Saturday 30 November 2019

Latest London Bridge Attack

A Fishmonger's Hall Affair?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8b-i_o1SdM
A man and a woman were killed in a terror attack in London carried out by an Islamist extremist who had been jailed for an al-Qaida inspired bomb plot and was recently released on licence.


Image of victim, David Merritt (25) released by family and police.
London Bridge victim Jack Merritt
https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/30/first-victim-london-bridge-terror-attack-named-11246004/?fbclid=IwAR3ldjJhnYQ7nQYZHnxNhpRaKc7hMpjfthNPi0GaNJkSpFjxYoMC7wu97ZI

Scotland Yard are investigating how 28-year-old Usman Khan was able to launch the attack in London Bridge on Friday, despite being known to the authorities and fitted with an electronic tag to monitor his movements. He was allowed out a year ago after serving time for his part in a plot to blow up the London Stock Exchange.      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/29/london-bridge-police-shoot-stabbing-suspect-after-five-injured

BREAKING: One of the victims of the London Bridge terror attack has been named as Jack Merritt in media reports.

He was a course coordinator for the Learning Together programme, which was hosting a conference at Fishmongers’ Hall attended by Usman Khan.


Police have named the second victim of the London Bridge attack as former University of Cambridge student Saskia Jones.
The 23-year-old's family paid tribute to a "funny, kind, positive influence" in a statement released by the Metropolitan Police, confirming she and fellow Cambridge alumni 25-year-old Jack Merritt were fatally stabbed by convicted terrorist Usman Khan.

Second former Cambridge University student killed at London Bridge named


QUESTIONS THAT NEED TO BE ANSWERED


  • Why no video of the actual alleged fatal stabbings?
  • Where did they occur, who were the injured and what were the circumstances? Why has this element of the incident not been covered?
  • Why if the stabbings take place 1.8th mile away at the Fishmonger's Hall, was the suspect almost immediately ("Five minutes") apprehended by armed police and this after he had already been floored and disarmed by members of the public?
  • How can we be sure that the man shot on the bridge was the same man who carried out the fatal stabbing?
  • Why given the fact that the man was disarmed and held down on the ground, did the police choose to shoot him dead in cold blood, rather than arrest him?
  • Does the above indicate a changed police philosophy - as indicated some years ago by David Cameron - basically a policy of 'shoot to kill' on the back of suspicion?
  • If what has been reported about the dead suspect is correct, was he allowed out of gaol having served half his sentence without a risk assessment or referral to the Parole Board?
  • He was apparently wearing an electronic tag. Isn't it strange that in planning such a serious attack, he didn't first remove it or leave it at the scene?
  • Clearly the assailant had not made any plans to escape after the crime. Isn't this strange for an apparent professional terrorist with gaol time?
  • Who were the people on scene wearing identity tags? And what prompted their physical intervention?
  • Who was the man who removed the large knife?
  • Why, if that was the murder weapon, does it appear totally clean and un-blood stained?
  • Witnesses report a lot of gun fire yet the only ones with guns were the police. As this must have happened at the conclusion of the incident, why did police subsequently order people to run or hide in panic?
  • If the event was unexpected, how was it possible to muster so many police in addition to the dedicated fast response terrorist officers? Surely this must have required fore-knowledge and planning or are all those policemen hanging around somewhere kitted up with guns and high viz jackets just waiting for the call?
  • How can we be sure this was not just another fabricated case organised with the precise purpose of raising tensions prior to an election (note previous similar timing) and of 'neutralising' a terrorist target, whether he carried out the alleged stabbing or not?



Modern policing?
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html

This is the official narrative from https://www.aol.co.uk/news/2019/11/30/london-bridge-killer-freed-less-than-seven-years-into-16-year-te/?ncid=webmailUsman Khan, 28, killed a man and a woman in the knife rampage on Friday afternoon and injured three other people, who are being treated in hospital.

He was attending a conference on prisoner rehabilitation organised by University of Cambridge-associated Learning Together at Fishmongers' Hall and "threatened to blow up" the building just before 2pm.

Usman Khan

"Prisoners are usually released halfway through a determinate sentence but Khan had served less than seven years when he was freed on licence in December last year. The Parole Board said it had no involvement in his release and that Khan "appears to have been released automatically on licence (as required by law), without ever being referred to the board""


Empty buses. Subliminal messaging?

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html



An one-sided discussion 29.11.2019


The Guardian reported: "A man and a woman were killed in a terror attack in London carried out by an Islamist extremist who had been jailed for an al-Qaida inspired bomb plot and was recently released on licence.

Scotland Yard are investigating how 28-year-old Usman Khan was able to launch the attack in London Bridge on Friday, despite being known to the authorities and fitted with an electronic tag to monitor his movements. He was allowed out a year ago after serving time for his part in a plot to blow up the London Stock Exchange.
The incident played out in extraordinary scenes that prompted praise for the bravery of members of the public and police. In graphic footage captured by bystanders, civilians are seen wrestling with a person lying on the ground at the northern end of the bridge, before being pulled to safety by armed police arriving at the scene.

The suspect, dressed in black, then appeared to try to rise, before firearms officers fired two shots. One man wearing a suit appeared to have removed a large knife from the suspect before the shots were fired, and was filmed running down the road away from the scene gesturing at others to get back.

Police confirmed the suspect died at the scene. It is believed that he was acting alone."

A:  7:13 PMWearing a fake suicide vest....done miss that bit out

7:15 PM  Another white lorry: "Cars and buses on the busy bridge were at a standstill, with a white lorry stopped diagonally across the lanes. Video footage showed police pointing guns at the lorry before moving to check its container."

A, 7:16 PMWhite vans and lorry's are bad news

7:18 PM Taking no chances. Controlling the narrative. And hiding in an attic is a new variant. "One woman from New York, who gave her name only as Aditi, said she had hidden in the attic of a cheese shop in nearby Borough market when she noticed people running from the bridge.

“We ran down a side street and noticed people running into Neal’s Yard Dairy,” she told the Guardian. “We were one of the last to get in before they locked the door. We were taken to the attic and the staff said they had been trained for such an incident. We were there for around 30 minutes before the police gave clearance to exit and move further away from the market. My partner and I are rattled but OK. We’re just glad to be safe.”

"Another woman called Jo from east London said she had been in the market when people started to panic and run. “I saw two people fall over. The police then told people to get inside, so we sheltered in Le Pain Quotidien. They locked the doors and moved people away from the glass. The police has just let us leave.”

"More than 20 witnesses were taken to be debriefed at the police-allocated building near the incident. Some of them looked shaken as they entered the building. More arrived in marked and unmarked police vehicles as the afternoon wore on, including restaurant and transport workers. None were willing to talk to reporters."

They certainly seem to appear at the right moment. I suppose shooting a de-armed man is now de rigour except the pretend suicide vest would proved nec. justification.

A, 7:22 PM Haha Tim unfortunately such things do happen

7:23 PM Sure do. And particularly just before elections strangely.

A, 7:31 PM So it may be extremest making a point saying current government can't protect you and wanting the people the vote for the weak labour government

7:44 PM Don't think that one plays. Violence always benefits the Conservatives (except when it doesn't) lol "Several People Wounded in Stabbing in The Hague, Dutch Police Say" As always Haaretz is on the ball.  TIMING!

https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/several-people-wounded-in-stabbing-in-the-hague-dutch-police-say-1.8198577?utm_source=Push_Notification&utm_medium=web_push&utm_campaign=General

https://www.aol.co.uk/news/2019/11/29/three-injured-in-hague-stabbing/

Nov 29, 2019 9:37 PM they are two hours ahead of course It could be just to get Prince Andrew off the front page or to distract from more Israeli bombing of Gaza (just taken place apparently)

Adam, 7:53 PM It's all over now and nobody will ever remember

7:54 PM aol is full of 'running people' images (as per the script)

People fleeing from the scene
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50604781




https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html

A, 7:56 PM Not my type. No shoes?

7:56 PMha ha who he?

A, 7:57 PMYou must realise these attacks happen and are genuine sometimes Tim

"A bystander holding a knife after police surrounded a person at the scene (from the twitter feed of @HLOBlog)"

A, 8:06 PM You assume conspiracy with an hour's research 🤭

8:13 PM Well with so many previous suspicious events I'm just very very wary of the OFFICIAL narrative. Who is the official MI5 looking type who is walking away with the knife? Doesn't he know that's tampering with evidence, or perhaps he does? And note it appears completely free of any blood staining. It's also clear that the man has been overpowered by the public before armed police arrive. Why not then arrest the man? Why shoot him dead? And where have the members of public gone? Another pic shows bystanders all wearing tabs round their necks. Who were they and what event were they attending?

Image may contain: one or more people, people standing, people walking and outdoor


Image may contain: 1 person, standing, walking and outdoor

https://www.facebook.com/chrisdjpursuit.murrey/videos/10220882676125236/

A, 8:15 PM How can you call it official when it happened 5 hours ago?

an almost identical one stopped traffic in the Lee Rigby stabbing. How many stabbing have there been in London without a white lorry helping out?You are the expert now. You can sort it all out. I've retired. lol

A, 8:31 PM White lorry's and vans are the most common in the UK and Europe out of all colours for a reason

8:38 PM true. White articulated s are too. Plain one notice. Stopping traffic in similar incidents. Then there is the one with 39 dead bodies. If i was a policeman i wud want to know who was driving those lorries and where. Incidentally my Rigby article appears to have disappeared from the blog and in answer to your earlier question, within three hours at most, this was declared to be a "terrorist event" by the authorities.

A, 8:46 PM Haha you wish it had you wish you were a target of truth! Maybe London drivers are too aware of incidents so they decided to block traffic going into a conflict zone Citizen protection

8:46 PM maybe you are right A,

8:47 A: Maybe I'm not but it is another theory

8:56 PM No you could be quite right. It cannot be ruled out for sure. But neither can more dubious ones. Where are the injured? Where are the para medics? "Lots of gun shots" "People in restaurants ordered to lie on the floor" The only ones with guns and shooting were the police! <!-- TAG START -->
<div class="vdb_player vdb_5688f66de4b040e17d9912265688f5c1e4b0f2c97f395156" vdb_params="m.refbcid=566fd3cdff690c1970b2ccbd&m.refpid=5d1dbcfb10ca0475df0d2106">
<script type="text/javascript" src="//delivery.vidible.tv/jsonp/pid=5688f66de4b040e17d991226/vid=5de16c19d21f1a1883d222a9/5688f5c1e4b0f2c97f395156.js"></script>
</div>
<!-- TAG END { date: 11/29/19 } -->

Not sure if that works And all this for a man on the ground who had been disarmed and overpowered even before police arrive???  This is 10% terror and 90% theatre.



A, 9:01 PM What about the fake suicide vest?

9:06 PM Yea good question. Who saw it? When was it detected? When all the people were on top of him? It appears police shot him from close range multiple times, so how did they decide he had one? Can the claim be relied upon? All very suspicious.Two killed and three injured (besides the shot man) it has been claimed

A, 9:09 PM If you watch the video I got the impression police arrived after the suspect had been overcome by citizens then the police saw the vest and were aggressive towards citizens and made them leave then bang

9:10 PM BBC: "Videos on social media appear to show passers-by holding down a man at London Bridge. Another man in a suit could be seen running from him, having apparently retrieved a large knife. Footage then shows an officer arriving, seeming to indicate to the group to move, and firing a shot."

Image result for john de menezes
https://www.google.com/search?q=john+de+menezes&rlz=1C1ARAB_enGB463GB464&sxsrf=ACYBGNSbvHWkzxRrP2bzfbX3Yb-8cBxXjA:1575125418114&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=6PcXiks3gXE0OM%253A%252CZS7A7uqJtLD6-M%252C%252Fm%252F071py6&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kTQ7aYXcPoYP--mHODuU1vGv3THQA&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj2z5e4l5LmAhXJesAKHWZsAF0Q_B0wCnoECAsQAw#imgrc=6PcXiks3gXE0OM:


So the witness statement that she heard lots of shots. Who and where were they fired? The killings were at Fishmongers Hall. How far is that from london bridge? M/s Dick (who supervised the totally unjustified John de Menezes) shooting issued the standard statement: ""We must emerge stronger still from this tragedy. In doing that we will ensure that the few who seek to divide us will never, ever succeed."

BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner said attackers wear fake suicide vests for a couple of reasons: To add to public panic and in some cases to ensure police shoot them dead. To some attackers, martyrdom is preferable to capture, trial and spending many years in prison, our correspondent added.

A, 9:18 PM Shooting people is bad vote for Corbyn

9:18 PM See all the assumptions being made there before anything firm is known about the individual in question. Was the man shot on the bridge the same as the person killing people at fishmongers hall? Could be.Adam,

9:19 PM Vote labour

Wheres fishmongers hall?Adam,

Map of the scene
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-50604781

9:26 PMNo idea9:26 PM214 m away apparently - I imagine no more than a ten minute walk. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Fishmongers'+Hall,+London/@51.507954,-0.0961639,15z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x4876035154705331:0x3c5eb685335874f!8m2!3d51.5094364!4d-0.0876559

10:35 PM If this was a terrorist incident it is a very very half hearted one. It will be interesting to hear the precise details of the stabbing site some distance from where he was challenged and shot dead. Notice how no one challenges the notion that a man should be shot dead rather than arrested. This is a subtle side effect of these events and a stated intentional one. It is brutalising our societal norms that the police should be an arresting force not a killing machine. All you have to do is label the event a 'terrorist' one, and the police have carte blanch to shoot on sight without any due process. Who can tell if this dead man was guilty of the stabbings or not?

Adam, 10:43 PM Slow down before you write again I can't keep up

10:44 PM BBC just reported that the dead man was a convicted terrorist who had been released from gaol on condition his movements would be monitored!!!! Now if that's not into patsy territory i don't know what is.

A, 10:44 PM Your like a Jew in a gold mine Haha there we go They are always in the "watch list"

10:47 PM "release a terrorist on condition...." What the hell is that about? What a load of bollocks. "Do this little job for us and you'll be free", more like, except they didnt explain he wud have to be shot dead to qualify!

11:06 PM  Friday usually chosen for these events to max evening and weekend coverage

A, 11:09 PM Facts will come out in days and weeks not in hours

11:22 PM That alleged criminal Hilary Clinton happens to be on Graham Norton i see. Good timing

A, 11:23 PMIs she??? Are you sure?

11:23 PM That's what radio times says with her daughter

A, 11:26 PM Plugging what?

11:26 PMbook i think A,

11:27 PM Very strange guest for Graham Norton

11:27 PMon How to be successful woman? Perhaps she had to be in London to coordinated the 'terrorist attack' or something similar? (There are precedents: Bush in Dallas for JFK assassination; Ehud Olmert in New York for 9/11; Netanyahu in London for 7/7 etc.)

A, 11:32 PM Yeah maybe!! Hilldog isn't what she seems

11:35 PM It would be hard to find a woman more deeply embroiled in ....

A, 11:39 PM Well that's not true History has many females that have a.far higher personal body count than Hilldog

11:44 PM Alive on the planet i should have said



https://edition.cnn.com/2019/11/29/uk/gallery/london-bridge-incident-1129-intl/index.html



People stand outside the London Bridge Station after it was closed.
Alberto Pezzali/AP







One of the people killed in yesterday’s knife attack at London Bridge has been identified as a University of Cambridge worker. The death of Jack Merritt, 25, from Cottenham, Cambridgeshire, was confirmed on Twitter by his father David. The assailant, who was wearing a fake suicide-vest, had ‘threatened to blow up’ the building and was thought to have started ‘lashing out’ in a downstairs room. He was reportedly grabbed by conference-goers and bundled out of the front door and ended up on the bridge, where he was tackled by members of the public and shot dead by police.

Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/30/first-victim-london-bridge-terror-attack-named-11246004/?fbclid=IwAR3ldjJhnYQ7nQYZHnxNhpRaKc7hMpjfthNPi0GaNJkSpFjxYoMC7wu97ZI?ito=cbshare
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/

I do have one rather obvious question around this account of  such a tragic event. If the accused attacked people inside the building, causing serious injury and subsequent death to both a man and woman, why was he was not over-powered and detained there and then, instead of being 'bundled out of the building', where he might cause even more mayhem? In fact it appears he didn't hurt anyone in the busy street - or did he?


Graduation with proud parents?
London Bridge victim Jack Merritt



Outside his Cambridge digs?
London Bridge victim Jack Merritt

Some rather coincidental associations with 'HARVEY' and 'RO'.



Romantic image with girlfriend on holiday?
London Bridge victim Jack Merritt


COMMENT:

All part of a picture that has been created surreptitiously so that no one has objected to this huge change in police philosophy and tactics. Note these events are always scripted to include "protection of values" and "love the perpatrators" etc. This is undoubtedly intentional to distract from the huge policy change. Of course once you extablish the principle in the public mind that the 'bad men' deserve it, you can extend it to other 'bad men' until it becomes the norm. This is what is called the the 'thin end of the wedge' or "the start of the slippery slope". The justifications for arbitrary arrest and/or summary execution grows ever wider and saves millions in legal fees and gaol time. But of course that is a different sort of society to the one we aspire to and ushers in tyranny by the back door. More than anything these events are exercises in mass psychology and the destination is not a pleasant one.



