Adam Trombly

Founder of Project Earth Adam Trombly is an internationally acknowledged expert in the fields of Physics, Atmospheric Dynamics, Geophysics, Rotating and Resonating Electromagnetic Systems, and Environmental Global Modeling.

Taking the advice of his friend and mentor, R. Buckminster Fuller, Adam has maintained a "synergistic, global view" within a multi-disciplinary scientific background. From this perspective, Adam offers unique insights into the changes humankind has effected on our environment, and the adjustments our future requires of us now.

See also:  

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/2016/02/fukushima-deep-trouble-by-robert.html

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=Fukushima

https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=Radon

Discussion with Adam Trombly:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdomxjfTNxg