'CAT FLAP'
(A doggerel!)
(Lessons to be learned from my cat's attitude to the G7!)
by Tim Veater
Me and my cat. Well fancy that!
A relationship made in heaven.
Or was it on earth, in light of the dearth,
Of available spaces in prison?
Last night she stayed out, In spite of my shout
And the worry it inevitably causes,
But when about eight, I called out at the gate,
She appeared with a saunter, and pauses.
"Do come in dear pussy and please don't be fussy,"
As I place a plate of chicken before her,
It's not altogether clear, what her response means my dear,
As she turns up her nose at the offer.
I return to my bed, with fresh dreams still in my head,
Cup of tea in my hand and the paper,
G7 is news and the Morrison blues
But of me and my cat not a mention.
We're not famous you see, It's how it should be -
Anonymity is not without its advantage -
"I suppose," says the Queen, "we all should appear keen
to pretend you are actually happy."
"So let's all sit here, socially distanced it's clear,
And photographer please make it snappy!"
However envious I may be, of the scenes on TV,
Or the fact that I wasn't invited,
To wine and to dine. No I think it quite fine.
In fact me and my cat are delighted.
And so the world turns, my cigarette burns,
Sending nonchalant plumes to the ceiling,
My cat scratches and licks and smiles at the Micks,
Who are desperate to appear so appealing.
Above us there sounds, throbbing helicopter wands,
All part of the security precautions,
Though our leaders are loved, it has to proved,
By ensuring that no one gets near them.
How many planes are required? How many cars must be hired?
How many soldiers and policemen are needed
To ensure seven people are protected?
But need I say more about the wolf at the door?
Red Riding Hood's easily bamboozled.
The hypocrisy's clear, is it pandemical fear
That is driving our threatened environment?
But me and my cat arn't concerned about that,
We just have to cope with the present.
The silence is fine, There must be a time,
When we all do our bit for descendants.
Dependent on what? Now there is a thought
We humans are continually asking.
The secret my dear, to me has become clear,
My cat's stoical outlook the answer.
To live in the 'NOW' with a purr and meow,
That's the key to a feline Nirvana. END.
Nightmare Song from Gilbert & Sullivan's Iolanthe ǀ English National Opera
Humans are but 'platforms'! I am however grateful for my 'augmentations' to eyes and orthodontics but not aural as yet. Military training has always been directed to enhancement of the physical, psychological and social attributes, towards the aim of making the individual a more effective killing machine. Weapons and all the paraphernalia of war extend human capability, the difference now being the sophistication of modern technology, particularly in the sphere of micro-biology and computer science. No doubt these are being actively researched and developed by advanced governments within the paradigm of eternal competition and conflict between states - essentially the psychological phenomenon of 'fear' of vulnerability to attack. I am pleased to see the concept of 'SWOT' that I taught thirty odd years ago, is still being employed in this 'cutting edge' subject!
One minute G7 leaders sit apart, next minute standing close and hugging one another. In masks, out of masks; shaking hands, bumping elbows; wining and dining; travelling in, out and about with no quarantine restrictions. Really what a farce? My cat is not amuse, in fact she never is.
ReplyDeleteI have heard the same rumour but whether there is any substance to it I don't know. What IS clear is that the government is hell bent on 'vaccinating' as many as possible and extending it to age groups not at risk from the alleged covid. This is totally irresponsible as the known and unknown dangers from the procedure could last and life time and cannot be reversed. The fact that despite the vaccination programme, the lock down cannot be lifted, rather says it all of this fraudulent scam.
As with the sellers of soap powder, 'NEW' is the essential ingredient to keep the product moving. We expect it of soap makers but not from government but that is what we've got. Time hancock and co went in the washing machine.
ReplyDeleteHow is it possible to get people to think clearly and objectively when they have been subjected to billions of pounds worth of one-sided and inaccurate PROPAGANDA? It has obviously been very effective in creating quite unnecessary and irrational fear and the justification for crazy, crazy policies that have only had the opposite effect to what is claimed. The first curve was caused predominantly by government POLICY particularly in care homes and hospitals. Government admits the figures attributed to covid were grossly over-stated. This is confirmed by the disparity between "notifiable disease" statistics (covid was added to the list in March 2020) and those promulgated elsewhere. Total deaths for 2020 are within normal range and lower than several previous years. The average of death where covid was a factor is HIGHER than average life expectancy! Hospital occupancy is actually LOWER than normal levels. There is NO evidence of an infectious pandemic. Previous mass gatherings, and we have had any number on beaches and in protests have never been linked to an increase in disease. People who have died WITH covid have predominantly died from quite separate, chronic health conditions. Covid is NOT a serious threat to the general population. Lateral flow and PCR tests on which current prognostications are based, are by general consent not only unreliable but positively misleading. To base damaging social, economic and health policies on them verges on the criminal. There are at least 3000 coronavirus variants besides literally millions of other micro-organism with the potential to cause disease but to which the human body has adapted its own, highly sophisticated defence mechanisms. This is why humans have survived and proliferated in such huge numbers. The various covid 'vaccines' are not vaccines at all in the true sense. They are experimental, unapproved, gene altering therapies, that have officially already caused over 1300 deaths and 900 000 adverse effects in the UK alone. The long term effects, for obvious reasons, are undetermined and unlikely to be reversible or treatable if and when they become apparent. To coerce the public not at risk to take them is shameful, particularly when they guarantee neither freedom from symptoms or infectivity to others, whilst probably increasing the risk of anti-phylactic shock. Whilst obsessing over this relatively non fatal disease, over 5 000 000 wait for operations and more die from untreated serious diseases. You really couldn't have a bigger government cock-up or scam that has perniciously infected the minds of the general population.
ReplyDeleteThose in this group may be aware of my feeble efforts over the years to raise awareness of John Locke and his connection to Pensford. For generations this was hardly recognised and certainly not celebrated as perhaps it might have been. Recently I came across a fact that resonates with the present 'Corona Crisis' and which may be of interest here.
ReplyDeleteLocke was described at the time as having a 'versatile mind', active in a wide range of areas, for which only after his death in 1704, he became famous. Maybe not so well known, is the fact that throughout his life one of his main interests was the practice of medicine, although he did not obtain the degree of Bachelor of Medicine until 1675 when he was already 43. Locally people referred to him as "Dr. Locke" and he was consulted widely.
Nine years prior to obtaining his degree, he was treating patients and arguably saved the life of Lord Shaftesbury, one of the most prominent political figures of his day. More could be said about this but I will cut to the chase in relation to a very current issue - the suggested treatment of SARS Cov-2 with Hydroxychloroquine, touted by President Trump and now the centre of much controversy.
Of course Quinine has for a long time been regarded as useful in suppressing the effects of Malaria and was added to tonic water as a prophylactic for that purpose. It comes as something of a surprise to me however, that as early as early as 1678 it is recorded Locke was prescribing Chinchona bark - i.e. Quinine - to effectively treat a critically ill Caleb Banks, who was suffering from a fever, with symptoms very similar to those of the Coronavirus.
Thus we may claim that one of Pensford's finest, was remarkably well ahead of his time in this as in other fields!
Adam Scarborough
ReplyDeleteTim Veater Brilliantly said, Tim. The British government of occupation has spent millions Taxpayers money to psychological bodies ie Mindspace, Behavioural Insights Team. It's unrelenting 24/7 , audio-visual gobbledygook. It has had terrible negative affects on people's psyches and will continue to.
By realising what state psyops is about we can at least know our foe and counter it. Millions of the naive, gullible and innocent aren't so fortunate. My opinion- the .British government is guilty of fraud, malice & deliberate psychological harm on the people . Just hope some legal minds can acknowledge this as we move on.
Four British Airways Pilots Die In One Week - Are Deaths Related to covid 'vaccination'?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZarRE49pvvU
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteA cautionary tale from the past about dangerous injections. The contaminated 'Factor VIII' scandal affecting thousands.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57547366
https://www.factor8scandal.uk/the-fallout#:~:text=Hepatitis%20C%20infected%20haemophiliacs%20(Excludes%20HIV)&text=The%20total%20number%20of%20all,1%2C246%20as%20of%20October%202017.
Yet another fatal police shooting. In the presence of children, within the context of a domestic room, with several policemen present, shooting a 22 year old with live bullets, in addition to being tasered, on the face of it, certainly appears as 'over-kill'. Without any public or parliamentary debate, the police have been armed up to the teeth, and even more worryingly, become trigger happy, shooting people instead of arresting them. Covid policing has shown them as a group of bullies who have lost all contact with proportion. Nor has experience shown that they are properly held to account in such cases. Only in extreme cases should policemen fire weapons. The public needs to be reassured that this was one of them.
ReplyDeleteThe danger from Covid is and always has been, an exaggerated con. that with billions of pounds worth of propaganda the public has been brainwashed to accept. This little incident - who knows whether it was staged or not? - is blown out of all proportion, whilst hundreds of thousands demonstrating peacefully on the streets is virtually ignored by the BBC and other outlets. That is the measure of the disproportionate media bias to which we are all subject in this dystopian nightmare.
