The deadly vaccine. When will the awful truth dawn? Already too late for untold thousands obviously.

Richard Rawsthorn

·

This morning I met a friend, maybe 50 years old, who's battling with cancer. She's always done the right things - sensible eating, plenty of exercise, never smoked etc. and, apart from the cancer, her health is excellent. She mentioned that, although there's no previous history of cancer in her family, now another two are also battling, one in his 50s, the other in her 30s.

I asked whether she'd had the covid jabs. She replied that she had "kept them up to date" including one very recently. I didn't ask about the others in her family.

We can't draw conclusions from one instance, but straws in the wind.....

Tim Veater

Besides the well documented adverse clotting effects on the blood and leucocyte invasion of the myocardium (heart muscle) I am quite sure the 'you-know-what' is having all sorts of other micro-biological reactions, not excluding uncontrolled cellular growth (i.e. 'cancer') Of course, if the blood has a greater propensity to clot, it can happen in any organ or part of the circulatory system, with equally grave consequences. As recent medical discoveries have proved, there is a dynamic and on-going relationship between the immune system and the development and control of tumours. The vaccine genome contained four modifications, including one with HIV homology. The potential for initiating pernicious cellular replication was clearly and specifically predicted. What we now see on a broad front, is merely a perfectly rational result, of a totally irrational, or even malevolent, policy.

Everybody must know by now that covid TESTING is totally unreliable. In other words to base any conclusions on testing statistics is utterly worthless. Only data based on incontrovertible facts (i.e. symptoms, hospitalisations and deaths) should be used. Flu and 'covid' sufferers are clearly one and the same in practice. The figures were manipulated for political purposes during the 'pandemic' which did not qualify as one. The peaks in deaths during it cannot be disentangled from the administrative changes in homes and hospitals. What we have now is increase in deaths most probably resulting from a combination of the well known vaccine adverse effects and the delayed lock-down consequences on mental and physical health. All of these features have been predicted. Not only is the government largely responsible, its complete failure to respond appropriately to the statistical and clinical evidence of the extraordinary policy balls-up, only confirm the appalling state of affairs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjIxwtvf8Nw&lc=UgwWKtqWYgqkB8aAtCZ4AaABAg.9kdNSBhXOjN9kdYDQZ1P7p

More absolute proof of significant adverse effect of corona vaccine on children in two year old study:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYz-yelhkYE

Dr. John Campbell

Dr. John Campbell

2.63M subscribers

249,234 views 14 Jan 2023

Changes of ECG parameters after BNT162b2 vaccine in the senior high school students https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36602...

Full text link https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...

Data collected, December 2021 Published, January 2023 Aims Determine the ECG parameter change Determine efficacy of ECG screening after the second dose of BNT162b2 In cooperation with the school vaccination system of Taipei City government (Taiwan) N = 4,928 (mostly male) 12 to 18 year old Before and after 12 lead ECGs Three follow up 12 lead ECGs ECGs read by by pediatric cardiologists Serial comparisons of ECGs and questionnaire survey Heart rate increased significantly after the vaccine, (mean increase of 2.6 beats per minute) QRS duration and QT interval decreased significantly after the vaccine with increasing heart rate 763 (17.1%) had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose. After the first dose, 209 (5.7%) had at least one cardiac symptom Cardiac symptoms Chest pain Palpitations Dizziness or syncope Depolarization and repolarization parameters All 4 cardiac symptoms significantly higher after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (p less than 0.001) N = 4,928 Abnormal ECGs were obtained in 51 (1.0%) 31 students were asymptomatic ST – T changes, 37 Premature ventricular contractions, 4 Sinus bradycardia, 2 Atrial tachycardia, 1 Incomplete right bundle branch block, 3 Abnormal QRS, 2 Prolonged QT, 2 4 judged to have significant arrhythmia 1 was diagnosed with mild myocarditis 10, suspected pericarditis All of these symptoms improved over time Asymptomatic at one month No covid in Taiwan at this time. Conclusion Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine Incidences of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis are 0.1% One in a thousand Rotavirus vaccine Rotashield, (1999) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/...

1 to 2 serious events per 10,000 vaccinees (Intussusception) Vaccine withdrawn From the authors BNT162b2 has a better safety profile than mRNA-1273 Moderna Cardiac-related adverse effects, as peri- and myocarditis, are of particular concern because of possible serious complications US vaccina advice https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-...

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-...

CDC recommends one updated (bivalent) booster dose: • For everyone aged 5 years and older if it has been at least 2 months since your last dose. • For children aged 6 months–4 years who completed the Moderna primary series and if it has been at least 2 months since their last dose. UK vaccine advice Who can get a COVID-19 vaccine Everyone aged 5 (on or before 31 August 2022) and over can get a 1st and 2nd dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. People aged 16 and over, and some children aged 12 to 15, can also get a booster dose.