Christopher Bollyn shared a post.
Admin1 hr

Israeli "Intel" SITE Blames Islamic State (ISIS) for London Attack
The recent knife attack on London Bridge is being blamed on Islamic State according to information provided by the Israeli Rita Katz who runs the Maryland-based information/propaganda website called SITE Intelligence Group. Katz provides her information to the media and government intelligence agencies. Although ISIS supposedly has a global network, no other agency appears to be able to obtain or provide the information that the Israeli SITE Intelligence does. The unique information Katz is privy to serves to "interpret" jihadist terror events for the global media. Her information is used to steer and validate the fraudulent War on Terror. The War on Terror, it should be noted, is a creation of Israeli military intelligence that has been foisted on the United States and Western nations. The fact that Katz is an Israeli is never mentioned in the news reports that provide her reports.
Here is a report from November 30, 2019, RT.com based on information provided by Katz:
"Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) has reportedly claimed responsibility for the stabbing attack on London Bridge. The claim comes even as the terrorist group’s propaganda is being wiped off messaging apps.
"The terrorist organization laid claim to the knife rampage on Saturday, according to SITE Intelligence Group, an organization that tracks extremist groups’ online presence. While IS has been known to claim responsibility for ‘lone-wolf’ terrorist attacks worldwide, SITE Director Rita Katz noted that the attack “bore IS-inspired hallmarks,” and suggested on Friday that the group’s claim may be delayed.
"There is, however, no evidence to support the claim from what the UK police have so far shared with the public.
"The claim was broadcast through the group’s Amaq News Agency, a propaganda outlet that disseminates its message through apps like Telegram."
Source: "ISIS claims responsibility for London Bridge attack – just as terrorists are being wiped off Telegram en masse"
https://www.rt.com/…/474757-isis-claims-london-bridge-atta…/


Contrast the media treatment of the murder of this 14 year old London boy and the genuine shocked reation of the mother and close relatives: https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/gang-behind-jayden-moodie-murder-are-londons-most-feared/ar-AAK4fE2?ocid=spartandhp



5 comments:

  1. Ross Cowan Tim Veater seems like Duncan posited an attempt to get the focus off of Andrew? And a Narwhal tusk ?

    Ross Cowan That could certainly be a factor. I mentioned it myself. The other big issues here are the election and Brexit. I think the dark (NATO/EU) forces want to stop Brexit. (Remember the Jo Cox MP murder?) at all cost. They also prefer Conservative to Labour. The problem is if you get one you dont get the other and vice versa. There also seems to be a prolongued attempt to undermine the British monarchy. You may remember that "London Bridge is falling down" was the media code fo the Queen's death and we have had two so called terrorist events focused on it so far. Is that a subtle sign? Are certain forces making preparations for a coup on her death and before Charles succeeds? Who knows? Not beyond the realms of the possible. The Narwhal tusk is byzarre. I have no idea if it has any significance. What was it doing there. Again an absence of blood on the knife and pavement are peculiar. As usual it's hard to distinguish between what's real and what's not.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For moving dead body see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh5a_wnqFMM

    ReplyDelete

  3. Veater Ecosan
    1 minute ago (edited)
    As always, as soon as this was designated a "terrorist event", certain standard consequences flow. The first question is why THIS stabbing event was within FIVE minutes declared such, in stark contrast to all the other stabbings, often fatal, that have been occuring in the Metropolis. Then again, no one has answered how an electronically tagged, convicted terrorist, could have been two hundred miles or so from the area he was meant to remain, WITHOUT the full knowledge of MI5. Then presumably he entered the conference wearing a false 'suicide vest' and carrying two knives, yet no one challenges him? A conference filled with ex-cons, yet no security on the door? And how would the accused identify the very organiser of the event out of however many were attending? The speed with which both terrorist and more ordinary police were on scene (5 minutes), proves there MUST have been pre-planning. Everything about this event shouts an alternative explanation, including the possibility that it was an intentional targeting of the alleged dead.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Targeted killings discussed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZcOA2_YP8U&fbclid=IwAR0sreccFjz9KEnNz297W0eQUn2jkQi-NrId0JeXzf8n54WxuUoSxB2NzV0

    ReplyDelete
  5. Veater Ecosan
    1 second ago
    Note also ALL the attention has been on the events on the bridge. Where in fact were Merritt and Jones stabbed? That is not all clear. Was it inside the Fishmongers' Hall, outside it or on the bridge? There seems a total absence of video relating to the fatal attacks yet no one questions this as the media is obsessed with the struggle with the alleged attacker. Also note there is only ONE recumbent body on London Bridge. Where are the bodies of Merritt and Jones. If other high profile murders are anything to go by, if Merritt and Jones were indeed murdered, they were very likely killed by someone else entirely.

    ReplyDelete

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.