ReplyDeleteHarassing public officials is unacceptable but it is a pity that MP's are not as outraged by the fact that thousands of elderly have died, denied the comfort of relations by their bedside; or the public harassed by police for sitting on a park bench; or for all the hypocrisy demonstrated by those who made the ridiculous Covid rules but didn't abide by them. Millions have had their businesses ruined and their freedoms trashed. Is it little wonder that people are annoyed?
Covid is currently the 24th cause of death in the UK, even taking into account that is "with" not "of". Twenty three other causes, including infections, are apparently of no importance to BBC or newspapers. This is mass insanity in action, as is basing policy on proven unreliable diagnostic tests that bear no demonstrable relationship to illness or death. Similarly the evidence for Covid infection between people is thin to the point of non existence, making all the rules on masks and distancing a total nonsense. This regime has little to do with preventing illness and everything to do with psychological conditioning and control. Those behind it must be very pleased how easy it was to achieve.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if you or anyone else has noticed how conveniently timed and inflated this incident is, for distracting attention and discussion away from the hypocrisy and corruption surrounding the Hancock affair? The usual fishy smell of media manipulation to which we have become accustomed? In the scale of things how does the relatively innocuous harassment of an official, equate to the thousands of citizens harassed BY officials or the BILLIONS of pounds of public money wasted on admittedly useless schemes? Strangely these latter attract the opprobrium of neither politicians or press. How strange is that?
ReplyDeleteEven the most naïve must be aware that news stories are manipulated by a variety of sources including the media itself. The evidence is 'in your face'. Take for example the decision by the BBC to inflate certain stories and block others, the huge 'freedom' demonstration being a case in point. Have you forgotten the famous phrase, "It's a good time to bury bad news"? However it is quite clear that influencing the news and events to manipulate public opinion is far more diverse and even sinister. A long time has past since Vance Packard exposed the 'Hidden Persuaders', since when the methods have become far more pervasive and sophisticated. Hollywood and media are up to it all the time, sometimes in close association with covert organisations. What is 'Sage' other than a government-funded behavioural change organisation? The only defence to all this is knowledge and awareness on the part of the public and the willingness to say 'No'.
ReplyDeleteENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION? WHAT A JOKE.
ReplyDeletehttps://theintercept.com/2021/06/30/epa-pesticides-exposure-opp/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=The%20Intercept%20Newsletter
SEE: https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=COUNTRICIDE
ReplyDeleteWhat a coincidence! Deaths and 'rates of infection' and 'variants' always appear to go up after (1) lock-down measures are introduced, or (2) after mass 'vaccination' has been introduced but never after crowded mass events. God forbid we conclude that first and foremost it has been directly Government policy that has caused these figures and which is now the cause of increased deaths from all other treatable diseases that have joined the ten million waiting list. From ALL angles this has been an UNMITIGATED disaster, and Valance and Whitty I'm afraid must take their share of the blame. http://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/
ReplyDeleteIs one of Whitty's recommended situations for wearing a mask, a walk through St James' (or any other) park?
ReplyDeletehttps://www.aol.co.uk/news/covid-19-whitty-vallance-pledge-181419013.html
First masks are and never have been a factor in the incidence or spread of SARS Cov-2. If it had been, there would by now be epidemiological proof. There is none. Masks were window dressing and the well known phenomenon of 'psychological reinforcement'. It also perhaps also usefully identified who was compliant and who was not. There may arguably some point for a person coughing or sneezing (although of course such persons should not be out anyway) and in situations where strangers are literally packed 'cheek by jowl', as on the tube in rush hour. There may be limited point where people suffering symptoms meet those without. The concept of symptomless infection on which the whole mask policy was based, and which made millionaires of the chosen few, besides polluting the earth on an unprecedented scale, is yet another myth, much relied upon by the people that out of panic, not science, came up with the idiotic policy of putting nappies over faces and sticking cotton buds up children's noses. https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=masks
ReplyDeleteIt is becoming increasingly clear that SARS Cov-2 resulted from 'gain of function' work by first the United States, subsequently delegated to the Wuhan lab. Whether the organism escaped from the lab or was independently distributed before or at the World Military Games there, is not clear but what is clear is that the story this was a zoonotic bug that jumped directly from bats to man is utterly untenable. It also proves the intention to deceive and 'cover-up' at the highest level. In other words it was intentionally developed and probably released, as a biological weapon for political purposes that are not difficult to conceive. Party to secrets, it may go some way to explain the government's (in retrospect) over-reaction. It may also explain why one of the first trips carried out by the Queen, after being released from her Windsor incarceration, was to Porton Down. https://veaterecosan.blogspot.com/search?q=porton+down
ReplyDelete