Friday 23 February 2024

MANCHESTER BOMBING !

Further developments in the Richard D Hall civil case.



For anyone interested in the fact that 'terrorist events', and the reporting of them, are often misrepresented or otherwise manipulated, the following video is a MUST VIEW.

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=311&part=1&gen=99

It relates to the so-called 'Manchester Bombing', in which it is claimed, a Libyan terrorist (Salman Abedi) blew himself up, killing twenty-two members of the public in the process.

Subsequently an individual who claims to have been there and been injured as a result, (Martin Hibbert) is suing Richard D Hall, an investigative journalist, for harassment and damages.

Mr Hibbert made public his view of the proceedings and Mr Rich on the ITV 'Good Morning Britain' programme to a very sympathetic Ben Shephard and his female co-host. Contrary to good practice, they did not give Mr Rich the opportunity to respond and referred to him throughout not as a journalist and investigative film maker but as a 'Conspiracist'. There is no doubt therefore the programme was biased and unfair.

The above video is therefore Richard D Hall's to counter some of the factual errors - and there are many - of Mr Hibbert's account of events on the ITV national broadcast.

I questioned the voracity of the offical story at the time, calling attention to the many anomalies and indications that it was yet another 'false flag', planned and executed, not by terrorists but by the security services of either this or another country or countries.

Richard D Hall has investigated it in much greater detail than me and explains some of his findings as they relate to the civil case in the film. One alleged victim claimed a bolt from the explosion went right through her thigh but is shown walking in high heels immediately after, her slacks intact other than for a dark stain and no injury apparent. This irrefutably proves her claim to be false.

In similar vein, the claimant in this case - at 18 minutes in - is shown in video footage to allege his daughter, Eve Hibbert was hit by a bolt that, with manual demonstration, entered in the RH side of her skull, leaving through the other. This is clearly a profound mis-representation, as if it had happened as described it is not possible she could have survived.

This alone I would suggest, destroys the credibility of Mr Hibbert and the reliability of his civil action.

As I warned many months ago, Rich is being targeted in order to ruin him financially and prevent him from carrying out his work challenging such high profile events with obvious political ramfications, which is ultimately damaging to the credibility of the state.

It is conversely of great importance to those that value their freedoms and the principles of honesty that the state is meant to stand for. The only defense against state mendacity, is the active awareness of the electorate. Do your part by becoming aware:

https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=311&part=1&gen=99
https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=Manchester
https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=richard+d+hall


FROM THE VIDEO:

"Richard D. Hall appeared at a High Court Hearing on Monday 29th January 2024. The Hearing was to determine the outcome of the Claimant's Application to accept without question the official narrative of the Manchester bombing, and thus prevent him from presenting any evidence which challenges the official narrative at a trial. An article by Iain Davis can be found hereThe Judgment can be found here. (See links below) 

"At the Hearing, video evidence was presented which was filmed at the scene of the Manchester incident, in the City Room, filmed 4 minutes after the blast. It showed a woman, Ruth Murrell, walking without impairment or any visual injury - who it was claimed had a nut or bolt travel all the way through her leg (15cm), and out of the other side. 

"Also shown was a still image of the merchandise stall completely in tact, which was just yards from the blast and in direct line of sight of the blast. 

"This evidence is not specifically referred to in this Judgment, and was not shown at the Public Inquiry. Images were also shown at the Hearing, of the City Room shortly after the blast, showing that no visible building damage was caused, and no blood is visible on the floor, and windows were not broken etc. This evidence is also not specifically mentioned in the Judgment. The evidence is first hand video and CCTV evidence from the crime scene.

"None of the CCTV evidence which is relied upon by the Claimants, which would demonstrate they were present at the Arena, has been released by the Public Inquiry, and has not been seen by the Court. 

"An Application to the Court to have this CCTV evidence released was submitted and a second Application was submitted to have the 2017 medical records of the Claimants released for a surgeon to view. 

Both of the Applications have been rejected in this Judgment. 

"With regards the CCTV evidence, what was relied upon, were statements made by two people who claim to have seen the CCTV evidence, but no footage or images have been provided.

"Many other evidential points were covered at the hearing which are presented In this video, and also the BBC's actions against Richard in relation to the timing of the Claim."


Richard D. Hall – A Travesty of Justice

Iain Davis  https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/13/richard-d-hall-a-travesty-of-justice/

"UK independent journalist, researcher and documentary filmmaker Richard D. Hall faces conviction, sizeable damages and an injunction that could potentially end his career and his livelihood. The High Court of Justice has denied Hall the opportunity to present any kind of meaningful defence. This travesty of justice has potential implication, not just for Richard D. Hall, but for all journalists who dare to question power."

Neutral Citation Number: [2024] EWHC 227 (KB) Case No: KB-2023-002102 IN THE 
HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE KING'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIST

Before : MASTER DAVISON - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : (1) MARTIN HIBBERT (2) EVE HIBBERT (By her mother and litigation friend SARAH GILLBARD) Claimants - and – RICHARD D HALL

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.